nach oben

Current Osteoporosis Reports

Erschienen in:

08.02.2017 | Biomechanics (M Silva and K Jepsen, Section Editors)

Sex-Differences in Skeletal Growth and Aging

verfasst von: Jeri W. Nieves

Erschienen in: Current Osteoporosis Reports | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

There have been numerous published reports describing skeletal differences between males and females. The goal of this report is to describe recent findings to help elucidate remaining questions.

Recent Findings

It is known that even in youth, there are sex differences in skeletal health. One recent report suggests these differences are evident at 6 years of age. With the availability of newer imaging techniques, specifically HRpQCT and microCT-3D, micro-architectural differences related to sex-differences have been studied. This has highlighted the importance of cortical porosity in describing possible sex differences in fracture risk.

Summary

We have a better understanding of skeletal microarchitecture that highlights sex differences in both growth and aging that may relate to fracture risk, although more longitudinal studies are needed. Sex differences in microarchitecture, particularly cortical porosity may also be important in understanding any, as of yet unknown, sex differences in fracture reduction with treatment.

Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726–33. doi:10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4.CrossRefPubMed

van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Cooper C. Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone. 2001;29(6):517–22.CrossRefPubMed

Kannegaard PN, van der Mark S, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B. Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture. National analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival. Age Ageing. 2010;39(2):203–9. doi:10.1093/ageing/afp221.CrossRefPubMed

Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colon-Emeric CS, Vanderschueren D, Milisen K, Velkeniers B, et al. Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(6):380–90. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bergen G, Stevens MR, Burns ER. Falls and fall injuries among adults aged ≥65 Years — United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:993–8. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6537a2.CrossRefPubMed

Chang VC, Do MT. Risk factors for falls among seniors: implications of gender. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181:521–31.CrossRefPubMed

Stevens JA, Sogolow ED. Gender differences for non-fatal unintentional fall related injuries among older adults. Inj Prev. 2005;11(2):115–9. doi:10.1136/ip.2004.005835.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Callisaya ML, Blizzard L, Schmidt MD, McGinley JL, Srikanth VK. Sex modifies the relationship between age and gait: a population-based study of older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(2):165–70.CrossRefPubMed

Daly RM, Rosengren BE, Alwis G, Ahlborg HG, Sernbo I, Karlsson MK. Gender specific age-related changes in bone density, muscle strength and functional performance in the elderly: a-10 year prospective population-based study. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:71. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, et al. The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(11):2520–6. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Ensrud KE, Taylor BC, Peters KW, Gourlay ML, Donaldson MG, Leslie WD, et al. Implications of expanding indications for drug treatment to prevent fracture in older men in United States: cross sectional and longitudinal analysis of prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014;349:g4120. doi:10.1136/bmj.g4120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Shepherd JA, Schousboe JT, Broy SB, Engelke K, Leslie WD. Executive summary of the 2015 ISCD position development conference on advanced measures from DXA and QCT: fracture prediction beyond BMD. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18(3):274–86.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Fitzpatrick LA. Secondary causes of osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(5):453–68. doi:10.4065/77.5.453.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Seeman E. Periosteal bone formation—a neglected determinant of bone strength. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 24;349(4):320–3.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Jepsen KJ, Andarawis-Puri N. The amount of periosteal apposition required to maintain bone strength during aging depends on adult bone morphology and tissue-modulus degradation rate. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(9):1916–26. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1643.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Szulc P, Seeman E, Duboeuf F, Sornay-Rendu E, Delmas PD. Bone fragility: failure of periosteal apposition to compensate for increased endocortical resorption in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(12):1856–63. doi:10.1359/jbmr.060904.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Walsh JS, Paggiosi MA, Eastell R. Cortical consolidation of the radius and tibia in young men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(9):3342–8.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hansen S, Shanbhogue V, Folkestad L, Nielsen MM, Brixen K. Bone microarchitecture and estimated strength in 499 adult Danish women and men: a cross-sectional, population-based high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic study on peak bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;94(3):269–81. doi:10.1007/s00223-013-9808-5.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Macdonald HM, Nishiyama KK, Kang J, Hanley DA, Boyd SK. Age-related patterns of trabecular and cortical bone loss differ between sexes and skeletal sites: a population-based HR-pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(1):50–62. doi:10.1002/jbmr.171.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Burghardt AJ, Kazakia GJ, Ramachandran S, Link TM, Majumdar S. Age- and gender-related differences in the geometric properties and biomechanical significance of intracortical porosity in the distal radius and tibia. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(5):983–93. doi:10.1359/jbmr.091104.PubMed

21.

• Nicks KM, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Riggs BL, Melton 3rd LJ, Khosla S. Relationship of age to bone microstructure independent of areal bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(3):637–44. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1468. In individuals matched for aBMD, women over age 50 had a 96% and men a 56% increase in cortical porosity, that was obviously not captured by aBMD CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Farr JN, Khosla S. Skeletal changes through the lifespan—from growth to senescence. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(9):513–21. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2015.89.PubMedPubMedCentral

23.

• Bala Y, Zebaze R, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Atkinson EJ, Iuliano S, Peterson JM, Amin S, Bjørnerem Å, Melton LJ, Johansson H, Kanis JA. Cortical porosity identifies women with osteopenia at increased risk for forearm fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(6):1356–62. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2167. In this case control study, the presence of cortical porosity has been shown to be a risk factor (fourfold increase in risk) for forearm fractures in women with low bone mass CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

• Shanbhogue VV, Brixen K, Hansen S. Age- and sex-related changes in bone microarchitecture and estimated strength: a three-year prospective study using HRpQCT. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(8):1541–9. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2817. In a longitudinal HRpQCT study, males had a lesser increase in cortical porosity as compared to females CrossRefPubMed

25.

Thomsen JS, Jensen MV, Niklassen AS, Ebbesen EN, Bruel A. Age-related changes in vertebral and iliac crest 3D bone microstructure—differences and similarities. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(1):219–28. doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2851-x.CrossRefPubMed

26.

• Thomsen JS, Niklassen AS, Ebbesen EN, Brüel A. Age-related changes of vertical and horizontal lumbar vertebral trabecular 3D bone microstructure is different in women and men. Bone. 2013;57(1):47–55. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.025. In this study of autopsy samples, vertical bone was lost faster for women than for men with no sex-related differences in bone loss of horizontal voxels CrossRefPubMed

27.

Chen H, Zhou X, Shoumura S, Emura S, Bunai Y. Age- and gender-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructure of cortical and trabecular bone at the human femoral neck. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(4):627–36. doi:10.1007/s00198-009-0993-z.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Looker AC, Beck TJ, Orwoll ES. Does body size account for gender differences in femur bone density and geometry? J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(7):1291–9.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nieves JW, Formica C, Ruffing J, Zion M, Garrett P, Lindsay R, et al. Males have larger skeletal size and bone mass than females, despite comparable body size. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(3):529–35. doi:10.1359/JBMR.041005.CrossRefPubMed

30.

• Medina-Gomez C, Heppe DH, Yin JL, Trajanoska K, Uitterlinden AG, Beck TJ, et al. Bone mass and strength in school-age children exhibit sexual dimorphism related to differences in lean mass: the generation R study. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(5):1099–106. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2755. Skeletal gender differences are already present at 6 years of age with boys having stronger bones (based on density and geometry) than girls, and these differences appear to be affected by muscle mass CrossRefPubMed

31.

Nasiri M, Luo Y. Study of sex differences in the association between hip fracture risk and body parameters by DXA-based biomechanical modeling. Bone. 2016;90:90–8. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.006.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Callewaert F, Sinnesael M, Gielen E, Boonen S, Vanderschueren D. Skeletal sexual dimorphism: relative contribution of sex steroids, GH-IGF1, and mechanical loading. J Endocrinol. 2010;207(2):127–34. doi:10.1677/JOE-10-0209.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Laurent M, Antonio L, Sinnesael M, Dubois V, Gielen E, Classens F, et al. Androgens and estrogens in skeletal sexual dimorphism. Asian journal of andrology. 2014;16(2):213–22. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.122356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

LeBlanc ES, Nielson CM, Marshall LM, Lapidus JA, Barrett-Connor E, Ensrud KE, et al. The effects of serum testosterone, estradiol, and sex hormone binding globulin levels on fracture risk in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(9):3337–46. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-0206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Cauley JA, Ewing SK, Taylor BC, Fink HA, Ensrud KE, Bauer DC, et al. Sex steroid hormones in older men: longitudinal associations with 4.5-year change in hip bone mineral density—the osteoporotic fractures in men study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(9):4314–23. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2635.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Vanderschueren D, Laurent MR, Claessens F, Gielen E, Lagerquist MK, Vandenput L, et al. Sex steroid actions in male bone. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(6):906–60. doi:10.1210/er.2014-1024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Clarke BL, Khosla S. Female reproductive system and bone. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;503(1):118–28. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2010.07.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Chung M, Balk EM, Brendel M, Ip S, Lau J, Lee J et al. Vitamin D and calcium: a systematic review of health outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009(183):1–420.

39.

Cranney A, Horsley T, O'Donnell S, Weiler H, Puil L, Ooi D et al. Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007(158):1–235.

40.

Group D. Patient level pooled analysis of 68 500 patients from seven major vitamin D fracture trials in US and Europe. BMJ. 2010;340:b5463. doi:10.1136/bmj.b5463.CrossRef

41.

Tang BM, Eslick GD, Nowson C, Smith C, Bensoussan A. Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;370(9588):657–66. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61342-7.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Silk LN, Greene DA, Baker MK. The effect of calcium or calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density in healthy males: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2015;25(5):510–24. doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0202.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Mosekilde L, Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L. The pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in men. Drugs. 2013;73(1):15–29.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Seeman E. An exercise in geometry. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(3):373–80.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Sundh D, Mellstrom D, Nilsson M, Karlsson M, Ohlsson C, Lorentzon M. Increased cortical porosity in older men with fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(9):1692–700. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2509.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Sex-Differences in Skeletal Growth and Aging
verfasst von: Jeri W. Nieves
Publikationsdatum: 08.02.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Osteoporosis Reports / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1544-1873
Elektronische ISSN: 1544-2241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-017-0349-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Sex-Differences in Skeletal Growth and Aging

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Functional Diversity of Ciliary Proteins in Bone Development and Disease

Bone Pain and Muscle Weakness in Cancer Patients

Fracture Burden: What Two and a Half Decades of Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study Data Reveal About Clinical Outcomes of Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis: Treat-to-Target

Parathyroid Hormone and Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein Analogs in Osteoporosis Therapy

Microcephalic Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism, Type II: a Clinical Review

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie