Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Child's Nervous System
Erschienen in: Child's Nervous System 6/2014

01.06.2014 | Review Paper

Skull base embryology: a multidisciplinary review

verfasst von: Antonio Di Ieva, Emiliano Bruner, Thomas Haider, Luigi F. Rodella, John M. Lee, Michael D. Cusimano, Manfred Tschabitscher

Erschienen in: Child's Nervous System | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The skull base represents a central and complex bone structure of the skull and forms the floor of the cranial cavity on which the brain lies. Anatomical knowledge of this particular region is important for understanding several pathologic conditions as well as for planning surgical procedures. Embryology of the cranial base is of great interest due to its pronounced impact on the development of adjacent regions including the brain, neck, and craniofacial skeleton.

Materials and methods

Information from human and comparative anatomy, anthropology, embryology, surgery, and computed modelling was integrated to provide a perspective to interpret skull base formation and variability within the cranial functional and structural system.

Results and conclusions

The skull base undergoes an elaborate sequence of development stages and represents a key player in skull, face and brain development. Furthering our holistic understanding of the embryology of the skull base promises to expand our knowledge and enhance our ability to treat associated anomalies.
Literatur
1.
Ross C, Henneberg M (1995) Basicranial flexion, relative brain size, and facial kyphosis in Homo sapiens and some fossil hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol 98:575–593PubMedCrossRef
2.
Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ (2005) Duplication of the occipital condyles. Clin Anat 18:92–95PubMedCrossRef
3.
Ross CF, Ravosa MJ (1993) Basicranial flexion, relative brain size, and facial kyphosis in nonhuman primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 91:305–324PubMedCrossRef
4.
Lomholt JF, Fischer-Hansen B, Keeling JW, Reintoft I, Kjaer I (2004) Subclassification of anencephalic human fetuses according to morphology of the posterior cranial fossa. Pediatr Dev Pathol 7:601–606PubMedCrossRef
5.
Jeffery N (2005) Cranial base angulation and growth of the human fetal pharynx. Anat Rec A: Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 284:491–499CrossRef
6.
Jeffery N, Spoor F (2002) Brain size and the human cranial base: a prenatal perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:324–340PubMedCrossRef
7.
Lieberman DE, Ross CF, Ravosa MJ (2000) The primate cranial base: ontogeny, function, and integration. Am J Phys Anthropol Suppl 31:117–169CrossRef
8.
McBratney-Owen B, Iseki S, Bamforth SD, Olsen BR, Morriss-Kay GM (2008) Development and tissue origins of the mammalian cranial base. Dev Biol 322:121–132PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
Nie X (2005) Cranial base in craniofacial development: developmental features, influence on facial growth, anomaly, and molecular basis. Acta Odontol Scand 63:127–135PubMedCrossRef
10.
Di Ieva A, Bruner E, Davidson J, Pisano P, Haider T, Stone SS, Cusimano MD, Tschabitscher M, Grizzi F (2013) Cranial sutures: a multidisciplinary review. Childs Nerv Syst 29:893–905
11.
Iaconetta G, Fusco M, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Samii M, Tschabitscher M (2007) The abducens nerve: microanatomic and endoscopic study. Neurosurgery 61:7–14, discussion 14PubMedCrossRef
12.
Harris FS, Rhoton AL (1976) Anatomy of the cavernous sinus. A microsurgical study. J Neurosurg 45:169–180PubMedCrossRef
13.
Skrzat J, Walocha J, Srodek R, Nizankowska A (2006) An atypical position of the foramen ovale. Folia Morphol 65:396–399
14.
Umansky F, Elidan J, Valarezo A (1991) Dorello’s canal: a microanatomical study. J Neurosurg 75:294–298PubMedCrossRef
15.
Standring S (2008) GRAY’S anatomy — the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Edinburgh
16.
Lam A, Holbrook E (2013) Skull base anatomy and CSF rhinorrhea. Adv Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 74:1–11CrossRef
17.
Koblmüller L (1934) A case of condylus tertius. Anat Anz 71:305–352
18.
19.
Bolk L (1921) Different forms and origniation of Condylus tertius. Anat Anz 54
20.
Jiang X, Iseki S, Maxson RE, Sucov HM, Morriss-Kay GM (2002) Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev Biol 241:106–116PubMedCrossRef
21.
Santaolalla-Montoya F, Martinez-Ibarguen A, Sanchez-Fernandez JM, Sanchez-del-Rey A (2012) Principles of cranial base ossification in humans and rats. Acta Oto-Laryngol 132:349–354CrossRef
22.
Nie X, Luukko K, Fjeld K, Kvinnsland IH, Kettunen P (2005) Developmental expression of Dkk1-3 and Mmp9 and apoptosis in cranial base of mice. J Mol Histol 36:419–426PubMedCrossRef
23.
Young B, Minugh-Purvis N, Shimo T, St-Jacques B, Iwamoto M, Enomoto-Iwamoto M, Koyama E, Pacifici M (2006) Indian and sonic hedgehogs regulate synchondrosis growth plate and cranial base development and function. Dev Biol 299:272–282PubMedCrossRef
24.
Riccomagno MM, Martinu L, Mulheisen M, Wu DK, Epstein DJ (2002) Specification of the mammalian cochlea is dependent on Sonic hedgehog. Genes Dev 16:2365–2378PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
Balczerski B, Zakaria S, Tucker AS, Borycki AG, Koyama E, Pacifici M, Francis-West P (2012) Distinct spatiotemporal roles of hedgehog signalling during chick and mouse cranial base and axial skeleton development. Dev Biol 371:203–214PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
Nie X, Luukko K, Kvinnsland IH, Kettunen P (2005) Developmentally regulated expression of Shh and Ihh in the developing mouse cranial base: comparison with Sox9 expression. Anat Rec A: Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 286:891–898CrossRef
27.
Couly GF, Coltey PM, Le Douarin NM (1993) The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 117:409–429PubMed
28.
Evans DJ, Noden DM (2006) Spatial relations between avian craniofacial neural crest and paraxial mesoderm cells. Dev Dyn 235:1310–1325PubMedCrossRef
29.
Cankal F, Ugur HC, Tekdemir I, Elhan A, Karahan T, Sevim A (2004) Fossa navicularis: anatomic variation at the skull base. Clin Anat 17:118–122PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
32.
Couly GF, Coltey PM, Le Douarin NM (1992) The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras. Development 114:1–15PubMed
33.
34.
Kuratani S (2005) Craniofacial development and the evolution of the vertebrates: the old problems on a new background. Zool Sci 22:1–19PubMedCrossRef
35.
Hayek H (1927) Analyses of the proatlas, epistropheus, atlas and occipital bone. Morph Jahrb 58
36.
Tubbs RS, Lingo PR, Mortazavi MM, Cohen-Gadol AA (2013) Hypoplastic occipital condyle and third occipital condyle: review of their dysembryology. Clin Anat 26:928–932PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
Jacquement (1850) Abnormal articulation of occiput and axis. Bull Soc Anat Paris 25:49
39.
Al-Motabagani MA, Surendra M (2006) Total occipitalization of the atlas. Anat Sci Int 81:173–180PubMedCrossRef
40.
Sauser G (1934) Intracranial Manifestation of the last occipital vertebra. Sonderdruck Zeitschr Anat Entwicklungsgeschichte 104
41.
42.
Currarino G, Maravilla KR, Salyer KE (1985) Transsphenoidal canal (large craniopharyngeal canal) and its pathologic implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 6:39–43PubMed
43.
Hedlund G (2006) Congenital frontonasal masses: developmental anatomy, malformations, and MR imaging. Pediatr Radiol 36:647–662, quiz 726–647PubMedCrossRef
44.
Vermeij-Keers C (1990) Craniofacial embryology and morphogenesis: normal and abnormal. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
45.
Stricker M, Van der Meulen J, Raphael B, Mazzola R (1990) Craniofacial growth and development. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
46.
Davies ML, Macpherson P (1991) Fibrous dysplasia of the skull: disease activity in relation to age. Br J Radiol 64:576–579PubMedCrossRef
47.
Bowers CA, Taussky P, Couldwell WT (2014) Surgical treatment of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia in adults. Neurosurg Rev 37:47–53PubMedCrossRef
48.
Smartt JM Jr, Karmacharya J, Gannon FH, Teixeira C, Mansfield K, Hunenko O, Shapiro IM, Kirschner RE (2005) Intrauterine fetal constraint induces chondrocyte apoptosis and premature ossification of the cranial base. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:1363–1369PubMedCrossRef
49.
50.
De Beer G (1937) The development of the vertebrates skull. Clarendon Press, Oxford
51.
Gans C, Northcutt RG (1983) Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates: a new head. Science 220:268–273PubMedCrossRef
52.
Noden DM (1978) The control of avian cephalic neural crest cytodifferentiation: I. Skeletal and connective tissues. Dev Biol 67:296–312PubMedCrossRef
53.
54.
Kuratani S (1989) Development of the orbital region in the chondrocranium of Caretta caretta. Reconsideration of the vertebrate neurocranium configuration. Anat Anz 169:335–349PubMed
55.
Marugan-Lobon J, Buscalioni AD (2009) New insight on the anatomy and architecture of the avian neurocranium. Anat Rec 292:364–370CrossRef
56.
Milner AC, Walsh SA (2009) Avian brain evolution: new data from Palaeogene birds (Lower Eocene) from England. Zool J Linnean Soc 155:198–219CrossRef
57.
Huxley TH (1863) Evidence as to man’s place in nature. Appleton, New York
58.
Bruner E, Averini M, Manzi G (2003) Endocranial traits. Prevalence and distribution in a recent human population. Eur J Anat 7:23–33
59.
Lieberman DE, Pearson OM, Mowbray KM (2000) Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape. J Hum Evol 38:291–315PubMedCrossRef
60.
61.
Bastir M, Rosas A, Stringer C, Cuetara JM, Kruszynski R, Weber GW, Ross CF, Ravosa MJ (2010) Effects of brain and facial size on basicranial form in human and primate evolution. J Hum Evol 58:424–431PubMedCrossRef
62.
McCarthy RC (2001) Anthropoid cranial base architecture and scaling relationships. J Hum Evol 40:41–66PubMedCrossRef
63.
Ross CF, Henneberg M, Ravosa MJ, Richard S (2004) Curvilinear, geometric and phylogenetic modeling of basicranial flexion: is it adaptive, is it constrained? J Hum Evol 46:185–213PubMedCrossRef
64.
Lieberman DE, McCarthy RC (1999) The ontogeny of cranial base angulation in humans and chimpanzees and its implications for reconstructing pharyngeal dimensions. J Hum Evol 46:185–213 36:487–517
65.
Jeffery N, Spoor F (2004) Ossification and midline shape changes of the human fetal cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:78–90PubMedCrossRef
66.
Enlow DH (1990) Facial growth. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
67.
68.
Moss ML, Young RW (1960) A functional approach to craniology. Am J Phys Anthropol 18:281–292PubMedCrossRef
69.
Moss ML (1959) The pathogenesis of premature cranial synostosis in man. Acta Anat 37:351–370PubMedCrossRef
70.
Strait DS (2001) Integration, phylogeny, and the hominid cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 114:273–297PubMedCrossRef
71.
Bruner E, Ripani M (2008) A quantitative and descriptive approach to morphological variation of the endocranial base in modern humans. Am J Phys Anthropol 137:30–40PubMedCrossRef
72.
Bastir M, Rosas A (2005) Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face. Am J Phys Anthropol 128:26–34PubMedCrossRef
73.
Bruner E (2007) Cranial shape and size variation in human evolution: structural and functional perspectives. Childs Nerv Syst 23:1357–1365PubMedCrossRef
74.
Masters MP (2012) Relative size of the eye and orbit: an evolutionary and craniofacial constraint model for examining the etiology and disparate incidence of juvenile-onset myopia in humans. Med Hypotheses 78:649–656PubMedCrossRef
75.
Gunz P, Harvati K (2007) The Neanderthal “chignon”: variation, integration, and homology. J Hum Evol 52:262–274PubMedCrossRef
76.
77.
Bastir M, Rosas A (2009) Mosaic evolution of the basicranium in Homo and its relation to modular development. Evol Biol 36:637–654CrossRef
78.
Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS (2005) Virtual reconstruction: a primer in computer-assisted paleontology and biomedicine. Wiley-Liss, New York
79.
Bookstein FL, Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Prossinger H, Schaefer K, Seidler H (2003) Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. J Hum Evol 44:167–187PubMedCrossRef
80.
Bookstein F (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
81.
Zelditch ML, Swidersky DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists. Elsevier, San Diego
82.
Slice DE (2007) Geometric morphometrics. Annu Rev Anthropol 36:261–281CrossRef
83.
84.
Ingraham FD, Matson DD (1943) An unusual nasopharyngeal encephalocele. N Engl J Med 228:815–820CrossRef
85.
Lewinska-Smialek B, Szaro P, Ciszek B (2013) Anatomy of the adult foramen cecum. Eur J Anat 3:142–145
86.
Suwanwela C, Suwanwela N (1972) A morphological classification of sincipital encephalomeningoceles. J Neurosurg 36:201–211PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Skull base embryology: a multidisciplinary review
verfasst von
Antonio Di Ieva
Emiliano Bruner
Thomas Haider
Luigi F. Rodella
John M. Lee
Michael D. Cusimano
Manfred Tschabitscher
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Child's Nervous System / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2411-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Child's Nervous System 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Cover Editorial

The relationship with parent associations

Original Paper

Optical coherence tomography: a quantitative tool to screen for papilledema in craniosynostosis

Case Report

Acute hydrocephalus in a child with a third ventricle arachnoid cyst and coincidental enteroviral meningitis

Original Paper

Prospective investigation of anterior pituitary function in the acute phase and 12 months after pediatric traumatic brain injury

Original Paper

The efficacy of neuroendoscopic treatment for middle cranial fossa arachnoid cysts assessed by MRI 3D segmentation and modeling

Original Paper

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma in children and adolescents: a single-center experience

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.