Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2016

18.08.2016 | Original Article

Single-Center Experience on Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score 40 Patients

verfasst von: Georgios C. Sotiropoulos, Spyridon Vernadakis, Andreas Paul, Dieter P. Hoyer, Fuat H. Saner, Anja Gallinat

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Organ shortage and waiting list mortality have led to changes in the allocation policy in Eurotransplant.

Aim

To identify factors influencing the survival of liver transplanted patients with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 40.

Patients and Methods

Data of listed adult patients who reached a MELD score 40 in the period 12/2006–06/2010 were reviewed. Donor/graft and recipient characteristics, and operative details were analyzed. Statistical analysis encompassed Kaplan–Meier analysis/log-rank test as well as univariate and multivariable regression analyses.

Results

Forty-eight patients achieved a MELD score 40. Thirty patients were transplanted, whereas 18 patients were not. Three-month, 1-year, and 5-year patient and graft survival for transplanted patients was 53, 50, and 47 %, respectively. Three-month and 1-year survival after listing was 11 and 6 % for not transplanted patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed pre-operative dialysis (p = 0.0246) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (p = 0.0231) to be independent prognostic factors for post-transplant patient survival. A point scoring system was created, which reached statistical significance (p = 0.0007). One-year and 5-year survival for scores 0, 1, and 2 were 72 and 64, 42 and 42 and 0 %, respectively. There was no statistical difference in transplantation costs between patients who survived or died (p = 0.1578).

