Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende Patientenratgeber
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Addiction Reports
Erschienen in:

01.06.2019 | Tobacco (K Garrison, Section Editor)

Social Media for Tobacco Smoking Cessation Intervention: A Review of the Literature

verfasst von: Johannes Thrul, Kayla N. Tormohlen, Meredith C. Meacham

Erschienen in: Current Addiction Reports | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Social media platforms have the potential to reach large audiences and deliver intervention content in an interactive format. Yet, little is known about the efficacy of social media for smoking cessation treatment or which specific features best promote participant engagement and behavior change. This article seeks to evaluate the current literature on the use of social media interventions to support smoking cessation.

Recent Findings

Findings suggest that social media interventions are feasible and can be utilized effectively for smoking cessation treatment. Greater participant engagement with intervention content appears to be associated with positive changes in smoking behaviors in most, but not all studies reviewed.

Summary

Smoking cessation interventions on social media hold promise to help smokers quit. Future randomized trials with longer follow-up intervals are needed to expand the current evidence base, as are studies that systematically investigate strategies to improve participant engagement with interventions.
Literatur
1.
Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, Bailey WC, Benowitz NL, Curry SJ, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update: clinical practice guideline [Internet]. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 2008. [cited 2015 Jan 26]. Available from: http://​stacks.​cdc.​gov/​view/​cdc/​6964/​
2.
Stead LF, Koilpillai P, Fanshawe TR, Lancaster T. Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;3:CD008286.
3.
Edwards SA, Bondy SJ, Callaghan RC, Mann RE. Prevalence of unassisted quit attempts in population-based studies: a systematic review of the literature. Addict Behav. 2014;39:512–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Caraballo RS, Shafer PR, Patel D, Davis KC, McAfee TA. Quit methods used by US adult cigarette smokers, 2014–2016. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14.
5.
Raupach T, West R, Brown J. The most “successful” method for failing to quit smoking is unassisted cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15:748–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Maher CA, Lewis LK, Ferrar K, Marshall S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
•• Ramo DE, Thrul J, Delucchi KL, Hall S, Ling PM, Belohlavek A, et al. A randomized controlled evaluation of the tobacco status project, a Facebook intervention for young adults. Addiction. 2018;113:1683–95. This is the first randomized trial of a Facebook smoking cessation intervention for young adults showing short-term intervention benefits for smoking cessation. Noteworthy is the biochemical verification of self-reported smoking cessation outcomes the investigators of this study conducted. CrossRef
9.
Ramo DE, Thrul J, Chavez K, Delucchi KL, Prochaska JJ. Feasibility and quit rates of the tobacco status project: a Facebook smoking cessation intervention for young adults. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e291.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Ramo DE, Thrul J, Delucchi KL, Ling PM, Hall SM, Prochaska JJ. The tobacco status project (TSP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a Facebook smoking cessation intervention for young adults. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:897.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
•• Pechmann C, Delucchi K, Lakon CM, Prochaska JJ. Randomised controlled trial evaluation of Tweet2Quit: a social network quit-smoking intervention. Tob Control. 2017;26:188–94 This study is a randomized trial of a Twitter smoking cessation intervention (participants also received nicotine patches and cessation advice). A total of 40% of intervention participants reported 7-day smoking abstinence at the 60-day follow-up. CrossRefPubMed
12.
Pechmann C, Pan L, Delucchi K, Lakon CM, Prochaska JJ. Development of a Twitter-based intervention for smoking cessation that encourages high-quality social media interactions via automessages. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Cheung YTD, Chan CHH, Lai C-KJ, Chan WFV, Wang MP, Li HCW, et al. Using WhatsApp and Facebook online social groups for smoking relapse prevention for recent quitters: a pilot pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e238.CrossRef
14.
• Cole-Lewis H, Perotte A, Galica K, Dreyer L, Griffith C, Schwarz M, et al. Social network behavior and engagement within a smoking cessation Facebook page. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e205 This study investigated user engagement with the NCI’s Smokefree women Facebook page and demonstrated that recent quitters had the highest engagement and most interactions with others via comments. Moreover, this study showed the importance of a moderator for keeping participants engaged. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
• Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Erar B, Stanton CA. Use of an online smoking cessation community promotes abstinence: results of propensity score weighting. Health Psychol. 2015;34:1286–95 This study found that passive engagement (seeing/reading) smoking cessation intervention content on an online social network is associated with positive intervention outcomes.CrossRefPubMedCentral
16.
Haines-Saah RJ, Kelly MT, Oliffe JL, Bottorff JL. Picture me Smokefree: a qualitative study using social media and digital photography to engage young adults in tobacco reduction and cessation. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Kim SJ, Marsch LA, Brunette MF, Dallery J. Harnessing Facebook for smoking reduction and cessation interventions: Facebook user engagement and social support predict smoking reduction. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Papandonatos GD, Erar B, Stanton CA, Graham AL. Online community use predicts abstinence in combined internet/phone intervention for smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016;84:633–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Strekalova YA, Damiani RE. Message design and audience engagement with tobacco prevention posts on social media. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33:668–72.CrossRefPubMed
20.
• Thrul J, Klein AB, Ramo DE. Smoking cessation intervention on Facebook: which content generates the best engagement? J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e244 This secondary data analysis of a Facebook smoking cessation intervention investigated which intervention message content generated the highest engagement among participants. Motivational interviewing type content was most engaging for participants not ready to quit smoking, while information on how to quit was most engaging for those ready to quit. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Brandenburg N. Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;48:1279–89.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Wang C, Burris MA. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav. 1997;24:369–87.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Naslund JA, Kim SJ, Aschbrenner KA, McCulloch LJ, Brunette MF, Dallery J, et al. Systematic review of social media interventions for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2017;73:81–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Thrul J, Meacham MC, Ramo DE. A novel and remote biochemical verification method of smoking abstinence: predictors of participant compliance. Tob Prev Cessat. 2018;4.
26.
Lisha NE, Thrul J, Ling PM. Latent class analysis to examine patterns of smoking and other tobacco products in young adult bar patrons. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64:93–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Sung H-Y, Wang Y, Yao T, Lightwood J, Max W. Polytobacco use and nicotine dependence symptoms among US adults, 2012–2014. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20:S88–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Glasser AM, Collins L, Pearson JL, Abudayyeh H, Niaura RS, Abrams DB, et al. Overview of electronic nicotine delivery systems: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52:e33–66.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Lemyre A, Poliakova N, Bélanger RE. The Relationship Between Tobacco and Cannabis Use: A Review. Subst Use Misuse 2019;54:130–45.
31.
Thornton L, Batterham PJ, Fassnacht DB, Kay-Lambkin F, Calear AL, Hunt S. Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: systematic review. Internet Interv. 2016;4:72–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Thornton L, Harris K, Baker AL, Johnson M, Kay-Lambkin FJ. Recruiting for addiction research via Facebook. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016;35:494–502.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Topolovec-Vranic J, Natarajan K. The use of social media in recruitment for medical research studies: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Whitaker C, Stevelink S, Fear N. The use of Facebook in recruiting participants for health research purposes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Ramo DE, Meacham M, Thrul J, Belohlavek A, Sarkar U, Humfleet G. Exploring Identities and Preferences for Intervention Among LGBTQ+ Young Adult Smokers Through Online Focus Groups. J Adolesc Health 2019;64:390–7.
36.
• Thrul J, Belohlavek A, Hambrick D, Kaur M, Ramo DE. Conducting online focus groups on Facebook to inform health behavior change interventions: two case studies and lessons learned. Internet Interv. 2017;9:106–11 This study presents how to use Facebook to conduct focus groups to inform smoking cessation intervention development for social media delivery. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
38.
Metadaten
Titel
Social Media for Tobacco Smoking Cessation Intervention: A Review of the Literature
verfasst von
Johannes Thrul
Kayla N. Tormohlen
Meredith C. Meacham
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Current Addiction Reports / Ausgabe 2/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-2952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00246-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

E-Cigarettes: Tobacco Policy and Regulation

  • Tobacco (K Garrison, Section Editor)

Gambling and Homelessness: Prevalence and Pathways

  • Gambling (L Clark, Section Editor)

Correction to: Social Media for Tobacco Smoking Cessation Intervention: a Review of the Literature

  • Correction

New Psychoactive Substances (NPS), Psychedelic Experiences and Dissociation: Clinical and Clinical Pharmacological Issues

  • Dissociation and Addictive Behaviors (J Billieux and A Schimmenti, Section Editors)

A Review of the Use and Appeal of Flavored Electronic Cigarettes

  • Tobacco (K Garrison, Section Editor)

Mechanisms and Clinical Features of Co-Occurring Opioid and Nicotine Use

  • Tobacco (K Garrison, Section Editor)

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

„Wir wollen die Bedeutung von Gen- und Umwelteinflüssen besser verstehen“

Eine Mutation in einem einzelnen Gen kann bei Mäusen eine Art Bipolarstörung auslösen. PD Dr. Jan Deussing vom Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie in München sieht in solchen Tiermodellen eine Möglichkeit, den Ursachen der Erkrankung auf den Grund zu gehen.

Suizidassistenz erhöht Suizidzahlen: Aktuelle Ergebnisse der geplanten S3-Leitlinie

Erstmals wird in Deutschland eine S3-Leitlinie zum Thema Suizidalität erarbeitet. Ziel ist es, die Versorgung in suizidalen Krisen durch einheitliche Standards zu verbessern. Erste Ergebnisse der bisherigen Leitlinienarbeit wurden auf dem DGPPN-Kongress vorgestellt.

Einer von sieben Frauen macht die Menopause sehr zu schaffen

Von mäßigen bis schweren vasomotorischen Beschwerden sind 14,7% der Frauen in der Postmenopause betroffen. Das haben kanadische Forscherinnen in einer Subgruppenanalyse der WARM-Studie herausgefunden.

Depressive Senioren fahren besonders riskant

Beim Autofahren machen ältere Depressive häufiger eine Vollbremsung, gehen öfter zu schnell in Kurven und halten sich seltener an Tempolimits als Senioren ohne Depression. Offenbar scheint eine Depression eine riskante Fahrweise im Alter zu verstärken.

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise