Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2020

02.01.2020 | Original Scientific Report

Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers

verfasst von: Tri Huu Nguyen, Thanh Nhu Dang, Thomas Schnelldorfer

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic single-port surgery has widely been introduced for the treatment of various abdominal conditions. But controversies still exist regarding its potential advantages and risks, especially for emergency surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of a single-port laparoscopic repair using straight laparoscopic instruments for the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers.

Methods

A prospective consecutive case series was conducted including all patients with a perforated duodenal ulcer who underwent a laparoscopic single-port repair at a single institution from January 2012 to June 2018. The operation was performed through a single port using conventional straight laparoscopic instruments and intra-corporeal knot tying techniques.

Results

Out of 75 patients, simple closure of the perforation without omental patch was accomplished in 96% of cases. Conversion to an open operation was required in one patient (1.3%) due to a posterior duodenal perforation, and additional trocar placement was needed in another patient (1.3%). The mean incision length was 2.0 ± 0.2 cm. The mean operation time was 63.0 ± 26.6 min. Meantime a nasogastric tube remained in place was 2.9 ± 0.8 days. Mean duration of analgesic use was 2.8 ± 0.8 days. The rate of postoperative complications was 2.7%, including two patients with wound infections. There were no instances of intestinal leak or abscess. The postoperative hospital stay was 5.7 ± 1.2 days.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic single-port repair using conventional straight laparoscopic instruments with intra-corporeal knot tying technique was safe and feasible for patients with perforated duodenal ulcers with low risk factors. This method offers results comparable to those expected with the standard multiport laparoscopic approach with the addition of improved cosmetic outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng EKW, Lam YH, Sung JJY et al (2000) Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation. Ann Surg 231:153–158CrossRef Ng EKW, Lam YH, Sung JJY et al (2000) Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation. Ann Surg 231:153–158CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anbalakan K, Chua D, Pandya GJ et al (2015) Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models—Are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 14:38–44CrossRef Anbalakan K, Chua D, Pandya GJ et al (2015) Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models—Are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 14:38–44CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M (2005) Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 92:1195–1207CrossRef Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M (2005) Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 92:1195–1207CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Borle FR, Mehra B, Ranjan Singh A (2014) Comparison of cosmetic outcome between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural Indian population: a randomized clinical trial. Indian J Surg 77:877–880CrossRef Borle FR, Mehra B, Ranjan Singh A (2014) Comparison of cosmetic outcome between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural Indian population: a randomized clinical trial. Indian J Surg 77:877–880CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans L, Manley K (2016) Is there a cosmetic advantage to single-incision laparoscopic surgical techniques over standard laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:177–182CrossRef Evans L, Manley K (2016) Is there a cosmetic advantage to single-incision laparoscopic surgical techniques over standard laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:177–182CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100:191–208CrossRef Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100:191–208CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Sung K, Lee D, Lee W et al (2011) Single-port laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer: intracorporeal ‘cross and twine’ knotting. Surg Endosc 25:229–233CrossRef Lee J, Sung K, Lee D, Lee W et al (2011) Single-port laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer: intracorporeal ‘cross and twine’ knotting. Surg Endosc 25:229–233CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouret P, Franqois Y, Vignal J et al (1990) Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 77:1006CrossRef Mouret P, Franqois Y, Vignal J et al (1990) Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 77:1006CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathason LK, Easter DW, Cuschieri A (1990) Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 4:232–233CrossRef Nathason LK, Easter DW, Cuschieri A (1990) Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 4:232–233CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrge N, Barton RG, Enniss TM et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Am J Surg 206:957–963CrossRef Byrge N, Barton RG, Enniss TM et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Am J Surg 206:957–963CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ et al (1999) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 134:845–850CrossRef Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ et al (1999) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 134:845–850CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Budzyński P, Pędziwiatr M, Grzesiak-Kuik A et al (2015) Changing patterns in the surgical treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer—single centre experience. Videosurg Miniinv 10:430–436CrossRef Budzyński P, Pędziwiatr M, Grzesiak-Kuik A et al (2015) Changing patterns in the surgical treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer—single centre experience. Videosurg Miniinv 10:430–436CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Mayer T et al (2005) Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: comparison with conventional surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1487–1490CrossRef Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Mayer T et al (2005) Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: comparison with conventional surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1487–1490CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Downes RO (2016) Single incision laparoscopic peptic ulcer repair with the use extracorporeal Mishra knot: a case report. J Univ Surg 4:1–5 Downes RO (2016) Single incision laparoscopic peptic ulcer repair with the use extracorporeal Mishra knot: a case report. J Univ Surg 4:1–5
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J et al (2013) Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 257:413–418CrossRef Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J et al (2013) Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 257:413–418CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G et al (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848CrossRef Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G et al (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KY, Kim TH, Kim SN, Park CH (2007) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the simple “one-stitch” suture with omental patch technique. Surg Endosc 22:1632–1635CrossRef Song KY, Kim TH, Kim SN, Park CH (2007) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the simple “one-stitch” suture with omental patch technique. Surg Endosc 22:1632–1635CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MG (2015) Laparoscopic surgery for perforated duodenal ulcer disease: analysis of 70 consecutive cases from a single surgeon. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:331–336CrossRef Kim MG (2015) Laparoscopic surgery for perforated duodenal ulcer disease: analysis of 70 consecutive cases from a single surgeon. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:331–336CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Aly OE, Black DH, Rehman H et al (2016) Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 35:120–128CrossRef Aly OE, Black DH, Rehman H et al (2016) Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 35:120–128CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ates M, Sevil S, Bakircioglu E et al (2007) Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:615–619CrossRef Ates M, Sevil S, Bakircioglu E et al (2007) Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:615–619CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Chin HM, Bae YJ et al (2015) Risk factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic simple closure in perforated duodenal ulcer. Int J Surg 15:40–44CrossRef Kim JH, Chin HM, Bae YJ et al (2015) Risk factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic simple closure in perforated duodenal ulcer. Int J Surg 15:40–44CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V et al (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084CrossRef Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V et al (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pai D, Sharma A, Kanungo R et al (1999) Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg 69:210–213CrossRef Pai D, Sharma A, Kanungo R et al (1999) Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg 69:210–213CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BKB et al (2004) Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 91:481–484CrossRef Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BKB et al (2004) Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 91:481–484CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam PWF, Lam MCS, Hui EKL et al (2005) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers. The “three-stitch” Graham patch technique. Surg Endosc 19:1627–1630CrossRef Lam PWF, Lam MCS, Hui EKL et al (2005) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers. The “three-stitch” Graham patch technique. Surg Endosc 19:1627–1630CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Abd Ellatif ME, Salama AF, Elezaby AF et al (2013) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: patch versus simple closure. Int J Sur 11:948–951CrossRef Abd Ellatif ME, Salama AF, Elezaby AF et al (2013) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: patch versus simple closure. Int J Sur 11:948–951CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers
verfasst von
Tri Huu Nguyen
Thanh Nhu Dang
Thomas Schnelldorfer
Publikationsdatum
02.01.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05352-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

World Journal of Surgery 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.