Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 3/2019

08.11.2018 | Original Article

Splenic flexure mobilization in rectal cancer surgery: do we always need it?

verfasst von: Francesco Ferrara, Giuseppe Di Gioia, Daniele Gentile, Giulia Carrara, Davide Gobatti, Marco Stella

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Splenic flexure (SFM) in rectal cancer surgery is a crucial step which may increase the difficulty of the operation. The aim of this retrospective single-center study is to demonstrate if the selective omission of SFM during anterior rectal resection can reduce the complexity of the operation, without affecting post-operative and oncologic outcomes. Data of 112 consecutive rectal resections for cancer from March 2010 to March 2017 were analyzed and divided into two groups: SFM and No-SFM. A sub-analysis was then performed for laparoscopy and traditional cases. Post-operative and oncologic outcomes, including overall (OS) and cancer-related survival (CRS), were analyzed and compared. SFM was performed in 42% of cases and laparoscopy was used in 73.2%. Operative time resulted significantly lower in the No-SFM group (190 vs. 225 min, p = 0.01). In laparoscopy in the No-SFM group, operative time and post-operative stay were significantly lower (205.5 vs. 222.5 min, p = 0.04; 9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.01). Most of the open resections were performed without SFM (35.4% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.02). No statistical significant differences were found in OS and CRS in the two groups. We support the hypothesis that every surgeon should carry out an accurate intra-operative evaluation to perform a selective SFM. When possible, SFM can be safely avoided with no additional risks in terms of post-operative and oncologic outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Katory M, Tang CL, Koh WL et al (2008) A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic flexure mobilization. Colorectal Dis 10(2):165–169PubMed Katory M, Tang CL, Koh WL et al (2008) A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic flexure mobilization. Colorectal Dis 10(2):165–169PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan DJ, Moynagh M, Brannigan AE, Gleeson F, Rowland M, O’Connell PR (2007) Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50:302–307CrossRefPubMed Brennan DJ, Moynagh M, Brannigan AE, Gleeson F, Rowland M, O’Connell PR (2007) Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50:302–307CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Choi DJ, Kim SH (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization: a prospective study assessing anastomotic safety. Hepatogastroenterology 56:1354–1358PubMed Kim J, Choi DJ, Kim SH (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization: a prospective study assessing anastomotic safety. Hepatogastroenterology 56:1354–1358PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Kang SB, Kim DW, Lee KH, Kim YH (2009) Laparoscopic vs open resection without splenic flexure mobilization for the treatment of rectum and sigmoid cancer: a study from a single institution that selectively used splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(1):62–68CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Kang SB, Kim DW, Lee KH, Kim YH (2009) Laparoscopic vs open resection without splenic flexure mobilization for the treatment of rectum and sigmoid cancer: a study from a single institution that selectively used splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(1):62–68CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsden M, Conti J, Zeidan S et al (2012) The selective use of splenic flexure mobilization is safe in both laparoscopic and open anterior resections. Colorectal Dis 14:1255–1261CrossRefPubMed Marsden M, Conti J, Zeidan S et al (2012) The selective use of splenic flexure mobilization is safe in both laparoscopic and open anterior resections. Colorectal Dis 14:1255–1261CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon AR, Maxwell WA, Holmes JT (1991) Carcinoma of the rectum: a 10-year experience. Br J Surg 78:308–311CrossRefPubMed Dixon AR, Maxwell WA, Holmes JT (1991) Carcinoma of the rectum: a 10-year experience. Br J Surg 78:308–311CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Finan PJ (2008) Splenic flexure mobilisation for anterior resection performed for sigmoid and rectal cancer: why I (nearly) always mobilize the splenic flexure in rectal cancer surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:638–642CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Finan PJ (2008) Splenic flexure mobilisation for anterior resection performed for sigmoid and rectal cancer: why I (nearly) always mobilize the splenic flexure in rectal cancer surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:638–642CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlson RM, Roberts PL, Hall JF et al (2014) What are 30-day postoperative outcomes following splenic flexure mobilization during anterior resection? Tech Coloproctol 18(3):257–264CrossRefPubMed Carlson RM, Roberts PL, Hall JF et al (2014) What are 30-day postoperative outcomes following splenic flexure mobilization during anterior resection? Tech Coloproctol 18(3):257–264CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hida J, Okuno K, Yasutomi M et al (2005) Optimal ligation level of the primary feeding artery and bowel resection margin in colon cancer surgery: the influence of the site of the primary feeding artery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2232–2237CrossRefPubMed Hida J, Okuno K, Yasutomi M et al (2005) Optimal ligation level of the primary feeding artery and bowel resection margin in colon cancer surgery: the influence of the site of the primary feeding artery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2232–2237CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao GP, Zhou ZG, Lei WZ et al (2005) Pathological study of distal mesorectal cancer spread to determine a proper distal resection margin. World J Gastroenterol 11:319–322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhao GP, Zhou ZG, Lei WZ et al (2005) Pathological study of distal mesorectal cancer spread to determine a proper distal resection margin. World J Gastroenterol 11:319–322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubbini M, Vettorello GF, Guerrera C et al (1990) A prospective study of local recurrence after resection and low stapled anastomosis in 183 patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 33:117–121CrossRefPubMed Rubbini M, Vettorello GF, Guerrera C et al (1990) A prospective study of local recurrence after resection and low stapled anastomosis in 183 patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 33:117–121CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JK, Holubar SD, Wolff BG, Follestad B, O’Byrne MM, Qin R (2011) Risk factors for splenic injury during colectomy: a matched case–control study. World J Surg 35:1123–1129CrossRefPubMed Wang JK, Holubar SD, Wolff BG, Follestad B, O’Byrne MM, Qin R (2011) Risk factors for splenic injury during colectomy: a matched case–control