Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2016

17.10.2016 | Original Article

Skeletal effects in Angle Class II/1 patients treated with the functional regulator type II

Cephalometric and tensor analysis

verfasst von: Simone Schulz, Bernd Koos, Kathrin Duske, Franka Stahl

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this work was to employ both cephalometric and tensor analysis in characterizing the skeletal changes experienced by patients with Angle Class II/1 malocclusion during functional orthodontic treatment with the functional regulator type II.

Methods

A total of 23 patients with Class II/1 malocclusion based on lateral cephalograms obtained before and after treatment with the functional regulator type II were analyzed. Another 23 patients with Angle Class II/1 malocclusion who had not undergone treatment were included as controls.

Results

Our cephalometric data attest to significant therapeutic effects of the functional regulator type II on the skeletal mandibular system, including significant advancement of the mandible, increases in effective mandibular length with enhancement of the chin profile, and reduction of growth-related bite deepening. No treatment-related effects were observed at the cranial-base and midface levels. In addition, tensor analysis revealed significant stimulation of mandibular growth in sagittal directions, without indications of growth effects on the maxilla. Its growth-pattern findings differed from those of cephalometric analysis by indicating that the appliance did promote horizontal development, which supports the functional orthodontic treatment effect in Angle Class II/1 cases.

Conclusions

Tensor analysis yielded additional insights into sagittal and vertical growth changes not identifiable by strictly cephalometric means. The functional regulator type II was an effective treatment modality for Angle Class II/1 malocclusion and influenced the skeletal development of these patients in favorable ways.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Angelieri F, Franchi L, Cevidanes LHS et al (2013) Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance: a prospective evalution 7 years post-treatment. Eur J Orthod 36(2):192–199CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Angelieri F, Franchi L, Cevidanes LHS et al (2013) Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance: a prospective evalution 7 years post-treatment. Eur J Orthod 36(2):192–199CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Baccetti T, Franchi L (2001) Maximizing esthetic and functional changes in Class II treatment by appropriate treatment timing. In: McNamara JAJ, Kelly K (eds) Frontiers of dental and facial esthetics Monograph 38 Craniofacial Growth Series. University of Michigan, Center for Human Growth and Development, Ann Arbor, pp 237–52 Baccetti T, Franchi L (2001) Maximizing esthetic and functional changes in Class II treatment by appropriate treatment timing. In: McNamara JAJ, Kelly K (eds) Frontiers of dental and facial esthetics Monograph 38 Craniofacial Growth Series. University of Michigan, Center for Human Growth and Development, Ann Arbor, pp 237–52
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA (2005) The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 11(3):119–129CrossRef Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA (2005) The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 11(3):119–129CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Battagel JM (1996) The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 18(1):41–54 Battagel JM (1996) The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 18(1):41–54
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bookstein FL (1982) On the cephalometrics of skeletal change. Am J Orthod 82(3):177–98 Bookstein FL (1982) On the cephalometrics of skeletal change. Am J Orthod 82(3):177–98
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chadwick SM, Aird JC, Taylor PJ et al (2001) Functional regulator treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 23(5):495–505CrossRefPubMed Chadwick SM, Aird JC, Taylor PJ et al (2001) Functional regulator treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 23(5):495–505CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L et al (2006) Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129(5):599.e1–12 Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L et al (2006) Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129(5):599.e1–12
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Creekmore TD, Radney LJ (1983) Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic? Am J Orthod 83(2):89–108CrossRefPubMed Creekmore TD, Radney LJ (1983) Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic? Am J Orthod 83(2):89–108CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Intersience Publications, New York, p 1940 Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Intersience Publications, New York, p 1940
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Falck F (1991) Long-term results of treatment of distal occlusion with the function regulator. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52(5):263–7 Falck F (1991) Long-term results of treatment of distal occlusion with the function regulator. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52(5):263–7
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Falck F, Fränkel R (1989) Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 96(4):333–341CrossRef Falck F, Fränkel R (1989) Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 96(4):333–341CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fränkel R (1969) The treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with functional correctors. Am J Orthod 55(3):265–75 Fränkel R (1969) The treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with functional correctors. Am J Orthod 55(3):265–75
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fränkel R, Fränkel C (1989) Orofacial orthopedics with the function regulator. Karger, Basel, München, Paris, London, New York, New Delhi, Singapore, Tokyo, Sidney Fränkel R, Fränkel C (1989) Orofacial orthopedics with the function regulator. Karger, Basel, München, Paris, London, New York, New Delhi, Singapore, Tokyo, Sidney
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman DC, McNamara JA, Baccetti T et al (2009) Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 135(5):570.e1–6 Freeman DC, McNamara JA, Baccetti T et al (2009) Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 135(5):570.e1–6
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Houston WJ (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83(5):382–90 Houston WJ (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83(5):382–90
