Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2016

17.10.2016

Short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

verfasst von: Takeshi Nishikawa, Soichiro Ishihara, Keisuke Hata, Koji Murono, Koji Yasuda, Kensuke Otani, Toshiaki Tanaka, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Kazushige Kawai, Hiroaki Nozawa, Hironori Yamaguchi, Toshiaki Watanabe

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Along with an aging society, the number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer treated with a surgical modality has gradually increased. Our purpose is to verify the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer in elderly patients.

Methods

We compared the short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in patients aged 80 years or older with colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2014.

Results

Of 150 elderly colorectal patients, 62 patients received laparoscopic surgery, and 88 patients, open surgery. In the laparoscopic surgery group, two patients were converted to open surgery due to extensive adhesion. The amount of blood loss was smaller in patients treated with laparoscopic surgery than those with open surgery (44.0 ± 86.5 vs. 329.9 ± 482.1 ml, P < 0.01). In the laparoscopic surgery group, days until oral intake (5.3 ± 1.9 vs. 7.0 ± 3.0 days, P < 0.01) and hospital stay (17.2 ± 6.8 vs. 22.0 ± 14.0 days, P < 0.01) were shorter. Morbidity (30.6 vs. 42.0 %) and mortality (1.6 vs. 1.1 %) in laparoscopic and open surgery groups were similar.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer was a safe and less invasive alternative to open surgery, with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashino I, Mizoue T, Tanaka K, Tsuji I, Tamakoshi A, Matsuo K, Wakai K, Nagata C, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Sasazuki S, Research Group for the Development and Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Strategies in Japan (2015) Vegetable consumption and colorectal cancer risk: an evaluation based on a systematic review and meta-analysis among the Japanese population. JJCO 45(10):973–979PubMed Kashino I, Mizoue T, Tanaka K, Tsuji I, Tamakoshi A, Matsuo K, Wakai K, Nagata C, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Sasazuki S, Research Group for the Development and Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Strategies in Japan (2015) Vegetable consumption and colorectal cancer risk: an evaluation based on a systematic review and meta-analysis among the Japanese population. JJCO 45(10):973–979PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyasaka Y, Mochidome N, Kobayashi K, Ryu S, Akashi Y, Miyoshi A (2014) Efficacy of laparoscopic resection in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Today 44(10):1834–1840CrossRefPubMed Miyasaka Y, Mochidome N, Kobayashi K, Ryu S, Akashi Y, Miyoshi A (2014) Efficacy of laparoscopic resection in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Today 44(10):1834–1840CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Kawamoto A, Okugawa Y, Hiro J, Saigusa S, Toiyama Y, Araki T, Tanaka K, Mohri Y, Kusunoki M (2015) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 3(4):897–901PubMedPubMedCentral Inoue Y, Kawamoto A, Okugawa Y, Hiro J, Saigusa S, Toiyama Y, Araki T, Tanaka K, Mohri Y, Kusunoki M (2015) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 3(4):897–901PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Strker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):662–664CrossRef Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Strker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):662–664CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52CrossRefPubMed The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRefPubMed The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jane DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726CrossRef Gillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jane DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(9):982–989CrossRefPubMed Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(9):982–989CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645CrossRefPubMed Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong S, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chan HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774CrossRefPubMed Jeong S, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chan HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Colorectal Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Colorectal Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, AbisGA Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, AbisGA Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch (2009) International union against cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch (2009) International union against cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng WG, Zhou ZX, Hou HR, Liang JW, Zhou HT, Wang Z, Zhang XM, Hu JJ (2015) Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer in elderly patients. JSR 193(2):613–618CrossRefPubMed Zeng WG, Zhou ZX, Hou HR, Liang JW, Zhou HT, Wang Z, Zhang XM, Hu JJ (2015) Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer in elderly patients. JSR 193(2):613–618CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M, Yamagishi S, Watanabe K, Watanabe J, Kanazawa A, Ichikawa Y, Oba M, Morita S, Hashiguchi Y, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2014) Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Endosc 28(2):466–476CrossRefPubMed Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M, Yamagishi S, Watanabe K, Watanabe J, Kanazawa A, Ichikawa Y, Oba M, Morita S, Hashiguchi Y, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2014) Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Endosc 28(2):466–476CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallribera Valls F, Landi F, Espin Basany E, Sanchez Garcia JL, Jimenez Gomez LM, Mati Gallostra M, Salgado Cruz L, Armengol Carrasco M (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients. Surg Endosc 28(12):3373–3378CrossRefPubMed Vallribera Valls F, Landi F, Espin Basany E, Sanchez Garcia JL, Jimenez Gomez LM, Mati Gallostra M, Salgado Cruz L, Armengol Carrasco M (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients. Surg Endosc 28(12):3373–3378CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PHM (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195(6):768–773CrossRefPubMed Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PHM (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195(6):768–773CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vignali A, Palo SD, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs open colectomies in octogerarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48(11):2070–2075CrossRefPubMed Vignali A, Palo SD, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs open colectomies in octogerarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48(11):2070–2075CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng WG, Liu MJ, Zhou ZX, Hou HR, Liang JW, Wang Z, Zhang XM, Hu JJ (2015) Outcome of laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19(10):1869–1874CrossRefPubMed Zeng WG, Liu MJ, Zhou ZX, Hou HR, Liang JW, Wang Z, Zhang XM, Hu JJ (2015) Outcome of laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19(10):1869–1874CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Cebrian J, Gil Yonte P, Jimenez-Toscano M, Vega L, Ochando F (2013) Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon carcinoma: a surgical challenge but oncologically feasible. Colorectal Dis 15(2):e79–e83CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Cebrian J, Gil Yonte P, Jimenez-Toscano M, Vega L, Ochando F (2013) Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon carcinoma: a surgical challenge but oncologically feasible. Colorectal Dis 15(2):e79–e83CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Cassoni P, Giraudo G, Arolfo S, Morino M (2015) Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29(8):2196–2202CrossRefPubMed Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Cassoni P, Giraudo G, Arolfo S, Morino M (2015) Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29(8):2196–2202CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Shukla PJ, Trencheva K, Merchant C, Maggoiori L, Michelassi F, Sonoda T, Lee SW, Milsom JW (2015) Laparoscopic resection of T4 colon cancers: is it feasible? Dis Colon Rectum 58(1):25–31CrossRefPubMed Shukla PJ, Trencheva K, Merchant C, Maggoiori L, Michelassi F, Sonoda T, Lee SW, Milsom JW (2015) Laparoscopic resection of T4 colon cancers: is it feasible? Dis Colon Rectum 58(1):25–31CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Odermatt M, Miskovic D, Siddiqi N, Khan J, Parvaiz A (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open emergency resection for colon cancer: an observational propensity score-matched study. World J Surg 37(10):2458–2467CrossRefPubMed Odermatt M, Miskovic D, Siddiqi N, Khan J, Parvaiz A (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open emergency resection for colon cancer: an observational propensity score-matched study. World J Surg 37(10):2458–2467CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
verfasst von
Takeshi Nishikawa
Soichiro Ishihara
Keisuke Hata
Koji Murono
Koji Yasuda
Kensuke Otani
Toshiaki Tanaka
Tomomichi Kiyomatsu
Kazushige Kawai
Hiroaki Nozawa
Hironori Yamaguchi
Toshiaki Watanabe
Publikationsdatum
17.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4921-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.