Background
Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease caused by
Mycobacterium leprae, an alcohol-acid resistant bacillus that has a notable affinity for the skin and peripheral nerves [
1]. From an epidemiological perspective, approximately 225,000 new leprosy cases are diagnosed each year around the world, with 8.9% of these cases occurring in children and adolescents [
2,
3]. Furthermore, at the time of diagnosis 11% of these children already present with grade 2 disability increasing to 27.3% during their follow-up [
3].
In Colombia, 300–500 new cases of leprosy are reported per year. Seven percent of the new leprosy cases occurred in children younger than 15 years of age, 59% of these cases were in children 10–14 years of age [
4,
5]. Although there is a low prevalence of leprosy in Colombia as a whole (< 1/10000 inhabitants), we have detected high transmission of
M. leprae with certain at risk populations [
5]. Thorough evaluation by physical examination, detection of antibodies against the gold standard antigen phenolic glycolipid (PGL)-I, and PCR detection of
M. leprae DNA in nasal swabs and suspicious skin lesions have contributed to the detection of both new patients and infected but healthy household contacts (HHC). In addition, molecular epidemiology studies in Colombia have demonstrated intra-familiar
M. leprae transmission [
6]. Determining who is infected with
M. leprae is complicated by the inability to isolate and culture the bacteria ex vivo. Antibodies against
M. leprae are therefore considered as a simple proxy indicator of infection or, at a minimum, exposure. We previously reported that the synthetic mimetic of PGL-I, natural octyl disaccharide (NDO), can be combined with recombinant protein Leprosy IDRI Diagnostic (LID)-1 to provide the NDO-LID conjugate that can detect antibodies in the serum of leprosy patients and many HHC [
7]. In patients, the magnitude of the antibody response correlates strongly with the level of infection [
7].
Leprosy among children and adolescents has been correlated with certain social and environmental aspects, such as cohabiting with an index case, malnutrition, living in overcrowded households, and absence of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) immunization scars [
4,
8]. Likewise,
M. leprae infection could also be linked to interactions with potential animal reservoirs such as armadillos [
9]. Importantly, as it was mentioned, 7% of Colombian cases occur in children younger than 15 years of age with approximately 3 of every 5 of these cases are in children aged 10–14 years old [
4,
5]. These data are alarming because they reveal ongoing and active transmission of
M. leprae that, on top of a diagnostic lag, indicate shortcomings in the elimination efforts of leprosy control programs.
Given that detection of serum antibodies against
M. leprae is more practical among at risk populations than direct detection methods (PCR and histopathology) [
6], we hypothesized that these responses used in the context of various socioeconomic indicators could enhance our understanding of factors that contribute to the risk of
M. leprae infection and development of leprosy. The objective of this study was therefore to determine the relationship between anti-NDO-LID antibodies (IgM, IgG, protein A titers (i.e. antibodies for both IgM and IgG)), taking into account that the levels of these immunoglobulins are strongly linked with
M. leprae infection levels [
7,
10], and social and environmental aspects that could be associated with a higher
M. leprae infection rate in children and adolescents in the higher risk regions of Colombia.
Discussion
Leprosy remains a public health problem in many areas. Establishing the relationship between
M. leprae infection and socio-environmental factors may help identify why there is greater frequency of infection among juvenile HHC of leprosy patients relative to other contacts. Considering that leprosy has strong links to poverty [
12,
13], we examined the rates and levels of serum suggestive of
M. leprae infection against various indicators of reduced social status in Colombia. In agreement with the general findings of other, we determined that the lower the socioeconomic status of the household inhabited by children and adolescents, the higher rates and levels of antibodies against the diagnostic conjugate NDO-LID. Residency in a geographic region linked to extreme poverty and prolonged (> 10 years) exposure to a leprosy case were very influential, as was reported consumption of armadillo meat. Although limited to convenience sampling and a small sample collection that does not represent all Colombian regions, at a time when leprosy control program activities are generally being scaled back or integrated into general health systems, our data and methods could help focus control efforts, inform education campaigns and enhance the overall output of leprosy-specific programs.
It is widely reported and accepted that HHC of MB patients have a higher risk of
M. leprae infection and subsequent development of leprosy than HHC of PB patients [
14]. In contrast with the reported data of Amorim et al. [
15], in which elevated antibody responses were found in HHC of MB patients compared to HHC of PB patients, our analyses found no significant differences in either anti-NDO-LID frequencies or levels when juvenile contacts were stratified by index case presentation. Although our previous data did not statistically relate serum antibody responses with duration of exposure to a patient [
6] others have linked this with risk of
M. leprae infection [
15] and we therefore decided to assess this environmental variable and relationship among subgroups in the current study. Accordingly, we observed that individuals with > 10 years exposure had significantly greater rates of seropositivity than those with < 10 years exposure. These results suggest that those with a longer length of residency with a leprosy index case, and therefore greater cumulative exposure, have a greater likelihood of infection and of developing the disease.
Knowing that leprosy is associated with poverty is not particularly beneficial in focusing control efforts in Colombia because it has the third lowest distribution of wealth of any country in the world [
16]. Our study indicates that the geographic region in which children and adolescents reside is, however, an important variable that presents risk for
M. leprae infection. Serologic data from three distinct geographic regions (Uraba-Antioquia-Choco shared region, the Caribbean region, and the Andean region), revealed that juveniles in the UAChR region had a higher
M. leprae infection rates than the other regions. These results can be explained in part by the inherent conditions of this region. UAChR is characterized for its poor public health conditions, being one of the most unequal distribution of wealth regions in Colombia, and for having parts of its territory lacking in fundamental public services like basic sanitation as well as electricity and water supply. This finding agrees with observations made in 139 municipalities in Tocantins, Brazil [
13], where municipalities with a higher vulnerability and social inequality presented with increases in leprosy onset and spread of
M. leprae.
When evaluating the relative impacts of either region of residence or socioeconomic status on
M. leprae infection in the study populations, we found that, rather than belonging to a low-low socioeconomic status, inhabiting a vulnerable geographic region (without sanitary and public services like UAChR) was the key social variable that resulted in increased frequency of
M. leprae infection. This was heightened by the fact that these vulnerable geographic regions have unfavorable socioeconomic conditions such as malnutrition, low schooling levels and absence of leprosy control program interventions [
12,
17].
It is noteworthy to the region that
M. leprae infection has been associated with armadillo hunting and manipulation [
18,
19]. Given that leprosy can be considered somewhat zoonotic, that
M. leprae-infected armadillos have been found in Colombia, and that armadillos are often used as a meat source, in traditional medicine and as pets, we hypothesized that armadillo consumption could be of great importance in the studied population [
9,
20]. While Schmitt et al. [
21] could not relate armadillo meat consumption with
M. leprae infection in Brazil, arguing not only that cooking the meat would kill the mycobacterium but also that there is a lack of evidence for gastrointestinal transmission, we found that armadillo meat consumption correlated with higher frequencies of
M. leprae infection in children and adolescents. This is consistent with other recent findings that armadillo meat consumption is related to a higher proportion of leprosy cases [
19,
20].
Among the factors that appeared protective, BCG immunization was associated with reduced
M. leprae infection frequencies among the children and adolescents in our study cohorts. The BCG vaccine can enhance cellular immune responses against
M. leprae, and immunization with BCG has been recommended for HHC of diagnosed leprosy index cases [
22]. Our findings are therefore compatible with both our previous research as well studies in Brazilian populations. As a pre-emptive approach to reduce the emergence of new cases and enable
M. leprae elimination, it has recently been suggested that seropositive individuals that have asymptomatic or sub-clinical
M. leprae infection receive BCG re-vaccination as well as treatment with rifampicin to serve as an early intervention to alter the natural course of infection [
23,
24]. Our data provide further evidence for the implementation of prophylactic measures within high risk juvenile and other HHC populations.
In summary, our assessment among Colombian children and adolescents in contact with leprosy cases reveals that risk of
M. leprae infection is increased by: residency in a vulnerable geographic region; > 10 years exposure to the leprosy index case; and consumption of armadillo meat. These results are similar to those obtained in other socioeconomic analyses [
12,
13,
18] strengthening our understanding of the impact of environmental and behavioral variables on the risk of becoming infected with
M. leprae and potentially developing leprosy. We propose that regular monitoring of the serum anti-NDO-LID antibodies in children and adolescents, and the construction of predictive models for anti-
M. leprae antibody titers, would be useful among HHC to aid both the early diagnosis of new leprosy cases and track transmission of
M. leprae. Together, this information can be used to focus control efforts.
Conclusions
Despite being classified by the WHO as a disease in elimination phase, our results show that, in accordance with the national control program statistics [
25], leprosy continues to be a public health issue in several regions in Colombia. This situation points out either failures or a lack of implementation of the eradication strategies proposed by the WHO.
This study has also proven that active M. leprae transmission persists in child and adolescent population, mainly in those populations located in vulnerable geographic regions with little presence from government, with armadillo meat consumption traditions, and that are subject to a long exposure to leprosy cases. Therefore, these findings show us that as long as the government does not intervene on the critical socioenvironmental variables distressing juvenile population, leprosy elimination will only be a utopia achieved on the desk of the national control program.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.