study. World J Surg 35:1123–1129CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassar K, Munro A (2002) Iatrogenic splenic injury. J R Coll Surg Edinb 47:731–741PubMed Cassar K, Munro A (2002) Iatrogenic splenic injury. J R Coll Surg Edinb 47:731–741PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim HS, Kim JG, Cho HM (2014) How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection? Int J Med Sci 11(9):857–862CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim HS, Kim JG, Cho HM (2014) How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection? Int J Med Sci 11(9):857–862CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Alici A, Kement M, Gezen C et al (2010) Apical lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in distal colorectal cancer: an analysis of the risk of tumor involvement and the impact of high ligation on anastomotic integrity. Tech Coloproctol 14:1–8CrossRefPubMed Alici A, Kement M, Gezen C et al (2010) Apical lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in distal colorectal cancer: an analysis of the risk of tumor involvement and the impact of high ligation on anastomotic integrity. Tech Coloproctol 14:1–8CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennis M, Parc Y, Lefevre JH, Chafai N, Attal E, Tiret E (2012) Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis a retrospective series of 483 patients. Ann Surg 255:504–510CrossRefPubMed Bennis M, Parc Y, Lefevre JH, Chafai N, Attal E, Tiret E (2012) Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis a retrospective series of 483 patients. Ann Surg 255:504–510CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM et al (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic vs open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17:1530–1535CrossRefPubMed Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM et al (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic vs open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17:1530–1535CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Manceau G, Karoui M, Breton S et al (2012) Right colon to rectal anastomosis (Deloyers procedure) as a salvage technique for low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: postoperative and long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 55:363–368CrossRefPubMed Manceau G, Karoui M, Breton S et al (2012) Right colon to rectal anastomosis (Deloyers procedure) as a salvage technique for low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: postoperative and long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 55:363–368CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nano M, Dal Corso H, Ferronato M, Solej M, Hornung JP, Dei Poli M (2004) Ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in the surgery of rectal cancer: anatomical considerations. Dig Surg 21:123–126CrossRefPubMed Nano M, Dal Corso H, Ferronato M, Solej M, Hornung JP, Dei Poli M (2004) Ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in the surgery of rectal cancer: anatomical considerations. Dig Surg 21:123–126CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C (2005) Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 20:253–257CrossRefPubMed Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C (2005) Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 20:253–257CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging handbook, 7th edn. Springer, New York Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging handbook, 7th edn. Springer, New York
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy R, Jenkins I, Finan PJ (2008) Controversial topics in surgery: splenic flexure mobilisation for anterior resection performed for sigmoid and rectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(8):638–642CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kennedy R, Jenkins I, Finan PJ (2008) Controversial topics in surgery: splenic flexure mobilisation for anterior resection performed for sigmoid and rectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(8):638–642CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouvas N, Gogos-Pappas G, Tsimogiannis K et al (2014) Impact of splenic flexure mobilization on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic left colectomy for colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(5):470–474CrossRefPubMed Gouvas N, Gogos-Pappas G, Tsimogiannis K et al (2014) Impact of splenic flexure mobilization on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic left colectomy for colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(5):470–474CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Boni L, Fingerhut A, Marzorati A, Rausei S, Dionigi G, Cassinotti E (2017) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic low anterior resection: results of a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 31(4):1836–1840CrossRefPubMed Boni L, Fingerhut A, Marzorati A, Rausei S, Dionigi G, Cassinotti E (2017) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic low anterior resection: results of a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 31(4):1836–1840CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lertsithichai P, Rattanapichart P (2004) Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications. Asian J Surg 27:202–210CrossRefPubMed Lertsithichai P, Rattanapichart P (2004) Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications. Asian J Surg 27:202–210CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Güenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS et al (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24:CD004647 Güenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS et al (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24:CD004647
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE et al (2007) Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 31:1143–1152CrossRef Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE et al (2007) Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 31:1143–1152CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rullin A et al (2009) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:479–488CrossRefPubMed Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rullin A et al (2009) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:479–488CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Geng HZ, Nasier D, Liu B, Gao H, Xu YK (2015) Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(7):494–501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Geng HZ, Nasier D, Liu B, Gao H, Xu YK (2015) Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(7):494–501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226CrossRef Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Splenic flexure mobilization in rectal cancer surgery: do we always need it?
verfasst von
Francesco Ferrara
Giuseppe Di Gioia
Daniele Gentile
Giulia Carrara
Davide Gobatti
Marco Stella
Publikationsdatum
08.11.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0603-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Updates in Surgery 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.