Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Breast cancer treatment is reported to be influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). Few reports, however, stem from national, equality-based health care systems. The aim of this study was to analyse associations between SES, rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), patient-reported preoperative information and perceived involvement in Sweden.
All women operated for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included. Tumour and treatment data as well as socioeconomic data were retrieved from national registers. Postal questionnaires regarding preoperative information about breast-conserving options and perceived involvement in the decision-making process had previously been sent to all women receiving mastectomy.
Of 7735 women, 4604 (59.5%) received BCS. In addition to regional differences, independent predictors of BCS were being in the middle or higher age groups, having small tumours without clinically involved nodes, being born in Europe outside Sweden, having a higher education than primary school and an intermediate or high income per household. Women with smaller, clinically node-negative tumours felt more often involved in the surgical decision and informed about breast-conserving options (both p < 0.001). In addition, women who perceived that BCS was discussed as an alternative to mastectomy were more often in a partnership (p < 0.001), not born in Sweden (p = 0.035) and had an employment (p = 0.031).
Socioeconomic factors are associated with surgical treatment even in a national health care system that is expected to offer all women the same standard of care. This should be taken into account and adapted to in preoperative counselling on surgical options in breast cancer.
Veronesi U et al (2002) Breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy. N Engl J Med 347(16):1227–1232 CrossRef
Fisher B et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241 CrossRef
de Boniface J et al (2017) Survival and axillary recurrence following sentinel node-positive breast cancer without completion axillary lymph node dissection: the randomized controlled SENOMAC trial. BMC Cancer 17(1):379 CrossRef
van Maaren MC et al (2016) 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 17(8):1158–1170 CrossRef
Hofvind S, Holen A, Aas T, Roman M, Sebuødegård S, Akslen LA (2015) Women treated with breast conserving surgery do better than those with mastectomy independent of detection mode, prognostic and predictive tumor characteristics. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(10):1417–1422 CrossRef
Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (2016) Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 36(15):1938–1943 CrossRef
Molenaar S et al (2004) Predictors of patients’ choices for breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: A prospective study. Br J Cancer 90(11):2123–2130 CrossRef
Sheehan JB, Sherman KA, Lam T, Boyages J (2007) Association of information satisfaction, psychological distress and monitoring coping style with post-decision regret following breast reconstruction. Psychooncology 16(4):342–351 CrossRef
Caldon LJM et al (2011) Why do hospital mastectomy rates vary Differences in the decision-making experiences of women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 104(10):1551–1557 CrossRef
Gu J, Groot G, Boden C, Busch A, Holtslander L, Lim H (2018) Review of factors influencing women’s choice of mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review. Clin. Breast Cancer 18(4):e539–e554 CrossRef
Ridao-López M, García-Armesto S, Abadía-Taira B, Peiró-Moreno S, Bernal-Delgado E (2011) Income level and regional policies, underlying factors associated with unwarranted variations in conservative breast cancer surgery in Spain. BMC Cancer 11:145 CrossRef
Dahlbäck C, Manjer J, Rehn M, Ringberg A (2017) Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery can benefit from the opportunity to participate in choosing their surgical technique. World J Surg 41(3):734–741 CrossRef
Bröstcancerregistret N (2018) Rapport från nationella sammanfattning bröstcancerregistret
Frisell A, Lagergren J, de Boniface J (2016) National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision-making on immediate breast reconstruction rates. Br J Surg 103(12):1640–1648 CrossRef
Frisell A, Lagergren J, Halle M, de Boniface J Socioeconomic status influences immediate breast reconstruction rates, patient information and involvement in surgical decision-making. Submitted manuscript
Mac Bride MB et al (2013) Factors associated with surgical decision making in women with early-stage breast cancer: a literature review. J Women’s Health 22(3):236–242 CrossRef
Byers TE et al (2008) The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States. American Cancer Society, pp 582–591
Jacobs LK, Kelley KA, Rosson GD, Detrani ME, Chang DC (2008) Disparities in urban and rural mastectomy populations: the effects of patient- and county-level factors on likelihood of receipt of mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 15(10):2644–2652 CrossRef
Nattinger AB, Kneusel RT, Hoffmann RG, Gilligan MA (2001) Relationship of distance from a radiotherapy facility and initial breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(17):1344–1346 CrossRef
Trial AR et al (2004) Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery. JAMA 292(4):435–441 CrossRef
Brown FF, Lewis JW, Harcleroad (1969) AV instruction technology, media, and methods, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Falvo DR (1994) Effective patient education. A guide to increased compliance, 2nd edn. Aspen Publishers,
Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K (2000) The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press, New York CrossRef
Årsrapport 2018 från Nationella Bröstcancerregistret. no. September, 2018
Projektrapport Validering av Nationellt kvalitetsregister för bröstcancer. 2015
- Socioeconomic status differs between breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and breast conservation, and affects patient-reported preoperative information
J. de Boniface
- Springer US
Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie
Mail Icon II