It has been known for several decades that the magnitude of the corneal electroretinogram (ERG) varies with position on the eye surface, especially in the presence of focal or asymmetric stimuli or retinal lesions. However, this phenomenon has not been well-characterized using simultaneous measurements at multiple locations on the cornea. This work provides the first characterization of spatial differences in the ERG across the rat cornea.
A contact lens electrode array was employed to record ERG potentials at 25 corneal locations simultaneously following brief full-field flash stimuli in normally sighted Long-Evans rats. These multi-electrode electroretinogram (meERG) responses were analyzed for spatial differences in a-wave and b-wave amplitudes and implicit times.
Spatially distinct ERG potentials could be recorded reliably. Comparing relative amplitudes across the corneal locations suggested a slight non-uniform distribution when using full-field, near-saturating stimuli. Amplitudes of a- and b-waves were approximately 3 % lower in the inferior quadrant than in the superior quadrant of the cornea.
The present results comprise the start of the first normative meERG database for rat eyes and provide a basis for comparison of results from eyes with functional deficit. Robust measures of spatial differences in corneal potentials will also support optimization and validation of computational source models of the ERG. To fully utilize the information contained in the meERG data, a detailed understanding of the roles of the many determinants of local corneal potentials will eventually be required.
Xu X, Karwoski CJ (1994) Current source density (CSD) analysis of retinal field potentials. I. Methodological considerations and depth profiles. J Neurophysiol 72(1):84–95 PubMed
IFAC, Italian National Resource Council, “Nello Carara,” Florence, Italy. www.niremf.ifac.cnr.it/tissprop. Last accessed 2 July 2011
Sundmark E (1958) Recording of the human electroretinogram with the contact glass: influence of the position of the recording electrode on the b-potential. Acta Ophthalmol 36(2):273–280 CrossRef
Sundmark E (1958) Recording of the human electroretinogram with the contact glass: III. Influence of the shape of the fluid layer between the glass and the eye on the electroretinogram. Acta Ophthalmol 36(5):917–928 CrossRef
Sundmark E (1959) The contact glass in human electroretinography. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 52:3–40
Holland MG, Herr N (1964) The electroretinographic potential field localization of retinal lesions. Am J Ophtalmol 57:639–645 CrossRef
Bach M, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Johnson MA, McCulloch DL, Meigen T, Viswanathan S (2013) ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG)—2012 update. Doc Ophthalmol 124(1):1–13 CrossRef
Krakau CET (1958) On the potential field of the rabbit electroretinogram. Acta Ophthalmol 36(II):183–207
Han C, Liu Z, Zhang X, Pogwizd S, He B (2008) Noninvasive three-dimensional cardiac activation imaging from body surface potential maps: a computational and experimental study on a rabbit model. IEEE Tran Med Imaging 27(11):1622–1630 CrossRef
Ortin-Martinez A, Jimenez-Lopez M, Nadal-Nicolas FM, Salinas-Navarro M, Alarcon-Martinez L, Sauve Y, Villegas-Perez MP, Vidal-Sanz M, Agudo-Barriuso M (2010) Automated quantification and topographical distribution of the whole population of S- and L-cones in adult albino and pigmented rats. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(6):3171–3183 CrossRef
Danias J, Shen F, Goldblum D, Chen B, Ramos-Esteban J, Pados SM, Mittag T (2002) Cytoarchitecture of retinal ganglion cells in the rat. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(3):587–594
Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S (2002) Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(5):1673–1685
- Spatial differences in corneal electroretinogram potentials measured in rat with a contact lens electrode array
Ashley N. Selner
Justin C. Williams
John R. Hetling
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg