Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2018

27.03.2018 | Original Article

Short- and Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery

verfasst von: Henrik Nienhüser, Patrick Heger, Robin Schmitz, Yakup Kulu, Markus K. Diener, Johannes Klose, Martin Schneider, Beat P. Müller-Stich, Alexis Ulrich, Markus W. Büchler, Andre L. Mihaljevic, Thomas Schmidt

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

While several trials have compared laparoscopic to open surgery for colon cancer showing similar oncological results, oncological quality of laparoscopic versus open rectal resection is not well investigated.

Methods

A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. Qualitative and quantitative meta-analyses of short-term (rate of complete resections, number of harvested lymph nodes, circumferential resection margin positivity) and long-term (recurrence, disease-free and overall survival) oncologic results were conducted.

Results

Fourteen randomized controlled trials were identified including 3528 patients. Patients in the open resection group had significantly more complete resections (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.51–0.97; p = 0.03) and a higher number of resected lymph nodes (mean difference − 0.92; 95% CI − 1.08 to 0.75; p < 0.001). No differences were detected in the frequency of positive circumferential resection margins (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.62–1.10; p = 0.18). Furthermore, no significant differences of long-term oncologic outcome parameters after 5 years including locoregional recurrence (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.44–2.05; p = 0.89), disease-free survival (OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.84–1.58; p = 0.36), and overall survival (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.76–1.41; p = 0.82) were found. Most trials exhibited a relevant risk of bias and several studies provided no information on the surgical expertise of the participating surgeons.

Conclusion

Differences in oncologic outcome between laparoscopic and open rectal surgery for rectal cancer were detected for the complete resection rate and the number of resected lymph nodes in favor of the open approach. No statistically significant differences were found in oncologic long-term outcome parameters.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel, R., C. Desantis, and A. Jemal, Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014. 64(2): p. 104–17.CrossRefPubMed Siegel, R., C. Desantis, and A. Jemal, Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014. 64(2): p. 104–17.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, B.K., et al., Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer, 2010. 116(3): p. 544–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards, B.K., et al., Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer, 2010. 116(3): p. 544–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald, R.J., E.M. Husband, and R.D. Ryall, The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg, 1982. 69(10): p. 613–6.CrossRefPubMed Heald, R.J., E.M. Husband, and R.D. Ryall, The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg, 1982. 69(10): p. 613–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs, M., J.C. Verdeja, and H.S. Goldstein, Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991. 1(3): p. 144–50.PubMed Jacobs, M., J.C. Verdeja, and H.S. Goldstein, Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991. 1(3): p. 144–50.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas, M.H., et al., Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2013. 14(3): p. 210–8.CrossRefPubMed van der Pas, M.H., et al., Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2013. 14(3): p. 210–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Stead, M.L., et al., Assessing the relative costs of standard open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer in a randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2000. 33(2): p. 99–103.CrossRefPubMed Stead, M.L., et al., Assessing the relative costs of standard open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer in a randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2000. 33(2): p. 99–103.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou, P.J., et al., Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005. 365(9472): p. 1718–26.CrossRefPubMed Guillou, P.J., et al., Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005. 365(9472): p. 1718–26.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Theophilus, M., C. Platell, and K. Spilsbury, Long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis, 2014. 16(3): p. O75–81.CrossRefPubMed Theophilus, M., C. Platell, and K. Spilsbury, Long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis, 2014. 16(3): p. O75–81.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, C.L., G. Qu, and H.W. Xu, The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014. 29(3): p. 309–20.CrossRefPubMed Wang, C.L., G. Qu, and H.W. Xu, The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014. 29(3): p. 309–20.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Di, B., et al., Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up outcomes. Surg Oncol, 2013. 22(3): p. e39–43.CrossRefPubMed Di, B., et al., Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up outcomes. Surg Oncol, 2013. 22(3): p. e39–43.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhry, E., et al., Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev, 2008. 34(6): p. 498–504.CrossRefPubMed Kuhry, E., et al., Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev, 2008. 34(6): p. 498–504.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vennix, S., et al., Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014(4): p. Cd005200. Vennix, S., et al., Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014(4): p. Cd005200.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Biondi, A., et al., Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery. BMC Surg, 2013. 13 Suppl 2: p. S12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Biondi, A., et al., Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery. BMC Surg, 2013. 13 Suppl 2: p. S12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Panic, N., et al., Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One, 2013. 8(12): p. e83138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Panic, N., et al., Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One, 2013. 8(12): p. e83138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer, H.J., C.L. Deijen, and E. Haglind, A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med, 2015. 373(2): p. 194.PubMed Bonjer, H.J., C.L. Deijen, and E. Haglind, A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med, 2015. 373(2): p. 194.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne, D.G., et al., Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2010. 97(11): p. 1638–45.CrossRefPubMed Jayne, D.G., et al., Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2010. 97(11): p. 1638–45.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne, D.G., et al., Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol, 2007. 25(21): p. 3061–8.CrossRefPubMed Jayne, D.G., et al., Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol, 2007. 25(21): p. 3061–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Green, B.L., et al., Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2013. 100(1): p. 75–82.CrossRefPubMed Green, B.L., et al., Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2013. 100(1): p. 75–82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang, S.B., et al., Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 2010. 11(7): p. 637–45.CrossRefPubMed Kang, S.B., et al., Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 2010. 11(7): p. 637–45.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong, S.Y., et al., Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 2014. 15(7): p. 767–74.CrossRefPubMed Jeong, S.Y., et al., Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 2014. 15(7): p. 767–74.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung, K.L., et al., Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet, 2004. 363(9416): p. 1187–92.CrossRefPubMed Leung, K.L., et al., Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet, 2004. 363(9416): p. 1187–92.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng, S.S., et al., Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 2009. 52(4): p. 558–66.CrossRefPubMed Ng, S.S., et al., Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 2009. 52(4): p. 558–66.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga, M., et al., Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007. 50(4): p. 464–71.CrossRefPubMed Braga, M., et al., Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007. 50(4): p. 464–71.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman, J., et al., Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2015. 314(13): p. 1346–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fleshman, J., et al., Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2015. 314(13): p. 1346–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, F.L., et al., Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus the open approach in curative resection of rectal cancer. J Int Med Res, 2010. 38(3): p. 916–22.CrossRefPubMed Liu, F.L., et al., Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus the open approach in curative resection of rectal cancer. J Int Med Res, 2010. 38(3): p. 916–22.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lujan, J., et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2009. 96(9): p. 982–9.CrossRefPubMed Lujan, J., et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2009. 96(9): p. 982–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng, S.S., et al., Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc, 2014. 28(1): p. 297–306.CrossRefPubMed Ng, S.S., et al., Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc, 2014. 28(1): p. 297–306.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pechlivanides, G., et al., Lymph node clearance after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach. Dig Dis, 2007. 25(1): p. 94–9.CrossRefPubMed Pechlivanides, G., et al., Lymph node clearance after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach. Dig Dis, 2007. 25(1): p. 94–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson, A.R., et al., Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2015. 314(13): p. 1356–63.CrossRefPubMed Stevenson, A.R., et al., Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2015. 314(13): p. 1356–63.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou, Z.G., et al., Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 2004. 18(8): p. 1211–5.CrossRefPubMed Zhou, Z.G., et al., Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 2004. 18(8): p. 1211–5.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang, X., et al., Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized, controlled trial from China. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2011. 21(5): p. 381–5.CrossRefPubMed Liang, X., et al., Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized, controlled trial from China. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2011. 21(5): p. 381–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy, R.H., et al., Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol, 2014. 32(17): p. 1804–11.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy, R.H., et al., Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol, 2014. 32(17): p. 1804–11.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel, O. and M.W. Buchler, The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg, 2013. 100(2): p. 172–3.CrossRefPubMed Strobel, O. and M.W. Buchler, The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg, 2013. 100(2): p. 172–3.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Bege, T., et al., The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg, 2010. 251(2): p. 249–53.CrossRefPubMed Bege, T., et al., The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg, 2010. 251(2): p. 249–53.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kayano, H., et al., Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 2011. 25(9): p. 2972–9.CrossRefPubMed Kayano, H., et al., Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc, 2011. 25(9): p. 2972–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Son, G.M., et al., Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2010. 20(7): p. 609–17.CrossRefPubMed Son, G.M., et al., Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2010. 20(7): p. 609–17.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Leibold, T., et al., Prognostic implications of the distribution of lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(13): p. 2106–11.CrossRefPubMed Leibold, T., et al., Prognostic implications of the distribution of lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(13): p. 2106–11.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, C.H., et al., Learning curve of laparoscopic low anterior resection in terms of local recurrence. J Surg Oncol, 2014. 110(8): p. 989–96.CrossRefPubMed Kim, C.H., et al., Learning curve of laparoscopic low anterior resection in terms of local recurrence. J Surg Oncol, 2014. 110(8): p. 989–96.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauer, R., et al., Adjuvant vs. neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: the German trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94. Colorectal Dis, 2003. 5(5): p. 406–15.CrossRefPubMed Sauer, R., et al., Adjuvant vs. neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: the German trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94. Colorectal Dis, 2003. 5(5): p. 406–15.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Short- and Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery
verfasst von
Henrik Nienhüser
Patrick Heger
Robin Schmitz
Yakup Kulu
Markus K. Diener
Johannes Klose
Martin Schneider
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Alexis Ulrich
Markus W. Büchler
Andre L. Mihaljevic
Thomas Schmidt
Publikationsdatum
27.03.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3738-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.