Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Cancer 1/2019

Open Access 01.12.2019 | Research article

Single dose of dexamethasone is not associated with postoperative recurrence and mortality in breast cancer patients: a propensity-matched cohort study

verfasst von: Myoung Hwa Kim, Dong Wook Kim, Seho Park, Joo Heung Kim, Ki Young Lee, Jisung Hwang, Young Chul Yoo

Erschienen in: BMC Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2019

Abstract

Background

Dexamethasone is widely used in cancer patients despite the concern that perioperative glucocorticoids may potentially cause immunosuppression. However, studies on the influence of dexamethasone on cancer recurrence after curative surgery have produced conflicting results. The goal of our study was to compare postoperative recurrence-free survival and overall survival between patients with breast cancer who received perioperative dexamethasone and those who did not.

Methods

The medical records of 2729 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery between November 2005 and December 2010 were reviewed. These patients were followed up until December 2015. The patients were categorised according whether they received a single dose of intravenous dexamethasone perioperatively or not. Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate any associations between dexamethasone usage with postoperative recurrence and mortality. Additionally, we performed a sensitivity test with propensity score matching to adjust for selection bias.

Results

Among the 2628 patients, 236 (8.5%) received perioperative dexamethasone. No increasing risk for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.442; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.969–2.145; P = 0.071) or mortality (HR, 1.256; 95% CI, 0.770–2.047; P = 0.361) after breast cancer surgery were identified in patients who received dexamethasone. Similarly, propensity score matching did not show significant associations in postoperative recurrence (HR, 1.389; 95% CI, 0.904–2.132; P = 0.133) or mortality (HR, 1.506; 95% CI, 0.886–2.561; P = 0.130) in patients who received dexamethasone.

Conclusions

We found that a perioperative single dose of dexamethasone is not associated with increased recurrence or mortality after curative surgery in breast cancer patients.
Abkürzungen
BMI
Body mass index
CI
Confidence interval
ER
Oestrogen receptor
HER
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
HR
Hazard ratio
PR
Progesterone receptor
SD
Standard deviation
TNM
Tumour-node-metastasis

Background

Even though surgery is the best curative option for solid tumours, surgical manipulation still carries a risk of tumour spreading. Even after complete removal, tumour cells released during surgery may eventually lead to recurrence if they escape immune surveillance [13]. It is well known that corticosteroids induce generalized immunosuppression [4], and dexamethasone in particular can significantly suppress lymphokine production and cell proliferation [4], impair natural killer function [5, 6], and promote resistance to apoptosis in tumour cells [7].
However, many anaesthesiologists prefer to administer a single dose of dexamethasone because perioperative administration of this corticosteroid (4–10 mg intravenously) can reduce postoperative nausea/vomiting and surgical pain, and it can also enhance the quality of life during recovery, including the patient’s emotional state and physical independence [8, 9]. Despite its widespread use, there have been few clinical studies evaluating the influence of perioperative dexamethasone on oncological outcomes with conflicting results.
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women and is a leading cause of death globally. Although many studies on the treatment of breast cancer and prevention of postoperative recurrence have been performed, the 10-year survival rate in Western Europe is still 70% [10]. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate how dexamethasone, frequently used in the perioperative period, affects the outcomes of breast cancer, to address concerns about its immunosuppressive properties.

Methods

Subjects

Our protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Hospital Research Ethics Committee of Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System (4-2017-0677). The board waived the requirement for informed consents because this study was retrospective. The data were collected from the electronic medical documents of patients who underwent curative surgery of breast cancer at a tertiary single institution between November 2005 and December 2010. All data were analysed except those of patients who underwent multiple surgeries simultaneously, lacked anaesthesia or surgical information, or received steroid therapy for any reason.

Data collection

Retrieved demographic data of the patients included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, induction agents, anaesthetic agents, and antiemetic agents and analgesics. Dexamethasone was administered perioperatively at the discretion of the anaesthesiologists. We also collected surgical information including the surgical procedure and duration, expressed cellular receptors, tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, tumour type, histological type, and any administered chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Clinicopathological parameters, including levels of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2, were obtained from the registry database. Tumours with ≥1% of their cells exhibiting ER and/or PR staining were considered positive for these receptors. In addition, we used the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria to identify the TNM staging [11]. Local (or regional) metastasis was determined as tumour recurrence in the ipsilateral breast, regional lymph nodes, and/or chest wall. Every 6–12 months, the patients were observed clinically, which included taking a medical history, performing a physical examination, and performing laboratory and imaging tests to detect any cancer relapse. Any recurrence at a distant site, including the contralateral axillary or supraclavicular lymph nodes, was defined as a distant metastasis. Recurrence-free survival was calculated from the date of surgery to the date on which loco-regional or distant metastasis was first detected. The postoperative overall survival was assessed from the first date of curative surgery to the last follow-up date or death from any cause.

Statistical analyses

Patients who received dexamethasone and those who did not were compared using Student’s t-test for continuous variables and the X2 test for categorical variables. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All potential confounders associated with recurrence and mortality after breast cancer surgery, which were chosen based on their clinical significance as reported in the literature were analysed using competing risk and Cox regression analyses, respectively. First, we performed univariate analysis to identify potential risk factors for postoperative recurrence and mortality; those with P-values of < 0.1 were subjected to multivariate analysis, following which hazard ratios (HRs) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Fine and Gray competing risk analysis was performed for the recurrence with death as a competing risk. The univariate associations between dexamethasone usage and overall survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis together with the log-rank test. We also conducted a sensitivity test to assess the robustness of our findings with respect to the relationship between dexamethasone and each of recurrence and mortality, wherein we performed propensity score matching. Variables were adjusted to factors including BMI, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, and the score was calculated with logistic regression. A greedy heuristic algorithm was used to identify the optimally matched groups without drop-outs; this excluded cases with differences exceeding twice the standard deviation (SD) during matching similar propensity scores. As a result, 1-to-5 matching was chosen because it carried the strongest statistical power. All statistical analyses were conducted with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) except for Kaplan-Meier curves, which were constructed using the R package version 3.0.2 (http://​www.​r-project.​org).

Results

Subjects

We collected the data from 2729 patients who underwent surgery following their diagnosis with breast cancer during the study period. Among them, 63 patients who underwent multiple surgeries, 21 with unclear anaesthetic methods, and 17 who received preoperative steroid therapy were excluded. Ultimately, 2628 patients were analysed in our study. The patients were followed up to December 2015. The mean (SD) follow-up period for our study population was 70.1 (23.1) months.

Patients’ demographic data

A comparison of the characteristics of patients who received dexamethasone (N = 236) and those who did not (N = 2392) is shown in Table 1. These two groups had similar baseline demographic data. However, there were significant differences with respect to anaesthetic agent, induction agent, nitric oxide use, antiemetic use, surgical procedure, and chemotherapy/radiotherapy administration between the two groups.
Table 1
Comparison of characteristics between patients who received dexamethasone and those who did not
 
Non-dexamethasone
(N = 2392)
Dexamethasone
(N = 236)
P-value
Demographic data
 Age (years)
50.1 ± 10.3
49.5 ± 9.3
0.418
 BMI (kg m−2)
23.3 ± 3.1
23.4 ± 3.1
0.764
 Comorbidity
  HTN
473 (19.8)
44 (18.6)
0.732
  DM
172 (7.2)
14 (5.9)
0.594
  Cardiac disease
60 (2.5)
4 (1.7)
0.656
  Pulmonary disease
46 (1.9)
6 (2.5)
0.463
  Endocrine disease
109 (4.6)
14 (5.9)
0.332
  Renal disease
16 (0.7)
1 (0.4)
> 0.999
  Liver disease
16 (0.7)
2 (0.8)
0.673
  Neurological disease
40 (1.7)
4 (1.7)
> 0.999
  Others
14 (0.6)
3 (1.3)
0.191
Anaesthetic factors
 Anaesthetic agent
  
0.001
  Volatiles
   Sevoflurane
1461 (61.1)
141 (59.7)
 
   Desflurane
613 (25.6)
47 (19.9)
 
   Isoflurane
242 (10.1)
27 (11.4)
 
   Enflurane
31 (1.3)
10 (4.2)
 
  TIVA
45 (1.9)
11 (4.7)
 
 Induction agents
  
0.029
  Propofol
1856 (77.6)
168 (71.2)
 
  Barbiturate
536 (22.4)
68 (28.8)
 
N2O
176 (7.4)
28 (11.9)
0.021
Premedicationa
1585 (66.3)
169 (71.6)
0.111
Antiemetic
2069 (86.5)
180 (76.3)
< 0.001
Rescue analgesics
2297 (96.0)
225 (95.3)
0.602
Hypertensive events
145 (6.1)
15 (6.4)
0.886
Hypotensive events
343 (14.3)
25 (10.6)
0.140
Colloid administration
36 (1.5)
6 (2.5)
0.267
RBC transfusion
12 (0.5)
0 (0)
0.616
Surgical factors
 Surgical procedure
  
0.014
  BCS
1156 (48.3)
94 (39.8)
 
  Mastectomy
1218 (51.7)
170 (60.2)
 
 Surgical duration (min)
207.2 ± 131.0
212.5 ± 108.5
0.487
 TNM staging
  
0.974
  1
1126 (47.1)
113 (47.9)
 
  2
876 (36.7)
86 (36.4)
 
  3
387 (16.2)
37 (15.7)
 
 Receptors
  Oestrogen
1652 (69.1)
173 (73.3)
0.183
  Progesterone
1506 (63.0)
151 (64.0)
0.778
  HER2
658 (27.5)
60 (25.4)
0.540
 Histological analysis
  
0.118
  Well-differentiated
508 (21.2)
48 (20.3)
 
  Moderately differentiated
1058 (44.2)
105 (44.5)
 
  Poorly differentiated
584 (24.4)
48 (20.3)
 
  Others
242 (10.1)
35 (14.8)
 
 Tumour types
  
0.818
  IDC
2105 (88.0)
212 (87.7)
 
  ILC
85 (3.6)
10 (4.2)
 
  Others
202 (8.4)
19 (8.1)
 
 Chemotherapy
1619 (67.7)
179 (75.8)
0.010
 Radiotherapy
1559 (65.2)
137 (58.1)
0.032
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, or number (percentage)
BMI body mass index, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, TIVA total intravenous anaesthesia, N2O nitrous oxide, RBC red blood cell, BCS breast conserving surgery, TNM tumour–node–metastasis, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, ILC invasive lobular carcinoma
aPremedication: Midazolam 0.03 mg kg−1 was administered

Risk factors for postoperative recurrence in breast cancer surgery

Table 2 presents the factors that affected postoperative breast cancer recurrence as revealed by competing risk analyses. Multivariate analyses revealed that cancer recurrence was not associated with perioperative dexamethasone administration (hazard ratio [HR], 1.442; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.969–2.145; P = 0.071). Table 3 details the propensity 1-to-5 matching analysis for our primary findings. This also showed no association between dexamethasone and postoperative recurrence (HR, 1.389; 95% CI, 0.904–2.132; P = 0.133). Other anaesthetic factors also were not correlated with the recurrence. The type of surgical procedure and higher TNM staging (stage 2 and 3) were significantly associated with breast cancer recurrence. Figure 1a shows the recurrence-free survival probabilities following breast cancer surgery according to dexamethasone administration; this showed no significant influence due to dexamethasone (P = 0.295).
Table 2
Competing risk analyses of factors associated with cancer recurrence after surgery for breast cancer
Variables
Univariate
Multivariate
HR
95% CI
P-value
HR
95% CI
P-value
Dexamethasone
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.348
0.912
1.994
0.134
1.442
0.969
2.145
0.071
Age
0.989
0.976
1.002
0.089
    
Age (years)
 < 40
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 40–49
0.673
0.469
0.967
0.032
0.866
0.598
1.254
0.447
 50–59
0.705
0.482
1.032
0.072
0.779
0.526
1.154
0.213
 60–69
0.665
0.421
1.05
0.080
0.703
0.416
1.188
0.188
 ≥70
0.563
0.254
1.249
0.158
0.591
0.247
1.414
0.237
BMI
0.99
0.948
1.034
0.654
    
BMI (kg m−2)
 < 18.4
1.033
0.523
2.039
0.927
0.835
0.421
1.658
0.607
 18.4–22.9
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 23–24.9
1.026
0.739
1.423
0.880
1.100
0.791
1.530
0.572
 25–29.9
1.033
0.749
1.426
0.842
1.021
0.738
1.411
0.901
 ≥30
0.73
0.298
1.789
0.491
0.626
0.254
1.546
0.310
HTN
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.952
0.686
1.322
0.770
1.045
0.714
1.531
0.820
DM
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.132
0.700
1.832
0.612
1.158
0.681
1.968
0.588
Anaesthetic agents
 TIVA
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Volatile
1.247
0.550
2.830
0.597
1.072
0.470
2.441
0.869
N2O
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.325
0.879
1.997
0.179
    
Transfusion
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
2.591
0.644
10.426
0.180
    
Premedicationa
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
0.878
0.670
1.150
0.345
    
Surgical procedure
 BCS
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Mastectomy
2.516
1.883
3.360
< 0.001
1.934
1.429
2.618
< 0.001
TNM staging
 1
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 2
2.397
1.674
3.431
< 0.001
1.778
1.168
2.706
0.007
 3
7.395
5.217
10.48
< 0.001
5.300
3.433
8.183
< 0.001
Oestrogen receptor
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.576
0.443
0.748
< 0.001
0.886
0.597
1.315
0.549
Progesterone receptor
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.605
0.467
0.783
< 0.001
0.835
0.571
1.222
0.355
Chemotherapy
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
3.265
2.213
4.818
< 0.001
0.958
0.580
1.582
0.866
Radiotherapy
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.211
0.917
1.597
0.177
    
CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, BMI body mass index, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, TIVA total intravenous anaesthesia, N2O nitrous oxide, BCS breast conserving surgery, TNM tumour-node-metastasis
aPremedication: Midazolam 0.03 mg kg−1 was administered
Table 3
Factors associated with postoperative cancer recurrence in patients with breast cancer after propensity score matching
Variables
Univariate
Multivariate
HR
95% CI
P-value
HR
95% CI
P-value
Dexamethasone
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.251
0.822
1.903
0.295
1.389
0.904
2.132
0.133
Age
0.982
0.964
1.000
0.055
    
Age (years)
 < 40
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 40–49
0.736
0.466
1.162
0.188
1.053
0.655
1.690
0.832
 50–59
0.572
0.347
0.944
0.029
0.614
0.364
1.037
0.068
 60–69
0.685
0.361
1.301
0.248
0.603
0.289
1.258
0.177
 ≥70
0.613
0.186
2.017
0.421
0.453
0.126
1.628
0.225
BMI
0.977
0.922
1.035
0.436
    
BMI (kg m−2)
 < 18.4
1.349
0.542
3.358
0.520
1.477
0.585
3.730
0.409
 18.4–22.9
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 23–24.9
1.159
0.765
1.757
0.485
1.321
0.866
2.015
0.196
 25–29.9
0.919
0.597
1.417
0.703
1.032
0.667
1.597
0.888
 ≥30
0.326
0.045
2.353
0.266
0.345
0.047
2.524
0.295
HTN
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.109
0.718
1.713
0.642
1.270
0.761
2.118
0.360
DM
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.438
0.755
2.740
0.269
1.502
0.742
3.040
0.259
Anaesthetic agents
 TIVA
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Volatile
0.575
0.235
1.406
0.225
0.782
0.312
1.960
0.600
N2O
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.515
0.919
2.497
0.103
    
Transfusion
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.894
0.265
13.547
0.525
    
Premedicationa
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
0.873
0.611
1.249
0.458
    
Surgical procedure
 BCS
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Mastectomy
2.119
1.458
3.078
< 0.001
1.659
1.121
2.457
0.012
TNM staging
 1
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 2
2.454
1.503
4.006
< 0.001
2.160
1.223
3.814
0.008
 3
8.215
5.121
13.177
< 0.001
7.780
4.303
14.064
< 0.001
Oestrogen receptor
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.564
0.400
0.796
0.001
0.783
0.463
1.325
0.363
Progesterone receptor
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.572
0.407
0.803
0.001
0.818
0.491
1.363
0.441
Chemotherapy
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.870
1.293
2.706
0.001
0.669
0.350
1.279
0.224
Radiotherapy
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.683
1.139
2.486
0.009
    
CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, BMI body mass index, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, TIVA total intravenous anaesthesia, N2O nitrous oxide, BCS breast conserving surgery, TNM tumour-node-metastasis
In 1 to 5 propensity matching process, the basic characteristics of 1224 subjects in the control group were considered to be different from the dexamethasone group and excluded from the final matching analyses. Consequently, 234 patients who received dexamethasone and 1170 patients who did not receive dexamethasone were included
aPremedication: Midazolam 0.03 mg kg−1 was administered
Table 4 presents the factors that potentially influence postoperative mortality in patients with breast cancer following Cox regression. Multivariate analyses revealed no association between perioperative dexamethasone administration and mortality (HR, 1.389; 95% CI, 0.904–2.132; P = 0.133). Instead, this was significantly associated with old age (≥70 years), transfusion, the type of surgical procedure, higher TNM staging (stage 3), and progesterone receptor-positive status. Table 5 details the association between dexamethasone and postoperative mortality as identified after the propensity 1-to-5 matching. While there was no association between dexamethasone and postoperative mortality (HR, 1.506; 95% CI, 0.886–2.561; P = 0.130), the type of surgical procedure, higher TNM stage (≥3), and progesterone receptor were significantly associated with postoperative mortality. Figure 1b shows the postoperative overall survival probability in patients according to dexamethasone use; this showed that dexamethasone did not significantly influence the overall survival (P = 0.442).
Table 4
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of factors associated with mortality after surgery for breast cancer
Variables
Univariate
Multivariate
HR
95% CI
P-value
HR
95% CI
P-value
Dexamethasone
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.051
0.652
1.696
0.837
1.256
0.770
2.047
0.361
Age
1.028
1.013
1.042
< 0.001
    
Age (years)
 < 40
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 40–49
0.586
0.369
0.931
0.024
0.772
0.480
1.240
0.285
 50–59
0.852
0.539
1.346
0.493
0.922
0.575
1.479
0.736
 60–69
1.175
0.716
1.929
0.523
1.151
0.654
2.027
0.625
 ≥70
2.713
1.534
4.798
< 0.001
2.427
1.220
4.830
0.012
BMI
0.993
0.947
1.041
0.758
    
BMI (kg m−2)
 < 18.4
1.564
0.810
3.021
0.183
1.271
0.653
2.474
0.480
 18.4–22.9
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 23–24.9
1.14
0.788
1.649
0.488
1.180
0.813
1.715
0.384
 25–29.9
1.016
0.696
1.483
0.934
0.963
0.657
1.413
0.847
 ≥30
1.209
0.527
2.775
0.654
1.265
0.545
2.939
0.584
HTN
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.564
1.128
2.166
0.007
1.048
0.703
1.563
0.817
DM
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.810
1.148
2.852
0.0107
1.217
0.732
2.023
0.450
Anaesthetic agents
 TIVA
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Volatile
0.497
0.123
2.017
0.328
3.036
0.738
12.485
0.124
N2O
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.388
0.892
2.158
0.146
    
Transfusion
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
7.527
2.792
20.296
< 0.001
5.551
1.980
15.559
0.001
Premedicationa
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
0.817
0.602
1.108
0.193
    
Surgical procedure
 BCS
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Mastectomy
3.073
2.169
4.355
< 0.001
2.244
1.556
3.236
< 0.001
TNM staging
 1
        
 2
1.902
1.275
2.838
0.002
1.591
0.994
2.545
0.053
 3
6.312
4.318
9.226
< 0.001
5.435
3.338
8.850
< 0.001
Oestrogen receptor
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.398
0.297
0.533
< 0.001
0.758
0.488
1.177
0.217
Progesterone receptor
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.369
0.274
0.496
< 0.001
0.565
0.367
0.870
0.010
Chemotherapy
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.870
1.293
2.706
< 0.001
0.674
0.403
1.128
0.133
Radiotherapy
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
0.922
0.682
1.246
0.597
    
CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, BMI body mass index, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, TIVA total intravenous anaesthesia, N2O nitrous oxide, BCS breast conserving surgery, TNM tumour-node-metastasis
aPremedication: Midazolam 0.03 mg kg−1 was administered
Table 5
Factors associated with postoperative mortality in patients with breast cancer after propensity score matching
Variables
Univariate
Multivariate
HR
95% CI
P-value
HR
95% CI
P-value
Dexamethasone
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
1.223
0.733
2.041
0.442
1.506
0.886
2.561
0.130
Age
1.005
0.983
1.028
0.636
    
Age (years)
 < 40
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 40–49
0.607
0.331
1.113
0.107
0.979
0.517
1.855
0.949
 50–59
0.763
0.416
1.400
0.382
0.778
0.411
1.473
0.440
 60–69
1.165
0.574
2.364
0.673
0.962
0.419
2.208
0.927
 ≥70
1.087
0.318
3.714
0.894
0.866
0.226
3.323
0.834
BMI
0.991
0.925
1.063
0.810
    
BMI (kg m−2)
 < 18.4
0.852
0.542
3.358
0.520
0.759
0.179
3.216
0.709
 18.4–22.9
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 23–24.9
1.449
0.765
1.757
0.485
1.647
0.994
2.730
0.053
 25–29.9
1.012
0.597
1.417
0.703
1.008
0.584
1.740
0.976
 ≥30
        
HTN
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.692
1.052
2.723
0.030
    
DM
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.775
0.858
3.672
0.122
    
Anaesthetic agents
 TIVA
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Volatile
1.050
0.258
4.272
0.946
1.400
0.332
5.892
0.647
N2O
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.523
0.840
2.763
0.166
    
