Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 7/2022

11.05.2022 | Original Article

Spread of lymph node metastasis and adjuvant therapy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

verfasst von: Hiroshi Kurahara, Yuko Mataki, Tetsuya Idichi, Yota Kawasaki, Shinichiro Mori, Ken Sasaki, Takaaki Arigami, Akihiro Nakajo, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Michiyo Higashi, Takao Ohtsuka

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Lymphatic metastasis is a major route of metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC). The present study aimed to elucidate the pattern of lymph node (LN) metastasis and the effectiveness of LN dissection and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with DCC.

Methods

Patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent for DCC were enrolled. The nomenclature of the LN stations was defined according to the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery guidelines. Effectiveness of LN dissection of each station was calculated using frequency of LN metastasis to the station and 5-year survival rate of patients with LN metastasis to that station.

Results

Of the 105 patients included in the study, 46 (43.8%) had LN metastasis, and 43 (41.0%) underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy. LN metastasis, serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9 level > 37 U/mL, and positive bile duct margin were independent risk factors for shorter overall survival (OS). The most common metastatic LN station at surgery was No. 13 (32.7%), followed by No. 12 (19.2%), No. 17 (9.6%), and No. 8 (6.6%). There was no effectiveness of LN dissection of the station No. 8, 14, and 16. Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with longer OS in patients with LN metastasis but not in those with positive ductal margins or serum CA 19–9 level > 37 U/mL.

Conclusions

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a better prognosis in patients with DCC and LN metastasis. However, a more effective therapeutic strategy is required to improve the prognosis of patients with other negative prognostic factors.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Razumilava N, Gores GJ (2014) Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 383:2168–2179CrossRef Razumilava N, Gores GJ (2014) Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 383:2168–2179CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Mahjoub A, Bouvier V, Menahem B et al (2019) Epidemiology of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma in the French population. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:678–684CrossRef Al Mahjoub A, Bouvier V, Menahem B et al (2019) Epidemiology of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma in the French population. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:678–684CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ercolani G, Dazzi A, Giovinazzo F et al (2015) Intrahepatic, peri-hilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma: three different locations of the same tumor or three different tumors? Eur J Surg Oncol 41:1162–1169CrossRef Ercolani G, Dazzi A, Giovinazzo F et al (2015) Intrahepatic, peri-hilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma: three different locations of the same tumor or three different tumors? Eur J Surg Oncol 41:1162–1169CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrianello S, Paiella S, Allegrini V et al (2015) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:623–628CrossRef Andrianello S, Paiella S, Allegrini V et al (2015) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:623–628CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y et al (2015) Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 102:399–406CrossRef Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y et al (2015) Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 102:399–406CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Lin H, Sun Y et al (2019) Prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in surgical patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Res 236:2–11CrossRef Li X, Lin H, Sun Y et al (2019) Prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in surgical patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Res 236:2–11CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung MJ, Lee KJ, Bang S et al (2011) Preoperative serum CA 19–9 level as a predictive factor for recurrence after curative resection in biliary tract cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1651–1656CrossRef Chung MJ, Lee KJ, Bang S et al (2011) Preoperative serum CA 19–9 level as a predictive factor for recurrence after curative resection in biliary tract cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1651–1656CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2011) Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:651–658CrossRef Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2011) Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:651–658CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurahara H, Maemura K, Mataki Y et al (2017) Relationship between the surgical margin status, prognosis, and recurrence in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402:87–93CrossRef Kurahara H, Maemura K, Mataki Y et al (2017) Relationship between the surgical margin status, prognosis, and recurrence in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402:87–93CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hester C, Nassour I, Adams-Huet B et al (2018) Improved survival in surgically resected distal cholangiocarcinoma treated with adjuvant therapy: a propensity score matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 22:2080–2087CrossRef Hester C, Nassour I, Adams-Huet B et al (2018) Improved survival in surgically resected distal cholangiocarcinoma treated with adjuvant therapy: a propensity score matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 22:2080–2087CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergeat D, Turrini O, Courtin-Tanguy L et al (2018) Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis from a French multicentric cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:701–709CrossRef Bergeat D, Turrini O, Courtin-Tanguy L et al (2018) Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis from a French multicentric cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:701–709CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Messina C, Merz V, Frisinghelli M et al (2019) Adjuvant chemotherapy in resected bile duct cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 143:124–129CrossRef Messina C, Merz V, Frisinghelli M et al (2019) Adjuvant chemotherapy in resected bile duct cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 143:124–129CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T et al (1995) New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 82:346–351CrossRef Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T et al (1995) New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 82:346–351CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura T, Yamamoto Y, Sugiura T et al (2021) Reconsidering the optimal regional lymph node station according to tumor location for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 28:1602–1611CrossRef Imamura T, Yamamoto Y, Sugiura T et al (2021) Reconsidering the optimal regional lymph node station according to tumor location for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 28:1602–1611CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyazaki M, Ohtsuka M, Miyakawa S et al (2015) Classification of biliary tract cancers established by the Japanese society of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery 3(rd) English edition. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:181–196CrossRef Miyazaki M, Ohtsuka M, Miyakawa S et al (2015) Classification of biliary tract cancers established by the Japanese society of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery 3(rd) English edition. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:181–196CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF et al (2012) Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA 308:147–156CrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF et al (2012) Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA 308:147–156CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebata T, Hirano S, Konishi M et al (2018) Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer. Br J Surg 105:192–202CrossRef Ebata T, Hirano S, Konishi M et al (2018) Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer. Br J Surg 105:192–202CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A et al (2019) Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase iii study. J Clin Oncol 37:658–667CrossRef Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A et al (2019) Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase iii study. J Clin Oncol 37:658–667CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH et al (2019) Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 20:663–673CrossRef Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH et al (2019) Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 20:663–673CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Furuse J, Okusaka T, Boku N et al (2008) S-1 monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62:849–855CrossRef Furuse J, Okusaka T, Boku N et al (2008) S-1 monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62:849–855CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Okusaka T, Ishii H, Funakoshi A et al (2006) Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57:647–653CrossRef Okusaka T, Ishii H, Funakoshi A et al (2006) Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57:647–653CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Tomokuni A et al (2019) A prospective, randomized phase ii study of adjuvant gemcitabine versus S-1 after major hepatectomy for biliary tract cancer (KHBO 1208): kansai hepato-biliary oncology group. Ann Surg 270:230–237CrossRef Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Tomokuni A et al (2019) A prospective, randomized phase ii study of adjuvant gemcitabine versus S-1 after major hepatectomy for biliary tract cancer (KHBO 1208): kansai hepato-biliary oncology group. Ann Surg 270:230–237CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav S, Xie H, Bin-Riaz I et al (2019) Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:1432–1438CrossRef Yadav S, Xie H, Bin-Riaz I et al (2019) Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:1432–1438CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Spread of lymph node metastasis and adjuvant therapy for distal cholangiocarcinoma
verfasst von
Hiroshi Kurahara
Yuko Mataki
Tetsuya Idichi
Yota Kawasaki
Shinichiro Mori
Ken Sasaki
Takaaki Arigami
Akihiro Nakajo
Yoshihiko Fukukura
Michiyo Higashi
Takao Ohtsuka
Publikationsdatum
11.05.2022
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2022
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-022-02175-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2022

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 7/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.