Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2008

01.01.2008 | Chest

Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: Detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice

verfasst von: Zsolt Szucs-Farkas, Michael A. Patak, Seyran Yuksel-Hatz, Thomas Ruder, Peter Vock

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of energy subtraction (ES) chest radiography on the detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in daily routine. Seventy-seven patients and 25 healthy subjects were examined with a single exposure digital radiography system. Five blinded readers evaluated first the non-subtracted PA and lateral chest radiographs alone and then together with the subtracted PA soft tissue images. The size, location and number of lung nodules or masses were registered with the confidence level. CT was used as standard of reference. For the 200 total lesions, a sensitivity of 33.5–52.5% was found at non-subtracted and a sensitivity of 43.5–58.5% at energy-subtracted radiography, corresponding to a significant improvement in four of five readers (p < 0.05). However, in three of five readers the rate of false positives was higher with ES. With ES, sensitivity, but not the area under the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (AFROC) curve, showed a good correlation with reader experience (R = 0.90, p = 0.026). In four of five readers, the diagnostic confidence improved with ES (p = 0.0036). We conclude that single-exposure digital ES chest radiography improves detection of most pulmonary nodules and masses, but identification of nodules <1 cm and false-positive findings remain a problem.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McAdams HP, Samei E, Dobbins J, 3rd, Tourassi GD, Ravin CE (2006) Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology 241:663–683PubMedCrossRef McAdams HP, Samei E, Dobbins J, 3rd, Tourassi GD, Ravin CE (2006) Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology 241:663–683PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart BK, Huang HK (1990) Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography. Medical Physics 17:866–875PubMedCrossRef Stewart BK, Huang HK (1990) Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography. Medical Physics 17:866–875PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Flynn MJ (2002) An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems. Medical physics 29:447–459PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Flynn MJ (2002) An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems. Medical physics 29:447–459PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischbach F, Freund T, Pech M, Werk M, Bassir C, Stoever B, Felix R, Ricke J (2003) Comparison of indirect CsI/a:Si and direct a:Se digital radiography. An assessment of contrast and detail visualization. Acta Radiol 44:616–621PubMedCrossRef Fischbach F, Freund T, Pech M, Werk M, Bassir C, Stoever B, Felix R, Ricke J (2003) Comparison of indirect CsI/a:Si and direct a:Se digital radiography. An assessment of contrast and detail visualization. Acta Radiol 44:616–621PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruber M, Uffmann M, Weber M, Prokop M, Balassy C, Schaefer-Prokop C (2006) Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography. European Radiology 16:1544–1550PubMedCrossRef Gruber M, Uffmann M, Weber M, Prokop M, Balassy C, Schaefer-Prokop C (2006) Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography. European Radiology 16:1544–1550PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser RG, Hickey NM, Niklason LT, Sabbagh EA, Luna RF, Alexander CB, Robinson CA, Katzenstein AL, Barnes GT (1986) Calcification in pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital radiography. Radiology 160:595–601PubMed Fraser RG, Hickey NM, Niklason LT, Sabbagh EA, Luna RF, Alexander CB, Robinson CA, Katzenstein AL, Barnes GT (1986) Calcification in pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital radiography. Radiology 160:595–601PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho JT, Kruger RA (1989) Comparison of dual-energy and conventional chest radiography for nodule detection. Investigative Radiology 24:861–868PubMedCrossRef Ho JT, Kruger RA (1989) Comparison of dual-energy and conventional chest radiography for nodule detection. Investigative Radiology 24:861–868PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Oestmann JW, Greene R, Rhea JT, Rosenthal H, Koenker RM, Tillotson CL, Pearsen KD, Hill JW, Velaj RH (1989) “Single-exposure” dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications. Investigative Radiology 24:517–521PubMedCrossRef Oestmann JW, Greene R, Rhea JT, Rosenthal H, Koenker RM, Tillotson CL, Pearsen KD, Hill JW, Velaj RH (1989) “Single-exposure” dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications. Investigative Radiology 24:517–521PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR (1997) Simulation of subtle lung nodules in projection chest radiography. Radiology 202:117–124PubMed Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR (1997) Simulation of subtle lung nodules in projection chest radiography. Radiology 202:117–124PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kido S, Kuriyama K, Kuroda C, Nakamura H, Ito W, Shimura K, Kato H (2002) Detection of simulated pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography of the chest: effect of a computer-aided diagnosis system (Part 2). European Journal of Radiology 44:205–209PubMedCrossRef Kido S, Kuriyama K, Kuroda C, Nakamura H, Ito W, Shimura K, Kato H (2002) Detection of simulated pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography of the chest: effect of a computer-aided diagnosis system (Part 2). European Journal of Radiology 44:205–209PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricke J, Fischbach F, Freund T, Teichgraber U, Hanninen EL, Rottgen R, Engert U, Eichstadt H, Felix R (2003) Clinical results of CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography. Eur Radiol 13:2577–2582PubMedCrossRef Ricke J, Fischbach F, Freund T, Teichgraber U, Hanninen EL, Rottgen R, Engert U, Eichstadt H, Felix R (2003) Clinical results of CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography. Eur Radiol 13:2577–2582PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Uemura M, Miyagawa M, Yasuhara Y, Murakami T, Ikura H, Sakamoto K, Tagashira H, Arakawa K, Mochizuki T (2005) Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Radiation Medicine 23:391–397PubMed Uemura M, Miyagawa M, Yasuhara Y, Murakami T, Ikura H, Sakamoto K, Tagashira H, Arakawa K, Mochizuki T (2005) Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Radiation Medicine 23:391–397PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kido S, Ikezoe J, Naito H, Arisawa J, Tamura S, Kozuka T, Ito W, Shimura K, Kato H (1995) Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm. Radiology 194:407–412PubMed Kido S, Ikezoe J, Naito H, Arisawa J, Tamura S, Kozuka T, Ito W, Shimura K, Kato H (1995) Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm. Radiology 194:407–412PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischbach F, Freund T, Rottgen R, Engert U, Felix R, Ricke J (2003) Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. AJR 181:1519–1524PubMed Fischbach F, Freund T, Rottgen R, Engert U, Felix R, Ricke J (2003) Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. AJR 181:1519–1524PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fetterly KA, Schueler BA (2006) Performance evaluation of a computed radiography imaging device using a typical “front side” and novel “dual side” readout storage phosphors. Medical Physics 33:290–296PubMedCrossRef Fetterly KA, Schueler BA (2006) Performance evaluation of a computed radiography imaging device using a typical “front side” and novel “dual side” readout storage phosphors. Medical Physics 33:290–296PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, Neitzel U, Vock P, Gudinchet F, Verdun FR (2006) An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology. Medical Physics 33:411–420PubMedCrossRef Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, Neitzel U, Vock P, Gudinchet F, Verdun FR (2006) An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology. Medical Physics 33:411–420PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, Neitzel U, Vock P, Gudinchet F, Verdun FR (2006) Influence of cassette type on the DQE of CR systems. Medical Physics 33:3637–3639PubMedCrossRef Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, Neitzel U, Vock P, Gudinchet F, Verdun FR (2006) Influence of cassette type on the DQE of CR systems. Medical Physics 33:3637–3639PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakraborty DP, Winter LH (1990) Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 174:873–881PubMed Chakraborty DP, Winter LH (1990) Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 174:873–881PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR (1999) Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. Radiology 213:727–734PubMed Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR (1999) Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. Radiology 213:727–734PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Flynn MJ, Peterson E, Eyler WR (2003) Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection. Radiology 228:76–84PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Flynn MJ, Peterson E, Eyler WR (2003) Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection. Radiology 228:76–84PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, McCauley DI, McGuinness G, Libby DM, Smith JP, Pasmantier MW, Miettinen OS (2004) CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 231:164–168PubMedCrossRef Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, McCauley DI, McGuinness G, Libby DM, Smith JP, Pasmantier MW, Miettinen OS (2004) CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 231:164–168PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Aberle RD, Gamsu G, Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Swensen SJ (2001) Screening for Lung Cancer with Helical Computed Tomography: A Consensus Statement of the Society of Thoracic Radiology. J Thorac Imaging 16:65–68PubMedCrossRef Aberle RD, Gamsu G, Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Swensen SJ (2001) Screening for Lung Cancer with Helical Computed Tomography: A Consensus Statement of the Society of Thoracic Radiology. J Thorac Imaging 16:65–68PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: Detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice
verfasst von
Zsolt Szucs-Farkas
Michael A. Patak
Seyran Yuksel-Hatz
Thomas Ruder
Peter Vock
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0758-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

European Radiology 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.