Transfusion
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
6.113
1.503
24.857
0.011
3.063
0.6900
13.600
0.141
Premedicationa
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
0.796
0.515
1.231
0.305
    
Surgical procedure
 BCS
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Mastectomy
2.699
1.652
4.408
< 0.001
2.289
1.367
3.833
0.002
TNM staging
 1
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 2
2.403
1.293
4.466
0.006
1.553
0.774
3.117
0.216
 3
8.587
4.770
15.458
< 0.001
5.509
2.732
11.106
< 0.001
Oestrogen receptor
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.338
0.222
0.514
< 0.001
0.699
0.374
1.305
0.261
Progesterone receptor
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
0.280
0.180
0.435
< 0.001
0.428
0.228
0.803
0.008
Chemotherapy
 No
1 (ref)
   
1 (ref)
   
 Yes
4.667
2.156
10.103
< 0.001
1.381
0.549
3.474
0.493
Radiotherapy
 No
1 (ref)
       
 Yes
1.473
0.926
2.343
0.102
    
CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, BMI body mass index, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, TIVA total intravenous anaesthesia, N2O nitrous oxide, BCS breast conserving surgery, TNM tumour-node-metastasis
In 1 to 5 propensity matching process, the basic characteristics of 1224 subjects in the control group were considered to be different from the dexamethasone group and excluded from the final matching analyses. Consequently, 234 patients who received dexamethasone and 1170 patients who did not receive dexamethasone were included
aPremedication: Midazolam 0.03 mg kg−1 was administered

Sub-group analyses for association between dexamethasone and subtypes of breast cancer

In the sub-group analyses to specify association between dexamethasone and subtypes of breast cancer including ER-dependency, PR-dependency or TNM staging, there was no association between dexamethasone and the recurrence or mortality in ER-dependent breast cancer. Instead, dexamethasone was significantly associated with the risk of mortality in PR-positive breast cancer (HR 2.637, 95% CI 1.106–6.288, p = 0.029). Moreover, dexamethasone showed a significant tendency to increase risk of the recurrence in TNM stage 1of breast cancer (HR 2.976, 95% CI 1.106–6.288, p = 0.002).

Discussion

Dexamethasone is an effective and widely used agent that is administered perioperatively to improve the quality of recovery after surgery. However, dexamethasone can also induce immunosuppression and may cause tumour cells to escape from the immune system. As a patient’s perioperative management is only handled by the anaesthesiologist, the choice of anaesthetic agent may critically affect post-surgical outcomes. Hence, anaesthesiologists should consider the possibility of immunosuppression before administering dexamethasone. From this perspective, investigating the effects of perioperative dexamethasone administration on postoperative oncologic outcomes, in patients who were already immunocompromised due to the perioperative environment, is very important. In our study, we found that perioperative dexamethasone was not associated with recurrence or mortality of patients after breast cancer surgery.
Stress response following surgery is part of the systemic reaction to an injury, and it encompasses a wide range of immunological, endocrinological, and haematological effects [12]. Importantly, the inevitable immunosuppression during the perioperative period can allow tumour cells to evade the immune system, leading to recurrence in patients who are prone to undetectable micrometastases [13], even though surgical resection of a tumour remains the optimal curative treatment. Previous investigations suggest that perioperative impairment of the immune system increases the risk of cancer recurrence in patients undergoing oncologic surgery [14, 15]. Glucocorticoids are involved in postoperative suppression of natural killer cell activity [16]; their role in immunosuppression includes the significant suppression of lymphokine production and cell proliferation [4], impairment of natural killer function [6], and rendering tumour cells more resistant to apoptosis [7]. Glucocorticoids are also known to induce proliferation in normal cells such as erythroid progenitor cells and fibroblasts [17, 18]; and previous studies have shown that low concentrations of dexamethasone also can induce in vitro proliferation of cancer cells such as those derived from glioma [19], astrocytoma [20], and Kaposi’s sarcoma [21]. Hence, even though dexamethasone-induced immunosuppression may be temporary, it can aggravate tumour cell evasion of immune surveillance.
The issue of perioperative dexamethasone-induced immunosuppression influencing oncological outcomes has recently been investigated by other groups. Yu and colleagues retrospectively studied 515 patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery and found a higher rate of cancer recurrence in patients who received dexamethasone [22]. Moreover, patients receiving a single dose of dexamethasone before undergoing colon cancer surgery were shown to have a potentially increased risk of distant recurrence [23]. On the other hand, a retrospective study of 309 women who underwent endometrial cancer surgery showed that dexamethasone that was administered to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting was not associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence or with altered progression-free or overall survival compared to patients who did not receive dexamethasone [24]. Additionally, De Oliveira et al. [25] demonstrated that perioperative dexamethasone had no effect on recurrence in patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, although they did not report survival data. Another study found that perioperative dexamethasone might improve postoperative survival in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma [26].
Our finding that perioperative dexamethasone appears to have no significant effect on postoperative outcomes including recurrence free and overall survival of patients who underwent breast cancer surgery may be explained as follows: Dexamethasone has been shown to reduce the perioperative stress response [27, 28]; therefore, the direct immunosuppression caused by dexamethasone may be counteracted by its protective effect on the normal stress response to surgical stimuli. Dexamethasone also has pro-apoptotic properties that may lengthen the survival of patients with certain types of cancer [29, 30]. Glucocorticoids can destroy cancerous lymphoid cells, and are thus essential for treating lymph node tissue malignancies.
In contrast to these favourable characteristics of dexamethasone, glucocorticoids in general may also induce the growth of malignant solid tumours and increase their dissemination as a consequence of decreasing inter-cell adhesiveness and enhancing tissue permeability. In this regard, two recent reports were published on the relationship between glucocorticoid use and breast cancer risk. They described no evidence of glucocorticoid use influencing breast cancer recurrence in Danish populations [31, 32]. However, these studies included breast cancer patients regardless of whether they underwent surgery, and also investigated various types of glucocorticoids combined. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study to investigate the impact of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative recurrence and mortality in patients with breast cancer, and to determine whether single-dose dexamethasone is safe in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Based on our findings, chemotherapy was not significantly associated with postoperative recurrence and mortality in the multivariate analyses, in contrast to univariate analysis results. This may be because of confounding effects associated with chemotherapy and TNM staging, as chemotherapy is administered according to the TNM stage in breast cancer patients. However, we could not avoid investigating chemotherapy and TNM stage together in our multivariate analysis model, as both were critical for determining the effect of dexamethasone on postoperative outcomes. Moreover, a higher TNM stage remained a critical risk factor for postoperative recurrence and mortality despite chemotherapy. Although the administration of dexamethasone to subjects with chemotherapy may lead to worsened prognoses in patients with breast cancer, it likely has little impact on the perioperative immunity of patients because surgery is usually scheduled 1 month after completing chemotherapy at our institution. Moreover, while the antiemetic regimen is prescribed according to the degree of nausea experienced by patients, dexamethasone is not a routinely administered agent. Furthermore, a large cohort study of breast cancer patients [32] showed no evidence of an association between preoperative systemic, inhaled, or intestinal-acting glucocorticoids and breast cancer recurrence. As our study was designed to investigate the effect of a single dose of dexamethasone during anaesthesia on oncologic outcomes, we did not include the data of dexamethasone administered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, we performed sub-group analyses to find out more association between dexamethasone and subtypes of breast cancer such as ER-dependency, PR-dependency, or TNM staging. In this result, we found that dexamethasone is associated with the risk of mortality in PR-dependent breast cancer and recurrence in TNM stage 1 after breast cancer surgery. This detrimental effect of dexamethasone in TNM stage 1 and PR-dependent breast cancer requires further studies with sufficient sample size.
The present study is limited by its retrospective nature. Our patients were not randomised, and the clinical protocol was not standardised; therefore, selection bias and the effects of unmeasured confounding variables cannot be excluded. Moreover, the factors that influenced care providers to administer or forgo perioperative dexamethasone are unknown, although such decisions were unlikely to be associated with tumour status. Even though single-dose perioperative dexamethasone administration has known to have no association with an increased risk of acute postoperative complications including wound infection, the lack of information regarding dexamethasone-related adverse effects other than recurrence or mortality was considered a weak point of the study. There may be limited strength to the conclusion because of the relatively small population who received dexamethasone compared with the large total sample size. Nevertheless, the reliability of our data was buttressed by the retrospective design to some extent, because our homogeneous patients comprising 2628 women were managed perioperatively in a similar manner at the same hospital. Above all, our analyses may have the statistical power by the sensitivity test of 1-to-5 propensity score matching, which led to well-matched groups and minimized the potential for significant confounding. Although randomised clinical trials are required for definitive conclusions, our results from post-propensity score matching ought to add valuable insight despite the study’s limitations.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results suggest that a single dose of perioperative dexamethasone does not increase the risk of recurrence in patients after breast cancer surgery, and it appears to be safe in this patient population.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This study was not supported by any external funding sources.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Our protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Hospital Research Ethics Committee of Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System (4-2017-0677). The board waived the requirement for informed consents because this study was retrospective.
Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmgren L, O'Reilly MS, Folkman J. Dormancy of micrometastases: balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression. Nat Med. 1995;1(2):149–53.CrossRef Holmgren L, O'Reilly MS, Folkman J. Dormancy of micrometastases: balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression. Nat Med. 1995;1(2):149–53.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Smyth MJ, Godfrey DI, Trapani JA. A fresh look at tumor immunosurveillance and immunotherapy. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(4):293–9.CrossRef Smyth MJ, Godfrey DI, Trapani JA. A fresh look at tumor immunosurveillance and immunotherapy. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(4):293–9.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shakhar G, Ben-Eliyahu S. Potential prophylactic measures against postoperative immunosuppression: could they reduce recurrence rates in oncological patients? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(8):972–92.CrossRef Shakhar G, Ben-Eliyahu S. Potential prophylactic measures against postoperative immunosuppression: could they reduce recurrence rates in oncological patients? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(8):972–92.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunicka JE, Talle MA, Denhardt GH, Brown M, Prince LA, Goldstein G. Immunosuppression by glucocorticoids: inhibition of production of multiple lymphokines by in vivo administration of dexamethasone. Cell Immunol. 1993;149(1):39–49.CrossRef Kunicka JE, Talle MA, Denhardt GH, Brown M, Prince LA, Goldstein G. Immunosuppression by glucocorticoids: inhibition of production of multiple lymphokines by in vivo administration of dexamethasone. Cell Immunol. 1993;149(1):39–49.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bush KA, Krukowski K, Eddy JL, Janusek LW, Mathews HL. Glucocorticoid receptor mediated suppression of natural killer cell activity: identification of associated deacetylase and corepressor molecules. Cell Immunol. 2012;275(1–2):80–9.CrossRef Bush KA, Krukowski K, Eddy JL, Janusek LW, Mathews HL. Glucocorticoid receptor mediated suppression of natural killer cell activity: identification of associated deacetylase and corepressor molecules. Cell Immunol. 2012;275(1–2):80–9.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Holbrook NJ, Cox WI, Horner HC. Direct suppression of natural killer activity in human peripheral blood leukocyte cultures by glucocorticoids and its modulation by interferon. Cancer Res. 1983;43(9):4019–25.PubMed Holbrook NJ, Cox WI, Horner HC. Direct suppression of natural killer activity in human peripheral blood leukocyte cultures by glucocorticoids and its modulation by interferon. Cancer Res. 1983;43(9):4019–25.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YX, Wang Y, Fu CC, Diao F, Song LN, Li ZB, Yang R, Lu J. Dexamethasone enhances cell resistance to chemotherapy by increasing adhesion to extracellular matrix in human ovarian cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17(1):39–50.CrossRef Chen YX, Wang Y, Fu CC, Diao F, Song LN, Li ZB, Yang R, Lu J. Dexamethasone enhances cell resistance to chemotherapy by increasing adhesion to extracellular matrix in human ovarian cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17(1):39–50.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat De Oliveira GS Jr, Castro-Alves LJ, Ahmad S, Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ. Dexamethasone to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(1):58–74.CrossRef De Oliveira GS Jr, Castro-Alves LJ, Ahmad S, Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ. Dexamethasone to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(1):58–74.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat De Oliveira GS Jr, Ahmad S, Fitzgerald PC, Marcus RJ, Altman CS, Panjwani AS, McCarthy RJ. Dose ranging study on the effect of preoperative dexamethasone on postoperative quality of recovery and opioid consumption after ambulatory gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(3):362–71.CrossRef De Oliveira GS Jr, Ahmad S, Fitzgerald PC, Marcus RJ, Altman CS, Panjwani AS, McCarthy RJ. Dose ranging study on the effect of preoperative dexamethasone on postoperative quality of recovery and opioid consumption after ambulatory gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(3):362–71.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Allemani C, Minicozzi P, Berrino F, Bastiaannet E, Gavin A, Galceran J, Ameijide A, Siesling S, Mangone L, Ardanaz E, et al. Predictions of survival up to 10 years after diagnosis for European women with breast cancer in 2000-2002. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(10):2404–12.CrossRef Allemani C, Minicozzi P, Berrino F, Bastiaannet E, Gavin A, Galceran J, Ameijide A, Siesling S, Mangone L, Ardanaz E, et al. Predictions of survival up to 10 years after diagnosis for European women with breast cancer in 2000-2002. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(10):2404–12.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2784–95.CrossRef Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2784–95.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(1):109–17.CrossRef Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(1):109–17.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sekandarzad MW, van Zundert AAJ, Lirk PB, Doornebal CW, Hollmann MW. Perioperative anesthesia care and tumor progression. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(5):1697–708.CrossRef Sekandarzad MW, van Zundert AAJ, Lirk PB, Doornebal CW, Hollmann MW. Perioperative anesthesia care and tumor progression. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(5):1697–708.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Heaney A, Buggy DJ. Can anaesthetic and analgesic techniques affect cancer recurrence or metastasis? Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(Suppl 1):i17–28.CrossRef Heaney A, Buggy DJ. Can anaesthetic and analgesic techniques affect cancer recurrence or metastasis? Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(Suppl 1):i17–28.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shakhar G, Abudarham N, Melamed R, Schwartz Y, Rosenne E, Ben-Eliyahu S. Amelioration of operation-induced suppression of marginating pulmonary NK activity using poly IC: a potential approach to reduce postoperative metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(2):841–52.CrossRef Shakhar G, Abudarham N, Melamed R, Schwartz Y, Rosenne E, Ben-Eliyahu S. Amelioration of operation-induced suppression of marginating pulmonary NK activity using poly IC: a potential approach to reduce postoperative metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(2):841–52.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shakhar G, Blumenfeld B. Glucocorticoid involvement in suppression of NK activity following surgery in rats. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;138(1–2):83–91.CrossRef Shakhar G, Blumenfeld B. Glucocorticoid involvement in suppression of NK activity following surgery in rats. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;138(1–2):83–91.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Li S, Mawal-Dewan M, Cristofalo VJ, Sell C. Enhanced proliferation of human fibroblasts, in the presence of dexamethasone, is accompanied by changes in p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 and the insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor. J Cell Physiol. 1998;177(3):396–401.CrossRef Li S, Mawal-Dewan M, Cristofalo VJ, Sell C. Enhanced proliferation of human fibroblasts, in the presence of dexamethasone, is accompanied by changes in p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 and the insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor. J Cell Physiol. 1998;177(3):396–401.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganguli G, Back J, Sengupta S, Wasylyk B. The p53 tumour suppressor inhibits glucocorticoid-induced proliferation of erythroid progenitors. EMBO Rep. 2002;3(6):569–74.CrossRef Ganguli G, Back J, Sengupta S, Wasylyk B. The p53 tumour suppressor inhibits glucocorticoid-induced proliferation of erythroid progenitors. EMBO Rep. 2002;3(6):569–74.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Langeveld CH, van Waas MP, Stoof JC, Sutanto W, de Kloet ER, Wolbers JG, Heimans JJ. Implication of glucocorticoid receptors in the stimulation of human glioma cell proliferation by dexamethasone. J Neurosci Res. 1992;31(3):524–31.CrossRef Langeveld CH, van Waas MP, Stoof JC, Sutanto W, de Kloet ER, Wolbers JG, Heimans JJ. Implication of glucocorticoid receptors in the stimulation of human glioma cell proliferation by dexamethasone. J Neurosci Res. 1992;31(3):524–31.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Freshney RI. Effects of glucocorticoids on glioma cells in culture. Minireview on cancer research. Exp Cell Biol. 1984;52(5):286–92.PubMed Freshney RI. Effects of glucocorticoids on glioma cells in culture. Minireview on cancer research. Exp Cell Biol. 1984;52(5):286–92.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo WX, Antakly T. AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: evidence for direct stimulatory effect of glucocorticoid on cell proliferation. Am J Pathol. 1995;146(3):727–34.PubMedPubMedCentral Guo WX, Antakly T. AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: evidence for direct stimulatory effect of glucocorticoid on cell proliferation. Am J Pathol. 1995;146(3):727–34.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu HC, Luo YX, Peng H, Kang L, Huang MJ, Wang JP. Avoiding perioperative dexamethasone may improve the outcome of patients with rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(5):667–73.CrossRef Yu HC, Luo YX, Peng H, Kang L, Huang MJ, Wang JP. Avoiding perioperative dexamethasone may improve the outcome of patients with rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(5):667–73.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Taylor MH, Hill AG. Association between preoperative glucocorticoids and long-term survival and cancer recurrence after colectomy: follow-up analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(Suppl 1):i68–73.CrossRef Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Taylor MH, Hill AG. Association between preoperative glucocorticoids and long-term survival and cancer recurrence after colectomy: follow-up analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(Suppl 1):i68–73.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Merk BA, Havrilesky LJ, Ehrisman JA, Broadwater G, Habib AS. Impact of postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis with dexamethasone on the risk of recurrence of endometrial cancer. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):453–8.CrossRef Merk BA, Havrilesky LJ, Ehrisman JA, Broadwater G, Habib AS. Impact of postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis with dexamethasone on the risk of recurrence of endometrial cancer. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):453–8.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat De Oliveira GS Jr, McCarthy R, Turan A, Schink JC, Fitzgerald PC, Sessler DI. Is dexamethasone associated with recurrence of ovarian cancer? Anesth Analg. 2014;118(6):1213–8.CrossRef De Oliveira GS Jr, McCarthy R, Turan A, Schink JC, Fitzgerald PC, Sessler DI. Is dexamethasone associated with recurrence of ovarian cancer? Anesth Analg. 2014;118(6):1213–8.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Call TR, Pace NL, Thorup DB, Maxfield D, Chortkoff B, Christensen J, Mulvihill SJ. Factors associated with improved survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multivariable model. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(2):317–24.CrossRef Call TR, Pace NL, Thorup DB, Maxfield D, Chortkoff B, Christensen J, Mulvihill SJ. Factors associated with improved survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multivariable model. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(2):317–24.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Karaman K, Bostanci EB, Aksoy E, Ulas M, Yigit T, Erdemli MO, Ercin U, Bilgihan A, Saydam G, Akoglu M. Effects of dexamethasone and pheniramine hydrogen maleate on stress response in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2013;205(2):213–9.CrossRef Karaman K, Bostanci EB, Aksoy E, Ulas M, Yigit T, Erdemli MO, Ercin U, Bilgihan A, Saydam G, Akoglu M. Effects of dexamethasone and pheniramine hydrogen maleate on stress response in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2013;205(2):213–9.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardinale F, Mastrototaro MF, Cappiello A, Caffarelli C, Caimmi S, Barberi S, Bernardini R. Immunological modifications induced from products used during the perioperative period. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011;24(3 Suppl):S13–20.CrossRef Cardinale F, Mastrototaro MF, Cappiello A, Caffarelli C, Caimmi S, Barberi S, Bernardini R. Immunological modifications induced from products used during the perioperative period. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011;24(3 Suppl):S13–20.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu S, Wang B, Li S, Zhou Y, An L, Wang Y, Lv H, Zhang G, Fang F, Liu Z, et al. Immune cell populations decrease during craniotomy under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(3):572–7.PubMed Liu S, Wang B, Li S, Zhou Y, An L, Wang Y, Lv H, Zhang G, Fang F, Liu Z, et al. Immune cell populations decrease during craniotomy under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(3):572–7.PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan S, Lopez-Dee Z, Kumar R, Ling J. Activation of NFkB is a novel mechanism of pro-survival activity of glucocorticoids in breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2013;337(1):90–5.CrossRef Khan S, Lopez-Dee Z, Kumar R, Ling J. Activation of NFkB is a novel mechanism of pro-survival activity of glucocorticoids in breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2013;337(1):90–5.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorensen GV, Cronin-Fenton DP, Sorensen HT, Ulrichsen SP, Pedersen L, Lash TL. Use of glucocorticoids and risk of breast cancer: a Danish population-based case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(1):R21.CrossRef Sorensen GV, Cronin-Fenton DP, Sorensen HT, Ulrichsen SP, Pedersen L, Lash TL. Use of glucocorticoids and risk of breast cancer: a Danish population-based case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(1):R21.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lietzen LW, Ahern T, Christiansen P, Jensen AB, Sorensen HT, Lash TL, Cronin-Fenton DP. Glucocorticoid prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence: a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(12):2419–25.CrossRef Lietzen LW, Ahern T, Christiansen P, Jensen AB, Sorensen HT, Lash TL, Cronin-Fenton DP. Glucocorticoid prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence: a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(12):2419–25.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Single dose of dexamethasone is not associated with postoperative recurrence and mortality in breast cancer patients: a propensity-matched cohort study
verfasst von
Myoung Hwa Kim
Dong Wook Kim
Seho Park
Joo Heung Kim
Ki Young Lee
Jisung Hwang
Young Chul Yoo
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5451-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

BMC Cancer 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.