Background
Methods
Eligibility criteria
The literature search
Data extraction and synthesis
Results
Study (country) | Objective | Design | Participants | N | Major findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Han, 2016 [20] (South Korea) | To examine social workers’ understanding of a patient’s right to EoL care decisions in long-term care facilities | A cross-sectional survey | A non-probability sample of social workers in long-term care facilities. | 297 | 1. 55.3% of the respondents had experience aiding elderly patients and/or family members by providing information about ADs. 2. Social workers’ understanding of a patient’s right to EoL care decisions was associated with their general and medical knowledge of ADs, experience in EOL care, and relevant training. |
Kwon & Kolomer, 2016 [19] (South Korea) | To examine social workers’ awareness & attitudes toward EoL care planning | A cross-sectional survey | A non-probability sample of gerontological or geriatric social workers | 246 | 1. 73% of the social workers reported no knowledge of ADs. 2. 22% had education or training in EOL issues. 3. 83.3% reported that they did not have any experience working with terminally ill patients. 4. 41.1% felt comfortable with death discussion in general, and 26.8% felt comfortable in having a discussion about death with older clients. 5. Social workers who emphasized self-determination, professed a preference for hospice care, and were comfortable discussing death were more likely to have a positive attitude to ACP. |
Stein et al., 2016 [44] (USA) | To explore social worker involvement and leadership in ACP conversations with patients and families | A cross-sectional, web-based survey | Social workers employed in hospice, palliative care, and related settings | 641 | 1. 96% of the respondents reported that social workers in their department conducted ACP discussions with patients/families. 2. 80% of the respondents reported that social workers were responsible for educating patients and/or families about ACP options. 3. 68% of the respondents reported that social workers were responsible for documenting ACP. 4. Compared with those at other care settings, oncology and inpatient palliative care social workers were less likely to be responsible for ensuring that patients/families are informed of ACP options and documenting ACP preferences. |
Kwon et al., 2014 [11] (USA) | To examine the attitudes of social work students toward EoL care planning, | A cross-sectional survey | A cluster sample of social work students at a school | 102 | 1. 72% of the participants indicated that they felt comfortable discussing the topic of death. 2. 97% indicated that self-determination is a very important principle in social work practice. 3. 75% answered that they would be troubled if problems of self-determination resulted in conflicts. 4. Positive attitudes toward ACP were associated with higher levels of comfort when discussing death, more emphasis on self-determination, and apprehension of conflicts of self-determination. |
Sherwood, 2012 [24] (USA) | To explorer the knowledge and attitudes of social service workers’ in nursing homes regarding the preparation of ADs. | Qualitative interviews | A purposive sample of 15 social work assistants came from 11 facilities. | 15 | 1. 60% of the respondents said that they receive no training regarding ADs, although 53% said they have recently received training on the POLST. 2. One third of the respondents stated that social workers initiate the AD conversation, 33% said that nurses initiate the AD conversation, and others said that AD conversation is done at admission or during care planning meeting with family members. 3. 73% stated that they have conversations about AD during care meetings. 4. 40% indicated that they provide a facility-specific form to residents regarding ADs, and additional 40% noted that no AD forms are provided at all. 5. All respondents indicated a situation they had once dealt with where the family requests something different from what is written on the patient’s ADs. |
Gutheil & Heyman, 2011 [35] (USA) | To examine social workers’ attitudes toward EoL planning | A cross-sectional survey | Randomly selected social workers (response rate: 42%) | 844 | 1. Social workers in health and aging had significantly higher positive attitude scores than those not in health and aging. 2. For social workers in health and aging, 72.3% had completed a HCP, compared with 48.8% in other than health and aging. 3. For social workers in health and aging, 88.8% had training in EoL care issues, compared with 53.2% in other than health and aging. 4. For social workers in health and aging, 78.3% indicated that they received EoL care training in continuing education programs. |
Peck, 2009 [38] (USA) | To examine the extent to which the death anxiety of oncology social workers impacts the completion of personal ADs, and their communication about ADs with patients. | A cross-sectional survey | A random sample of oncology social workers (response rate: 25%) | 114 | 1. 68% of the respondents reported having completed a personal AD. 2. Motivating factors for personal AD completion included professional experience, peace of mind, control over decisions, and the desire to not have family members make decisions. 3. As death anxiety scores increased, the communication scores decreased related to disclosure of information about ADs (to patients) and values in living. 4. There was no significant difference in death anxiety scores between social workers who had completed and those who had not completed an AD. |
Heyman & Gutheil, 2006 [39] (USA) | To examine the factors associated with social workers’ involvement in EoL planning. | A cross-sectional survey | A random sample of NASW members in health and aging (response rate: 63%) | 390 | 1. 62% of the respondents stated they had a role in EoL planning. 2. 72.5% rated education as an important role and 31.5% said that facilitating decision making was an important role for them in EoL planning. 3. 75% felt that physicians saw social workers as having a role in work with EoL planning. 4. 44% stated they are very often involved in discussing the HCP with clients, and 37.3% stated they are very often involved in counseling clients regarding HCPs. 5. Almost 25% stated that they were very often involved in receiving requests from other professionals to explain HCP, and 23.8% stated they were very often involved in completing HCPs. 6. Factors that predicted social workers’ involvement with the HCP included age, attitudes, perceptions of barriers, and perceived physician support. |
Lacey, 2006 [42] (USA) | To describe nursing home social services staff roles and perceptions related to EoL medical decision making for nursing home residents in end-stage dementia. | A cross-sectional survey | A convenient sample of nursing home social workers. | 138 | 1. 97% identified themselves as being responsible for discussing ADs on admission. 2. 90% said that they often or always provided written information to newly admitted residents and family members (a PSDA requirement). 3. 72% said that they helped families clarify their thoughts about LST choices. 4. 45% agreed or strongly agreed that social work discipline is best suited to discussing ADs with residents and family members. 5. A substantial proportion of respondents (1–75%) did not correctly answered relevant “true/false” questions about LST. |
Black, 2005a [40] (USA) | To examine social workers’ personal death attitudes and experiences in relation to their ADs communication practice behavior. | A cross-sectional survey | A cluster sample of social workers employed at 6 hospitals (response rate: 94%) | 29 | 1. 38% of the respondents reported recent experience with terminal illness; 48% reported recent death of a close friend or a family member. 2. Social workers with either fearful or avoidant death attitudes collaborated less frequently with other professionals about ADs, compared to practitioners with neutral death attitudes. 3. Social workers reporting recent personal experiences with terminal illness differed from practitioners without personal experiences by less frequent collaboration with others, initiation of the topic of AD, and disclosure of information regarding AD. |
Lacey, 2005 [43] (USA) | To discuss the responses of nursing home social workers regarding their perceived use of skills related to ACP for nursing home residents. | A cross-sectional survey | A convenient sample of nursing home social workers. | 138 | 1. 93% of the respondents said they often or always educate families about ADs. 2. 93% said they are often or always involved in care planning for residents with dementia. 3. 77% said they often or always were involved in conflict resolution with families. 4. 58% reported often or always educate staff about ADs. 5. 55% reported they often or always engaged in developing a more professional role for social workers in their respective facilities. |
Black, 2004 [41] (USA) | To describe social workers’ AD communication practices with hospitalized elderly patients | A cross-sectional survey | A cluster sample of social workers employed at 6 hospitals (response rate: 94%) | 29 | 1. Social workers frequently and comprehensively address the phases of the AD communication process in their practices with hospitalized elderly patients. 2. 52% of the social workers reported spending between 0.5 h and one hour daily in their AD communication practices with hospitalized elderly patients. 3. While 19% of the social workers believed that they were spending a sufficient amount of time discussing ADs, 82% reported that the time they spent in AD communications was inadequate. |
Csikai et al., 2004 [25] (USA) | To identify ethical problems in EoL care decision making faced by oncology social workers | Qualitative interviews | Hospital social workers | 12 | 1. Common ethical issues identified through thematic analysis included preservation of patients’ autonomy/self-determination, beneficence of health care providers, and medical futility of end-of-life treatments. 2. Continued communication with all parties involved was key in resolving ethical problems. Referrals to ethics committees or ethics consultation teams occurred for more complex cases. 3. Although they viewed the development of relevant guidelines as desirable, many indicated there would be numerous barriers to their implementation. |
Heyman & Gutheil, 2003 [36] (USA) | To examine the attitudes of entry-level MSW students toward end-of-life planning and the factors associated with these attitudes. | A cross-sectional survey | A cluster sample of MSW students (response rate: 64%) | 267 | 1. 57% of the respondents were knowledgeable about living wills. 2. Attitudes toward end-of-life planning was significantly correlated with age, knowledge, personal comfort with end-of-life discussions, and personal desire for treatment. |
Werner & Carmel, 2001 [22] (Israel) | to examine the involvement, beliefs, and knowledge of social workers in health care settings in the process of making decisions regarding LSTs. | A cross-sectional survey | A convenience sample of social workers | 68 | 1. 31.2% of the social workers (in Israel) reported never or almost never being involved in asking patients about their wishes. 2. Social workers’ involvement in decision making regarding LST were negatively associated with their perceptions regarding physicians’ involvement and positively associated with higher exposure to terminal patients. 3. Most participants (52 to 71%) agreed with different statements regarding social workers’ responsibility for talking with patients and participating in the process of decision making regarding LSTs. 4. The area in which social workers reported being more involved were activities related to family members. The extent of social workers’ involvement was related to their beliefs regarding their role and their knowledge about LSTs. |
Baker, 2000 [37] (USA) | To describe the knowledge and attitudes of health care social workers regarding ADs. | A cross-sectional survey | A systematic random sample of social workers (response rate: 65%) | 324 | 1. 98% of the respondents had positive attitudes regarding the use of ADs. 2. 82% had a high to moderate level of knowledge about ADs. 3. Those with more experience working with the elderly had higher levels of knowledge. 4. Those employed in nursing homes and hospice settings had more positive attitudes than did those working in other health care facilities. |
Study (country) | Objectives | Design | Participants | N | Major findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yee et al., 2011 [21] (Singapore) | To explore the knowledge, attitudes and experience of renal health-care professionals in Singapore on ACP for patients with end-stage renal failure. | A cross-sectional survey | All renal physicians, renal nurses, renal medical social workers (MSWs) and other allied health professionals working in Singapore (response rate: 90.6%) | 562 | 1. MSWs and physicians had higher knowledge scores than nurses and others. 2. 82.4% of doctors and 100% of MSWs considered ACP discussions as part of their role, but only 37.1% of nurses and 38.1% of other allied health professionals thought likewise. 3. MSWs appeared to be the most confident in conducting ACP discussions. Nurses were the least confident, and most were fearful of upsetting patients and families. 4. 90% of the nurses and 71.4% of others occasionally or never discussed ACP with their patients compared to 66.6% of physicians and 53.9% of MSW. Of those who discussed ACP with their patients, 82% of the physicians and 90% of MSW initiated the discussions themselves compared to nurses (18.6%). |
Heyman, 2008 [45] (USA) | To examine the factors associated with health care professionals’ attitudes toward the HCP, one form of an AD. | A cross-sectional survey | A random sample of nurses and social workers who were members of relevant professional associations (response rate: 34% for nurses and 46% for social workers) | 213 | 1. Social workers and nurses had generally positive attitudes toward the HCP, but social workers had higher attitude scores than nurses. 2. Factors that predicted attitudes included profession and training in end-of-life care. 3. Professionals’ perception of individual/family barriers and their perception of system barriers increase, their attitude towards HCP decreases. 4. Health care professionals who had prior training in EoL planning had more positive attitudes toward the HCP than those who did not have training. 5. The top three perceived barriers against HCP were: patient discomfort in discussing the topic; patient knowledge about the HCP; and patient’s fear of death. |
Laje et al., 2007 [48] (USA) | To assess nursing home physicians’ and social workers’ perceptions of a patient plan of care form | A cross-sectional survey | A convenient sample of physicians and social workers | 37 physicians & 60 social workers | 1. 85.6% of the respondents stated that social workers are completing the form, while 49% of the physicians and 25% of the social workers said that physicians are involved in completing the form. 2. 92.5% of the respondents stated that the patient plan of care from was completed within less than 2 weeks of admission. |
Black, 2006 [26] (USA) | To explore differences in AD communication practices by comparing and contrasting nurses’ and social workers’ perceptions of their roles. | Qualitative interviews | A purposive sample of care professionals from a moderate-sized facility | 6 nurses & 5 social workers | 1. Nurses’ communication tended to focus on pragmatic information, but social workers expressed addressing the “meaning” of the choices faced by patients. 2. For nurses, ADs were addressed routinely with almost all of their patients through institutional admission procedures. Social workers’ AD communication practices were limited to the patients encountered through screening or referrals. 3. Social workers indicated an awareness of their roles as advocates in promoting the content of the patient’s wishes with family members as well as with other health care providers. Nurses reported advocating on the patient’s behalf with other providers. 4. When discussing the appointment of a surrogate decision maker, nurses reported urging patients to choose a family member and social workers reported encouraging patients to question the selection of a family member as a surrogate. 5. Nurses perceived particular expertise among social workers as good communicators, and social workers acknowledged nurses’ primary role with patients. |
Black, 2005b [46] (USA) | To examine the roles and AD communication practices of social workers as members of the interdisciplinary health care team. | A cross-sectional survey | A cluster sample of multi-disciplinary professionals employed at 6 hospitals | 32 physicians, 74 nurses, 29 social workers | 1. Physicians reported the lowest frequency of initiating the AD communication while social workers reported the highest. 2. Compared to both nurses and physicians, social workers disclosed more information about the purpose of ADs, patient rights to formulate or modify the documents, parameters about specific ADs, and the need to document patient ADs in the medical record. 3. Compared to both nurses and physicians, social workers more frequently talked with patients about potential proxy choices, assessed prospective proxy’s capacity to serve as a surrogate, and confirmed that identified proxy was willing, able, and available to serve. 4. Social workers discuss the treatment options of feeding tubes, respirators, and comfort measures more than physicians and nurses, and the option of hospice more than nurses. 5. Compared to both nurses and physicians, social workers more frequently urged patients to think about their values in living as they consider the impact of potential treatment options. 6. Social workers also differed from physicians and nurses by interacting more frequently with family and others via the request of another health care professional. 7. 52% of the social workers spent 0.5–1.0 h daily in their AD communication practices, while the physicians (90%) and nurses (86%) spent less than 0.5 h daily for AD communication. |
Werner et al., 2004 [23] (Israel) | To examine nurses’ and social workers’ attitudes and beliefs about and involvement in LST decisions. | A cross-sectional survey | A cluster sample of nurses who were working in 3 large medical centers and a convenient sample of social workers from different health care settings. | 274 | 1. Whereas nurses reported being more involved in the daily care of terminally ill patients, social workers reported being more involved in discussions with patients and family members. 2. Social workers reported consistently stronger beliefs than nurses regarding their role in the decision-making process and their role with patients and family members. 3. Nurses were more willing than social workers to use artificial feeding and less willing to use mechanical ventilation and CPR for all conditions. |
Neuman & Wade, 1999 [47] (USA) | To explore the perceptions of health care providers as to how effective AD arrangements were in assuring compliance with the patients’ wishes, and their satisfaction levels with the process. | A cross-sectional survey | An interdisciplinary sample of health care providers practicing in a variety of settings (response rate: 33%) | 116 | 1. 64% of the respondents indicated that they had direct responsibility in overseeing the facility’s ADs program or in discussing ADs with patients’ families. 2. Social workers as a group reported lower levels of satisfaction with AD laws and systems than nurses and other professionals. 3. Respondents working in hospitals were more likely to report encountering patient and family conflict regarding treatment decisions, difficulty in communicating with the patient and family and lack of adequate guidance from the medical staff. |
Study (country) | Objectives | Design | Participants | N | Major findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Song et al., 2010 [31] (USA) | To determine whether homeless persons will complete a counselling session on ACP with a social worker and fill out a legal AD. | A single-blind, randomized controlled trial | Homeless persons recruited from 8 sites were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: a self-guided intervention and a counselor-guided intervention | 262 | 1. The overall completion rate for ADs was significantly higher in the one-to-one counselling group than in the self-guided group (37.9% vs. 12.8%). 2. This difference persisted across all of the eight sites and most subgroups. |
Johnson & Stadel, 2007 [27] (USA) | To test the efficacy of a preadmission educational interview by a social worker on the completion of Ads | A quasi-experimental study | Adult orthopedic surgical patients who were admitted to a hospital for hip or knee replacement surgery | 54 | 1. After the intervention, 43% of patients in the treatment group had a health care proxy on their charts, compared to 6% of those in the comparison group (p < .005). 2. Age, residence, ethnicity, and diagnosis were found not to have significant impact on signing a health care proxy. |
Pearlman et al., 2005 [28] (USA) | To increase ACP use through an educational and motivational intervention by social workers. | A randomized controlled clinical trial | A sample of veteran patients recruited from 23 providers were randomized into the intervention or control group. | 280 | 1. Compared to the controls, the intervention patients reported more ACP discussions with their providers (64% vs 38%). Living wills were filed in the medical record twice as often in the intervention group (48% vs 23%). 2. Provider-patient dyads in the intervention group had higher agreement scores than the control group for treatment preferences, values, and personal beliefs (p < .01). |
Morrison et al., 2005 [29] (USA) | To assess the effect of a ACP intervention directed at social workers on identification and documentation of preferences for medical treatments and on patient outcomes | A randomized controlled trial | Newly admitted long-term care residents were allocated into either an intervention or a control group. | 139 | 1. Intervention residents were significantly more likely than residents in the control group to have their preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p = .005), artificial nutrition and hydration (p < .01), intravenous antibiotics (p < .01), and hospitalization (p < .01) documented in the nursing home chart. 2. Control residents were significantly more likely than intervention residents to receive treatments discordant with their prior stated wishes. |
Dipko et al., 2003 [32] (USA) | To examine the effectiveness of group education sessions in increasing completion of ADs | A retrospective cohort control study | A cohort of outpatients was divided into three categories: group participants, individually educated patients, and the patients with no AD education. | 13,913 | 1. Social work education of any kind resulted in an overall completion rate of 20% versus 2.1% in the non-intervention group. 2. Group education was twice as effective as an individual social work session, and as effective as multiple sessions, but less time consuming. |
Gockel et al., 1998 [30] (USA) | To evaluate the effect of an educational intervention by social workers on the completion of ADs | An uncontrolled observational study | A convenient sample of outpatients recruited at an ambulatory care setting | 203 | 1. An educational intervention increases the percentage of individuals who initiate an AD. 2. Patients with more hospitalizations were more likely not to have an AD. |
Bailly & DePoy, 1995 [33] (USA) | To evaluate a social work program designed to promote older people’s autonomous decision making regarding ADs. | An uncontrolled observational study | A convenient sample of older clients who regularly used family medical care services. | 10 | 1. The results revealed a continuum of willingness among elderly people to address future decision making. |
Luptak & Boult, 1994 [34] (USA) | To examine the effectiveness of an intervention implemented by a social worker to help frail elders to record AD | An uncontrolled observational study | All patients who visited an experimental geriatric evaluation and management clinic during a period of 14 months. | 34 | 1. 71% of the participants recorded AD. Of these, 96% named a proxy and 83% recorded specific treatment preferences. |
Themes | Major findings |
---|---|
Attitudes toward the use of ACP | • 98% of social workers had positive attitudes regarding the use of ADs [37]. • 97% of social workers identified themselves as being responsible for discussing ADs on admission [42]. • 62% of social workers stated they had a role in EoL planning [39]. • 45% of social workers agreed that social work discipline is best suited to discussing ADs with residents and family members [42]. • 52–71% of social workers agreed that they are responsible for talking with patients and participating in the process of decision making regarding LSTs [22]. • 72% of social work students in the US indicated that they felt comfortable discussing the topic of death [11]. • 41% of social workers in South Korea felt comfortable with death discussion [19]. • Social workers and nurses had generally positive attitudes toward the HCP, but social workers had higher attitude scores than nurses [45]. • Social workers in health and aging had significantly higher positive attitude scores than those not in health and aging [35]. • Those employed in nursing homes and hospice settings had more positive attitudes than did those working in other health care facilities [37]. |
Knowledge, education & training regarding ACP | • 82% of social workers had a high to moderate level of knowledge about ADs; those with more experience working with the elderly had higher levels of knowledge [37]. • 57% of social work students were knowledgeable about living wills [36]. • For health care social workers, 88.8% had training in EoL care issues, compared with 53.2% in other social workers, and 78.3% indicated that they received EoL care training in continuing education programs [35]. • 60% of social worker assistants said that they receive no training regarding ADs, although 53% said they have recently received training on the POLST [24]. • A substantial proportion of respondents (1–75%) did not correctly answered relevant “true/false” questions about LST [42]. • Social workers as a group reported lower levels of satisfaction with AD laws and systems than nurses and other professionals [47]. • 73% of social workers in South Korea reported no knowledge of ADs [19]. |
Involvement in ACP | Findings related to ADs • 96% of the respondents reported that social workers in their department are conducting ACP discussions with patients/families [44]. • 80% of the respondents reported that social workers are responsible for educating patients and/or families about ACP options [44]. • 93% of social workers said they often or always educate families about ADs [43]. • 68% of the respondents reported that social workers are responsible for documenting ACP [44]. • 85.6% of the respondents stated that social workers are completing the care plan form, while 49% of the physicians and 25% of the social workers said that physicians are involved in completing the care plan form [48]. • 90% of social workers said that they often or always provided written information regarding ADs to newly admitted residents and family members (a PSDA requirement) [42]. • 93% of social workers said they are often or always involved in care planning for residents with dementia [43]. • One third of social workers stated that they initiate the AD conversation, 33% said that nurses initiate the AD conversation, and others said that AD conversation is done at admission or during care planning meeting [24]. • 73% of social worker assistants stated that they have conversations about AD during care meetings [24]. • 31.2% of social workers reported never or almost never being involved in asking patients about their wishes [22]. • 40% of social workers indicated that they provide a facility-specific form to residents regarding ADs, and additional 40% noted that no AD forms are provided at all [24]. • 55.3% of the social workers (in South Korea) had experience aiding elderly patients and/or family members by providing information about ADs [20]. • 83.3% of the social workers (in South Korea) reported that they did not have any experience working with terminally ill patients; only 2.8% reported that they had ever provided AD planning [19]. • The area in which social workers reported being more involved was activities related to family members [22]. • 64% of social workers indicated that they had direct responsibility in discussing ADs with patients’ families [47]. • 52% of social workers reported spending 0.5-1 h daily in their AD communication practices with hospitalized elderly patients and their families, and 82% of them reported that the time they spent in AD communications was inadequate [41]. • Compared to physicians and nurses, social workers spent more time daily in their AD communication practices with hospitalized elderly patients [46]. Findings related to HCP • 72.3% of health care social workers had completed a HCP, compared with 48.8% of other social workers [35]. • 44% of social workers stated they are very often involved in discussing the HCP with clients, and 37.3% are very often involved in counseling clients regarding HCPs [39]. • Almost 25% of social workers stated that they were very often involved in receiving requests from other professionals to explain HCP, and 23.8% stated they were very often involved in completing HCPs [39]. |
Social workers’ roles in interdisciplinary health care teams | • 100% of MSWs and 82.4% of doctors considered ACP discussions as part of their role, but only 37.1% of nurses thought likewise [21]. • 72.5% of social workers rated education as an important role and 31.5% said that facilitating decision making was an important role for them in EoL planning [39] • In Singapore, 53.9% of MSWs occasionally or never discussed ACP with their patients compared to 66.6% of physicians and 90% of the nurses. Of those who discussed ACP with their patients, 90% of MSWs and 82% of the physicians initiated the discussions themselves compared to 18.6% of nurses [21]. • Social workers reported consistently stronger beliefs than nurses regarding their role with patients and family members in the decision-making process [23]. • Compared with physicians and nurses, MSWs appeared to be the most confident in conducting ACP discussions [21]. • Nurses acknowledged particular expertise among social workers as good communicators, and social workers perceived nurses’ primary role with patient [26]. • Social workers reported being more involved in discussions with patients and family members, whereas nurses reported being more involved in the daily care of terminally ill patients [23]. • For nurses, ADs were addressed routinely with almost all of their patients through institutional admission procedures and routine nursing care. Social workers’ AD communication practices were limited to patients encountered through screening or referrals that typically did not originate for ACP purposes [26]. • Social workers indicated an awareness of their roles as advocates in promoting the content of the patient’s wishes with family members and health care providers [26]. |
Ethical issues related to the use of ACP | • 97% of social worker students indicated that self-determination is a very important principle in social work practice [11]. • 75% of social worker students answered that they would be troubled if problems of self-determination resulted in conflicts [11]. • 77% of social workers said they often or always were involved in conflict resolution with families [43]. • Nearly all respondents indicated a situation they had once dealt with where the family requests something different from what is written on the patient’s ADs [24]. • 72% of social workers reported that they helped families clarify their thoughts about LST choices [42]. • Common ethical issues identified through thematic analysis included preservation of patients’ autonomy/self-determination, beneficence of health care providers, and medical futility of end-of-life treatments [25]. • Social workers working in hospitals were more likely to report encountering patient and family conflict regarding treatment decisions, difficulty in communicating with the patient and family and lack of adequate guidance from the medical staff [47]. • Continued communication with all parties involved was key in resolving ethical problems [25]. |