nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

02.02.2016 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique

verfasst von: Katharina Stahnke, Constanze Nikulka, Gerd Diederichs, Hendrik Haneveld, Markus Scheibel, Christian Gerhardt

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

So far, recurrent rotator cuff defects are described to occur in the early postoperative period after arthroscopic repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the musculotendinous structure of the supraspinatus, as well as bone marrow edema or osteolysis after arthroscopic double-row repair. Therefore, magnetic resonance (MR) images were performed at defined intervals up to 2 years postoperatively.

Study design

Case series; Level of evidence, 3.

Materials and methods

MR imaging was performed within 7 days, 3, 6, 12, 26, 52 and 108 weeks after surgery. All patients were operated using an arthroscopic modified suture bridge technique. Tendon integrity, tendon retraction [“foot-print-coverage” (FPC)], muscular atrophy and fatty infiltration (signal intensity analysis) were measured at all time points. Furthermore, postoperative bone marrow edema and signs of osteolysis were assessed.

Results

MR images of 13 non-consecutive patients (6f/7m, ∅ age 61.05 ± 7.7 years) could be evaluated at all time points until ∅ 108 weeks postoperatively. 5/6 patients with recurrent defect at final follow-up displayed a time of failure between 12 and 24 months after surgery. Predominant mode of failure was medial cuff failures in 4/6 cases. The initial FPC increased significantly up to 2 years follow-up (p = 0.004). Evaluations of muscular atrophy or fatty infiltration were not significant different comparing the results of all time points (p > 0.05). Postoperative bone marrow edema disappeared completely at 6 months after surgery, whereas signs of osteolysis appeared at 3 months follow-up and increased to final follow-up.

Conclusions

Recurrent defects after arthroscopic reconstruction of supraspinatus tears in modified suture bridge technique seem to occur between 12 and 24 months after surgery. Serial MRI evaluation shows good muscle structure at all time points. Postoperative bone marrow edema disappears completely several months after surgery. Signs of osteolysis seem to appear caused by bio-absorbable anchor implantations.

Anderl W, Heuberer PR, Laky B et al (2012) Superiority of bridging techniques with medial fixation on initial strength. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2559–2566CrossRefPubMed

Athwal GS, Shridharani SM, O’driscoll SW (2006) Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors: a report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1840–1845CrossRefPubMed

Bateman JE (1963) The diagnosis and treatment of ruptures of the rotator cuff. Surg Clin N Am 43:1523–1530PubMed

Baums MH, Geyer M, Buschken M et al (2010) Tendon-bone contact pressure and biomechanical evaluation of a modified suture-bridge technique for rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:992–998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bierry G, Huang AJ, Chang CY et al (2012) MRI findings of treated bacterial septic arthritis. Skeletal Radiol 41:1509–1516CrossRefPubMed

Boden RA, Burgess E, Enion D et al (2009) Use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors and associated accelerated shoulder arthropathy: report of 3 cases. Am J Sports Med 37:1429–1433CrossRefPubMed

Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ et al (2005) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1229–1240CrossRefPubMed

Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2011) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained? Am J Sports Med 39:2108–2116CrossRefPubMed

Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG et al (2010) Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 38:664–671CrossRefPubMed

10.

Christoforetti JJ, Krupp RJ, Singleton SB, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons et al (2012) Arthroscopic suture bridge transosseus equivalent fixation of rotator cuff tendon preserves intratendinous blood flow at the time of initial fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:523–530CrossRefPubMed

11.

Dhawan A, Ghodadra N, Karas V et al (2012) Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 40:1424–1430CrossRefPubMed

12.

Freehill MQ, Harms DJ, Huber SM et al (2003) Poly-l-lactic acid tack synovitis after arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 31:643–647PubMed

13.

Gerber C, Meyer DC, Nuss KM et al (2011) Anabolic steroids reduce muscle damage caused by rotator cuff tendon release in an experimental study in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2189–2195CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Hoppeler H, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons et al (2007) Correlation of atrophy and fatty infiltration on strength and integrity of rotator cuff repairs: a study in thirteen patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:691–696CrossRefPubMed

15.

Gerhardt C, Hug K, Pauly S et al (2012) Arthroscopic single-row modified mason-allen repair versus double-row suture bridge reconstruction for supraspinatus tendon tears: a matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med 40:2777–2785CrossRefPubMed

16.

Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J et al (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83PubMed

17.

Haneveld H, Hug K, Diederichs G et al (2013) Arthroscopic double-row repair of the rotator cuff: a comparison of bio-absorbable and non-resorbable anchors regarding osseous reaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(7):1647–1654. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2510-3 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hersche O, Gerber C, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (1998) Passive tension in the supraspinatus musculotendinous unit after long-standing rupture of its tendon: a preliminary report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:393–396CrossRefPubMed

19.

Iannotti JP, Deutsch A, Green A et al (2013) Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:965–971CrossRefPubMed

20.

Khazzam M, Kuhn JE, Mulligan E et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging identification of rotator cuff retears after repair: interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Am J Sports Med 40:1722–1727CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kluger R, Bock P, Mittlbock M et al (2011) Long-term survivorship of rotator cuff repairs using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med 39:2071–2081CrossRefPubMed

23.

Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD009020PubMed

24.

Liem D (2015) Arthroskopische Rotatorenmanschettenrekonstruktion. Obere Extremität 10:2. doi:10.1007/s11678-015-0306-4 CrossRef

25.

Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J et al (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:403–410CrossRefPubMed

26.

Mazzocca AD, Bollier MJ, Ciminiello AM et al (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs over time. Arthroscopy 26:592–599CrossRefPubMed

27.

Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA et al (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868CrossRefPubMed

28.

Meyer DC, Hoppeler H, Von Rechenberg B et al (2004) A pathomechanical concept explains muscle loss and fatty muscular changes following surgical tendon release. J Orthop Res 22:1004–1007CrossRefPubMed

29.

Miller BS, Downie BK, Kohen RB et al (2011) When do rotator cuff repairs fail? Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 39:2064–2070CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nazarian LN, Jacobson JA, Benson CB et al (2013) Imaging algorithms for evaluating suspected rotator cuff disease: society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology 267:589–595CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Nho SJ, Provencher MT, Seroyer ST et al (2009) Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy 25:788–793CrossRefPubMed

32.

Palmer WE, Levine SM, Dupuy DE (1997) Knee and shoulder fractures: association of fracture detection and marrow edema on MR images with mechanism of injury. Radiology 204:395–401CrossRefPubMed

33.

Park AY, Hatch JD (2011) Proximal humerus osteolysis after revision rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable suture anchors. Am J Orthop 40:139–141PubMed

34.

Park MC, Elattrache NS, Ahmad CS et al (2006) “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 22(1360):e1361–e1365

35.

Park MJ, Hsu JE, Harper C et al (2011) Poly-L/D-lactic acid anchors are associated with reoperation and failure of SLAP repairs. Arthroscopy 27:1335–1340CrossRefPubMed

36.

Park SE, Ji JH, Shafi M et al (2014) Arthroscopic management of occult greater tuberosity fracture of the shoulder. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 24:475–482CrossRef

37.

Parnes N, Defranco M, Wells JH et al (2013) Complications after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 29:1479–1486CrossRefPubMed

38.

Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:81–86PubMed

39.

Pauly S, Fiebig D, Kieser B et al (2011) Biomechanical comparison of four double-row speed-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques with or without medial or lateral row enhancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:2090–2097CrossRefPubMed

40.

Pauly S, Kieser B, Schill A et al (2010) Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations. Arthroscopy 26:1281–1288CrossRefPubMed

41.

Pilge H, Spang J, Rose T et al (2012) Osteolysis after rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable anchors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:305–310CrossRefPubMed

42.

Potapov A, Laflamme YG, Gagnon S, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons et al (2011) Progressive osteolysis of the radius after distal biceps tendon repair with the bioabsorbable screw. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:819–826CrossRefPubMed

43.

Rhee YG, Cho NS, Yoo JH (2014) Clinical outcome and repair integrity after rotator cuff repair in patients older than 70 years versus patients younger than 70 years. Arthroscopy 30:546–554CrossRefPubMed

44.

Shen PH, Lien SB, Shen HC, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons et al (2008) Long-term functional outcomes after repair of rotator cuff tears correlated with atrophy of the supraspinatus muscles on magnetic resonance images. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:1S–7SCrossRefPubMed

45.

Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K et al (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21:1307–1316CrossRefPubMed

46.

Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N et al (1997) Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:275–283CrossRefPubMed

47.

Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K et al (2008) Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 24:727–731CrossRefPubMed

48.

Voigt C, Bosse C, Vosshenrich R et al (2010) Arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair with suture-bridging technique: functional outcome and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 38:983–991CrossRefPubMed

49.

Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K et al (2010) Medial-row failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 26:430–435CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique
verfasst von: Katharina Stahnke
Constanze Nikulka
Gerd Diederichs
Hendrik Haneveld
Markus Scheibel
Christian Gerhardt
Publikationsdatum: 02.02.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2409-9

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique

Abstract

Introduction

Study design

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Study design

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Pre-operative templating in total elbow arthroplasty: not useful

Current status of ACL reconstruction in Germany

Anterior augmentation plating of aseptic humeral shaft nonunions after intramedullary nailing

Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement shows persistent clinical improvement in the mid-term

Shoulder arthroplasty in Germany: 2005–2012

Cobalt serum levels differ in well functioning Birmingham resurfacing and Birmingham modular THA

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie