Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2018

16.04.2018 | Original Article

Short-term dentoskeletal changes following Class II treatment using a fixed functional appliance: the Austro Repositioner

A pilot study

verfasst von: M. Dolores Austro, Encarnación González, M. Angustias Peñalver, Domingo Pérez, José Antonio Alarcón

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of a fixed functional appliance, the Austro Repositioner, in dolicho- and brachyfacial skeletal Class II patients.

Material and methods

In all, 20 dolicho- and 25 brachyfacial consecutive patients treated with the Austro Repositioner were compared with untreated controls (20 dolicho- and 20 brachyfacial patients) with the same initial dentoskeletal features. Lateral cephalograms were acquired before and 1.0±0.2 year after therapy.

Results

Significant improvements in skeletal Class II relationships were observed in both groups. The ANB angle decreased (3.56° in dolicho- and 3.13° in brachyfacial patients, P < 0.001) due to changes localized exclusively in the mandible, the SNB angle increased to 3.20° in dolicho- and 3.02° in brachyfacial patients, and the total mandibular length (Co-Pg) increased to 6.47 mm in dolicho- and 5.78 mm in brachyfacial patients (P < 0.001). A favorable guidance of vertical pattern was also achieved in both groups, and no significant changes were observed in the upper and lower incisors in both groups.

Conclusions

The Austro Repositioner was effective for short-term treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion resulting from the retrusion of the mandible in both dolicho- and brachyfacial patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. (2005) The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 11:119–129CrossRef Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. (2005) The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 11:119–129CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballester A, Langlade M (2001) Unlocking the malocclusion with a semifixed bite plate. J Clin Orthod 35:544–548PubMed Ballester A, Langlade M (2001) Unlocking the malocclusion with a semifixed bite plate. J Clin Orthod 35:544–548PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat De Almeida MR, Henriques JF, Ursi W (2002) Comparative study of the Frankel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:458–466CrossRefPubMed De Almeida MR, Henriques JF, Ursi W (2002) Comparative study of the Frankel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:458–466CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. (1999) Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:429–438CrossRefPubMed Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. (1999) Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:429–438CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Martina R, Cioffi I, Galeotti A, Tagliaferri R, Cimino R, Michelotti A, Valletta R, Farella M, Paduano S (2013) Efficacy of the Sander bite-jumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion: a randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 16:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12013 CrossRefPubMed Martina R, Cioffi I, Galeotti A, Tagliaferri R, Cimino R, Michelotti A, Valletta R, Farella M, Paduano S (2013) Efficacy of the Sander bite-jumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion: a randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 16:116–126. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ocr.​12013 CrossRefPubMed
17.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nance HN (1947) The limitations of orthodontic treatment; mixed dentition diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod 33:177–223PubMed Nance HN (1947) The limitations of orthodontic treatment; mixed dentition diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod 33:177–223PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O’Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I (2003) Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889540603003524 (quiz 339)CrossRefPubMed O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O’Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I (2003) Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:234–243. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S088954060300352​4 (quiz 339)CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O’Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I (2003) Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889540603003457 CrossRefPubMed O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O’Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I (2003) Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:128–137. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S088954060300345​7 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H (1982) The mechanism of class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82:104–113CrossRefPubMed Pancherz H (1982) The mechanism of class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82:104–113CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B (1997) Cephalometric characteristics of class II division 1 and class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 67:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067〈0111:CCOCID〉2.3.CO;2PubMed Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B (1997) Cephalometric characteristics of class II division 1 and class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 67:111–120. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1043/​0003-3219(1997)067〈0111:CCOCID〉2.3.CO;2PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Perinetti G, Cordella C, Pellegrini F, Esposito P (2008) The prevalence of malocclusal traits and their correlations in mixed dentition children: results from the Italian OHSAR Survey. Oral Health Prev Dent 6:119–129PubMed Perinetti G, Cordella C, Pellegrini F, Esposito P (2008) The prevalence of malocclusal traits and their correlations in mixed dentition children: results from the Italian OHSAR Survey. Oral Health Prev Dent 6:119–129PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Proffit WR, Fields HM, Sarver DM (2013) Contemporary orthodontics, 5th edn. Elsevier, St. Louis Proffit WR, Fields HM, Sarver DM (2013) Contemporary orthodontics, 5th edn. Elsevier, St. Louis
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Proffit WR, Fields HM, Sarver DM (2007) Contemporary orthodontics, 4th edn. CV Mosby, St. Luis Proffit WR, Fields HM, Sarver DM (2007) Contemporary orthodontics, 4th edn. CV Mosby, St. Luis
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr, Hunter WS (1974) An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from The University School Growth Study, The University of Michigan. Monograph 2, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor, Mich: The University of Michigan. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr, Hunter WS (1974) An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from The University School Growth Study, The University of Michigan. Monograph 2, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor, Mich: The University of Michigan.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Spalding O (2001) Treatment of class II malocclusion. In: Bishara S (ed) Text book of orthodontics. International edition. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 324–374 Spalding O (2001) Treatment of class II malocclusion. In: Bishara S (ed) Text book of orthodontics. International edition. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 324–374
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiner CC (1953) Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 39:729–755CrossRef Steiner CC (1953) Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 39:729–755CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. (1999) Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel compared with an untreated class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:597–609CrossRefPubMed Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. (1999) Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel compared with an untreated class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:597–609CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Tumer N, Gultan AS (1999) Comparison of the effects of monoblock and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:460–468CrossRefPubMed Tumer N, Gultan AS (1999) Comparison of the effects of monoblock and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:460–468CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363PubMed Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Short-term dentoskeletal changes following Class II treatment using a fixed functional appliance: the Austro Repositioner
A pilot study
verfasst von
M. Dolores Austro
Encarnación González
M. Angustias Peñalver
Domingo Pérez
José Antonio Alarcón
Publikationsdatum
16.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-018-0135-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.