Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018

Open Access 01.12.2018 | Research

Social health insurance, healthcare utilization, and costs in middle-aged and elderly community-dwelling adults in China

verfasst von: Zhonghua Wang, Xiangjun Li, Mingsheng Chen, Lei Si

Erschienen in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Although many studies have analyzed health insurance worldwide, most focus on whole populations rather than specific vulnerable groups. There is a lack of studies that compare different schemes. This paper evaluates the impact of different types of social health insurance and other associated factors on healthcare utilization and costs among middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults.

Methods

Data were obtained from a nationally representative middle-aged and elderly household survey, the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, which was conducted in 2015. Middle-aged and elderly are defined as people who are ≥45 years. Descriptive statistics were used to show the prevalence of each variable. Both logistic and multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between healthcare utilization/healthcare costs and health insurance in addition to other related factors.

Results

Although the rapid expansion of social health insurance coverage has significantly improved the healthcare utilization among middle-aged and elderly adults, the difference between three schemes is large. Urban Employee Medical Insurance (UEMI) has had a greater effect in improving healthcare utilization than New Cooperative Medical Insurance (NCMI) or Urban Resident Medical Insurance (URMI). Unification of health insurance programs and optimization of health resource allocations should be a practical way to alleviate healthcare utilization inequality across schemes. People having social health insurance spend more on total and out-of-pocket (OOP) healthcare costs than people not covered by social health insurance, suggesting that enrollment in social health insurance induces significant increases in both total and OOP healthcare expenses. UEMI for the urban employed has relatively higher funding criteria and reimbursement rate, which makes the greatest extent to induce increase in healthcare costs. Some demographic or socioeconomic factors significantly affect healthcare utilization and costs among middle-aged and elderly adults.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates the differences in healthcare utilization and costs between those with and without social health insurance and between those with different health insurance schemes. Policy efforts should further focus on adjusting social health insurance and optimizing healthcare resource allocation in order to enhance effective utilization of healthcare services and control cost increases among middle-aged and elderly adults.
Abkürzungen
CHARLS
China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
CI
Confidence intervals
NCMI
New Cooperative Medical Insurance
OOP
Out-of-pocket
PPS
Probability proportional to size
PSUs
Primary sampling units
SDGs
Sustainable Development Goals
UEMI
Urban Employee Medical Insurance
URMI
Urban Resident Medical Insurance

Background

Improving access to healthcare services for all through universal health coverage is one of main targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [1]. The ultimate goal of social health insurance is to provide affordable, cost-effective, and equitable healthcare for all people [2]. China has conducted a series of health reforms during the past two decades, including expansion of social health insurance coverage and improvement in the healthcare system. Social health insurance reform employed the strategy of universal coverage and has progressed with expanded benefits during the last decade [3]. There are mainly three types of social health insurance schemes in China: 1) Urban Employee Medical Insurance (UEMI); 2) Urban Resident Medical Insurance (URMI); and 3) New Cooperative Medical Insurance (NCMI). The UEMI for those who were employed in the urban sector was formally established in 1998. After that, the NCMI for rural residents and the URMI covering urban residents who had no formal employment were introduced in 2003 and 2007, respectively. These three schemes covered > 95% of the population (about 1.336 billion people) by the end of 2015 [4]. However, healthcare utilization and costs are still very unequal across different sub-populations, and rapid expansion of social health insurance has not reached the universal level of generosity seen in other countries [5].
Many studies indicate that healthcare utilization and costs are influenced by demographic or socioeconomic factors such as age, gender, marital status, education, health insurance, standard of living, and urban residence. Hansen et al. (2012) and Saeed et al. (2013) found that health status, income, health insurance, and other demographic factors are strong determinants of healthcare utilization [6, 7]. Patient factors may be more important than supply factors in explaining the differential use of health services [8]. The most recent studies have focused on the effects of health insurance on healthcare utilization or costs and have shown mixed results. Fang et al. (2012), Kondo et al. (2013) indicated a significant positive correlation between health insurance and healthcare utilization and costs [9, 10]. Gudindon (2014), Grigorakis et al. (2016) showed that health insurance increased the use and costs of inpatient but not outpatient services [11, 12]. Gotsadze et al. (2015) reported that the Medical Insurance Schemes may have improved healthcare utilization and reduced costs [13].
China has made significant improvements in life expectancy over the last two decades due to developments in economy and medical treatment. The economic reform and opening up since 1978 in China created a shift in health systems from “equal access for equal need” to one that is profit-oriented and gradually increased reliance on health insurance and user payment [14]. There are useful studies in which China’s social health insurance over the last several years has been analyzed. Most studies focus only on NCMS, URMI, or UEMI separately. The studies on NCMS are mainly concentrated on the effects of access to NCMS on healthcare utilization and costs. Wagstaff et al. [15] found that enrollment in NCMS increased healthcare utilization but has no effects on out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Babiarz et al. [16] reported that NCMS has been associated with a significant increase in healthcare utilization in village clinics, and OOP costs have decreased with access to NCMS. Cheng et al. [17] focused on the elderly and found that these participants are more likely to get adequate medical services, but the NCMS has not reduced their OOP spending. Focusing on urban people without access to the UEMI scheme, some studies have examined the effects of URMI on healthcare utilization and costs. Liu and Zhao [18] showed that the URMI scheme has significantly increased the utilization of formal medical services and total healthcare costs but has not reduced OOP costs. Similar results were found by Chen et al. [19]. Zeng et al. [20] showed that enrollment in URMI significantly increased the elderly’s total medical expenses. There are a few studies about the effects of UEMI on healthcare utilization and costs. Huang et al. [21] examined UEMI’s effects on the demand for healthcare services and found that the UEMI has been associated with decreased outpatient medical care utilization and expenditures but not with decreased inpatient care utilization and expenditures. Chen et al. [22] reported that people enrolling in UEMI witnessed a significant increase in the medical expenses compared to those no longer covered by UEMI.
In recent years, the age of the Chinese population has increased. The elderly are more sensitive to healthcare utilization and costs because of the high prevalence of chronic disease, low incomes, and the absence of social security [23]. Despite many studies that have examined health insurance worldwide, most have focused on whole populations rather than specific, vulnerable groups. Furthermore, in China, there still are significant differences in access to services and problems with total and OOP healthcare costs among people having different social health insurance schemes [24]. However, few studies have examined the disparity of the effects of social health insurance on healthcare utilization and costs. In this paper, using national representative survey data in China, we calculated the total amount of healthcare utilization, the prevalence of healthcare underutilization, and healthcare costs among middle-aged and elderly adults; we then estimated the differences in healthcare utilization and costs between those with and without social health insurance and between those with different social health insurance schemes.

Methods

Data source

Data were obtained from a nationally representative middle-aged and elderly household survey, the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which is available online at: http://​charls.​ccer.​edu.​cn/​en/​page/​data/​2015-charlswave1. This survey, which included 150 counties in 28 provinces, aims to construct a high-quality nationally representative sample of Chinese community-dwelling adults aged > 45 in order to conduct scientific research concerning the elderly [25]. The respondents in this survey include middle-aged and elderly adults ≥45 years in any household.
The sample was drawn in four stages. First, county-level units (counties or urban districts) were sampled directly. These counties cover 28 of 30 provinces in mainland China, other than Tibet. Second, village and community units within county units were chosen with the help of the National Bureau of Statistics, using recently updated village-level population data. The sample used administrative villages in rural areas and neighborhoods in urban areas as primary sampling units (PSUs). Three PSUs were selected within each county-level unit, using probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling, to select a total of 450 PSUs. Third, household units were selected in each PSU. The sampling frame was constructed using Google Earth base maps, and a computer-assisted personal interview program was then used to sample households and to conduct the interviews using portable computers. Specifically, GPS information was collected by photographing at the door of the household. Then, using personal interview program in portable computer, the interviewer interviewed the respondents and filled out each module of the questionnaire. The data was uploaded to the project group through internet at the end of the day. Finally, all age-eligible sample households who were willing to participate in the survey were interviewed.
The main questionnaire includes information on basic demographics, family, health status and functioning, health care and insurance, work, retirement and pension, income, expenditures and assets. With regard to healthcare utilization, monthly outpatient consultations (including face-to-face consultations and home visits) and yearly hospitalizations and dental visits were recorded. Healthcare underutilization was also recorded when asked whether or not to perceive a need for outpatient or inpatient care but did not seek treatment, early dismissal from the hospital and whether or not to see a dentist during the past year. Furthermore, reasons for not seeking outpatient or inpatient care (1. Illness is not serious. 2. Poor. 3. No time. 4. Not willing to go to hospital. 5. Poor quality of hospital. 6. Other) and reasons for early dismissal from the hospital (1. Can’t recover from illness. 2. Poor. 3. Poor quality of hospital. 4. Other) were asked in the questionnaire. Data on total and OOP costs of outpatient, inpatient, medication and dentist were collected by asking how much the total cost and paying out of pocket after reimbursement from healthcare insurance were during the outpatient visit, hospitalization, self-medication or dentist visit.
The total number of enrolled participants was 18,433. Detailed descriptions of the samples are included in Table 1.
Table 1
Description of sample
Variable/categories
Prevalence (%)
95% CI
n
Health insurance
 No insurance
4.71
0.0440
0.0502
861
 UEMI (Urban employee medical insurance)
12.53
0.1205
0.1301
2289
 URMI (Urban resident medical insurance)
7.27
0.0675
0.0780
1329
 NCMI (New cooperative medical insurance)
73.99
0.7335
0.7462
13,521
 other commercial insurance
1.5
0.0133
0.0168
275
Sex
 Male
47.74
0.4702
0.4846
8800
 Female
52.26
0.5154
0.5298
9633
Age
  ≤ 50
15.65
0.1513
0.1618
2885
  > 50 and ≤ 65
43.13
0.4242
0.4385
7951
  > 65
41.21
0.4050
0.4192
7597
Educational level
 Less than lower secondary education
87.09
0.8661
0.8758
16,038
 Upper secondary and/or vocational training
10.77
0.1033
0.1122
1984
 Tertiary education
2.13
0.0193
0.0234
393
Income level
 Lowest quintile
20.06
0.1930
0.2082
2153
 Second quintile
19.94
0.1918
0.2069
2140
 Third quintile
20.05
0.1929
0.2081
2152
 Fourth quintile
19.95
0.1919
0.2070
2141
 Highest quintile
20.00
0.1925
0.2076
2147
Marital status
 Married/cohabiting
81.14
0.1830
0.1943
14,950
 Single/divorced/widowed
18.86
0.8057
0.8170
3476
Urban or rural residence
 Urban
37.74
0.3697
0.3851
5699
 Rural
62.26
0.6149
0.6303
9401
Health self-reporting
 Excellent
1.37
0.0120
0.0155
241
 Very good
10.06
0.0961
0.1050
1764
 Good
14.26
0.1374
0.1478
2501
 Fair
52.51
0.5177
0.5325
9208
 Poor
21.80
0.2119
0.2241
3823
Among the individuals included in the survey, 4.71% had no health insurance, 1.5% had other commercial insurance, nearly 74, 13, and 7% enrolled in NCMI, UEMI, and URMI, respectively. Regarding socioeconomic classification, 41% were > 65 years, approximately 87% had less than lower secondary education, and 40% were in the second or lowest income quintile.

Data analysis

Measuring healthcare utilization

The number of outpatient consultations (including face-to-face consultations and home visits), hospitalizations and dental visits during the past year were calculated. We also calculated the prevalence of healthcare underutilization by type of health insurance. Specifically, outpatient care (perceived a need for outpatient care but did not seek outpatient treatment in the past month), inpatient care (perceived a need for inpatient care but were not hospitalized during the past year), early dismissal from the hospital, and dental care (whether or not to see a dentist during the past year) were included. Furthermore, according to the questionnaires, the prevalence of reasons for healthcare underutilization (including reasons for not seeking outpatient or inpatient care, reasons for early dismissal from the hospital) were assessed.

Healthcare costs

The total and OOP costs covered by different types of health insurance were calculated for each patient. The costs were further divided into medication, outpatient, inpatient, and dental costs. Medication costs included those medications that were purchased at the pharmacy during the past month. Outpatient costs were the value of expenditures of the doctor’s visit for the respondent in the past month. Inpatient costs were the value of hospitalization expenditures for the respondent in the past year. Dental costs included the value of dental care expenditures, including dentures, for the respondent in the past year.

Statistical analysis

Initially, descriptive statistics were used to show the prevalence of each variable with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Healthcare utilization, including the number of outpatient consultations, the number of hospitalizations, the number of dental visits, mean length of hospital stay, and the prevalence of healthcare underutilization, was then presented by different types of health insurance. Medication, outpatient, inpatient, and dental costs were calculated for different types of samples. Finally, logistic and multiple linear regression models were conducted to evaluate the association between healthcare utilization or healthcare costs and health insurance and other related factors [26]. The regression model can be written as follows:
$$ {Y}_i={\sum}_k{\beta}_k{X}_{ki}+{\varepsilon}_i $$
(1)
Where Y i denotes healthcare underutilization (when the subject answered positively to one or more of the following: perceived a need for outpatient care but did not seek outpatient treatment, perceived a need for inpatient care but did not go to the hospital, did not see a dentist for dental care, or early dismissal from the hospital), the total amount of healthcare utilization per year (the number of outpatient consultations + the number of hospitalizations + the number of dental visits) or healthcare costs (total costs and OOP) in a middle-aged and elderly population. X k denotes healthcare insurance and other related factors: 1) health insurance plan; 2) age; 3) gender; 4) marital status; 5) educational level; 6) income level; 7) self-reported health status, and 8) live in urban or rural. Detailed descriptions of the variables and indicators are included in Table 2.
Table 2
Description of dependent and predicting variables
 
Categories
Indicators/survey questions
Dependent variable
  
Healthcare underutilization
 Outpatient
Reported non-use of outpatient/no reported non-use of outpatient
Questions: Have you been ill in the last month? What the main reason for not seeking medical treatment?
 Inpatient
Reported non-use of inpatient/no reported non-use of inpatient
Question: In the past year, did a doctor suggest that you needed inpatient care but you did not get hospitalized?
 Dentist
No seen the dentist/ seen the dentist
Question: Have you seen a dentist for dental care in the last year?
 Early dismissal from the hospital
Reported dismissal from the hospital/ No reported dismissal from the hospital
Question: Why did you want to leave the hospital before you were recovered?
Reason for health underutilization
 Reason for not seeking outpatient
Illness is not serious/No time/ Hospital quality poor/ other
Question: What’s the main reason for not seeking medical treatment?
 Reason for not seeking inpatient
Poor/Not willing to go to hospital/ Hospital quality poor/other
Question: What’s the main reason for not seeking hospitalization?
 Reason for early dismissal from the hospital
Can’t recover from illness/ Poor/ Hospital quality poor/ other
Question: Why did you want to leave the hospital before you were recovered?
Healthcare utilization
 The number of outpatient visits
 
Questions: Which types of medical facilities have you visited in the last month for outpatient treatment? How many times did you visit these types of medical facilities during the last month?
 The number of hospitalizations
 
Question: How many times have you received inpatient care during the last year?
 The number of dentist visits
 
Question: How many times have you received dental care during the last year?
 Length of hospital stay
 
Question: How many nights were you hospitalized?
Healthcare costs
 Total medication costs
 
Question: What is the approximate total cost of treat yourself during the last month? (Consumed medicine, health supplement, health care equipment etc.)
 OOP medication costs
 
Question: How much did you pay out-of-pocket?
 Total outpatient costs
 
Question: How much did all the outpatient visit cost during the last month?
 OOP outpatient costs
 
Question: How much did you pay out of pocket, after reimbursement from insurance?
 Total inpatient costs
 
Question: What was the total medical cost of hospitalization?(Only include the fees paid to the hospital)
 OOP inpatient costs
 
Question: How much did you pay out of pocket for the hospitalization, after reimbursement from insurance?
 Total dentist costs
 
Question: What was the total medical cost for all the dental care in the last year?
 OOP dentist costs
 
Question: How much did you pay out of pocket, after reimbursement from insurance?
Independent variables
 Health insurance
0 No insurance/1 UEMI/2 URMI/3 NCMI/4 Other
Question: Are you the policy holder/primary beneficiary of any of the types of health insurance?
 Sex
Male/Female
 
 Age in years
≤55/56–65/> 65
 
 Educational level
Less than lower secondary/upper secondary & vocational training/tertiary
Question: What’s the highest level of education in last wave?
 Marital status
Not-married/Married
Question: What is your marital status?
 Health self-reported
Excellent/Very good/Good/Fair/Poor
Question: Would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?
 Income level
≤1920¥/1920–10,100¥/10,100–276,223¥/≥27,622–53,520¥/> 53,520¥
Yearly household income divided by number of household numbers; 1st household-member with a weight of 1, all following household members with a weight of 0.5
 Live in Urban or Rural
Urban/rural
 

Results

Health care utilization and costs by type of health insurance are included in Tables 3 and 4. Table 3 shows that 29% of respondents who perceived a need for outpatient care did not seek outpatient treatment in the past month. This proportion was highest among the middle-aged and elderly population not covered by social health insurance (43%), second highest among people with URMI (41%), and lowest among people covered by NCMI (28%). The main reason for not seeking outpatient care was “illness is not serious.” The proportion of individuals perceiving a need for inpatient care but not undergoing hospitalization during the past year was approximately 21%, and it was also highest among people not covered by social health insurance (33%). People with URMI demonstrated the second highest prevalence (31%) and the lowest prevalence consisted of people covered by UEMI (14%). The primary reason for not going to the hospital was “poor”. Eighty-three percent of the total respondents did not see a dentist during the past year, which was highest among the population covered by NCMI (84%). Of the total inpatients, 31% left the hospital before recovery, which can be explained mostly by economic reasons (50%). The people not covered by social health insurance demonstrated the highest prevalence (45%), and people covered by UEMI demonstrated the lowest prevalence (27%). The mean number of outpatient visits per month (in patients with at least one outpatient visit) amounted to 2.02 in middle-aged and elderly adults. The corresponding figures were higher among people covered by UEMI than in the other three groups. The highest mean number of hospitalizations per year (in patients with at least one hospitalization) was found among middle-aged and elderly adults covered by URMI (1.78), and the lowest number was 1.37 in people not covered by social health insurance. The mean number of dental visits per year (in patients with at least one dental visit) was 2.6, and people covered by NCMI demonstrated the highest number of dental visits (2.68).
Table 3
Healthcare utilization by type of health insurance in middle-aged and elderly adults
 
Not covered by social health insurance
UEMI
URMI
NCMI
total
Sign
 
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Healthcare underutilization
 Outpatient
0.4256
0.4855
0.2915
0.4548
0.4070
0.4921
0.2779
0.4480
0.2909
0.4542
**
 Inpatient
0.3321
0.4616
0.1445
0.3520
0.3091
0.4635
0.2116
0.4085
0.2099
0.4073
***
 Dentist
0.8427
0.3643
0.7660
0.4235
0.8010
0.3994
0.8436
0.3633
0.8311
0.3746
***
 Early dismissal from the hospital
0.4490
0.5025
0.2677
0.4434
0.3404
0.4764
0.3152
0.4648
0.3118
0.4633
**
Reason for not seeking outpatient care
 Illness is not serious
0.5750
0.4975
0.7696
0.4222
0.7339
0.4437
0.6600
0.4739
0.6746
0.4687
 
 Poor
0.2125
0.4117
0.0366
0.1884
0.1048
0.3076
0.1505
0.3577
0.1365
0.3435
 
 No time
0.0375
0.1912
0.0105
0.1021
0.0242
0.1543
0.0265
0.1606
0.0249
0.1560
 
 Hospital quality poor
0.0375
0.1912
0.0419
0.2009
0.0484
0.2155
0.0579
0.2336
0.0542
0.2266
 
 Other
0.1375
0.3465
0.1414
0.3493
0.0887
0.2855
0.1050
0.3067
0.1097
0.3126
 
Reason for not seeking inpatient care
 Poor
0.6667
0.4787
0.3273
0.4714
0.5606
0.5001
0.6120
0.4876
0.5764
0.4944
 
 Not willing to go to hospital
0.2121
0.4151
0.3364
0.4746
0.2273
0.4223
0.2283
0.4200
0.2405
0.4276
 
 Hospital quality poor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0818
0.2753
0.0606
0.2404
0.0336
0.1804
0.0401
0.1963
 
 Other
0.1212
0.3314
0.2545
0.4376
0.1515
0.3613
0.1261
0.3321
0.1430
0.3503
 
Reason for early dismissal from the hospital
 Can’t recover from illness
0.1053
0.3153
0.1899
0.3947
0.0714
0.2623
0.1561
0.3634
0.1549
0.3622
 
 Poor
0.5789
0.5073
0.3038
0.4628
0.5000
0.5092
0.5294
0.4997
0.4982
0.5004
 
 Hospital quality poor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0759
0.2666
0.0000
0.0000
0.0566
0.2313
0.0546
0.2274
 
 Other
0.3158
0.4776
0.4304
0.4983
0.4286
0.5040
0.2579
0.4380
0.2923
0.4552
 
Healthcare utilization
 The number of outpatient visits
1.75
2.01
2.32
3.39
1.93
2.04
2.11
2.64
2.02
2.42
***
 The number of hospitalizations
1.37
0.82
1.59
1.58
1.78
2.22
1.51
1.13
1.53
1.27
*
 The number of dental visits
2.57
2.20
2.36
2.53
2.36
1.91
2.68
3.94
2.60
3.55
**
 Length of hospital stay
12.49
13.58
13.92
13.86
13.32
23.35
12.05
13.50
12.42
14.19
***
Not covered by social health insurance includes the middle-aged and elderly population who did not enroll in any social health insurance (including UEMI, URMI, or NCMI) but possibly has commercial health insurance. Calculations were weighted using individual sampling weights and adjusted for household and individual responses
Note: *** implies p-value < 0.001, ** indicates p-value < 0.01, * implies p-value < 0.05
Table 4
Healthcare costs (in dollar terms) by type of health insurance in middle-aged and elderly adults
 
Not covered by social health insurance
UEMI
URMI
NCMI
total
Sign
 
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Medication costs (per month)
 Total
27.69
45.99
46.18
88.89
34.78
70.58
28.43
75.44
31.32
76.37
***
 OOP
27.53
45.43
44.41
86.04
34.09
69.60
27.15
73.14
29.86
74.07
***
Outpatient costs (per month)
 Total
19.59
112.73
63.75
649.14
61.86
685.73
43.25
1087.34
45.78
993.53
**
 OOP
17.66
98.67
37.53
619.90
36.78
381.37
26.21
247.90
27.60
323.72
*
Inpatient costs (per year)
 Total
165.51
1436.21
391.73
1787.08
235.41
1292.73
185.51
1013.36
214.04
1182.68
***
 OOP
113.88
951.67
157.39
838.62
138.25
917.84
117.28
705.91
123.89
750.83
**
Dentist costs (per year)
 Total
12.35
51.68
26.62
106.15
15.32
57.84
11.39
66.85
13.62
72.27
***
 OOP
12.34
51.67
24.24
101.02
15.24
57.69
11.04
58.44
13.02
65.29
***
Total healthcare costs (per year)
 Total
559.63
2052.96
1482.58
8104.24
1227.89
8570.99
875.85
13,093.33
958.43
12,010.06
*
 OOP
482.58
1611.43
910.94
7421.37
831.08
4856.40
596.74
3262.60
644.77
4091.15
***
Not covered by social health insurance includes the middle-aged and elderly population who did not enroll in any social health insurance plan (including UEMI, URMI, or NCMI), but possibly have commercial health insurance. Calculations were weighted using individual sampling weights and adjusted for household and individual responses
Note: *** implies p-value < 0.001, ** indicates p-value < 0.01, * implies p-value < 0.05
Table 4 shows the medication, outpatient, inpatient, and dental costs and total healthcare costs in middle-aged and elderly adults by type of health insurance. Mean total healthcare costs were significantly higher in the people covered by social health insurance compared to those who were not covered. Among the people covered by social health insurance, those who enrolled in the UEMI demonstrated the highest total healthcare costs and reimbursement rates. According to Table 4, mean reimbursement proportions of outpatient and inpatient costs were 40.1 and 43.1%, respectively, and these were higher among people covered by UEMI (41.2%, 59.8%) than people covered by URMI (40.5%, 41.3%), or NCMI (39.4%, 42.2%). Medication and dental costs were almost entirely paid by OOP-payments in middle-aged and elderly adults with all types of health insurance.
The results from the logistic regression model on healthcare underutilization are presented in Table 5. Social health insurance was significantly associated with healthcare underutilization. Middle-aged and elderly adults with social health insurance were less likely to report underutilization in comparison with individuals without social health insurance (OR = 0.593, 0.892, 0.757). Furthermore, individuals covered by UEMI demonstrated the lowest likelihood of underutilization (OR = 0.593), and people with NCMI demonstrated the second lowest likelihood of underutilization (OR = 0.757). The multivariate model shows a lower likelihood of underutilization of healthcare among middle-aged and elderly adults (age > 65), those who are married or cohabiting, and those living in urban areas. With respect to health status, individuals who self-reported “fair” were more likely to report underutilization of all types of social health insurance. In contrast with the lowest income quintile, the second to highest income group demonstrated the lower likelihood of healthcare underutilization, and the likelihood decreased with increasing income quintile.
Table 5
Logistic regression model on healthcare underutilization in middle-aged and elderly adults
Variables/categories
Odds Ratio
Std. Err.
Odds Ratio
Std. Err.
Odds Ratio
Std. Err.
Health insurance; ref.: Not covered by social health insurance
 UEMI
0.593***
0.102
    
 URMI
  
0.892**
0.111
  
 NCMI
    
0.757**
0.113
Female, ref.: Male
0.829
0.121
1.021
0.186
1.099
0.069
Age in years; ref.:<=50
  > 50 and <=65
0.642**
0.121
0.664*
0.142
0.800**
0.061
  > 65
0.489**
0.102
0.580**
0.150
0.696***
0.065
Educational level; ref.: Less than lower secondary education
 Single/divorced/widowedUpper secondary & vocational training
1.013
0.183
1.532
0.376
0.892
0.127
 Single/divorced/widowedTertiary education
0.878
0.303
0.800
0.928
1.087
0.818
Marital status; ref.:
 Single/divorced/widowed
      
 Married/cohabiting
0.722*
0.140
0.845
0.194
0.715***
0.058
Health status (self-reported); ref.: Excellent
 Very good
1.119***
0.059
1.207***
0.095
1.129***
0.027
 Good
1.396**
0.128
1.276**
0.120
1.212***
0.035
 Fair
1.597*
0.089
1.411**
0.138
1.381***
0.049
 Poor
1.131
0.315
0.636
0.222
0.715
0.097
Income level; ref.: Lowest quintile
 Second quintile
0.734***
0.091
0.838**
0.104
1.121
0.098
 Third quintile
0.722 **
0.121
0.841**
0.114
1.038
0.095
 Fourth quintile
0.651*
0.129
0.690***
0.045
0.921*
0.133
 Highest quintile
0.532*
0.130
0.380**
0.124
0.899**
0.097
Live in Urban or Rural; ref.: urban
1.607**
0.107
1.600*
0.143
1.802***
0.055
Note: *** implies p-value < 0.001, ** indicates p-value < 0.01, * implies p-value < 0.05
Estimates were weighted using individual sampling weights and adjusted for household and individual responses
Table 6 shows the results of the multiple regression model on the total amount of healthcare utilization in middle-aged and elderly adults. These results indicate a significant positive correlation between social health insurance and the total amount of healthcare utilization, which means that having social health insurance increases the amount of healthcare utilization. This effect was estimated to be the greatest among individuals with UEMI and the second greatest among individuals with NCMI. Elderly people were significantly associated with a higher healthcare utilization amount. This was true for the age groups 50–65 years and > 65 years when compared with individuals ≤ 50 years. The total amount of healthcare utilization was significantly higher in women than men among individuals with URMI and NCMI. In contrast with the lowest income quintile, the total amount of healthcare utilization was significantly increased in the second highest and highest income groups for all types of health insurance, and this effect was greatest among people covered by UEMI under the same income quintile. With regard to health status, the results exhibited a significant increase of healthcare utilization in groups that self-reported “poor,” “fair,” or “good” in contrast with the group self-reporting “excellent.”
Table 6
Multiple regression model on total amount of healthcare utilization in middle-aged and elderly adults
Variables/categories
Coef.
Std. Err.
Coef.
Std. Err.
Coef.
Std. Err.
Health insurance; ref.: Not covered by social health insurance
 UEMI
0.258***
0.066
    
 URMI
  
0.129*
0.066
  
 NCMI
    
0.188***
0.039
Female, ref.: male
0.028
0.052
0.312*
0.135
0.096*
0.041
Age in years;ref.:<=50
  > 50 and <=65
0.183**
0.059
0.044
0.067
0.068**
0.024
  > 65
0.277***
0.073
0.324*
0.161
0.139***
0.031
Educational level; ref.: Less than lower secondary education
 Upper secondary and vocational training
−0.025
0.063
−0.133*
0.052
−0.023
0.038
 Tertiary education
−0.015
0.119
0.343
0.319
0.269
0.281
Marital status; ref.:
 Single/divorced/widowed
      
 Married/cohabiting
0.056
0.068
0.020
0.078
−0.041
0.030
Health status (self-reported); ref.: Excellent
 Very good
0.274**
0.102
0.251*
0.125
0.191***
0.024
 Good
0.234*
0.115
0.289*
0.128
0.212***
0.032
 Fair
0.093
0.103
0.257*
0.114
0.267***
0.049
 Poor
0.687***
0.123
0.749***
0.134
0.697***
0.054
Income level; ref.: Lowest quintile
 Second quintile
0.099***
0.023
0.078**
0.029
0.016**
0.006
 Third quintile
0.107**
0.041
0.055**
0.018
0.015***
0.003
 Fourth quintile
0.143**
0.053
0.050*
0.022
0.032**
0.012
 Highest quintile
0.161***
0.027
0.079***
0.017
0.010**
0.004
Live in Urban or Rural; ref.: urban
−0.094
0.060
−0.064
0.065
−0.071**
0.024
Estimates were weighted using individual sampling weights and adjusted for household and individual responses
Note: *** implies p-value < 0.001, ** indicates p-value < 0.01, * implies p-value < 0.05
Table 7 reports the results of the multiple regression model on total healthcare costs in middle-aged and elderly adults. The social health insurances were significantly associated with total healthcare costs. Those people covered by social health insurance spend more on healthcare than people not covered by social health insurance, and this impact was estimated to be greater among people covered by UEMI in comparison with people with URMI or NCMI. Furthermore, results revealed a significant correlation between some demographic or socioeconomic factors and total healthcare costs. Specifically, total healthcare costs were significantly higher in men than women who were covered by all types of social health insurance schemes. Elderly people > 50 years spent more on healthcare than people ≤ 50 years, and this effect was estimated to be greatest among individuals covered by UEMI. The individuals who self-reported health statuses of “good” “fair,” or “poor” were associated with higher total costs, whereby costs increased with declining health conditions. Under the same health conditions, this effect was greatest among people with NCMI. Compared with the lowest income quintile, the second to highest income quintile was significantly associated with higher total healthcare costs. This effect was estimated to be greater among individuals with UEMI or URMI rather than NCMI.
Table 7
Multiple regression model for total healthcare costs in middle-aged and elderly adults
Variables/categories
Coef.
Std. Err.
Coef.
Std. Err.
Coef.
Std. Err.
Health insurance; ref.: Not covered by social health insurance
 UEMI
1.507***
0.266
    
 URMI
  
1.033***
0.275
  
 NCMI
    
0.920***
0.174
Female, ref. male
− 0.406*
0.186
− 0.556*
0.239
− 0.296***
0.077
Age in years; ref.:<=50
  > 50 and <=65
0.931***
0.260
0.576*
0.270
0.374***
0.097
  > 65
1.202***
0.288
0.922**
0.358
0.343**
0.118
Educational level; ref.: Less than lower secondary education
 Upper secondary & vocational training
0.331
0.223
0.442
0.330
0.181
0.153
 Tertiary education
0.850*
0.370
1.815
1.358
1.505
0.924
Marital status; ref.:
 Single/divorced/widowed
      
 Married/cohabiting
−0.073
0.251
0.145
0.316
0.037
0.109
Health status (self-reported); ref.: Excellent
 Very good
0.649
0.512
1.265*
0.602
1.793***
0.240
 Good
0.977*
0.484
0.928
0.581
2.150***
0.226
 Fair
2.490***
0.449
2.377***
0.507
3.279***
0.210
 Poor
4.543***
0.477
4.323***
0.541
5.118***
0.220
Income level; ref.: Lowest quintile
 Second quintile
0.773
0.564
0.829
0.503
0.319**
0.112
 Third quintile
0.842*
0.406
0.855*
0.418
0.551***
0.113
 Fourth quintile
1.253**
0.432
0.999*
0.448
0.469***
0.121
 Highest quintile
1.047*
0.435
1.031*
0.449
0.428***
0.129
Live in Urban or Rural; ref.: urban
−0.073
0.236
0.058
0.280
−0.276***
0.086
Estimates were weighted using individual sampling weights and adjusted for household and individual responses
Note: *** implies p-value < 0.001, ** indicates p-value < 0.01, * implies p-value < 0.05
In Table 8, we estimate health insurance and other correlates of OOP healthcare costs in middle-aged and elderly adults. These results indicate a significant positive correlation between social health insurance schemes and OOP healthcare costs, which means that for people with social health insurance, OOP healthcare costs will be greater than for those without these schemes. This can be interpreted as a result of the higher likelihood of healthcare underutilization among middle-aged and elderly adults without social health insurance (Table 5) and lower reimbursement rates of Chinese social health insurance (Table 4). The results also revealed a significant correlation between demographic or socioeconomic factors and OOP healthcare costs, and these estimation effects were similar to those seen in Table 7.
Table 8
Multiple regression model for OOP healthcare costs in middle-aged and elderly adults
Variables/categories
Coef.
Std. Err.
Coef.
Std. Err.
Coef.
Std. Err.
Health insurance; ref.: Not covered by social health insurance
 UEMI
1.128***
0.267
    
 URMI
  
0.937***
0.274
  
 NCMI
    
0.882***
0.173
Female, ref. male
−0.556**
0.188
−0.713**
0.238
−0.304***
0.075
Age in years; ref.:<=50
  > 50 and <=65
0.818**
0.263
0.578*
0.296
0.341***
0.096
  > 65
0.935***
0.293
0.632
0.364
0.252*
0.116
Educational level; ref.: Less than lower secondary education
 Upper secondary & vocational training
0.307
0.229
0.435
0.336
0.189
0.152
 Tertiary education
0.634
0.406
1.915
1.290
1.623
0.919
Marital status; ref.:
 Single/divorced/widowed
      
 Married/cohabiting
−0.011
0.261
0.190
0.315
0.075
0.106
Health status (self-reported); ref.: Excellent
 Very good
0.681
0.514
1.454*
0.601
1.711***
0.236
 Good
1.109*
0.484
0.991*
0.477
2.100***
0.222
 Fair
2.474***
0.448
2.607***
0.509
3.201***
0.207
 Poor
4.143***
0.480
4.521***
0.542
4.951***
0.217
Income level; ref.: Lowest quintile
 Second quintile
0.681
0.565
0.682
0.501
0.291**
0.110
 Third quintile
0.716
0.452
0.591
0.458
0.522***
0.111
 Fourth quintile
1.059**
0.406
0.799*
0.417
0.440***
0.120
 Highest quintile
0.646*
0.340
0.700*
0.389
0.354**
0.128
Live in Urban or Rural; ref.: urban
−0.040
0.238
0.098
0.279
−0.271***
0.085
Estimates were weighted using individual sampling weights and adjusted for household and individual responses
Note: *** implies p-value < 0.001, ** indicates p-value < 0.01, * implies p-value < 0.05

Discussion

China has conducted a series of health reforms during the past two decades, and the insurance coverage is almost universal [4]. However, few studies have examined the disparity of the effects of social health insurance on healthcare utilization and costs, especially among vulnerable groups. This study, focusing on middle-aged and elderly people, was conducted in order to analyze the differences in healthcare utilization and costs between those with and without social health insurance and between different types of social health insurance.
In this study, we found that 29% of respondents who perceived a need for outpatient care did not seek outpatient treatment and 21% of respondents who perceived a need for inpatient care did not seek inpatient treatment, and these proportions are highest among the middle-aged and elderly population not covered by health insurance (43%, 33%). Furthermore, the people not covered by social health insurance demonstrate the lowest mean number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations (Table 3). The regression results shown in Tables 5 and 6 further confirm that people with social health insurance are less likely to report underutilization and are significantly associated with a higher amount of healthcare utilization. These findings indicate that enrollment in social health insurance improves healthcare utilization among middle-aged and elderly adults, similar to that seen in existing studies [68, 10, 12]. Among the people covered by social health insurance, those with URMI demonstrate the highest prevalence of outpatient and inpatient underutilization (Table 3), and middle-aged and elderly adults with UEMI demonstrate the lowest likelihood of underutilization and the greatest effect of health insurance on the amount of healthcare utilization (Tables 5 and 6). This indicates that although the rapid expansion of health insurance coverage has improved the availability of health services, the differences in healthcare utilization between the three schemes is large. UEMI has had a greater effect on improving healthcare utilization than NCMI or URMI, which may be caused by different patterns in health insurance policy design and irrational allocation of health resources between urban and rural areas in China [27]. Unification of health insurance schemes and optimization of health resource allocation could be a practical way to alleviate this inequality in healthcare utilization.
Total healthcare costs were significantly higher in the people covered by social health insurance compared to those who were not covered (Table 4). The regression results also indicate that people with social health insurance spend more on total healthcare costs than people not covered by social health insurance (Table 7). This finding is similar to other published studies [9, 13, 16, 1820, 22]. However, our analysis shows that people with social health insurance also spend more on OOP healthcare costs than people not covered by social health insurance (Tables 4 and 8); this finding is similar to that found by Grigorakis et al. (2016), which indicated that enrolling in health insurance actually induced a significant increase in OOP health costs among middle-aged and elderly adults. This may be caused by a higher likelihood of healthcare underutilization among middle-aged and elderly adults without social health insurance, which reduces the demand and expenditure on health services, and the lower reimbursement rate of social health insurance in China, which produces relatively high OOP healthcare costs [28]. Furthermore, we found that middle-aged and elderly adults with UEMI had the highest healthcare costs and showed the greatest effects of health insurance on costs increase (Tables 4, 7, and 8). This finding reflects the differences in policy design in social health insurance, differences in population characteristics between middle-aged and elderly adult groups, and inequity in health resource allocation in China [29]. UEMI for the urban employed, who have a stable source of income and better accessibility to health services, has relatively higher funding criteria and reimbursement rates in comparison with URMI or NCMI [30]. Therefore, the greatest benefit seems to be to promote healthcare utilization and induce healthcare cost increases (both total healthcare costs and OOP costs).
Other demographic or socioeconomic factors associated with healthcare utilization and costs include age, gender, marital status, health status, living standards, and urban residence. Specifically, older people are significantly associated with lower likelihood of underutilization of healthcare, higher number of healthcare utilization and healthcare costs. This finding is similar to those in most of the previously conducted studies; chronic disease prevalence is higher in the older group, which stimulates more healthcare utilization and costs [6, 7, 913]. Those who are married or living in urban areas demonstrate a lower likelihood of healthcare underutilization. Being single is an obstacle to the utilization of health services. Married patients are more likely to seek treatment in regular medical institutions because their spouses may timely urge or take them to a high level medical institution to acquire needed medical care [31]. Compared to urban residents, the lower income of rural residents restricts their effective utilization of health services in China [29]. Therefore, policy effort should further focus on the rural elderly adults or the single to promote effective utilization of health services. We found an inverse association between gender and healthcare utilization and costs. While the total amount of healthcare utilization is significantly higher among women than men, healthcare costs are significantly higher among men than women. This finding is similar to van den Bussche et al. [32]; differences between men and women in the severity of illness and in the health behavior patterns might account for this discrepancy. High-income groups demonstrate a lower likelihood of healthcare underutilization. Meanwhile, healthcare utilization and costs increased with declining health status. These findings indicate that policies aimed at reducing inequality in healthcare utilization must consider economic factors and health status among middle-aged and elderly adults such as implementing strategies that increase income among the low-income elderly, narrow the income gap, and promote effective use of health services according to different health status [33].
Some limitations of our study must be acknowledged. We evaluated healthcare underutilization only among middle-aged and elderly adults perceiving a need for healthcare but did not seek treatment, and did not take into account those not perceiving a need for healthcare. Some patients objectively need healthcare, but they do not perceive or understand that need. Therefore, the prevalence of healthcare underutilization might have been underestimated to some extent. In addition, our study findings are likely to be influenced by additional factors, which are not included in the claims data; these include severity of illness or patients’ social settings. Finally, using cross-sectional data does not allow for any causal conclusions to be drawn.

Conclusions

Although the rapid expansion of social health insurance coverage in China has significantly improved healthcare utilization and costs among middle-aged and elderly adults, the differences between the three schemes are large. Individuals with UEMI had the highest healthcare costs and demonstrated the greatest effect of health insurance on healthcare utilization and expenses increases. The government should further adjust social health insurance schemes and optimize the allocation of health resources to alleviate the inequality across schemes and enhance effective utilization of healthcare services.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National School of Development, Peking University, and other members for their support and cooperation. We would also like to thank Prof. Dongfu Qian and Dr. Jun Wu who provided invaluable comments and suggestions for this paper.

Funding

This study is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 71503137). The funding bodies were not involved in the design of the study, or data collection, analysis, and interpretation or in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used in the current study are not publicly available due to the confidential policy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
This study was approved by the Academic Research Ethics Committee of Nanjing Medical University; reference number: 2,017,602. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration. Participants provided informed consent prior to data collection.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. NewYork: United Nations; 2015. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. NewYork: United Nations; 2015.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization. The world health report 2013: research for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. World Health Organization. The world health report 2013: research for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yip W, Hsiao W, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):833–42.CrossRefPubMed Yip W, Hsiao W, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):833–42.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber S, Yao L. World health report, background paper. Vol. 37. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Health insurance systems in China: a briefing note. Barber S, Yao L. World health report, background paper. Vol. 37. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Health insurance systems in China: a briefing note.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Ringberg U. Socioeconomic inequality in health care utilization in Norway: a population based cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Sev Res. 2012;12:336.CrossRef Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Ringberg U. Socioeconomic inequality in health care utilization in Norway: a population based cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Sev Res. 2012;12:336.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Saeed B, Louis M, Aidoo EN, Nsowah-Nuamah NN, Yawson AE, Zhao X. Socio-economic inequalities and healthcare utilization in Ghana. Int J Bus Soc Res. 2013;3(1):54–63. Saeed B, Louis M, Aidoo EN, Nsowah-Nuamah NN, Yawson AE, Zhao X. Socio-economic inequalities and healthcare utilization in Ghana. Int J Bus Soc Res. 2013;3(1):54–63.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Van JH, Demarest S, Tafforeau J, Oyen H. Socio-economic differences in the utilization of health services in Belgium. Health Policy. 2003;65(2):153–65.CrossRef Van JH, Demarest S, Tafforeau J, Oyen H. Socio-economic differences in the utilization of health services in Belgium. Health Policy. 2003;65(2):153–65.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang K, Ben-Chang S, Ma S. Health insurance coverage, medical expenditure and coping strategy: evidence from Taiwan. BMC Health Sev Res. 2012;12:442.CrossRef Fang K, Ben-Chang S, Ma S. Health insurance coverage, medical expenditure and coping strategy: evidence from Taiwan. BMC Health Sev Res. 2012;12:442.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Knodo A, Shigeoka H. Effects of universal health insurance on health care utilization, and supply-side responses: evidence from Japan. J Public Econ. 2013;99(3):1–23. Knodo A, Shigeoka H. Effects of universal health insurance on health care utilization, and supply-side responses: evidence from Japan. J Public Econ. 2013;99(3):1–23.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudindon GE. The impact of health insurance on health services utilization and health outcomes in Vietnam. Health Econ Policy Law. 2014;9(4):359.CrossRef Gudindon GE. The impact of health insurance on health services utilization and health outcomes in Vietnam. Health Econ Policy Law. 2014;9(4):359.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gotsadze G, Zoidez A, Rukhadze N, Shengelia N, Chkhaidze N. An impact evaluation of medical insurance for poor in Georgia: preliminary results and policy implications. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(suppl_1):i2–i13.CrossRefPubMed Gotsadze G, Zoidez A, Rukhadze N, Shengelia N, Chkhaidze N. An impact evaluation of medical insurance for poor in Georgia: preliminary results and policy implications. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(suppl_1):i2–i13.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Grigorakis N, Floros C, Tsangari H, Tsoukatos E. Out of pocket payments and social health insurance for private hospital care: evidence from Greece. Health Policy. 2016;120(8):948–59.CrossRefPubMed Grigorakis N, Floros C, Tsangari H, Tsoukatos E. Out of pocket payments and social health insurance for private hospital care: evidence from Greece. Health Policy. 2016;120(8):948–59.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira FBL. Social health insurance in China: principal reforms and inequalities. Salud Colect. 2017;13(1):5–17.CrossRefPubMed Ferreira FBL. Social health insurance in China: principal reforms and inequalities. Salud Colect. 2017;13(1):5–17.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagstaff A, Lindelow M, Jun G, Xu L, Qian J. Extending health insurance to rural population: an impact evaluation of China’s new cooperative medical scheme. Health Econ. 2009;28(1):1–19.CrossRef Wagstaff A, Lindelow M, Jun G, Xu L, Qian J. Extending health insurance to rural population: an impact evaluation of China’s new cooperative medical scheme. Health Econ. 2009;28(1):1–19.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Babiarz K, Miller G, Yi H, Zhang L, Rozelle S. New evidence on the impact of China’s new rural cooperative medical scheme and its implications for rural primary healthcare: multivariate difference-in-difference analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:C5617.CrossRefPubMed Babiarz K, Miller G, Yi H, Zhang L, Rozelle S. New evidence on the impact of China’s new rural cooperative medical scheme and its implications for rural primary healthcare: multivariate difference-in-difference analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:C5617.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng L, Liu H, Zhang Y, Shen K, Zeng Y. The impact of health insurance on health outcomes and spending of the elderly: evidence from China's new cooperative medical scheme. Health Econ. 2015;24(6):672–91.CrossRefPubMed Cheng L, Liu H, Zhang Y, Shen K, Zeng Y. The impact of health insurance on health outcomes and spending of the elderly: evidence from China's new cooperative medical scheme. Health Econ. 2015;24(6):672–91.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu H, Zhao Z. Does health insurance matter? Evidence from China’s urban resident basic medical insurance. J Comp Econ. 2014;42(4):1007–20.CrossRef Liu H, Zhao Z. Does health insurance matter? Evidence from China’s urban resident basic medical insurance. J Comp Econ. 2014;42(4):1007–20.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen G, Liu GG, Xu F. The impact of the urban resident basic medical insurance on health services utilization in China. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32(3):277.CrossRefPubMed Chen G, Liu GG, Xu F. The impact of the urban resident basic medical insurance on health services utilization in China. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32(3):277.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng YB, Ou L, Yang TJ. The effect of the urban resident basic medical insurance on Chinese elderly's medical expenses: results from the survey of CLHLS. Chin J Gerontol. 2017;37(3):55–8. Zeng YB, Ou L, Yang TJ. The effect of the urban resident basic medical insurance on Chinese elderly's medical expenses: results from the survey of CLHLS. Chin J Gerontol. 2017;37(3):55–8.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang F, Li G. The impacts of China's urban employee basic medical insurance on healthcare expenditures and health outcomes. Health Econ. 2015;26(2):149–63.CrossRefPubMed Huang F, Li G. The impacts of China's urban employee basic medical insurance on healthcare expenditures and health outcomes. Health Econ. 2015;26(2):149–63.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen H, Deng P. Health effect evaluation of the urban employee basic medical insurance. Soc Secur Stud. 2016;30(4):110–8. Chen H, Deng P. Health effect evaluation of the urban employee basic medical insurance. Soc Secur Stud. 2016;30(4):110–8.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang S, Meng Q, Chen L, Bekedam H, Evans T, Whitehead M. Tackling the challenges to health equity in China. Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1493–501.CrossRefPubMed Tang S, Meng Q, Chen L, Bekedam H, Evans T, Whitehead M. Tackling the challenges to health equity in China. Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1493–501.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin ZF, Wang N, Wang B. Research on the evaluation and effectiveness of the major medical insurance for urban and rural residents. J Suihua Univ. 2017;14(3):186–92. Yin ZF, Wang N, Wang B. Research on the evaluation and effectiveness of the major medical insurance for urban and rural residents. J Suihua Univ. 2017;14(3):186–92.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu K. The effects of social health insurance reform on people’s out-of-pocket health expenditure in China. Singapore: Springer Publications; 2016.CrossRef Liu K. The effects of social health insurance reform on people’s out-of-pocket health expenditure in China. Singapore: Springer Publications; 2016.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong X, Meng W. The problems and challenges in basic medical insurance fund-raising policies and suggestion for improvement. China Health Insurance. 2016;92(5):1–8. Xiong X, Meng W. The problems and challenges in basic medical insurance fund-raising policies and suggestion for improvement. China Health Insurance. 2016;92(5):1–8.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepehri A, Moshiri S, Simpson W, et al. Taking account of context: how important are household characteristics in explaining adult health - seeking behaviour? The case of Vietnam. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23(6):397–407.CrossRefPubMed Sepehri A, Moshiri S, Simpson W, et al. Taking account of context: how important are household characteristics in explaining adult health - seeking behaviour? The case of Vietnam. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23(6):397–407.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bussche H, Schon G, Kolonko T, Hansen H, Wegscheider K, et al. Patterns of ambulatory medical care utilization in elderly patients with special reference to chronic diseases and mutimorbidity –results from a claims data based observational study in Germany. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bussche H, Schon G, Kolonko T, Hansen H, Wegscheider K, et al. Patterns of ambulatory medical care utilization in elderly patients with special reference to chronic diseases and mutimorbidity –results from a claims data based observational study in Germany. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Metadaten
Titel
Social health insurance, healthcare utilization, and costs in middle-aged and elderly community-dwelling adults in China
verfasst von
Zhonghua Wang
Xiangjun Li
Mingsheng Chen
Lei Si
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0733-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe