Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 9/2020

02.04.2020 | Original Contributions

Single Versus Double-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch: Single-Site Comparative Cohort Study in 440 Consecutive Patients

verfasst von: Pablo Finno, Javier Osorio, Amador García-Ruiz-de-Gordejuela, Anna Casajoana, María Sorribas, Víctor Admella, Mónica Serrano, Joao Batista Marchesini, Almino C. Ramos, Jordi Pujol-Gebellí

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To study weight loss, comorbidity remission, complications, and nutritional deficits after duodenal switch (DS) and single-anastomosis DS with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S).

Material and Methods

Retrospective review of patients submitted to DS or SADI-S for morbid obesity in a single university hospital.

Results

Four hundred forty patients underwent DS (n = 259) or SADI-S (n = 181). Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 50.8 ± 6.4Kg/m2. Mean follow-up was 56.1 ± 37.2 months for DS and 27.2 ± 18.9 months for SADI-S. Global mean excess weight loss was 77.4% at 2 years similar for SADI-S and DS, and 72.1% at 10 years after DS. Although early complications were similar in SADI-S and DS (13.3% vs. 18.9%, p = n.s.), long-term complications and vitamin and micronutrient deficiencies were superior after DS. Rate of comorbidities remission was 85.2% for diabetes, 63.9% for hypertension, 77.6% for dyslipidemia, and 82.1% for sleep apnea, with no differences between both techniques. In patients with initial BMI > 55 kg/m2 (n = 91), DS achieved higher percentage of BMI < 35 kg/m2 (80% vs. 50%, p = 0.025) and higher rate of diabetes remission (100% vs. 75%, p = 0050).

Conclusions

DS and SADI-S showed similar weight loss and comorbidity remission rates at 2 years. In patients with initial BMI > 55 kg/m2, DS obtained better BMI control at 2 years and better diabetes remission, but more long-term complications and supplementation needs.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2019;92:6–10.CrossRef Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2019;92:6–10.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Skogar ML, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch is superior to gastric bypass in patients with super obesity when evaluated with the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2308–16.CrossRef Skogar ML, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch is superior to gastric bypass in patients with super obesity when evaluated with the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2308–16.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Strain GW, Torghabeh MH, Gagner M, et al. The impact of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) over 9 years. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):787–94.CrossRef Strain GW, Torghabeh MH, Gagner M, et al. The impact of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) over 9 years. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):787–94.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–8.CrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–8.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedberg J, Sundstrom J, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch versus roux-en-Y-gastric bypass for morbid obesity: sistematic review and meta-analysis of weight results, diabetes resolution and early complications in single-centre comparisons. Obes Rev. 2014;15(7):555–63.CrossRef Hedberg J, Sundstrom J, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch versus roux-en-Y-gastric bypass for morbid obesity: sistematic review and meta-analysis of weight results, diabetes resolution and early complications in single-centre comparisons. Obes Rev. 2014;15(7):555–63.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sucandy I, Titano J, Bonanni F, et al. Comparison of vertical sleeve gastrectomy versus biliopancreatic diversion. N Am J Med Sci. 2014;6(1):35–8.CrossRef Sucandy I, Titano J, Bonanni F, et al. Comparison of vertical sleeve gastrectomy versus biliopancreatic diversion. N Am J Med Sci. 2014;6(1):35–8.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Prachand VN, Davee RT, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006; 244(4) Prachand VN, Davee RT, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006; 244(4)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson B, Gill RS, de Gara CJ, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion: the effectiveness of duodenal switch and its limitations. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:974762.CrossRef Anderson B, Gill RS, de Gara CJ, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion: the effectiveness of duodenal switch and its limitations. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:974762.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME. Proximal duodenal-ileal end to side by-pass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME. Proximal duodenal-ileal end to side by-pass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera A, Herrera MA, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera A, Herrera MA, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat NIH. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: National Institutes of Health Consensus Developement conference statement. Am J Nutr. 1992;55(2 Suppl):615S–9S. NIH. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: National Institutes of Health Consensus Developement conference statement. Am J Nutr. 1992;55(2 Suppl):615S–9S.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gebelli JP, Gordejuela AG, Ramos AC, et al. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016;29(Suppl 1):85–90.CrossRef Gebelli JP, Gordejuela AG, Ramos AC, et al. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016;29(Suppl 1):85–90.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Surve A, Zaveri H, Cottam D, et al. A retrospective comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(3):415–22.CrossRef Surve A, Zaveri H, Cottam D, et al. A retrospective comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(3):415–22.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Biertho L, Simon-Hould F, Marceau S, et al. Current outcomes of laparoscopic duodenal switch. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2016;10:1.CrossRef Biertho L, Simon-Hould F, Marceau S, et al. Current outcomes of laparoscopic duodenal switch. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2016;10:1.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon RC, Kirkpatrick V, Gaskins L, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single- versus double-anastomosis duodenal switch at a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(2):245–52.CrossRef Moon RC, Kirkpatrick V, Gaskins L, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single- versus double-anastomosis duodenal switch at a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(2):245–52.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(8):1306–12.CrossRef Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(8):1306–12.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-Ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.CrossRef Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-Ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Surve A, Cottam D, Sanchez-Pernaute A, et al. The incidence of complications associated with loop duodeno-ileostomy after single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedures among 1328 patients: a multicenter experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(5):594–601.CrossRef Surve A, Cottam D, Sanchez-Pernaute A, et al. The incidence of complications associated with loop duodeno-ileostomy after single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedures among 1328 patients: a multicenter experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(5):594–601.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):454–61.CrossRef Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):454–61.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):408–16.CrossRef Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):408–16.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira SS, Guimarães M, Almeida R, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch(BPD-DS) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) result in distinct post-prandial hormone profiles. Int J Obes. 2019;43(12):2518–27.CrossRef Pereira SS, Guimarães M, Almeida R, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch(BPD-DS) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) result in distinct post-prandial hormone profiles. Int J Obes. 2019;43(12):2518–27.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Biertho L, Lebel S, Marceau S, et al. Perioperative complications in a consecutive series of 1000 duodenal switches. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:63–8.CrossRef Biertho L, Lebel S, Marceau S, et al. Perioperative complications in a consecutive series of 1000 duodenal switches. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:63–8.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottam A, Cottam D, Roslin M, et al. A matched cohort analysis of sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch with 18-month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2363–9.CrossRef Cottam A, Cottam D, Roslin M, et al. A matched cohort analysis of sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch with 18-month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2363–9.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethi M, Chau E, Youn A, et al. Long-term outcomes after biliopancreatic diversion with and without duodenal switch: 2-, 5-, and 10-year data. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(9):1697–705.CrossRef Sethi M, Chau E, Youn A, et al. Long-term outcomes after biliopancreatic diversion with and without duodenal switch: 2-, 5-, and 10-year data. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(9):1697–705.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Summerhays C, Cottam D, Cottam A. Internal hernia after revisional laparoscopic loop duodenal switch surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):e13–5.CrossRef Summerhays C, Cottam D, Cottam A. Internal hernia after revisional laparoscopic loop duodenal switch surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):e13–5.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):321–6.CrossRef Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):321–6.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutledge R, Kular K, Manchanda N. The mini-gastric bypass original technique. Int J Surg. 2019;61:38–41.CrossRef Rutledge R, Kular K, Manchanda N. The mini-gastric bypass original technique. Int J Surg. 2019;61:38–41.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sitarz R, Maciejewski R, Polkowski WP, et al. Gastroenterostoma after Billroth antrectomy as a premalignant condition. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(25):3201–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Sitarz R, Maciejewski R, Polkowski WP, et al. Gastroenterostoma after Billroth antrectomy as a premalignant condition. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(25):3201–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nemoto H, Tate G, Yokomizo K, et al. Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma occurring 50 years after a gastroenterostomy with braun anastomosis. Case Rep Oncol. 2014;7(2):330–6.CrossRef Nemoto H, Tate G, Yokomizo K, et al. Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma occurring 50 years after a gastroenterostomy with braun anastomosis. Case Rep Oncol. 2014;7(2):330–6.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Topart P, Becouarn G, Salle A, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion requires multiple vitamin and micronutrient adjustments within 2 years of surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1709–18.CrossRef Topart P, Becouarn G, Salle A, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion requires multiple vitamin and micronutrient adjustments within 2 years of surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1709–18.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Gabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(5):1092–8.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Gabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(5):1092–8.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mintzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analysis of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2098–104.CrossRef Mintzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analysis of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2098–104.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Single Versus Double-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch: Single-Site Comparative Cohort Study in 440 Consecutive Patients
verfasst von
Pablo Finno
Javier Osorio
Amador García-Ruiz-de-Gordejuela
Anna Casajoana
María Sorribas
Víctor Admella
Mónica Serrano
Joao Batista Marchesini
Almino C. Ramos
Jordi Pujol-Gebellí
Publikationsdatum
02.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04566-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Obesity Surgery 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.