Ausgabe 1/2018
Inhalt (27 Artikel)
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: where are we now?
Isra Ali, Steven Swift, G. Alessandro Digesu
Review of enhanced recovery programs in benign gynecologic surgery
Elisa R. Trowbridge, Caitlin N. Dreisbach, Bethany M. Sarosiek, Catherine Page Dunbar, Sarah Larkin Evans, Lee Anne Hahn, Kathie L. Hullfish
Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis
Talia Friedman, Guy D. Eslick, Hans Peter Dietz
Management of post-midurethral sling voiding dysfunction. International Urogynecological Association research and development committee opinion
Tony Bazi, Manon H. Kerkhof, Satoru I. Takahashi, Mohamed Abdel-Fattah
Prospective and randomized clinical trial comparing transobturator versus retropubic sling in terms of efficacy and safety
Claudia Cristina Palos, Ana P. Maturana, Frederico R. Ghersel, Cesar E. Fernandes, Emerson Oliveira
A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence
René P. Schellart, Sandra E. Zwolsman, Jean-Philippe Lucot, Dirk J. M. K. de Ridder, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Jan-Paul W. R. Roovers
Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women
Douglas G. Tincello, Natalie Armstrong, Paul Hilton, Brian Buckley, Christopher Mayne
Transobturator midurethral sling: What should patients expect after surgery?
Tomasz Rechberger, Andrzej Wrobel, Alicja Zietek, Ewa Rechberger, Michal Bogusiewicz, Pawel Miotla
Levator ani defects and the severity of symptoms in women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse
Sissel H. Oversand, Anne C. Staff, Leiv Sandvik, Ingrid Volløyhaug, Rune Svenningsen
Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse using validated questionnaires: 2-year prospective study
Farah Lone, Tamara Curnow, Sarah Anne Thomas
Factors influencing the outcome of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
Katja Stenström Bohlin, Maud Ankardal, Emil Nüssler, Håkan Lindkvist, Ian Milsom
Comparison of single- versus multicenter outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse repair using a mesh-capturing device
Edward Morcos, Daniel Altman, Daniel Hunde, Christian Falconer
Primary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: pessary use versus prolapse surgery
Anne-Lotte W. M. Coolen, Stephanie Troost, Ben Willem J. Mol, Jan- Paul W. R. Roovers, Marlies Y. Bongers
Primary care providers’ experience, management, and referral patterns regarding pelvic floor disorders: A national survey
Donna Mazloomdoost, Catrina C. Crisp, Steven D. Kleeman, Rachel N. Pauls
Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse: a Danish cohort study with 15–20 years’ follow-up
Ea Løwenstein, Lars Alling Møller, Jennie Laigaard, Helga Gimbel
Posterior colporrhaphy does not affect the urethral closure mechanism
Yasmine Khayyami, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov
Comparing different tissue-engineered repair materials for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: which material is better?
Xiaojuan Wang, Yisong Chen, Zhongyong Fan, Keqin Hua
Advanced uterovaginal prolapse: is vaginal hysterectomy with McCall culdoplasty as effective as in lesser degrees of prolapse?
Alexandriah Alas, Neeraja Chandrasekaran, Hemikaa Devakumar, Laura Martin, Eric Hurtado, G. Willy Davila
Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse
Stefano Manodoro, Matteo Frigerio, Alice Cola, Federico Spelzini, Rodolfo Milani
Comparison of strength of sacrocolpopexy mesh attachment using barbed and nonbarbed sutures
Marjorie L. Pilkinton, Gregory C. Levine, Laura Bennett, Harvey A. Winkler, Dara F. Shalom, Peter S. Finamore
Tips and tricks for uterosacral ligament suspension: how to avoid ureteral injury
Stefano Manodoro, Matteo Frigerio, Rodolfo Milani, Federico Spelzini
Surgical management of large pouch stone in continent urinary diversion
Erin Jesse, Ayman Mahdy
The retropubic sling more precisely restores the urethral closure mechanisms
Peter Petros
Authors’ reply to the comment by Petros et al. on “Retropubic versus transobturator MUS: Time to revisit?” by Lose and Klarskov
Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov, Werner Schaefer
Re: Does body mass index influence the outcome of midurethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence?
Erin A Brennand, Magali Robert
Reply to letter to the editor re: Does body mass index influence the outcome of midurethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence?
Jialei Qian, Deyi Luo