Conclusions

At our center, coexistence of pre-operative dialysis and PVT represents a clear contraindication for LT regarding MELD score 40 patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33:464–470.CrossRefPubMed Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33:464–470.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry K, Ioannou GN. Comparison of liver transplant-related survival benefit in patients with vs without hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:669–680.CrossRefPubMed Berry K, Ioannou GN. Comparison of liver transplant-related survival benefit in patients with vs without hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:669–680.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Benckert C, Quante M, Thelen A, et al. Impact of the MELD allocation after its implementation in liver transplantation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:941–948.CrossRefPubMed Benckert C, Quante M, Thelen A, et al. Impact of the MELD allocation after its implementation in liver transplantation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:941–948.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dutkowski P, Oberkofler CE, Béchir M, et al. The model for end-stage liver disease allocation system for liver transplantation saves lives, but increases morbidity and cost: a prospective outcome analysis. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:674–684.CrossRefPubMed Dutkowski P, Oberkofler CE, Béchir M, et al. The model for end-stage liver disease allocation system for liver transplantation saves lives, but increases morbidity and cost: a prospective outcome analysis. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:674–684.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouygues V, Compagnon P, Latournerie M, et al. MELD-based graft allocation system fails to improve liver transplantation efficacy in a single-center intent-to-treat analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012;36:464–472.CrossRefPubMed Bouygues V, Compagnon P, Latournerie M, et al. MELD-based graft allocation system fails to improve liver transplantation efficacy in a single-center intent-to-treat analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012;36:464–472.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:91–96.CrossRefPubMed Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:91–96.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Weismüller TJ, Fikatas P, Schmidt J, et al. Multicentric evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation and survival after liver transplantation in Germany—limitations of the ‘sickest first’-concept. Transpl Int. 2011;24:91–99.CrossRefPubMed Weismüller TJ, Fikatas P, Schmidt J, et al. Multicentric evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation and survival after liver transplantation in Germany—limitations of the ‘sickest first’-concept. Transpl Int. 2011;24:91–99.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittermann T, Makar G, Goldberg DS. Early post-transplant survival: interaction of MELD score and hospitalization status. J Hepatol. 2015;63:601–608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bittermann T, Makar G, Goldberg DS. Early post-transplant survival: interaction of MELD score and hospitalization status. J Hepatol. 2015;63:601–608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Foxton MR, Al-Freah MA, Portal AJ, et al. Increased model for end-stage liver disease score at the time of liver transplant results in prolonged hospitalization and overall intensive care unit costs. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:668–677.PubMed Foxton MR, Al-Freah MA, Portal AJ, et al. Increased model for end-stage liver disease score at the time of liver transplant results in prolonged hospitalization and overall intensive care unit costs. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:668–677.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki H, Bartlett AS, Muiesan P, Jassem W, Rela M, Heaton N. High model for end-stage liver disease score as a predictor of survival during long-term follow-up after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:384–388.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki H, Bartlett AS, Muiesan P, Jassem W, Rela M, Heaton N. High model for end-stage liver disease score as a predictor of survival during long-term follow-up after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:384–388.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Selzner M, Kashfi A, Cattral MS, et al. Live donor liver transplantation in high MELD score recipients. Ann Surg. 2010;251:153–157.CrossRefPubMed Selzner M, Kashfi A, Cattral MS, et al. Live donor liver transplantation in high MELD score recipients. Ann Surg. 2010;251:153–157.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yi NJ, Suh KS, Lee HW, et al. Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:496–503.CrossRefPubMed Yi NJ, Suh KS, Lee HW, et al. Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:496–503.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Klinzing S, Brandi G, Stehberger PA, Raptis DA, Béchir M. The combination of MELD score and ICG liver testing predicts length of stay in the ICU and hospital mortality in liver transplant recipients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klinzing S, Brandi G, Stehberger PA, Raptis DA, Béchir M. The combination of MELD score and ICG liver testing predicts length of stay in the ICU and hospital mortality in liver transplant recipients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Marotta P, Wall WJ, et al. Should a lower quality organ go to the least sick patient? Model for end-stage liver disease score and donor risk index as predictors of early allograft dysfunction. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:1303–1306.CrossRefPubMed Croome KP, Marotta P, Wall WJ, et al. Should a lower quality organ go to the least sick patient? Model for end-stage liver disease score and donor risk index as predictors of early allograft dysfunction. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:1303–1306.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon KS, Chen TH, Jeng LB, et al. A high model for end-stage liver disease score should not be considered a contraindication to living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:316–319.CrossRefPubMed Poon KS, Chen TH, Jeng LB, et al. A high model for end-stage liver disease score should not be considered a contraindication to living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:316–319.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaltenborn A, Hartmann C, Salinas R, et al. Risk factors for short- and long-term mortality in liver transplant recipients with MELD score ≥30. Ann Transplant. 2015;20:59–69.CrossRefPubMed Kaltenborn A, Hartmann C, Salinas R, et al. Risk factors for short- and long-term mortality in liver transplant recipients with MELD score ≥30. Ann Transplant. 2015;20:59–69.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauchfuss F, Zidan A, Scheuerlein H, Dittmar Y, Bauschke A, Settmacher U. Waiting time, not donor-risk-index, is a major determinant for beneficial outcome after liver transplantation in high-MELD patients. Ann Transplant. 2013;18:243–247.CrossRefPubMed Rauchfuss F, Zidan A, Scheuerlein H, Dittmar Y, Bauschke A, Settmacher U. Waiting time, not donor-risk-index, is a major determinant for beneficial outcome after liver transplantation in high-MELD patients. Ann Transplant. 2013;18:243–247.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yerdel MA, Gunson B, Mirza D, et al. Portal vein thrombosis in adults undergoing liver transplantation: risk factors, screening, management, and outcome. Transplantation. 2000;69:1873–1881.CrossRefPubMed Yerdel MA, Gunson B, Mirza D, et al. Portal vein thrombosis in adults undergoing liver transplantation: risk factors, screening, management, and outcome. Transplantation. 2000;69:1873–1881.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Olthoff KM, Kulik L, Samstein B, Kaminski M, et al. Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:943–949.CrossRefPubMed Olthoff KM, Kulik L, Samstein B, Kaminski M, et al. Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:943–949.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Englesbe MJ, Schaubel DE, Cai S, Guidinger MK, Merion RM. Portal vein thrombosis and liver transplant survival benefit. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:999–1005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Englesbe MJ, Schaubel DE, Cai S, Guidinger MK, Merion RM. Portal vein thrombosis and liver transplant survival benefit. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:999–1005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat John BV, Konjeti R, Aggarwal A, et al. Impact of untreated portal vein thrombosis on pre and post liver transplant outcomes in cirrhosis. Ann Hepatol. 2013;12:952–958.PubMed John BV, Konjeti R, Aggarwal A, et al. Impact of untreated portal vein thrombosis on pre and post liver transplant outcomes in cirrhosis. Ann Hepatol. 2013;12:952–958.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexopoulos S, Matsuoka L, Cho Y, et al. Outcomes after liver transplantation in patients achieving a model for end-stage liver disease score of 40 or higher. Transplantation. 2013;95:507–512.CrossRefPubMed Alexopoulos S, Matsuoka L, Cho Y, et al. Outcomes after liver transplantation in patients achieving a model for end-stage liver disease score of 40 or higher. Transplantation. 2013;95:507–512.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrowsky H, Rana A, Kaldas FM, et al. Liver transplantation in highest acuity recipients: identifying factors to avoid futility. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1186–1194.CrossRefPubMed Petrowsky H, Rana A, Kaldas FM, et al. Liver transplantation in highest acuity recipients: identifying factors to avoid futility. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1186–1194.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Panchal HJ, Durinka JB, Patterson J, et al. Survival outcomes in liver transplant recipients with model for end-stage liver disease scores of 40 or higher: a decade-long experience. HPB. 2015;17:1074–1084.CrossRefPubMed Panchal HJ, Durinka JB, Patterson J, et al. Survival outcomes in liver transplant recipients with model for end-stage liver disease scores of 40 or higher: a decade-long experience. HPB. 2015;17:1074–1084.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardoso FS, Karvellas CJ, Kneteman NM, Meeberg G, Fidalgo P, Bagshaw SM. Postoperative resource utilization and survival among liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥40: a retrospective cohort study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;29:185–191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cardoso FS, Karvellas CJ, Kneteman NM, Meeberg G, Fidalgo P, Bagshaw SM. Postoperative resource utilization and survival among liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥40: a retrospective cohort study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;29:185–191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nekrasov V, Matsuoka L, Rauf M, et al. National outcomes of liver transplantation for MELD ≥40: the impact of share 35. Am J Transplant. 2016. doi:10.1111/ajt.13823.PubMed Nekrasov V, Matsuoka L, Rauf M, et al. National outcomes of liver transplantation for MELD ≥40: the impact of share 35. Am J Transplant. 2016. doi:10.​1111/​ajt.​13823.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Delmonico FL, Jenkins RL, Freeman R, et al. The high-risk liver allograft recipient. Should allocation policy consider outcome? Arch Surg. 1992;127:579–584.CrossRefPubMed Delmonico FL, Jenkins RL, Freeman R, et al. The high-risk liver allograft recipient. Should allocation policy consider outcome? Arch Surg. 1992;127:579–584.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Merion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, Freeman RB, Port FK, Wolfe RA. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:307–313.CrossRefPubMed Merion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, Freeman RB, Port FK, Wolfe RA. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:307–313.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Vitale A, Morales RR, Zanus G, et al. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging and transplant survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:654–662.CrossRefPubMed Vitale A, Morales RR, Zanus G, et al. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging and transplant survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:654–662.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sotiropoulos GC. Survival benefit in hepatocellular carcinoma: when an innovative transplant strategy might benefit oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:611–612.CrossRefPubMed Sotiropoulos GC. Survival benefit in hepatocellular carcinoma: when an innovative transplant strategy might benefit oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:611–612.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gleisner AL, Muñoz A, Brandao A, et al. Survival benefit of liver transplantation and the effect of underlying liver disease. Surgery. 2010;147:392–404.CrossRefPubMed Gleisner AL, Muñoz A, Brandao A, et al. Survival benefit of liver transplantation and the effect of underlying liver disease. Surgery. 2010;147:392–404.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Single-Center Experience on Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score 40 Patients
verfasst von
Georgios C. Sotiropoulos
Spyridon Vernadakis
Andreas Paul
Dieter P. Hoyer
Fuat H. Saner
Anja Gallinat
Publikationsdatum
18.08.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4274-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Stanford Multidisciplinary Seminars

Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis: Got Stones?

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.