Yasushi Toh and Hiroyuki Yamamoto equally contributed to this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
It remains unknown how much institutional medical structure and process of implementation of clinical practice guidelines for esophageal cancers can improve quality of surgical outcome in Japan.
A web-based questionnaire survey was performed for departments registered in the National Clinical Database in Japan from October 2014 to January 2015. Quality indicators (QIs) including structure and process indicators (clinical practice guideline adherence) were evaluated on the risk-adjusted odds ratio for operative mortality (AOR) of the patients using registered cases in the database who underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction in 2013 and 2014.
Among 916 departments which registered at least one esophagectomy case during the study period, 454 departments (49.6%) responded to the questionnaire. Analyses of 6661 cases revealed that two structure QIs (certification of training hospitals by Japan Esophageal Society and presence of board-certified esophageal surgeons) were associated with significantly lower AOR (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). One highly recommended process QI regarding preoperative chemotherapy had strong tendency to associate with lower AOR (p = 0.053). In two process QIs, the answer “performed at the doctor’s discretion” showed a significant negative impact on prognosis, suggesting importance of institutional uniformity.
The medical institutional structure of board-certified training sites for esophageal surgeons and of participation of board-certified esophageal surgeons improves surgical outcome in Japan. Establishment of appropriate QIs and their uniform implementation would be crucial for future quality improvement of medical care in esophagectomy.
Nakayama T, Imanaka Y, Okuno Y, et al. Analysis of the evidence-practice gap to facilitate proper medical care for the elderly: investigation, using databases, of utilization measures for National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB). Environ Health Prev Med. 2017;22:51. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(Suppl):166–206. CrossRef
Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hashimoto H, et al. Challenges and prospects of a clinical database linked to the board certification system. Surg Today. 2014;44:1991–9. CrossRef
Gotoh M, Miyata H, Hashimoto H, et al. National Clinical Database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency. Surg Today. 2016;46:38–47. CrossRef
Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66. CrossRef
Takahashi AHN, Miyata H, Ono M, Gotoh M, Iwanaka T. A detailed report looked through a large clinical registry; how they enter the data; how they carry their practice. Geka. 2016;78:285–97.
Tatematsu N, Hasegawa S, Tanaka E, Sakai Y, Tsuboyama T. Impact of oesophagectomy on physical fitness and health-related quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2013;22:308–13. CrossRef
Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14:1–36. CrossRef
Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th edition: part II and III. Esophagus. 2017;14:37–65. CrossRef
- Significance of the board-certified surgeon systems and clinical practice guideline adherence to surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in Japan: a questionnaire survey of departments registered in the National Clinical Database
- Springer Singapore
Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin
Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Inneren Medizin
Mail Icon II