Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Uro-News 3/2019

04.03.2019 | Fortbildung

Die Zukunft der Prostatapathologie

Der aktuelle Stand beim Gleason-Score

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. med. Guido Sauter

Erschienen in: Uro-News | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Aktive Überwachung oder Brachytherapie werden leitliniengemäß nur bei einem Gleason-Grad von 3 + 3 empfohlen, Tumoren mit einem Gleason-Grad ≥ 8 gelten hingegen als „high-risk“ und werden oft nur palliativ behandelt. Mit der Bestimmung des Gleason-Score trifft der Pathologe somit eine für den Patienten schicksalhafte Entscheidung.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI. The Gleason Grading System: A Complete Guide for Pathologist and Clinicians. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilki; 2012 Epstein JI. The Gleason Grading System: A Complete Guide for Pathologist and Clinicians. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilki; 2012
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016; 40: 244–52PubMed Epstein JI et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016; 40: 244–52PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazinet M et al. Prognostic significance of antigenic heterogeneity, Gleason grade, and ploidy of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Prostate. 1992; 20: 311–26CrossRef Bazinet M et al. Prognostic significance of antigenic heterogeneity, Gleason grade, and ploidy of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Prostate. 1992; 20: 311–26CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zagars GK et al. Prognostic factors for clinically localized prostate carcinoma: analysis of 938 patients irradiated in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer. 1997; 79: 1370–80CrossRef Zagars GK et al. Prognostic factors for clinically localized prostate carcinoma: analysis of 938 patients irradiated in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer. 1997; 79: 1370–80CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Green GA et al. A Gleason score of 7 predicts a worse outcome for prostate carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy. Cancer. 1998; 83: 971–6CrossRef Green GA et al. A Gleason score of 7 predicts a worse outcome for prostate carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy. Cancer. 1998; 83: 971–6CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Narain V et al. How accurately does prostate biopsy Gleason score predict pathologic findings and disease free survival? Prostate. 2001; 49: 185–90CrossRef Narain V et al. How accurately does prostate biopsy Gleason score predict pathologic findings and disease free survival? Prostate. 2001; 49: 185–90CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao V et al. Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma. Urol Ann. 2018; 10: 324–9CrossRef Rao V et al. Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma. Urol Ann. 2018; 10: 324–9CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulman AA et al. Validation of the 2015 prostate cancer grade groups for predicting long-term oncologic outcomes in a shared equal-access health system. Cancer. 2017; 123: 4122–9CrossRef Schulman AA et al. Validation of the 2015 prostate cancer grade groups for predicting long-term oncologic outcomes in a shared equal-access health system. Cancer. 2017; 123: 4122–9CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pompe RS et al. Population-Based Validation of the 2014 ISUP Gleason Grade Groups in Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation, or no Local Treatment. Prostate. 2017; 77: 686–93CrossRef Pompe RS et al. Population-Based Validation of the 2014 ISUP Gleason Grade Groups in Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation, or no Local Treatment. Prostate. 2017; 77: 686–93CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathieu R et al: Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; 20: 197–202CrossRef Mathieu R et al: Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; 20: 197–202CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat He J et al. Validation of a Contemporary Five-tiered Gleason Grade Grouping Using Population-based Data. Eur Urol. 2017; 71: 760–3CrossRef He J et al. Validation of a Contemporary Five-tiered Gleason Grade Grouping Using Population-based Data. Eur Urol. 2017; 71: 760–3CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin MA et al. Genomic Correlates to the Newly Proposed Grading Prognostic Groups for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 557–60CrossRef Rubin MA et al. Genomic Correlates to the Newly Proposed Grading Prognostic Groups for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 557–60CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauter G et al. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens. Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 592–8CrossRef Sauter G et al. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens. Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 592–8CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauter G et al. Integrating Tertiary Gleason 5 Patterns into Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens. Eur Urol. 2018; 73: 674–83CrossRef Sauter G et al. Integrating Tertiary Gleason 5 Patterns into Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens. Eur Urol. 2018; 73: 674–83CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Egevad L et al. Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists. Histopathology. 2013; 62: 247–56CrossRef Egevad L et al. Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists. Histopathology. 2013; 62: 247–56CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauter G. Beurteilung des Prostatakarzinoms — Gleason-Score: Status 2016. Dtsch Arztebl. 2016; 113: 14–7 Sauter G. Beurteilung des Prostatakarzinoms — Gleason-Score: Status 2016. Dtsch Arztebl. 2016; 113: 14–7
Metadaten
Titel
Die Zukunft der Prostatapathologie
Der aktuelle Stand beim Gleason-Score
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. med. Guido Sauter
Publikationsdatum
04.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Uro-News / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-9026
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-5676
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00092-019-2186-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Uro-News 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Praxis konkret

Yoga für Urologen

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.