Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 7/2017

12.12.2016 | Computed Tomography

Should the automatic exposure control system of CT be disabled when scanning patients with endoaortic stents or mechanical heart valves? A phantom study

verfasst von: Giovanni Di Leo, Chiara Spadavecchia, Moreno Zanardo, Francesco Secchi, Ivan Veronese, Marie Claire Cantone, Francesco Sardanelli

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate the impact of endoaortic stents/mechanical heart valves on the output of an automatic exposure control (AEC) system and CT radiation dose.

Methods

In this phantom study, seven stents and two valves were scanned with varying tube voltage (80/100/120 kVp), AEC activation (enabled/disabled) and prosthesis (present/absent), for a total of 540 scans. For each prosthesis, the dose-length product (DLP) was compared between scans with the AEC enabled and disabled. Percentage confidence levels for differences due to the prosthesis were calculated.

Results

Differences between results with the AEC enabled and disabled were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.059). In the comparison with and without the prosthesis, DLP was unchanged at 80 kVp and 100 kVp, while a slight increase was observed at 120 kVp. The radiation dose varied from 1.8 mGy to 2.4 mGy without the prosthesis and from 1.8 mGy to 2.5 mGy with the prosthesis (confidence level 37–100%).

Conclusions

The effect of the prosthesis on the AEC system was negligible and not clinically relevant. Therefore, disabling the AEC system when scanning these patients is not likely to provide a benefit.

Key points

• CT-AEC system is not impaired in patients with endoaortic prostheses/heart valves.
• Negligible differences may be observed only at 120 kVp.
• Disabling the AEC system in these patients is not recommended.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat No authors listed (2004) Proceedings of the second ALARA conference. February 28, 2004. Houston, Texas, USA. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S162–S246 No authors listed (2004) Proceedings of the second ALARA conference. February 28, 2004. Houston, Texas, USA. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S162–S246
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad KN, Cole WC, Haase GM (2004) Radiation protection in humans: extending the concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage. Br J Radiol 77:97–99CrossRefPubMed Prasad KN, Cole WC, Haase GM (2004) Radiation protection in humans: extending the concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage. Br J Radiol 77:97–99CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ et al (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 28:1451–1459CrossRefPubMed Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ et al (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 28:1451–1459CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26:503–512CrossRefPubMed McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26:503–512CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizzo SMR, Kalra MK, Maher MM, Blake MA, Toth TL, Saini S (2005) Do metallic endoprostheses increase radiation dose associated with automatic tube-current modulation in abdominal-pelvic MDCT? A phantom and patient study. Am J Roentgenol 184:491–496CrossRef Rizzo SMR, Kalra MK, Maher MM, Blake MA, Toth TL, Saini S (2005) Do metallic endoprostheses increase radiation dose associated with automatic tube-current modulation in abdominal-pelvic MDCT? A phantom and patient study. Am J Roentgenol 184:491–496CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ et al (2010) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20:1–15CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ et al (2010) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20:1–15CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Should the automatic exposure control system of CT be disabled when scanning patients with endoaortic stents or mechanical heart valves? A phantom study
verfasst von
Giovanni Di Leo
Chiara Spadavecchia
Moreno Zanardo
Francesco Secchi
Ivan Veronese
Marie Claire Cantone
Francesco Sardanelli
Publikationsdatum
12.12.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4676-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

European Radiology 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.