Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gambling Studies 4/2018

21.02.2018 | Original Paper

Social Explanations of Lottery Play: New Evidence Based on National Survey Data

verfasst von: Mark Lutter, Daria Tisch, Jens Beckert

Erschienen in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study examines the social contexts of gambling and analyzes social motivations for playing the lottery. We test three sociological approaches simultaneously: network effects, consumption theory, and strain theory. The data used (SOEP-IS, N = 5868 individuals) has several advantages beyond being a large-scale representative sample of the German population. With information on households, we can analyze social network effects while avoiding the problems of egocentric network data. Another benefit of the SOEP-IS is the panel structure. We use the panel structure to improve measurements of strain theory by using the decline in income over time as a measure for it. Our results suggest that the three theories explain different aspects of lottery play. Networks seem to have an influence on lottery play. Having another person in the household playing the lottery is positively associated with both the probability of playing (regularly) and expenditures on lottery tickets. Daydreams and the belief in good luck are positively associated with lottery play as well. Strain theory is confirmed insofar as we find that a decline in income is significantly related to expenditures but not to the probability of playing the lottery. Overall, this study suggests that people play the lottery depending on their social surroundings, their desire to participate in a world normally out of their reach, and the tensions they feel from the distance between their aspirations and their actual social position.
Fußnoten
1
For data access, see SOEP-IS (2014). For more information on SOEP-IS, see Richter and Schupp (2012).
 
2
The equivalized income is calculated according to the OECD-modified equivalence scale. This scale assigns a value of 1 to the household head, a value of 0.5 to each additional adult household member (above age 14), and a value of 0.3 to each child (below age 14).
 
3
Results of the Scree test and the big gap between the eigenvalues of the second (0.8) and third factors (0.3) indicate that there are two latent variables.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, D. J. (1996). Playing the lottery. Social action, social networks and accounts of motive. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona. Adams, D. J. (1996). Playing the lottery. Social action, social networks and accounts of motive. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, D. J. (2001). My ticket, my ‘self’: Lottery ticket number selection and the commodification and extension of the self. Sociological Spectrum, 21(4), 455–477.CrossRef Adams, D. J. (2001). My ticket, my ‘self’: Lottery ticket number selection and the commodification and extension of the self. Sociological Spectrum, 21(4), 455–477.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Binde, P. (2009). Gambling motivation and involvement. A review of social science research. Östersund: The Swedish National Institute of Public Health. Binde, P. (2009). Gambling motivation and involvement. A review of social science research. Östersund: The Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
Zurück zum Zitat Binde, P. (2013). Why people gamble: A model with five motivational dimensions. International Gambling Studies, 13(1), 81–97.CrossRef Binde, P. (2013). Why people gamble: A model with five motivational dimensions. International Gambling Studies, 13(1), 81–97.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bloch, H. A. (1951). The sociology of gambling. American Journal of Sociology, 57(3), 215–221.CrossRef Bloch, H. A. (1951). The sociology of gambling. American Journal of Sociology, 57(3), 215–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Browne, B. A., & Brown, D. J. (1994). Predictors of lottery gambling among American college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(3), 339–347.CrossRef Browne, B. A., & Brown, D. J. (1994). Predictors of lottery gambling among American college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(3), 339–347.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron, C. A., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Cameron, C. A., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, C. (1987). The romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Campbell, C. (1987). The romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu, J., & Storm, L. (2010). Personality, perceived luck and gambling attitudes as predictors of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(2), 205–227.CrossRef Chiu, J., & Storm, L. (2010). Personality, perceived luck and gambling attitudes as predictors of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(2), 205–227.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1991). Selling hope. State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1991). Selling hope. State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Darke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1997). The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 486–511.CrossRef Darke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1997). The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 486–511.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Devereux, E. C. (1980). Gambling and the social structure: A sociological study of lotteries and horse racing in contemporary America. New York: Arno Press. Devereux, E. C. (1980). Gambling and the social structure: A sociological study of lotteries and horse racing in contemporary America. New York: Arno Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Downes, D. M., Davies, B. P., David, M. E., & Stone, P. (1976). Gambling, work and leisure. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. Downes, D. M., Davies, B. P., David, M. E., & Stone, P. (1976). Gambling, work and leisure. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Zurück zum Zitat Firestone, J. M., Garza, R. T., & Harris, R. J. (2005). Protestant work ethic and worker productivity in a Mexican Brewery. International Sociology, 20, 27–44.CrossRef Firestone, J. M., Garza, R. T., & Harris, R. J. (2005). Protestant work ethic and worker productivity in a Mexican Brewery. International Sociology, 20, 27–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frey, J. H. (1984). Gambling: A sociological review. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474(1), 107–121.CrossRef Frey, J. H. (1984). Gambling: A sociological review. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474(1), 107–121.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garvía, R. (2007). Syndication, institutionalization, and lottery play. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 603–652.CrossRef Garvía, R. (2007). Syndication, institutionalization, and lottery play. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 603–652.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor Books. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu, Y., Wang, B., Liu, L., Li, G., Huang, X., & Guo, D. (2017). Is lottery playing always harmful? Development of the lottery playing health scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(9), 1563–1571.CrossRef Hu, Y., Wang, B., Liu, L., Li, G., Huang, X., & Guo, D. (2017). Is lottery playing always harmful? Development of the lottery playing health scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(9), 1563–1571.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ladouceur, R., Dube, D., Giroux, I., Legendre, N., & Gaudet, C. (1995). Cognitive biases in gambling—American Roulette and 6/49-Lottery. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(2), 473–479. Ladouceur, R., Dube, D., Giroux, I., Legendre, N., & Gaudet, C. (1995). Cognitive biases in gambling—American Roulette and 6/49-Lottery. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(2), 473–479.
Zurück zum Zitat Lutter, M. (2012). Tagträume und Konsum. Die imaginative Qualität von Gütern am Beispiel der Nachfrage für Lotterien. Soziale Welt, 63(3), 233–251. Lutter, M. (2012). Tagträume und Konsum. Die imaginative Qualität von Gütern am Beispiel der Nachfrage für Lotterien. Soziale Welt, 63(3), 233–251.
Zurück zum Zitat McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.CrossRef McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.CrossRef Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mirels, H. L., & Garrett, J. B. (1971). Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40–44.CrossRef Mirels, H. L., & Garrett, J. B. (1971). Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olason, D. T., Hayer, T., Brosowski, T., & Meyer, G. (2015). Gambling in the mist of economic crisis: Results from three national prevalence studies from Iceland. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 759–774.CrossRef Olason, D. T., Hayer, T., Brosowski, T., & Meyer, G. (2015). Gambling in the mist of economic crisis: Results from three national prevalence studies from Iceland. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 759–774.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richter, D., & Schupp, J. (2012). SOEP innovation sample (SOEP-IS)—Description, structure and documentation. SOEPpaper 463. Berlin: DIW Berlin. Richter, D., & Schupp, J. (2012). SOEP innovation sample (SOEP-IS)Description, structure and documentation. SOEPpaper 463. Berlin: DIW Berlin.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling. A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134.CrossRef Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling. A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers, P., & Webley, P. (2001). “It could be us!”: Cognitive and social psychological factors in UK national lottery play. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 181–199.CrossRef Rogers, P., & Webley, P. (2001). “It could be us!”: Cognitive and social psychological factors in UK national lottery play. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 181–199.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosecrance, J. (1986). Why regular gamblers don’t quit: A sociological perspective. Sociological Perspectives, 29(3), 357–378.CrossRef Rosecrance, J. (1986). Why regular gamblers don’t quit: A sociological perspective. Sociological Perspectives, 29(3), 357–378.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2017). Predictors of problem gambling in the US. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(2), 327–342.CrossRef Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2017). Predictors of problem gambling in the US. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(2), 327–342.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Social Explanations of Lottery Play: New Evidence Based on National Survey Data
verfasst von
Mark Lutter
Daria Tisch
Jens Beckert
Publikationsdatum
21.02.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Ausgabe 4/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9748-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Journal of Gambling Studies 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe