ALK rearrangements in patients with NSCLC are highly sensitive to crizotinib treatment [
18]. As first-line treatment, crizotinib has an ORR of 74% and the median PFS is 10.9 months [
6]. Therefore, identification of appropriate patients with reliable detection methods is important for targeted therapy. Previous studies have demonstrated that VENTANA IHC is a highly sensitive and specific assay for detection of ALK gene status, and is a feasible alternative to the
ALK FISH assay [
19‐
21]. RT-PCR is an alternative method that is rapid and convenient to perform [
22]; however, the requirement of fresh frozen tissue samples for extracting RNA by the RT-PCR assay has limited its application in clinical practice. In the current study, we compared VENTANA IHC with the RT-PCR assay to detect
ALK rearrangements and report for the first time the response and survival of crizotinib for Chinese patients with
EML4-
ALK positive advanced NSCLC detected by VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR. In the enrolled 1720 patients, we identified 10.27% (172/1674) patients had ALK positive by VENTANA IHC method, 12.73% (41/322) patients had
ALK rearrangements by RT-PCR method, and 9.42% (26/276) patients were both positive by VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR. It has been reported that
ALK rearrangements range from 2 to 7% among unselected Caucasian NSCLC patients [
23,
24]. The frequency has been reported to be as high as 5–10% and is higher in the Asian population [
25‐
27]. The frequency of detection by RT-PCR in the current study was higher than VENTNANA IHC. Rosell et al. [
28] showed that RT-PCR detected more cases with the
EML4-
ALK fusion gene (12.5%) than IHC (6.7%) among 200 NSCLC patients, and based on routine examination by the two techniques, the
EML4-
ALK rearrangements can be detected more frequently by RT-PCR. The VENTANA IHC assay is performed routinely in most surgical pathology practices and IHC has been demonstrated as a reliable pre-screening test for detecting lung cancer in clinical practice. In addition, we observed an ORR of 59.09%, DCR of 80.30%, and median PFS of 9.0 months in 66 ALK-positive patients. The ORR was 65.90% and the DCR was 86.36% in the 44 patients in whom an
ALK translocation was confirmed by VETNANA IHC. The ORR was 55.88% and the DCR was 76.47% by RT-PCR in 34 ALK-positive patients. The median PFS of VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR was 8.5 and 9.2 months, respectively (p = 0.630). Although our study included first-, second-, and later-line crizotinib therapy, the median PFS was within the range of 7.7–10.9 months, as reported in relevant clinical trials [
6,
10,
29]. Interestingly, we also observed responses to crizotinib in two patients who had positive ALK fusion by VENTANA IHC, but not by RT-PCR. Another case which was ALK-positive by RT-PCR, but negative by VENTANA IHC, did not show a good response to crizotinib treatment. Therefore, VENTANA IHC is a rapid and relatively inexpensive method for diagnosing
ALK-rearranged NSCLC. RT-PCR may be highly sensitive, but the specificity of RT-PCR as a screening tool is likely to be extremely high and low abundance results accompanied other genes may occur with this highly sensitive technique [
28]. The application of VENTANA IHC is more moderate than RT-PCR as a screening method to detect ALK status in clinical practice and patients could benefit from crizotinib more so than RT-PCR.
In the current study, there were six patients with ALK VENTANA IHC-positive and RT-PCR-negative, demonstrating
ALK rearrangement revealed by NGS. Another 6 patients who had primary resistance to crizotinib therapy were also analyzed by NGS. Our results suggest that 4 patients were identified to have
EML4-
ALK variants, including E6; A20, E13; A20, E14; A20, and E18; A20. Two patients were identified to have non-
EML4-
ALK fusions; one patient with a
KCL1-
ALK fusion, which had been previously reported in the literature [
30], and one patient with a
FBXO36-
ALK fusion who received crizotinib therapy with a PFS of 21.2 months and an OS of > 46.7 months. NGS revealed a new ALK partner gene,
FBXO36, which is the first report in NSCLC worldwide, and it has good response to crizotinib. Currently, developments in NGS have created a new method for the simultaneous detection of a large number of gene fusions with known and unknown genes and gene mutations [
12,
14,
15]. Pekar-Zlotin et al. [
12] reported a 42.9% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity for
ALK FISH when compared to NGS DNA-based platform for the detection of
ALK gene rearrangements. Dacic et al. [
31] also demonstrated significant concordance between IHC and NGS in cases discordant between NGS and FISH. VENTANA IHC detects ALK expression for
ALK fusion genes independent of variant and fusion partners. Therefore, the VENTANA IHC method is highly recommended in routine pathologic diagnosis.
Although our results are significant, we recognize that there are limitations to the study. First, a major limitation was the retrospective design. Second, because of insufficient samples or DNA, we did not assess all tissues by VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR.