The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-017-9571-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Level of Evidence: Level III: Therapeutic Study
In an effort to control cost and increase value, Medicare is transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based alternative payment models (APMs). The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative represents one such voluntary APM. BPCI offers four different bundling options: model 1 covers all Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) and Models 2–4 cover 48 clinical episodes, including 186 separate DRGs.
The purpose of this investigation is to analyze and compare the cost savings achieved by two different BPCI program participants, provider A and provider B, enrolled in different models of BPCI (Models 2 and 3) for lower extremity joint replacements (LEJRs).
We analyzed the BPCI cost savings for Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) 469 and 470 (lower extremity joint replacement) of two different BPCI program participants. One (provider A) participated in Model 2 while the other (provider B) participated in Model 3. Retrospective payments were based upon savings generated by decreased actual expenses reconciled against target pricing for the episode of care in Models 2 and 3.
The Model 2 participant reduced the average cost of all episodes by 18.45%, with all of the savings occurring in the post acute phase. The Model 3 participant reduced episode costs by 16.73%.
Both BPCI providers achieved similar cost savings despite participating in different BPCI models. These cost savings all occurred in the post acute setting. The Model 2 provider achieved post acute savings through decreasing overall discharges to institutional post acute care (PAC) providers and decreasing readmissions, while the Model 3 provider decreased costs largely by decreasing the LOS for the institutional PAC providers and decreasing readmissions.
Keehan, S. P., J. A. Poisal, G. A. Cuckler, A. M. Sisko, S. D. Smith, A. J. Madison, D. A. Stone, C. J. Wolfe and J. M. Lizonitz (2016). National Health Expenditure Projections, 2015-25: Economy, Prices, And Aging Expected To Shape Spending And Enrollment. Health Aff (Millwood). doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0459.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Health Care Payment Learning and Action Network. [13 July 2016]; Available from: https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/Health-Care-Payment-Learning-and-Action-Network/.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative: General Information. [19 July 2016]; Available from: http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/bundled-payments/index.html.
The Lewin Group (2015). CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative Models 2-4: Year 1 Evaluation & Monitoring Annual Report. Prepared for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Slover, J. D., Mullaly, K. A., Payne, A., Iorio, R., & Bosco, J. (2016). What Is the Best Strategy to Minimize After-Care Costs for Total Joint Arthroplasty in a Bundled Payment Environment? J Arthroplasty 31(12):2710-2713. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.024.
Clair, A. J., Evangelista, P. J., Lajam, C. M., Slover, J. D., Bosco, J. A., & Iorio, R. (2016). Cost Analysis of Total Joint Arthroplasty Readmissions in a Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative. J Arthroplasty. 31(9):1862-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.029.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model. [01 August 2016]; Available from: https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/CJR.
- Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3
BS, BA Allyson Alfonso
MPA Lorraine Hutzler
MD Bill Robb
CEBS Chad Beste
PT, STC André Blom
MD Joseph Bosco
- Springer US
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II