Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2018

16.02.2018 | Review Article

Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update

verfasst von: Christos Iavazzo, Evelyn Eleni Minis, Ioannis D. Gkegkes

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Single-incision approach in robotic gynecology is a relatively new concept. The role of single-port systems in robotic hysterectomy, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the technical challenges, are still under investigation. A systematic review was performed by searching in PubMed and Scopus databases. In 810 out of 1225 patients, hysterectomy was performed for non-neoplastic disease. Single-Site® was the most common port system. Duration of the procedure and relative blood loss ranged from 60 to 311 min and 7 to 750 ml, respectively. The weight of the removed uteri ranged from 39 to 520 g. 4.9% of the included patients presented complications, among which bleeding, vaginal haematoma, laceration and dehiscence, umbilical hernia, and visceral injuries. Conversion rate to laparotomy reached 2.8%. Although some technical difficulties are still described in the literature, the single-port approach is becoming more standardized nowadays and performed by more surgeons. The initial phase of the learning curve can be achieved after five cases, while a proficiency in intracorporeal cuff suturing after 14 cases. Uterus weight and previous abdominal surgical history can still be limitations of the technique. Compared to our previous study, we can see that the technique has been used in more elderly or obese patients. The complication rate can reach 4.9% while the conversion rate can reach 2.8%. However, we consider that complication and conversion rates as well as surgical time could be improved with experience. Regarding post-operative pain and cosmetic outcomes, the lack of information do not allow us to draw any safe conclusions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Langebrekke A, Qvigstad E (2009) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with single-port access without vaginal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:609–611CrossRefPubMed Langebrekke A, Qvigstad E (2009) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with single-port access without vaginal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:609–611CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114:157–161CrossRefPubMed Fader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114:157–161CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID (2014) Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:725–731CrossRefPubMed Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID (2014) Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:725–731CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Meritens AB, Kim J, Dinkelspiel H, Chapman-Davis E, Caputo T, Holcomb KM (2017) Feasibility and learning curve of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:323–328CrossRef de Meritens AB, Kim J, Dinkelspiel H, Chapman-Davis E, Caputo T, Holcomb KM (2017) Feasibility and learning curve of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:323–328CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Moukarzel LA, Fader AN, Tanner EJ (2017) Feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in the gynecologic oncology setting. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:258–263CrossRefPubMed Moukarzel LA, Fader AN, Tanner EJ (2017) Feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in the gynecologic oncology setting. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:258–263CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrado G, Mereu L, Bogliolo S et al (2016) Robotic single site staging in endometrial cancer: A multi-institution study. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:1506–1511 Corrado G, Mereu L, Bogliolo S et al (2016) Robotic single site staging in endometrial cancer: A multi-institution study. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:1506–1511
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrado G, Cutillo G, Mancini E et al (2016) Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study. J Gynecol Oncol 27:e39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Corrado G, Cutillo G, Mancini E et al (2016) Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study. J Gynecol Oncol 27:e39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogliolo S, Ferrero S, Cassani C et al (2016) Single-site versus multiport robotic hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a retrospective evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:603–609CrossRefPubMed Bogliolo S, Ferrero S, Cassani C et al (2016) Single-site versus multiport robotic hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a retrospective evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:603–609CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat El Hachem L, Andikyan V, Mathews S et al (2016) Robotic single-site and conventional laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a matched case–control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:760–768CrossRefPubMed El Hachem L, Andikyan V, Mathews S et al (2016) Robotic single-site and conventional laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a matched case–control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:760–768CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Akdemir A, Yildirim N, Zeybek B, Karaman S, Sendag F (2015) Single incision trans-umbilical total hysterectomy: robotic or laparoscopic? Gynecol Obstet Invest 80:93–98CrossRefPubMed Akdemir A, Yildirim N, Zeybek B, Karaman S, Sendag F (2015) Single incision trans-umbilical total hysterectomy: robotic or laparoscopic? Gynecol Obstet Invest 80:93–98CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogliolo S, Mereu L, Cassani C et al (2015) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions’ preliminary experience. Int J Med Robot 11:159–165CrossRefPubMed Bogliolo S, Mereu L, Cassani C et al (2015) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions’ preliminary experience. Int J Med Robot 11:159–165CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong GO, Lee YH, Hong DG, Cho YL, Lee YS (2016) Robotic hysterectomy or myomectomy without power morcellation: a single-port assisted three-incision technique with manual morcellation. Int J Med Robot 12:483–489CrossRefPubMed Chong GO, Lee YH, Hong DG, Cho YL, Lee YS (2016) Robotic hysterectomy or myomectomy without power morcellation: a single-port assisted three-incision technique with manual morcellation. Int J Med Robot 12:483–489CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopez S, Mulla ZD, Hernandez L, Garza DM, Payne TN, Farnam RW (2016) A comparison of outcomes between robotic-assisted, single-site laparoscopy versus laparoendoscopic single site for benign hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:84–88CrossRefPubMed Lopez S, Mulla ZD, Hernandez L, Garza DM, Payne TN, Farnam RW (2016) A comparison of outcomes between robotic-assisted, single-site laparoscopy versus laparoendoscopic single site for benign hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:84–88CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Paek J, Lee JD, Kong TW, Chang SJ, Ryu HS (2016) Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc 30:1043–1050CrossRefPubMed Paek J, Lee JD, Kong TW, Chang SJ, Ryu HS (2016) Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc 30:1043–1050CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheib SA, Fader AN (2015) Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(179):e1–e8 Scheib SA, Fader AN (2015) Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(179):e1–e8
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagotti A, Corrado G, Fanfani F et al (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) vs. laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: a double-institution case–control study. Gynecol Oncol 130:219–223CrossRefPubMed Fagotti A, Corrado G, Fanfani F et al (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) vs. laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: a double-institution case–control study. Gynecol Oncol 130:219–223CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sendag F, Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ozdemir A, Gunusen I, Oztekin MK (2014) Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:689–694CrossRefPubMed Sendag F, Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ozdemir A, Gunusen I, Oztekin MK (2014) Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:689–694CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G, Ruggiero M, Tana R, Pluchino N (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg Endosc 27:2638–2643 Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G, Ruggiero M, Tana R, Pluchino N (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg Endosc 27:2638–2643
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E et al (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2759–2764CrossRefPubMed Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E et al (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2759–2764CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding DC, Hong MK, Chu TY, Chang YH, Liu HW (2017) Robotic single-site supracervical hysterectomy with manual morcellation: preliminary experience. World J Clin Case 5:172–177CrossRef Ding DC, Hong MK, Chu TY, Chang YH, Liu HW (2017) Robotic single-site supracervical hysterectomy with manual morcellation: preliminary experience. World J Clin Case 5:172–177CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva E, Silva A, Fernandes RP, Araujo MP et al (2017) Single-site robotic radical hysterectomy and sentinel lymphnode biopsy in cervical cancer: a case report. Rev Br Ginecol Obstet 39:35–40 Silva E, Silva A, Fernandes RP, Araujo MP et al (2017) Single-site robotic radical hysterectomy and sentinel lymphnode biopsy in cervical cancer: a case report. Rev Br Ginecol Obstet 39:35–40
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pluchino N, Buchs NC, Drakopoulos P, Wenger JM, Morel P, Dallenbach P (2014) Robotic single-site combined cholecystectomy and hysterectomy: advantages and limits. Int J Surg Case Rep 5:1025–1027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pluchino N, Buchs NC, Drakopoulos P, Wenger JM, Morel P, Dallenbach P (2014) Robotic single-site combined cholecystectomy and hysterectomy: advantages and limits. Int J Surg Case Rep 5:1025–1027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mereu L, Carri G, Khalifa H (2012) Robotic single port total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 127:644CrossRefPubMed Mereu L, Carri G, Khalifa H (2012) Robotic single port total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 127:644CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kane S, Stepp KJ (2010) Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery hysterectomy using robotic lightweight endoscope assistants. J Robot Surg 3:253–255CrossRefPubMed Kane S, Stepp KJ (2010) Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery hysterectomy using robotic lightweight endoscope assistants. J Robot Surg 3:253–255CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF, Kaouk JH, Falcone T (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:589–591CrossRefPubMed Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF, Kaouk JH, Falcone T (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:589–591CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat El Hachem L, Momeni M, Friedman K, Moshier EL, Chuang LT, Gretz HF 3rd (2016) Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology. Int J Med Robot 12:509–516CrossRefPubMed El Hachem L, Momeni M, Friedman K, Moshier EL, Chuang LT, Gretz HF 3rd (2016) Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology. Int J Med Robot 12:509–516CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ozgurel B, Oztekin MK, Sendag F (2015) Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:384–389CrossRefPubMed Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ozgurel B, Oztekin MK, Sendag F (2015) Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:384–389CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID (2015) The role of knotless barbed suture in gynecologic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Innovat 22:528–539CrossRef Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID (2015) The role of knotless barbed suture in gynecologic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Innovat 22:528–539CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID (2015) Port-site metastases in patients with gynecological cancer after robot-assisted operations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:263–269CrossRefPubMed Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID (2015) Port-site metastases in patients with gynecological cancer after robot-assisted operations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:263–269CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Iavazzo C, Papadopoulou EK, Gkegkes ID (2014) Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40:2125–2134CrossRefPubMed Iavazzo C, Papadopoulou EK, Gkegkes ID (2014) Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40:2125–2134CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao PP, Rao PP, Bhagwat S (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery—current status and controversies. J Minim Access Surg 7:6–16PubMedPubMedCentral Rao PP, Rao PP, Bhagwat S (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery—current status and controversies. J Minim Access Surg 7:6–16PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update
verfasst von
Christos Iavazzo
Evelyn Eleni Minis
Ioannis D. Gkegkes
Publikationsdatum
16.02.2018
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0789-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.