nach oben

Acta Diabetologica

Erschienen in:

19.03.2019 | Review Article

Spousal diabetes status as a risk factor for incident type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Duke Appiah, Pamela J. Schreiner, Elizabeth Selvin, Ellen W. Demerath, James S. Pankow

Erschienen in: Acta Diabetologica | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims

It is unclear if the presence of type-2 diabetes in one spouse is associated with the development of diabetes in the other spouse. We studied the concordance of diabetes among black and white participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and summarized existing studies in a meta-analysis.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort analysis of ARIC data from 8077 married men and women (mean age 54 years) without diabetes at baseline (1987–1989). Complementary log–log models that accounted for interval censoring was used to model the hazard ratio (HR) for the association of spousal diabetes status with the incidence of diabetes. For the meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for observational studies published through December 2018 that evaluated spousal concordance for diabetes.

Results

During a median follow-up of 22 years, 2512 incident cases of diabetes were recorded. In models with adjustment for general adiposity, spousal cardiometabolic factors and other diabetes risk factors, adults who had a spouse with diabetes had elevated risk for incident diabetes compared to those without a spouse diagnosed with diabetes (HR 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.41). This association did not differ by sex or race. Summarized estimates from the 17 studies (489,798 participants from 9 countries) included in the meta-analysis showed a positive association between spousal diabetes status and the development of diabetes (Pooled odds ratio 1.88, 95% CI 1.52–2.33).

Conclusions

Results from this large prospective biracial cohort and meta-analysis provides evidence that spouses of persons with diabetes are a high-risk group for diabetes.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th ed. http://www.diabetesatlas.org. Accessed 31 Dec 2018

Almgren P, Lehtovirta M, Isomaa B et al (2011) Heritability and familiality of type 2 diabetes and related quantitative traits in the Botnia Study. Diabetologia 54(11):2811–2819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-011-2267-5 CrossRefPubMed

Poulsen P, Kyvik KO, Vaag A, Beck-Nielsen H (1999) Heritability of type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and abnormal glucose tolerance—a population-based twin study. Diabetologia 42(2):139–145CrossRefPubMed

Kwak SH, Park KS (2013) Genetics of type 2 diabetes and potential clinical implications. Arch Pharm Res 36(2):167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-013-0021-x CrossRefPubMed

Barrett-Connor E, Suarez L (1982) Spouse concordance for fasting plasma glucose in non-diabetics. Am J Epidemiol 116(3):475–481CrossRefPubMed

Al-Sharbatti SS, Abed YI, Al-Heety LM, Basha SA (2016) Spousal concordance of diabetes mellitus among women in Ajman, United Arab Emirates. Sult Qaboos Univ Med J 16(2):e197–e202. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2016.16.02.010 CrossRef

Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist K, Sundquist J (2010) Familial risks for type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Diabetes Care 33(2):293–297. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0947 CrossRefPubMed

Stimpson JP, Peek MK (2005) Concordance of chronic conditions in older Mexican American couples. Prev Chronic Dis 2(3):A07PubMedPubMedCentral

Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Pringle M, Crown N, Hammersley V (2002) Married couples’ risk of same disease: cross sectional study. BMJ 325(7365):636CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Jurj AL, Wen W, Li HL et al (2006) Spousal correlations for lifestyle factors and selected diseases in Chinese couples. Ann Epidemiol 16(4):285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.07.060 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Khan A, Lasker SS, Chowdhury TA (2003) Are spouses of patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk of developing diabetes? Diabetes Care 26(3):710–712CrossRefPubMed

12.

Leong A, Rahme E, Dasgupta K (2014) Spousal diabetes as a diabetes risk factor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 12:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-12 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Raghavan S, Pachucki MC, Chang Y et al (2016) Incident type 2 diabetes risk is influenced by obesity and diabetes in social contacts: a social network analysis. J Gen Intern Med 31(10):1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3723-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Nielsen J, Hulman A, Witte DR (2018) Spousal cardiometabolic risk factors and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a prospective analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Diabetologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4587-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Cunningham SA, Adams SR, Schmittdiel JA, Ali MK (2017) Incidence of diabetes after a partner’s diagnosis. Prev Med 105:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.020 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

The ARIC investigators (1989) The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: design and objectives. Am J Epidemiol 129(4):687–702CrossRef

17.

McAdams DeMarco M, Coresh J, Woodward M et al (2011) Hypertension status, treatment, and control among spousal pairs in a middle-aged adult cohort. Am J Epidemiol 174(7):790–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr167 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Cobb LK, Godino JG, Selvin E, Kucharska-Newton A, Coresh J, Koton S (2015) Spousal influence on physical activity in middle-aged and older adults: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE (1982) A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr 36(5):936–942CrossRefPubMed

20.

Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ et al (1985) Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 122(1):51–65CrossRefPubMed

21.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151(4):W65–W94CrossRefPubMed

22.

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch VLM, Tugwell P (2018) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 24 July 2018

23.

Herzog R, Alvarez-Pasquin MJ, Diaz C, Del Barrio JL, Estrada JM, Gil A (2013) Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? A systematic review. BMC Public Health 13:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-154 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Symons MJ, Moore DT (2002) Hazard rate ratio and prospective epidemiological studies. J Clin Epidemiol 55(9):893–899CrossRefPubMed

25.

Martin D, Austin H (1991) An efficient program for computing conditional maximum likelihood estimates and exact confidence limits for a common odds ratio. Epidemiology 2(5):359–362CrossRefPubMed

26.

DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188CrossRefPubMed

27.

Rucker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Schumacher M (2008) Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead. BMC Med Res Methodol 8:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-79 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Galbraith RF (1988) A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med 7(8):889–894CrossRefPubMed

29.

Begg CB, Berlin JA (1988) Publication Bias—a problem in interpreting medical data. J R Stat Soc Ser A 151:419–463. https://doi.org/10.2307/2982993 CrossRef

30.

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Rosenberg MS (2005) The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution 59(2):464–468CrossRefPubMed

32.

Sun J, Lu J, Wang W et al (2016) Prevalence of diabetes and cardiometabolic disorders in spouses of diabetic individuals. Am J Epidemiol 184(5):400–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv330 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Trejo-Arteaga JM, Lopez-Carmona JM, Rodriguez-Moctezuma JR, Peralta-Pedrero ML, Escudero-Montero R, Gutierrez Escolano MF (2008) Risk of glucose metabolism changes in spouses of Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes. Med Clin (Barc) 131(16):605–608CrossRef

34.

de Visser KL, Landman GW, Kleefstra N et al (2015) Familial aggregation between the 14th and 21st century and type 2 diabetes risk in an isolated Dutch population. PLoS One 10(7):e0132549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132549 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Mothojakan NB, Hussain S, McCafferty K, Yaqoob MM, Chowdhury TA (2016) Comparison of spousal and family history of diabetes, hypertension and renal disease between haemodialysis patients with diabetes and haemodialysis patients without diabetes. Diabet Med 33(Suppl. 1):159 (Abstract)

36.

Patel SA, Dhillon PK, Kondal D et al (2017) Chronic disease concordance within Indian households: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med 14(9):e1002395. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002395 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Jayaprasad N, Bhatkule PR, Narlawar UW (2018) Risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Nagpur: a case control study. Int J Sci Res 7(2):53–55

38.

Wang JY, Liu CS, Lung CH, Yang YT, Lin MH (2017) Investigating spousal concordance of diabetes through statistical analysis and data mining. PLoS One 12(8):e0183413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183413 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Di Castelnuovo A, Quacquaruccio G, Donati MB, de Gaetano G, Iacoviello L (2009) Spousal concordance for major coronary risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 169(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn234 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Williamson DF (2007) Effect of BMI on lifetime risk for diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care 30(6):1562–1566. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2544 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Murea M, Ma L, Freedman BI (2012) Genetic and environmental factors associated with type 2 diabetes and diabetic vascular complications. Rev Diabet Stud 9(1):6–22. https://doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2012.9.6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Mackenbach JD, den Braver NR, Beulens JWJ (2018) Spouses, social networks and other upstream determinants of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 61(7):1517–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4607-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Wang Z, Ji W, Song Y et al (2017) Spousal concordance for hypertension: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 19(11):1088–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13084 CrossRef

44.

Cobb LK, Godino JG, Selvin E, Kucharska-Newton A, Coresh J, Koton S (2016) Spousal influence on physical activity in middle-aged and older adults: the ARIC study. Am J Epidemiol 183(5):444–451. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv104 CrossRefPubMed

45.

Chen HJ, Liu Y, Wang Y (2014) Socioeconomic and demographic factors for spousal resemblance in obesity status and habitual physical activity in the United States. J Obes 2014:703215. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/703215 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Wood L, Jago R, Sebire SJ, Zahra J, Thompson JL (2015) Sedentary time among spouses: a cross-sectional study exploring associations in sedentary time and behaviour in parents of 5 and 6 year old children. BMC Res Notes 8:787. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1758-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Pachucki MA, Jacques PF, Christakis NA (2011) Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. Am J Public Health 101(11):2170–2177. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300282 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Schoeppe S, Vandelanotte C, Rebar AL, Hayman M, Duncan MJ, Alley SJ (2018) Do singles or couples live healthier lifestyles? Trends in Queensland between 2005–2014. PLoS One 13(2):e0192584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192584 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Lentjes MA, Welch AA, Keogh RH, Luben RN, Khaw KT (2015) Opposites don’t attract: high spouse concordance for dietary supplement use in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) cohort study. Public Health Nutr 18(6):1060–1066. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014001396 CrossRefPubMed

50.

Gunn HE, Buysse DJ, Hasler BP, Begley A, Troxel WM (2015) Sleep concordance in couples is associated with relationship characteristics. Sleep 38(6):933–939. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4744 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Cobb LK, McAdams-DeMarco MA, Gudzune KA et al (2016) Changes in body mass index and obesity risk in married couples over 25 years: the ARIC cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 183(5):435–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv112 CrossRefPubMed

52.

Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med 357(4):370–379. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa066082 CrossRefPubMed

53.

den Braver NR, Lakerveld J, Rutters F, Schoonmade LJ, Brug J, Beulens JWJ (2018) Built environmental characteristics and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 16(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0997-z CrossRef

54.

Pasala SK, Rao AA, Sridhar GR (2010) Built environment and diabetes. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 30(2):63–68. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-3930.62594 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Rabi DM, Edwards AL, Southern DA et al (2006) Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services. BMC Health Serv Res 6:124. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-124 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Hamamy H (2012) Consanguineous marriages: preconception consultation in primary health care settings. J Community Genet 3(3):185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-011-0072-y CrossRefPubMed

57.

Summary of revisions: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018 (2018) Diabetes Care 41(Suppl 1):S4–S6. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-Srev01

58.

Kengne AP, Masconi K, Mbanya VN, Lekoubou A, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Matsha TE (2014) Risk predictive modelling for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 51(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408363.2013.853025 CrossRefPubMed

59.

Beagley J, Guariguata L, Weil C, Motala AA (2014) Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 103(2):150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.001 CrossRefPubMed

60.

Mani N, Caiola E, Fortuna RJ (2011) The influence of social networks on patients’ attitudes toward type II diabetes. J Community Health 36(5):728–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9366-6 CrossRefPubMed

61.

Falba TA, Sindelar JL (2008) Spousal concordance in health behavior change. Health Serv Res 43(1 Pt 1):96–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00754.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Schmittdiel JA, Cunningham SA, Adams SR, Nielsen J, Ali MK (2018) Influence of a new diabetes diagnosis on the health behaviors of the patient’s partner. Ann Fam Med 16(4):290–295. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2259 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Spousal diabetes status as a risk factor for incident type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis
verfasst von: Duke Appiah
Pamela J. Schreiner
Elizabeth Selvin
Ellen W. Demerath
James S. Pankow
Publikationsdatum: 19.03.2019
Verlag: Springer Milan
Erschienen in: Acta Diabetologica / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-5429
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-019-01311-y

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Spousal diabetes status as a risk factor for incident type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis

Abstract

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Update Innere Medizin

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Cross-talk between fetal membranes and visceral adipose tissue involves HMGB1–RAGE and VIP–VPAC2 pathways in human gestational diabetes mellitus

A marker of type VI collagen formation (PRO-C6) is associated with higher arterial stiffness in type 1 diabetes

First case of insulin neuritis after islet transplantation

Agonistic autoantibodies against B2-adrenergic receptors correlating with macrovascular disease in longstanding diabetes type 2

The prevalence of comorbid depression in patients with type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on huge number of observational studies

A randomized controlled trial comparing a telemedicine therapeutic intervention with routine care in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated by insulin pumps

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Update Innere Medizin