Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2005

01.12.2005 | Original Article

Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function

verfasst von: Chiara Ghetti, W. Thomas Gregory, S. Renee Edwards, Lesley N. Otto, Amanda L. Clark

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that clinical measurements of the superficial perineum and of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function correlate with the severity of pelvic organ prolapse. This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed 1037 women in an academic urogynecologic practice. Greatest descent of prolapse, by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, was correlated with two assessments of levator function—the Oxford grading scale and levator hiatus (LH) size measured by digital examination. Correlations were calculated using Pearson’s correlation for continuous variables and Kendall’s tau-b. Severity of prolapse correlated moderately with genital hiatus (GH) (r=0.5, p<0.0001) and with LH (transverse r=0.4, p<0.0001; longitudinal r=0.5, p<0.0001), but weakly with the Oxford grading scale (r=−0.16, p<0.0001). LH correlated with GH (r=0.5, p<0.0001) but not with perineal body (r=0.06, p=0.06). Both GH and LH size are associated with the severity of prolapse. LH size correlates more strongly to prolapse severity than assessment of PFM function by the Oxford grading scale.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Berglas B, Rubin IC (1953) Study of the supportive structures of the uterus by levator myography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 97:677–692 Berglas B, Rubin IC (1953) Study of the supportive structures of the uterus by levator myography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 97:677–692
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh K, Reid WMN, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:71–77CrossRef Singh K, Reid WMN, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:71–77CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh K, Jakab M, Reid WM, Berger LA, Hoyte L (2003) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of levator ani morphologic features in different grades of prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:910–915CrossRef Singh K, Jakab M, Reid WM, Berger LA, Hoyte L (2003) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of levator ani morphologic features in different grades of prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:910–915CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoyte L, Schierlitz L, Zou K, Flesh G, Fielding JR (2001) Two- and 3-dimensional MRI comparison of levator ani structure, volume, and integrity in women with stress incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:11–19CrossRef Hoyte L, Schierlitz L, Zou K, Flesh G, Fielding JR (2001) Two- and 3-dimensional MRI comparison of levator ani structure, volume, and integrity in women with stress incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:11–19CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Delancey JO, Hurd WW (1998) Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 91:364–368CrossRefPubMed Delancey JO, Hurd WW (1998) Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 91:364–368CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall AF, Theofrasous JP, Cundiff GW et al (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1471PubMed Hall AF, Theofrasous JP, Cundiff GW et al (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1471PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bo K, Finckenhagen HB (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:883–887CrossRef Bo K, Finckenhagen HB (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:883–887CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Woolson RF (1987) Statistical methods for the analysis of biomedical data. Wiley, New York Woolson RF (1987) Statistical methods for the analysis of biomedical data. Wiley, New York
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166CrossRef Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR (1995) Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:942–945CrossRef Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR (1995) Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:942–945CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function
verfasst von
Chiara Ghetti
W. Thomas Gregory
S. Renee Edwards
Lesley N. Otto
Amanda L. Clark
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2005
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2005
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1274-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2005

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.