Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2016

09.09.2015 | Original Article

Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy—a retrospective cohort study

verfasst von: Christian Kirschneck, Peter Proff, Claudia Reicheneder, Carsten Lippold

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The belief of many orthodontists that premolar extraction therapy leads to a loss of vertical dimension and an aggravated facial profile often predetermines a non-extraction approach. We investigated the short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction in borderline cases for extraction therapy on dentofacial parameters, especially vertical dimension and facial profile.

Materials and methods

Of 50 juvenile borderline cases for extraction treatment with a distinct sagittal overjet of 6–9 mm and dental crowding of >6 mm, 25 had all first premolars extracted, whereas the 25 control patients received non-extraction orthodontic treatment with corresponding fixed and removable appliances. Patient selection by multivariate cluster analysis ensured homogeneity at baseline regarding dentoskeletal parameters. Parameter changes were determined with radiographic cephalograms and compared between the extraction and non-extraction group.

Results

The systematic extraction of premolars in borderline patients with a distinct sagittal overjet and crowding did not significantly influence sagittal or vertical skeletal dimension, while leading to a slightly more concave lip profile due to incisor retraction compared to the non-extraction control group.

Conclusions

The influence of premolar extractions on facial profile is often overestimated, since only slight changes in lip profile are to be expected. In integrated treatment planning, the extraction decision should not be primarily based on concerns about the aggravation of facial profile and loss of vertical dimension.

Clinicial relevance

The decision, whether to extract healthy premolars in borderline patients for extraction therapy, is difficult to make. Our study clarifies the repercussions on cephalometric dentofacial parameters, facilitating future orthodontic extraction decisions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Konstantonis D, Anthopoulou C, Makou M (2013) Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in class I malocclusions. Prog Orthod 14:47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Konstantonis D, Anthopoulou C, Makou M (2013) Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in class I malocclusions. Prog Orthod 14:47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter J (1771) The natural history of the human teeth, explaining their structure and formation, growth and diseases, London Hunter J (1771) The natural history of the human teeth, explaining their structure and formation, growth and diseases, London
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tweed CH (1944) Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 42:22–45PubMed Tweed CH (1944) Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 42:22–45PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolender CJ, Bounoure GM, Barat Y (1995) Extraction versus nonextraction. SID Publisher, Paris Bolender CJ, Bounoure GM, Barat Y (1995) Extraction versus nonextraction. SID Publisher, Paris
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma SL, Sharma VP, Tandon P, et al. (2013) Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients. Contemp Clin Dent 4:206–212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Verma SL, Sharma VP, Tandon P, et al. (2013) Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients. Contemp Clin Dent 4:206–212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephens CK, Boley JC, Behrents RG, et al. (2005) Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128:450–457CrossRef Stephens CK, Boley JC, Behrents RG, et al. (2005) Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128:450–457CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Subtelny JD (1961) The soft tissue profile, growth and treatment changes. Angle Orthod 31:105–122 Subtelny JD (1961) The soft tissue profile, growth and treatment changes. Angle Orthod 31:105–122
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL, et al. (1996) The decision to extract: part II. Analysis of clinicians’ stated reasons for extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:393–402CrossRef Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL, et al. (1996) The decision to extract: part II. Analysis of clinicians’ stated reasons for extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:393–402CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schopf P (2003) Indication for and frequency of early orthodontic therapy or interceptive measures. J Orofac Orthop 64:186–200PubMed Schopf P (2003) Indication for and frequency of early orthodontic therapy or interceptive measures. J Orofac Orthop 64:186–200PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL, et al. (1996) The decision to extract: part 1–interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:297–309CrossRef Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL, et al. (1996) The decision to extract: part 1–interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:297–309CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE (1992) A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 102:1–14CrossRef Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE (1992) A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 102:1–14CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Weyrich C, Lisson JA (2009) The effect of premolar extractions on incisor position and soft tissue profile in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop 70:128–138CrossRefPubMed Weyrich C, Lisson JA (2009) The effect of premolar extractions on incisor position and soft tissue profile in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop 70:128–138CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Spahl TJ, Witzig JW (1987) The clinical management of basic maxillo-facial orthopedic appliances. PSG Pub. Co., Littleton, Mass Spahl TJ, Witzig JW (1987) The clinical management of basic maxillo-facial orthopedic appliances. PSG Pub. Co., Littleton, Mass
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright N, Modarai F, Cobourne MT, et al. (2011) Do you do damon(R)? what is the current evidence base underlying the philosophy of this appliance system? J Orthod 38:222–230CrossRefPubMed Wright N, Modarai F, Cobourne MT, et al. (2011) Do you do damon(R)? what is the current evidence base underlying the philosophy of this appliance system? J Orthod 38:222–230CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang G, Zhang L, Xu X, et al. (2008) Indications for non-extraction treatment of dental crowding with damon appliance. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 17:364–371PubMed Tang G, Zhang L, Xu X, et al. (2008) Indications for non-extraction treatment of dental crowding with damon appliance. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 17:364–371PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, et al. (1995) Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:28–37CrossRef Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, et al. (1995) Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:28–37CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Zaher AR (1997) Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 111:18–27CrossRef Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Zaher AR (1997) Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 111:18–27CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara SE, Zaher AR, Cummins DM, et al. (1994) Effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth of individuals with class II division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 64:221–230PubMed Bishara SE, Zaher AR, Cummins DM, et al. (1994) Effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth of individuals with class II division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 64:221–230PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Akinci Cansunar H, Uysal T (2014) Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:595–602CrossRef Akinci Cansunar H, Uysal T (2014) Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:595–602CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalwitzki M, Godt A, Göz G (2011) Effects of extraction treatment on maxillary and mandibular sagittal development in growing patients. Eur J Orthod 33:544–550CrossRefPubMed Kalwitzki M, Godt A, Göz G (2011) Effects of extraction treatment on maxillary and mandibular sagittal development in growing patients. Eur J Orthod 33:544–550CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Seben MP, Valarelli FP, de Freitas KMS, et al. (2013) Cephalometric changes in class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction. Dental Press J Orthod 18:61–69CrossRefPubMed Seben MP, Valarelli FP, de Freitas KMS, et al. (2013) Cephalometric changes in class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction. Dental Press J Orthod 18:61–69CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Yu H, Jiang C, et al. (2013) Vertical changes in class I malocclusion between 2 different extraction patterns. Saudi Med J 34:302–306PubMed Wang Y, Yu H, Jiang C, et al. (2013) Vertical changes in class I malocclusion between 2 different extraction patterns. Saudi Med J 34:302–306PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Trisnawaty N, Ioi H, Kitahara T, et al. (2013) Effects of extraction of four premolars on vermilion height and lip area in patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Eur J Orthod 35:521–528CrossRefPubMed Trisnawaty N, Ioi H, Kitahara T, et al. (2013) Effects of extraction of four premolars on vermilion height and lip area in patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Eur J Orthod 35:521–528CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsaros C, Ripplinger B, Högel A, et al. (1996) The influence of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the soft tissue profile. J Orofac Orthop 57:354–365CrossRefPubMed Katsaros C, Ripplinger B, Högel A, et al. (1996) The influence of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the soft tissue profile. J Orofac Orthop 57:354–365CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Segatto E, Segatto A, Braunitzer G, et al. (2014) Craniofacial and cervical morphology related to sagittal spinal posture in children and adolescents. Biomed Res Int 2014:638238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Segatto E, Segatto A, Braunitzer G, et al. (2014) Craniofacial and cervical morphology related to sagittal spinal posture in children and adolescents. Biomed Res Int 2014:638238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasund A (ca. 1973) Klinische kephalometrie für die bergen-technik, Bergen Hasund A (ca. 1973) Klinische kephalometrie für die bergen-technik, Bergen
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Segner D, Hasund A (2003) Individualisierte kephalometrie, 4, unveränd. Aufl edn. Segner, Hamburg Segner D, Hasund A (2003) Individualisierte kephalometrie, 4, unveränd. Aufl edn. Segner, Hamburg
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschneck C, Römer P, Proff P, et al. (2013) Association of dentoskeletal morphology with incisor inclination in angle class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study. Head Face Med 9:24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kirschneck C, Römer P, Proff P, et al. (2013) Association of dentoskeletal morphology with incisor inclination in angle class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study. Head Face Med 9:24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricketts RM (ed) Orthodontic diagnosis and planning: … their roles in preventive and rehabilitative dentistry. Rocky Mountain/Orthodontics, Denver, Colo Ricketts RM (ed) Orthodontic diagnosis and planning: … their roles in preventive and rehabilitative dentistry. Rocky Mountain/Orthodontics, Denver, Colo
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. G. Allen & Unwin ltd, London Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. G. Allen & Unwin ltd, London
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bukhary MT (2005) Comparative cephalometric study of class III malocclusion in Saudi and Japanese adult females. J Oral Sci 47:83–90CrossRefPubMed Bukhary MT (2005) Comparative cephalometric study of class III malocclusion in Saudi and Japanese adult females. J Oral Sci 47:83–90CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70 Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg J, Bauchner H, Backus J, et al. (2013) The new ICMJE recommendations. Dan Med J 60:1–2PubMed Rosenberg J, Bauchner H, Backus J, et al. (2013) The new ICMJE recommendations. Dan Med J 60:1–2PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M et al. (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370: 1453–1457. Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M et al. (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370: 1453–1457.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Basciftci FA, Usumez S (2003) Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects. Angle Orthod 73:36–42PubMed Basciftci FA, Usumez S (2003) Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects. Angle Orthod 73:36–42PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kocadereli I (2002) Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122:67–72CrossRef Kocadereli I (2002) Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122:67–72CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Demir A, Uysal T, Sari Z, et al. (2005) Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients. Eur J Orthod 27:524–531CrossRefPubMed Demir A, Uysal T, Sari Z, et al. (2005) Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients. Eur J Orthod 27:524–531CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinzinger G, Frye L, Diedrich P (2009) Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery—a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects. J Orofac Orthop 70:63–91CrossRefPubMed Kinzinger G, Frye L, Diedrich P (2009) Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery—a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects. J Orofac Orthop 70:63–91CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Bravo LA, Canut JA, Pascual A, et al. (1997) Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions. Br J Orthod 24:25–34CrossRefPubMed Bravo LA, Canut JA, Pascual A, et al. (1997) Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions. Br J Orthod 24:25–34CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hans MG, Groisser G, Damon C, et al. (2006) Cephalometric changes in overbite and vertical facial height after removal of 4 first molars or first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 130:183–188CrossRef Hans MG, Groisser G, Damon C, et al. (2006) Cephalometric changes in overbite and vertical facial height after removal of 4 first molars or first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 130:183–188CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim T, Kim J, Mah J, et al. (2005) First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension. Angle Orthod 75:177–182PubMed Kim T, Kim J, Mah J, et al. (2005) First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension. Angle Orthod 75:177–182PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Meral O, Işcan HN, Okay C, et al. (2004) Effects of bilateral upper first premolar extraction on the mandible. Eur J Orthod 26:223–231CrossRefPubMed Meral O, Işcan HN, Okay C, et al. (2004) Effects of bilateral upper first premolar extraction on the mandible. Eur J Orthod 26:223–231CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Nimri KS (2006) Vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions. Angle Orthod 76:52–58PubMed Al-Nimri KS (2006) Vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions. Angle Orthod 76:52–58PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Klapper L, Navarro SF, Bowman D, et al. (1992) The influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on brachyfacial and dolichofacial growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:425–430CrossRef Klapper L, Navarro SF, Bowman D, et al. (1992) The influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on brachyfacial and dolichofacial growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:425–430CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker CD, Nanda RS, Currier GF (1995) Skeletal and dental changes associated with the treatment of deep bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:382–393CrossRef Parker CD, Nanda RS, Currier GF (1995) Skeletal and dental changes associated with the treatment of deep bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:382–393CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Taner-Sarisoy L, Darendeliler N (1999) The influence of extraction orthodontic treatment on craniofacial structures: evaluation according to two different factors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 115:508–514CrossRef Taner-Sarisoy L, Darendeliler N (1999) The influence of extraction orthodontic treatment on craniofacial structures: evaluation according to two different factors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 115:508–514CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons ME, Joondeph DR (1973) Change in overbite: a ten-year postretention study. Am J Orthod 64:349–367CrossRefPubMed Simons ME, Joondeph DR (1973) Change in overbite: a ten-year postretention study. Am J Orthod 64:349–367CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC (1995) The extraction-nonextraction dilemma as it relates to TMD. Angle Orthod 65:175–186PubMed McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC (1995) The extraction-nonextraction dilemma as it relates to TMD. Angle Orthod 65:175–186PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramesh GC, Pradeep MC, Kumar GA, et al. (2012) Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 13:812–818CrossRefPubMed Ramesh GC, Pradeep MC, Kumar GA, et al. (2012) Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 13:812–818CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Canut J (1996) Eine analyse der dentofazialen ästhetik. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 28:83–105 Canut J (1996) Eine analyse der dentofazialen ästhetik. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 28:83–105
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Drobocky OB, Smith RJ (1989) Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 95:220–230CrossRef Drobocky OB, Smith RJ (1989) Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 95:220–230CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Bravo LA (1994) Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod 64:31–42PubMed Bravo LA (1994) Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod 64:31–42PubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Finnöy JP, Wisth PJ, Böe OE (1987) Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 9:68–78CrossRefPubMed Finnöy JP, Wisth PJ, Böe OE (1987) Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 9:68–78CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Tadic N, Woods MG (2007) Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment. Angle Orthod 77:808–816CrossRefPubMed Tadic N, Woods MG (2007) Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment. Angle Orthod 77:808–816CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat James RD (1998) A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 114:265–276CrossRef James RD (1998) A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 114:265–276CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Boley JC, Fulbright M, Lindenau S, Pontier J-P, Smith S (2000) Profilveränderungen bei kieferorthopädischer behandlung mit und ohne prämolarenextraktion. Kieferorthop 14:183–190 Boley JC, Fulbright M, Lindenau S, Pontier J-P, Smith S (2000) Profilveränderungen bei kieferorthopädischer behandlung mit und ohne prämolarenextraktion. Kieferorthop 14:183–190
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Broadbent J (1989) Wesensmerkmale des schönen gesichts. Funct Orthod 6:18–30PubMed Broadbent J (1989) Wesensmerkmale des schönen gesichts. Funct Orthod 6:18–30PubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Burstone CJ (1967) Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 53:262–284CrossRefPubMed Burstone CJ (1967) Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 53:262–284CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Downs WB (1956) Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 26:191–212 Downs WB (1956) Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 26:191–212
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowman SJ, Jr J, Lysle E (2000) The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 70:3–10PubMed Bowman SJ, Jr J, Lysle E (2000) The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 70:3–10PubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Zierhut EC, Joondeph DR, Artun J, et al. (2000) Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 70:208–219PubMed Zierhut EC, Joondeph DR, Artun J, et al. (2000) Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 70:208–219PubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Hambleton RS (1964) The soft-tissue covering of the skeletal face as related to orthodontic problems. Am J Orthod 50:405–420CrossRef Hambleton RS (1964) The soft-tissue covering of the skeletal face as related to orthodontic problems. Am J Orthod 50:405–420CrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Harzer W (1999) Lehrbuch der kieferorthopädie. Hanser, München, Wien Harzer W (1999) Lehrbuch der kieferorthopädie. Hanser, München, Wien
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschneck C, Proff P, Fanghaenel J, et al. (2013) Differentiated analysis of orthodontic tooth movement in rats with an improved rat model and three-dimensional imaging. Ann Anat 195:539–553CrossRefPubMed Kirschneck C, Proff P, Fanghaenel J, et al. (2013) Differentiated analysis of orthodontic tooth movement in rats with an improved rat model and three-dimensional imaging. Ann Anat 195:539–553CrossRefPubMed
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, et al. (2015) Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44:20140197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, et al. (2015) Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44:20140197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Chambers D, Bohay R, Kaci L, et al. (2015) The effective dose of different scanning protocols using the sirona GALILEOS(®) comfort CBCT scanner. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44:20140287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chambers D, Bohay R, Kaci L, et al. (2015) The effective dose of different scanning protocols using the sirona GALILEOS(®) comfort CBCT scanner. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44:20140287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 international commission on radiological protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 139:1237–1243CrossRefPubMed Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 international commission on radiological protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 139:1237–1243CrossRefPubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Tymofiyeva O, Proff PC, Rottner K, et al. (2013) Diagnosis of dental abnormalities in children using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons) 71:1159–1169CrossRef Tymofiyeva O, Proff PC, Rottner K, et al. (2013) Diagnosis of dental abnormalities in children using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons) 71:1159–1169CrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Jakob PM, et al. (2010) Three-dimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Oral Investig 14:169–176CrossRefPubMed Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Jakob PM, et al. (2010) Three-dimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Oral Investig 14:169–176CrossRefPubMed
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, et al. (1990) Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. The Angle Orthodontist 60:177–190PubMed Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, et al. (1990) Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. The Angle Orthodontist 60:177–190PubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Luecke III, Percy E, Jr J, Lysie E (1992) The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of “functional orthodontics”. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:4–12CrossRef Luecke III, Percy E, Jr J, Lysie E (1992) The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of “functional orthodontics”. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:4–12CrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Ong HB, Woods MG (2001) An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod 71:90–102PubMed Ong HB, Woods MG (2001) An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod 71:90–102PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy—a retrospective cohort study
verfasst von
Christian Kirschneck
Peter Proff
Claudia Reicheneder
Carsten Lippold
Publikationsdatum
09.09.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1574-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.