Erschienen in:
06.02.2020
Simulation training for the endoscopic management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide survey of rural surgeons’ needs and preferences analysis
verfasst von:
Shawn M. Purnell, Daniel J. Vargo, Michael Sarap, John J. Nguyen-Lee, Chelsea Allen, Brian J. Dunkin
Erschienen in:
Surgical Endoscopy
|
Ausgabe 1/2021
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Published needs analyses of rural surgeons have identified a need for training in the endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). The study aim was to survey rural surgeons regarding their requirements and preferences for a simulation model on which they could rehearse the endoscopic management of NVUGIB.
Methods
Rural surgeons were contacted via the American College of Surgery Advisory Council listserv and invited to complete an online survey.
Results
A total of 66 responses were received, representing all 4 US regional divisions. Seventy-seven percent of respondents perform > 100 endoscopy cases per year. A majority have no experience with simulation models (77%), citing cost, time, and access to training courses as the three most limiting factors. Thirty-three percent lacked confidence in managing UGIBs, and 73% were interested in receiving additional training. Preference analysis revealed that respondents preferred a portable simulation model (81%) that costs between $500 and $1000 (46%), and requires 1–2 weeks of training (34%). Verbal feedback from an expert was viewed as the most helpful type of feedback (61%).
Conclusion
Rural surgeons frequently perform flexible endoscopy in their practice and are interested in further training for the endoscopic management of NVUGIB. These results will be used to develop a simulation platform for training in the endoscopic management of NVUGIB that meets rural surgeons’ needs.