Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2021

17.03.2020 | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Single- and multi-site pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact on device longevity and therapy cost

verfasst von: Antonio D’Onofrio, Matteo Bertini, Tommaso Infusino, Girolamo D’Arienzo, Laura Cipolletta, Valter Bianchi, Giovanni Licciardello, Gianluca Savarese, Giovanni Russo, Danilo Ricciardi, Michele Manzo, Francesca Fabbri, Pasquale Notarstefano, Luca Santini, Monica Campari, Sergio Valsecchi, Giovanni Battista Forleo

Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Multiple left ventricular pacing strategies have been suggested for improving response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, these programming strategies may sometimes entail accepting configurations with high pacing threshold and accelerated battery drain. We assessed the feasibility of predefined pacing programming protocols, and we evaluated their impact on device longevity and their cost-impact.

Methods

We estimated battery longevity in 167 CRT-D patients based on measured pacing parameters according to multiple alternative programming strategies: single-site pacing associated with lowest threshold, non-apical location, longest interventricular delay, and pacing from two electrodes. To determine the economic impact of each programming strategy, we applied the results of a model-based cost analysis using a 15-year time horizon.

Results

Selecting the electrode with the lowest threshold resulted in a median device longevity of 11.5 years. Non-apical pacing and interventricular delay maximization were feasible in most patients and were obtained at the price of a few months of battery life. Device longevity of > 10 years was preserved in 87% of cases of non-apical pacing and in 77% on pacing at the longest interventricular delay. The mean reduction in battery life when the second electrode was activated was 1.5 years. Single-site pacing strategies increased the therapy cost by 4–6%, and multi-site pacing by 12–13%, in comparison with the lowest-cost scenario.

Conclusions

Modern CRT-D systems ensure effective pacing and allow multiple optimization strategies for maximizing service life or for enhancing effectiveness. Single- or multi-site pacing strategies can be implemented without compromising device service life and at an acceptable increase in therapy cost.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European heart rhythm association (EHRA). Europace. 2013;15:1070–118.CrossRef European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European heart rhythm association (EHRA). Europace. 2013;15:1070–118.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, Dresing T, Starling RC, Wilkoff BL, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–73.CrossRef Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, Dresing T, Starling RC, Wilkoff BL, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–73.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh JP, Klein HU, Huang DT, Reek S, Kuniss M, Quesada A, et al. Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Circulation. 2011;123:1159–66.CrossRef Singh JP, Klein HU, Huang DT, Reek S, Kuniss M, Quesada A, et al. Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Circulation. 2011;123:1159–66.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Onofrio A, Botto G, Mantica M, La Rosa C, Occhetta E, Verlato R, et al. The interventricular conduction time is associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: interventricular electrical delay. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5067–8.CrossRef D'Onofrio A, Botto G, Mantica M, La Rosa C, Occhetta E, Verlato R, et al. The interventricular conduction time is associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: interventricular electrical delay. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5067–8.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, Ellenbogen KA, Yu Y, Meyer TE, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2516–24.CrossRef Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, Ellenbogen KA, Yu Y, Meyer TE, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2516–24.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertini M, Mele D, Malagù M, Fiorencis A, Toselli T, Casadei F, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:1375–82.CrossRef Bertini M, Mele D, Malagù M, Fiorencis A, Toselli T, Casadei F, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:1375–82.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilton SB, Shibata MA, Sondergaard R, Cowan K, Semeniuk L, Exner DV. Relationship between left ventricular lead position using a simple radiographic classification scheme and long-term outcome with resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;23:219–27.CrossRef Wilton SB, Shibata MA, Sondergaard R, Cowan K, Semeniuk L, Exner DV. Relationship between left ventricular lead position using a simple radiographic classification scheme and long-term outcome with resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;23:219–27.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilton SB, Exner DV, Healey JS, Birnie D, Arnold MO, Sapp JL, et al. Left ventricular lead position and outcomes in the resynchronization-defibrillation for ambulatory heart failure trial (RAFT). Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:413–9.CrossRef Wilton SB, Exner DV, Healey JS, Birnie D, Arnold MO, Sapp JL, et al. Left ventricular lead position and outcomes in the resynchronization-defibrillation for ambulatory heart failure trial (RAFT). Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:413–9.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Biffi M, Bertini M, Ziacchi M, Gardini B, Mazzotti A, Massaro G, et al. Management of phrenic stimulation in CRT patients over the long term: still an unmet need ? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:1201–8.CrossRef Biffi M, Bertini M, Ziacchi M, Gardini B, Mazzotti A, Massaro G, et al. Management of phrenic stimulation in CRT patients over the long term: still an unmet need ? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:1201–8.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stabile G, D'Onofrio A, Pepi P, De Simone A, Santamaria M, Caico SI, et al. Interlead anatomic and electrical distance predict outcome in CRT patients. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2221–9.CrossRef Stabile G, D'Onofrio A, Pepi P, De Simone A, Santamaria M, Caico SI, et al. Interlead anatomic and electrical distance predict outcome in CRT patients. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2221–9.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Boriani G, Merino J, Wright DJ, Gadler F, Schaer B, Landolina M. Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA. Europace. 2018;20:1882–97.CrossRef Boriani G, Merino J, Wright DJ, Gadler F, Schaer B, Landolina M. Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA. Europace. 2018;20:1882–97.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pappone C, Ćalović Ž, Vicedomini G, Cuko A, McSpadden LC, Ryu K, et al. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:394–401.CrossRef Pappone C, Ćalović Ž, Vicedomini G, Cuko A, McSpadden LC, Ryu K, et al. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:394–401.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Deharo JC, Leyva F, Lubinski A, Lazzaro C. Impact of extending device longevity on the long-term costs of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a modelling study with a 15-year time horizon. Europace. 2013;15:1453–62.CrossRef Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Deharo JC, Leyva F, Lubinski A, Lazzaro C. Impact of extending device longevity on the long-term costs of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a modelling study with a 15-year time horizon. Europace. 2013;15:1453–62.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Forleo GB, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, Molfetta AD, Santini L, Romeo F. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:31–7.CrossRef Forleo GB, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, Molfetta AD, Santini L, Romeo F. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:31–7.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Forleo GB, Mantica M, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, et al. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1822–8.CrossRef Forleo GB, Mantica M, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, et al. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1822–8.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Mantica M, Parisi Q, Martino A, et al. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;42:59–66.CrossRef Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Mantica M, Parisi Q, Martino A, et al. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;42:59–66.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Bharmi R, Dalal N, Panattoni G, Pollastrelli A, et al. Hospitalization rates and associated cost analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator and quadripolar vs bipolar left ventricular leads: a comparative effectiveness study. Europace. 2015;17:101–7.CrossRef Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Bharmi R, Dalal N, Panattoni G, Pollastrelli A, et al. Hospitalization rates and associated cost analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator and quadripolar vs bipolar left ventricular leads: a comparative effectiveness study. Europace. 2015;17:101–7.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittal S, Nair D, Padanilam BJ, Ciuffo A, Gupta N, Gallagher P, et al. Performance of anatomically designed Quadripolar left ventricular leads: results from the NAVIGATE X4 clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1199–205.CrossRef Mittal S, Nair D, Padanilam BJ, Ciuffo A, Gupta N, Gallagher P, et al. Performance of anatomically designed Quadripolar left ventricular leads: results from the NAVIGATE X4 clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1199–205.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Philippon F, Liu L, Fung JW, Deharo JC, Anselme F, Delnoy PP, et al. Left ventricular three-dimensional quadripolar lead acute clinical study: the LILAC study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:438–47.CrossRef Philippon F, Liu L, Fung JW, Deharo JC, Anselme F, Delnoy PP, et al. Left ventricular three-dimensional quadripolar lead acute clinical study: the LILAC study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:438–47.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mele D, Nardozza M, Malagù M, Leonetti E, Fragale C, Rondinella A, et al. Left ventricular Lead position guided by parametric strain echocardiography improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:1001–11.CrossRef Mele D, Nardozza M, Malagù M, Leonetti E, Fragale C, Rondinella A, et al. Left ventricular Lead position guided by parametric strain echocardiography improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:1001–11.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Thébault C, Donal E, Meunier C, Gervais R, Gerritse B, Gold MR, et al. Sites of left and right ventricular lead implantation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy observations from the REVERSE trial. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2662–71.CrossRef Thébault C, Donal E, Meunier C, Gervais R, Gerritse B, Gold MR, et al. Sites of left and right ventricular lead implantation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy observations from the REVERSE trial. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2662–71.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinaldi CA, Burri H, Thibault B, Curnis A, Rao A, Gras D, et al. A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2015;17:7–17.CrossRef Rinaldi CA, Burri H, Thibault B, Curnis A, Rao A, Gras D, et al. A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2015;17:7–17.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Forleo GB, Santini L, Giammaria M, Potenza D, Curnis A, Calabrese V, et al. Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP). Europace. 2017;19:1170–7.CrossRef Forleo GB, Santini L, Giammaria M, Potenza D, Curnis A, Calabrese V, et al. Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP). Europace. 2017;19:1170–7.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Thibault B, Dubuc M, Khairy P, Guerra PG, Macle L, Rivard L, et al. Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. Europace. 2013;15:984–91.CrossRef Thibault B, Dubuc M, Khairy P, Guerra PG, Macle L, Rivard L, et al. Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. Europace. 2013;15:984–91.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Landolina M, Curnis A, Morani G, Vado A, Ammendola E, D'onofrio A, et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy in current clinical practice: an analysis according to influencing factors, device generation, and manufacturer. Europace. 2015;17:1251–8.CrossRef Landolina M, Curnis A, Morani G, Vado A, Ammendola E, D'onofrio A, et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy in current clinical practice: an analysis according to influencing factors, device generation, and manufacturer. Europace. 2015;17:1251–8.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat von Gunten S, Schaer BA, Yap SC, Szili-Torok T, Kühne M, Sticherling C, et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a comparison among manufacturers and over time. Europace. 2016;18(5):710–7.CrossRef von Gunten S, Schaer BA, Yap SC, Szili-Torok T, Kühne M, Sticherling C, et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a comparison among manufacturers and over time. Europace. 2016;18(5):710–7.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Boriani G, Ritter P, Biffi M, Ziacchi M, Diemberger I, Martignani C, et al. Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverter-defibrillators: an analysis from a remote monitoring database. Europace. 2016;18:1366–73.CrossRef Boriani G, Ritter P, Biffi M, Ziacchi M, Diemberger I, Martignani C, et al. Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverter-defibrillators: an analysis from a remote monitoring database. Europace. 2016;18:1366–73.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauser RG. The growing mismatch between patient longevity and the service life of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2022–5.CrossRef Hauser RG. The growing mismatch between patient longevity and the service life of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2022–5.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Akerström F, Narváez I, Puchol A, Pachón M, Martín-Sierra C, Rodríguez-Mañero M, et al. Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice. Europace. 2018;20:1161–7.CrossRef Akerström F, Narváez I, Puchol A, Pachón M, Martín-Sierra C, Rodríguez-Mañero M, et al. Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice. Europace. 2018;20:1161–7.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Landolina M, Morani G, Curnis A, Vado A, D'Onofrio A, Bianchi V, et al. The economic impact of battery longevity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the hospital and healthcare system perspectives. Europace. 2017;19(8):1349–56.CrossRef Landolina M, Morani G, Curnis A, Vado A, D'Onofrio A, Bianchi V, et al. The economic impact of battery longevity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the hospital and healthcare system perspectives. Europace. 2017;19(8):1349–56.CrossRef
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Gadler F, Ding Y, Verin N, Bergius M, Miller JD, Lenhart GM, et al. Economic impact of longer battery life of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in Sweden. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:657–66.CrossRef Gadler F, Ding Y, Verin N, Bergius M, Miller JD, Lenhart GM, et al. Economic impact of longer battery life of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in Sweden. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:657–66.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Single- and multi-site pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact on device longevity and therapy cost
verfasst von
Antonio D’Onofrio
Matteo Bertini
Tommaso Infusino
Girolamo D’Arienzo
Laura Cipolletta
Valter Bianchi
Giovanni Licciardello
Gianluca Savarese
Giovanni Russo
Danilo Ricciardi
Michele Manzo
Francesca Fabbri
Pasquale Notarstefano
Luca Santini
Monica Campari
Sergio Valsecchi
Giovanni Battista Forleo
Publikationsdatum
17.03.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00711-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.