Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Brain Structure and Function 2/2018

15.09.2017 | Original Article

Specific properties of the SI and SII somatosensory areas and their effects on motor control: a system neurophysiological study

verfasst von: Julia Friedrich, Moritz Mückschel, Christian Beste

Erschienen in: Brain Structure and Function | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Sensorimotor integration is essential for successful motor control and the somatosensory modality has been shown to have strong effects on the execution of motor plans. The primary (SI) and the secondary somatosensory (SII) cortices are known to differ in their neuroanatomical connections to prefrontal areas, as well as in their involvement to encode cognitive aspects of tactile processing. Here, we ask whether the area-specific processing architecture or the structural neuroanatomical connections with prefrontal areas determine the efficacy of sensorimotor integration processes for motor control. In a system neurophysiological study including EEG signal decomposition (i.e., residue iteration decomposition, RIDE) and source localization, we investigated this question using vibrotactile stimuli optimized for SI or SII processing. The behavioral data show that when being triggered via the SI area, inhibitory control of motor processes is stronger as when being triggered via the SII area. On a neurophysiological level, these effects were reflected in the C-cluster as a result of a temporal decomposition of EEG data, indicating that the sensory processes affecting motor inhibition modulate the response selection level. These modulations were associated with a stronger activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus extending to the right middle frontal gyrus as parts of a network known to be involved in inhibitory motor control when response inhibition is triggered over SI. In addition, areas important for sensorimotor integration like the postcentral gyrus and superior parietal cortex showed activation differences. The data suggest that connection patterns are more important for sensorimotor integration and control than the more restricted area-specific processing architecture.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Beste C, Stock A-K, Epplen JT, Arning L (2016) Dissociable electrophysiological subprocesses during response inhibition are differentially modulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.03.002 Beste C, Stock A-K, Epplen JT, Arning L (2016) Dissociable electrophysiological subprocesses during response inhibition are differentially modulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​euroneuro.​2016.​03.​002
Zurück zum Zitat Bodmer B, Beste C (2017) On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality: response inhibition processes and sensory modality. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1941–1951. doi:10.1002/hbm.23495 CrossRefPubMed Bodmer B, Beste C (2017) On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality: response inhibition processes and sensory modality. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1941–1951. doi:10.​1002/​hbm.​23495 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Dippel G, Beste C (2016) Concurrent information affects response inhibition processes via the modulation of theta oscillations in cognitive control networks. Brain Struct Funct 221:3949–3961. doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1137-1 CrossRefPubMed Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Dippel G, Beste C (2016) Concurrent information affects response inhibition processes via the modulation of theta oscillations in cognitive control networks. Brain Struct Funct 221:3949–3961. doi:10.​1007/​s00429-015-1137-1 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Ziemssen T, Beste C (2017) The norepinephrine system affects specific neurophysiological subprocesses in the modulation of inhibitory control by working memory demands: norepinephrinergic modulation of inhibitory control by working memory demands. Hum Brain Mapp 38:68–81. doi:10.1002/hbm.23344 CrossRefPubMed Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Ziemssen T, Beste C (2017) The norepinephrine system affects specific neurophysiological subprocesses in the modulation of inhibitory control by working memory demands: norepinephrinergic modulation of inhibitory control by working memory demands. Hum Brain Mapp 38:68–81. doi:10.​1002/​hbm.​23344 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Dippel G, Chmielewski W, Mückschel M, Beste C (2016) Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study. Brain Struct Funct 221:4091–4101. doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1148-y CrossRefPubMed Dippel G, Chmielewski W, Mückschel M, Beste C (2016) Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study. Brain Struct Funct 221:4091–4101. doi:10.​1007/​s00429-015-1148-y CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Fang P-C, Stepniewska I, Kaas JH (2005) Ipsilateral cortical connections of motor, premotor, frontal eye, and posterior parietal fields in a prosimian primate, Otolemur garnetti. J Comp Neurol 490:305–333. doi:10.1002/cne.20665 CrossRefPubMed Fang P-C, Stepniewska I, Kaas JH (2005) Ipsilateral cortical connections of motor, premotor, frontal eye, and posterior parietal fields in a prosimian primate, Otolemur garnetti. J Comp Neurol 490:305–333. doi:10.​1002/​cne.​20665 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hämäläinen H, Kekoni J, Sams M et al (1990) Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to P50 and P100 components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:13–21. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(90)90148-D CrossRefPubMed Hämäläinen H, Kekoni J, Sams M et al (1990) Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to P50 and P100 components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:13–21. doi:10.​1016/​0013-4694(90)90148-D CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Huster RJ, Enriquez-Geppert S, Lavallee CF et al (2013) Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 87:217–233. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001 Huster RJ, Enriquez-Geppert S, Lavallee CF et al (2013) Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 87:217–233. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijpsycho.​2012.​08.​001
Zurück zum Zitat Künzle H (1977) Projections from the primary somatosensory cortex to basal ganglia and thalamus in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. doi:10.1007/BF00237639 Künzle H (1977) Projections from the primary somatosensory cortex to basal ganglia and thalamus in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. doi:10.​1007/​BF00237639
Zurück zum Zitat Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A et al (2001) A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 356:1293–1322. doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0915 CrossRef Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A et al (2001) A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 356:1293–1322. doi:10.​1098/​rstb.​2001.​0915 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mückschel M, Stock A-K, Beste C (2014) Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. Cereb Cortex N Y N 24:2120–2129. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht066 CrossRef Mückschel M, Stock A-K, Beste C (2014) Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. Cereb Cortex N Y N 24:2120–2129. doi:10.​1093/​cercor/​bht066 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mückschel M, Dippel G, Beste C (2017b) Distinguishing stimulus and response codes in theta oscillations in prefrontal areas during inhibitory control of automated responses. Hum Brain Mapp. doi:10.1002/hbm.23757 Mückschel M, Dippel G, Beste C (2017b) Distinguishing stimulus and response codes in theta oscillations in prefrontal areas during inhibitory control of automated responses. Hum Brain Mapp. doi:10.​1002/​hbm.​23757
Zurück zum Zitat Nunez PL, Pilgreen KL (1991) The spline-Laplacian in clinical neurophysiology: a method to improve EEG spatial resolution. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 8:397–413 Nunez PL, Pilgreen KL (1991) The spline-Laplacian in clinical neurophysiology: a method to improve EEG spatial resolution. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 8:397–413
Zurück zum Zitat Ouyang G, Herzmann G, Zhou C, Sommer W (2011) Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): a new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials: RIDE: a new method to separate ERP components. Psychophysiology 48:1631–1647. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01269.x CrossRefPubMed Ouyang G, Herzmann G, Zhou C, Sommer W (2011) Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): a new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials: RIDE: a new method to separate ERP components. Psychophysiology 48:1631–1647. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1469-8986.​2011.​01269.​x CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ouyang G, Schacht A, Zhou C, Sommer W (2013) Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): a demonstration in go/no-go experiments. Psychophysiology 50:253–265. doi:10.1111/psyp.12004 CrossRefPubMed Ouyang G, Schacht A, Zhou C, Sommer W (2013) Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): a demonstration in go/no-go experiments. Psychophysiology 50:253–265. doi:10.​1111/​psyp.​12004 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ouyang G, Sommer W, Zhou C (2015b) Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): ERP analysis with residue iteration decomposition. Psychophysiology 52:839–856. doi:10.1111/psyp.12411 CrossRefPubMed Ouyang G, Sommer W, Zhou C (2015b) Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): ERP analysis with residue iteration decomposition. Psychophysiology 52:839–856. doi:10.​1111/​psyp.​12411 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Pascual-Marqui RD (2002) Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24(Suppl D):5–12PubMed Pascual-Marqui RD (2002) Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24(Suppl D):5–12PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Rasmussen T, Penfield W (1947) The human sensorimotor cortex as studied by electrical stimulation. Fed Proc 6:184PubMed Rasmussen T, Penfield W (1947) The human sensorimotor cortex as studied by electrical stimulation. Fed Proc 6:184PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wessel JR, Aron AR (2015) It’s not too late: the onset of the frontocentral P3 indexes successful response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Psychophysiology 52:472–480. doi:10.1111/psyp.12374 CrossRefPubMed Wessel JR, Aron AR (2015) It’s not too late: the onset of the frontocentral P3 indexes successful response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Psychophysiology 52:472–480. doi:10.​1111/​psyp.​12374 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff N, Mückschel M, Beste C (2017) Neural mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical networks during memory and cue-based task switching as revealed by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) based source localization. Brain Struct Funct. doi:10.1007/s00429-017-1437-8 Wolff N, Mückschel M, Beste C (2017) Neural mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical networks during memory and cue-based task switching as revealed by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) based source localization. Brain Struct Funct. doi:10.​1007/​s00429-017-1437-8
Metadaten
Titel
Specific properties of the SI and SII somatosensory areas and their effects on motor control: a system neurophysiological study
verfasst von
Julia Friedrich
Moritz Mückschel
Christian Beste
Publikationsdatum
15.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Brain Structure and Function / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1515-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Brain Structure and Function 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.