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Janson GRP, Toruño JLA, Martins DR et al (2003) Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance. Eur J Orthod 25(3):301–309CrossRefPubMed Janson GRP, Toruño JLA, Martins DR et al (2003) Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance. Eur J Orthod 25(3):301–309CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerr WJ, TenHave TR, McNamara JA (1989) A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulators (FR-2 and FR-3). Eur J Orthod 11(3):235–242PubMed Kerr WJ, TenHave TR, McNamara JA (1989) A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulators (FR-2 and FR-3). Eur J Orthod 11(3):235–242PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McNamara JA, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG (1985) Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. Am J Orthod 88(2):91–110CrossRefPubMed McNamara JA, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG (1985) Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. Am J Orthod 88(2):91–110CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG (1990) A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98(2):134–144CrossRef McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG (1990) A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98(2):134–144CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McNamara JA, Peterson JE, Alexander RG (1996) Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 2(2):114–137CrossRefPubMed McNamara JA, Peterson JE, Alexander RG (1996) Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 2(2):114–137CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyers RE, Bookstein FL (1979) The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 75(6):599–617CrossRefPubMed Moyers RE, Bookstein FL (1979) The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 75(6):599–617CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P (1993) Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104(2):153–161CrossRef Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P (1993) Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104(2):153–161CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Perillo L, Cannavale R, Ferro F et al (2011) Meta-analysis of skeletal mandibular changes during Frankel appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 33(1):84–92CrossRefPubMed Perillo L, Cannavale R, Ferro F et al (2011) Meta-analysis of skeletal mandibular changes during Frankel appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 33(1):84–92CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Perillo L, Castaldo MI, Cannavale R et al (2011) Evaluation of long-term effects in patients treated with Fränkel-2 appliance. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 12(4):261–266PubMed Perillo L, Castaldo MI, Cannavale R et al (2011) Evaluation of long-term effects in patients treated with Fränkel-2 appliance. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 12(4):261–266PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Perillo L, Johnston LE, Ferro A (1996) Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109(2):132–139CrossRef Perillo L, Johnston LE, Ferro A (1996) Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109(2):132–139CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Perillo L, Femiano A, Palumbo S et al (2013) Skeletal and dental effects produced by functional regulator-2 in pre-pubertal class II patients: a controlled study. Prog Orthod. 14(1):18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Perillo L, Femiano A, Palumbo S et al (2013) Skeletal and dental effects produced by functional regulator-2 in pre-pubertal class II patients: a controlled study. Prog Orthod. 14(1):18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodrigues de Almeida M, Castanha Henriques JF, Rodrigues de Almeida R et al (2002) Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 72(5):418–425PubMed Rodrigues de Almeida M, Castanha Henriques JF, Rodrigues de Almeida R et al (2002) Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 72(5):418–425PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider C (2007) Die Behandlung von Klasse II-Patienten mit abnehmbaren Platten und funktionskieferorthopädischen Geräten -Bedeutung der Frontzahninklination und Wachstumsrichtung für das Behandlungsergebnis. Medizinische Dissertation, Tübingen Schneider C (2007) Die Behandlung von Klasse II-Patienten mit abnehmbaren Platten und funktionskieferorthopädischen Geräten -Bedeutung der Frontzahninklination und Wachstumsrichtung für das Behandlungsergebnis. Medizinische Dissertation, Tübingen
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Showkatbakhsh R, Castaldo MI, Jamilian A et al (2013) Treatment effects of R-appliance and Fränkel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Paediatr Dent 14(1):17–22PubMed Showkatbakhsh R, Castaldo MI, Jamilian A et al (2013) Treatment effects of R-appliance and Fränkel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Paediatr Dent 14(1):17–22PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Silvestrini-Biavati A, Alberti G, Silvestrini Biavati F et al (2012) Early functional treatment in Class II division 1 subjects with mandibular retrognathia using Fränkel II appliance. A prospective controlled study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 13(4):301–306PubMed Silvestrini-Biavati A, Alberti G, Silvestrini Biavati F et al (2012) Early functional treatment in Class II division 1 subjects with mandibular retrognathia using Fränkel II appliance. A prospective controlled study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 13(4):301–306PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl F (2007) Kephalometrische, tensoranalytische und visuelle Analyse des Gesichtsschädelwachstums bei unbehandelten Probanden mit regelrechter Gebissentwicklung vom 7. bis 18. Lebensjahr Med. Habilitationsschrift. [Rostock] Stahl F (2007) Kephalometrische, tensoranalytische und visuelle Analyse des Gesichtsschädelwachstums bei unbehandelten Probanden mit regelrechter Gebissentwicklung vom 7. bis 18. Lebensjahr Med. Habilitationsschrift. [Rostock]
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl F, Baccetti T, Franchi L et al (2008) Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 134(1):125–137CrossRef Stahl F, Baccetti T, Franchi L et al (2008) Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 134(1):125–137CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Toth LR, McNamara JA (1999) Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116(6):597–609CrossRef Toth LR, McNamara JA (1999) Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116(6):597–609CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Witt E (1970) Die rechtzeitige kieferorthopädische Behandlung. In: Eschler J, Rakosi T, Witt E (eds) Kieferorthopädie für den praktischen Zahnarzt Eine Einführung. Werk, München, p 1970 Witt E (1970) Die rechtzeitige kieferorthopädische Behandlung. In: Eschler J, Rakosi T, Witt E (eds) Kieferorthopädie für den praktischen Zahnarzt Eine Einführung. Werk, München, p 1970
Metadaten
Titel
Skeletal effects in Angle Class II/1 patients treated with the functional regulator type II
Cephalometric and tensor analysis
verfasst von
Simone Schulz
Bernd Koos
Kathrin Duske
Franka Stahl
Publikationsdatum
17.10.2016
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0050-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.