Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016

29.12.2015 | Pancreatic Tumors

Single-Institution Experience with Irreversible Electroporation for T4 Pancreatic Cancer: First 50 Patients

verfasst von: Michael D. Kluger, MD, MPH, Irene Epelboym, MD, Beth A. Schrope, MD, PhD, Krishnaraj Mahendraraj, MD, Elizabeth M. Hecht, MD, Jonathan Susman, MD, Joshua L. Weintraub, MD, John A. Chabot, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) for treatment of locally advanced pancreatic tumors is garnering increasing attention. This study was conducted to determine perioperative morbidity and mortality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Prospective data of 50 consecutive patients receiving IRE for T4 lesions at a single tertiary center were analyzed. The primary end point was Clavien–Dindo complications at 90 days, and the secondary outcomes were survival and recurrence.

Results

A total of 50 patients underwent 53 IRE procedures for primary treatment (n = 29) or margin extension (n = 24), and 47 patients had adenocarcinoma. Six patients died within 90 days after the procedure (5 in the primary control group). Mortality occurred a median of 26 days (range, 8–42 days) after the procedure. Five patients in both the margin-extension and primary control groups experienced grade 3 or 4 morbidity (p = 0.739). The incidences of grades 3 to 5 complications did not differ significantly based on the adjustable parameters of IRE, tumor size, or primary treatment versus margin extension. After a median follow-up period of 8.69 months [interquartile range (IQR), 0.26–16.26 months], the median overall survival period for the primary control group was 7.71 months [95 % confidence interval (CI), 6.03–12.0 months) and was not reached in the margin-extension group (p = 0.01, log-rank).

Conclusions

At the authors’ center, the mortality rate after IRE was higher than reported in other series, with the majority occurring in the primary control group. Major morbidity trended around upper gastrointestinal bleeding, visceral ulcerations/perforations, and portal vein thromboses. This favors further investigation of the safety and efficacy of IRE.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Loehrer PJ Sr, Feng Y, Cardenes H, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4105–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Loehrer PJ Sr, Feng Y, Cardenes H, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4105–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1592–9.CrossRefPubMed Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1592–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherman WH, Chu K, Chabot J, et al. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine followed by gemcitabine and capecitabine/radiation therapy and surgery in locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121:673–80.CrossRefPubMed Sherman WH, Chu K, Chabot J, et al. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine followed by gemcitabine and capecitabine/radiation therapy and surgery in locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121:673–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann V, Haas M, Boeck S. Neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable and non-resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2484–92.CrossRefPubMed Heinemann V, Haas M, Boeck S. Neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable and non-resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2484–92.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Kumar S, Davidson BR, Fusai G. Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, 2. Art. No.: CD010244. Gurusamy KS, Kumar S, Davidson BR, Fusai G. Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, 2. Art. No.: CD010244.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RC, Kwon D, Chalikonda S,. et al. Treatment of 200 locally advanced (stage 3) pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with irreversible electroporation: safety and efficacy. Ann Surg. 2015;262:486–94.CrossRefPubMed Martin RC, Kwon D, Chalikonda S,. et al. Treatment of 200 locally advanced (stage 3) pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with irreversible electroporation: safety and efficacy. Ann Surg. 2015;262:486–94.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwon D, McFarland K, Velanovich V, Martin RC II. Borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma margin accentuation with intraoperative irreversible electroporation. Surgery. 2014;156:910–20.CrossRefPubMed Kwon D, McFarland K, Velanovich V, Martin RC II. Borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma margin accentuation with intraoperative irreversible electroporation. Surgery. 2014;156:910–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RG II, McFarland K, Ellis S, Velanovich V. Irreversible electroporation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: potential improved overall survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:443–9.CrossRef Martin RG II, McFarland K, Ellis S, Velanovich V. Irreversible electroporation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: potential improved overall survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:443–9.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RC II, McFarland K, Ellis S, Velanovich V. Irreversible electroporation therapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:361–9.CrossRefPubMed Martin RC II, McFarland K, Ellis S, Velanovich V. Irreversible electroporation therapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:361–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Allendorf JD, Lauerman M, Bill A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation for patients with locally unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility, efficacy, and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:91–100.CrossRefPubMed Allendorf JD, Lauerman M, Bill A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation for patients with locally unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility, efficacy, and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:91–100.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, et al. Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;254:882–93.CrossRefPubMed Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, et al. Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;254:882–93.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Narayanan G, Bhatia S, Echenique A, et al. Vessel patency post irreversible electroporation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37:1523–9.CrossRefPubMed Narayanan G, Bhatia S, Echenique A, et al. Vessel patency post irreversible electroporation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37:1523–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gawlas I, Epelboym I, Winner M, et al. Short-term but not long-term loss of patency of venous reconstruction during pancreatic resection is associated with decreased survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:75–82.CrossRefPubMed Gawlas I, Epelboym I, Winner M, et al. Short-term but not long-term loss of patency of venous reconstruction during pancreatic resection is associated with decreased survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:75–82.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Narayanan G, Hosein PJ, Arora G, et al. Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:1613–21.CrossRefPubMed Narayanan G, Hosein PJ, Arora G, et al. Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:1613–21.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang DT, Schellenberg D, Shen J, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer. 2009;115:665–72.CrossRefPubMed Chang DT, Schellenberg D, Shen J, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer. 2009;115:665–72.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mansson C, Bergenfeldt M, Brahmstaedt R, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation for treatment of localized pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:289–94.PubMed Mansson C, Bergenfeldt M, Brahmstaedt R, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation for treatment of localized pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:289–94.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunki-Jacobs EM, Philips P, Martin RCG. Evaluation of thermal injury to liver, pancreas, and kidney during irreversible electroporation in an in vivo experimental model. BJS. 2014;101:1113–21.CrossRef Dunki-Jacobs EM, Philips P, Martin RCG. Evaluation of thermal injury to liver, pancreas, and kidney during irreversible electroporation in an in vivo experimental model. BJS. 2014;101:1113–21.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ben-David E, Ahmed M, Faroja M, et al. Irreversible electroporation: treatment effect is susceptible to local environment and tissue properties. Radiology. 2013;269:738–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ben-David E, Ahmed M, Faroja M, et al. Irreversible electroporation: treatment effect is susceptible to local environment and tissue properties. Radiology. 2013;269:738–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricke J, Jürgens JH, Deschamps F, et al. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) fails to demonstrate efficacy in a prospective multicenter phase II trial on lung malignancies: the ALICE trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38:401–8.CrossRefPubMed Ricke J, Jürgens JH, Deschamps F, et al. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) fails to demonstrate efficacy in a prospective multicenter phase II trial on lung malignancies: the ALICE trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38:401–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagstaff PG, de Bruin DM, van den Bos W, et al. Irreversible electroporation of the porcine kidney: temperature development and distribution. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:e1–7.CrossRefPubMed Wagstaff PG, de Bruin DM, van den Bos W, et al. Irreversible electroporation of the porcine kidney: temperature development and distribution. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:e1–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Faroja M, Ahmed M, Appelbaum L, et al. Irreversible electroporation ablation: is all the damage nonthermal? Radiology. 2013;266:462–70.CrossRefPubMed Faroja M, Ahmed M, Appelbaum L, et al. Irreversible electroporation ablation: is all the damage nonthermal? Radiology. 2013;266:462–70.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–703.CrossRef Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–703.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao WC, Chien KL, Lin YL, et al. Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1095–103.CrossRefPubMed Liao WC, Chien KL, Lin YL, et al. Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1095–103.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Single-Institution Experience with Irreversible Electroporation for T4 Pancreatic Cancer: First 50 Patients
verfasst von
Michael D. Kluger, MD, MPH
Irene Epelboym, MD
Beth A. Schrope, MD, PhD
Krishnaraj Mahendraraj, MD
Elizabeth M. Hecht, MD
Jonathan Susman, MD
Joshua L. Weintraub, MD
John A. Chabot, MD
Publikationsdatum
29.12.2015
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5034-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.