Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Der Urologe 8/2013

01.08.2013 | CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung

Nierenkelchsteine

verfasst von: Dr. C. Netsch, A.J. Gross

Erschienen in: Die Urologie | Ausgabe 8/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Der Verlauf unbehandelter, asymptomatischer Kelchsteine ist hinsichtlich des Progressions- und Interventionsrisikos ungeklärt. Die Entscheidung zur aktiven Therapie von Nierenkelchsteinen basiert auf Aspekten wie Harnsteinzusammensetzung und -größe sowie Beschwerden. Die extrakorporale Stoßwellenlithotripsie (ESWL) weist eine niedrige Komplikationsrate auf und wird in den aktuellen Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie (DGU) und der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Urologie (EAU) als First-line-Therapie bei Nierenkelchsteinen bis 2 cm Durchmesser empfohlen. Bei der ESWL wird keine sofortige Steinfreiheit erreicht. Zudem unterscheiden sich die primären Steinfreiheitsraten (SFR) der ESWL, abhängig von Lokalisation und Harnsteinzusammensetzung, erheblich. Minimal-invasive Verfahren wie die perkutane Nephrolitholapaxie und die Ureterorenoskopie stellen Alternativen zur Behandlung von Nierenkelchsteinen dar, die in Zentren eine niedrige Morbidität und hohe primäre SFR aufweisen.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al (2011) Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology, http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pockets/english/22_Urolithiasis.pdf Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al (2011) Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology, http://​www.​uroweb.​org/​gls/​pockets/​english/​22_​Urolithiasis.​pdf
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Knoll T; AK Harnsteine, AK Endourologie und Steinerkrankung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Urologie (2009) S2-Leitlinie: Diagnose, Therapie und Metaphylaxe der Urolithiasis, AWMF-Registernummer 043/025, Stand 02/2009, http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/043-025_S2k_Diagnose__Therapie_und_Metaphylaxe_der_Urolithiasis_leitlinientext_02-2009_02-2014.pdf Knoll T; AK Harnsteine, AK Endourologie und Steinerkrankung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Urologie (2009) S2-Leitlinie: Diagnose, Therapie und Metaphylaxe der Urolithiasis, AWMF-Registernummer 043/025, Stand 02/2009, http://​www.​awmf.​org/​uploads/​tx_​szleitlinien/​043-025_​S2k_​Diagnose_​_​Therapie_​und_​Metaphylaxe_​der_​Urolithiasis_​leitlinientext_​02-2009_​02-2014.​pdf
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagele U, Knoll T, Schilling D et al (2008) Lower pole calyceal stones. Urologe A 47:875–884PubMedCrossRef Nagele U, Knoll T, Schilling D et al (2008) Lower pole calyceal stones. Urologe A 47:875–884PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgher A, Beman M, Holtzman JL et al (2004) Progression of nephrolithiasis: long-term outcomes with observation of asymptomatic calculi. J Endourol 18:534–539PubMedCrossRef Burgher A, Beman M, Holtzman JL et al (2004) Progression of nephrolithiasis: long-term outcomes with observation of asymptomatic calculi. J Endourol 18:534–539PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Glowacki LS, Beecroft ML, Cook RJ et al (1992) The natural history of asymptomatic urolithiasis. J Urol 147:319–321PubMed Glowacki LS, Beecroft ML, Cook RJ et al (1992) The natural history of asymptomatic urolithiasis. J Urol 147:319–321PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Inci K, Sahin A, Islamoglu E et al (2007) Prospective long-term follow-up of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol 177:2189–2192PubMedCrossRef Inci K, Sahin A, Islamoglu E et al (2007) Prospective long-term follow-up of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol 177:2189–2192PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeley FX Jr, Tilling K, Elves A et al (2001) Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for small asymptomatic renal calyceal stones. BJU Int 87:1–8PubMedCrossRef Keeley FX Jr, Tilling K, Elves A et al (2001) Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for small asymptomatic renal calyceal stones. BJU Int 87:1–8PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT et al (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941–944PubMedCrossRef Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT et al (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941–944PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zehnder P, Roth B, Birkhäuser F et al (2011) A prospective randomised trial comparing the modified HM3 with the MODULITH® SLX-F2 lithotripter. Eur Urol 59:637–644PubMedCrossRef Zehnder P, Roth B, Birkhäuser F et al (2011) A prospective randomised trial comparing the modified HM3 with the MODULITH® SLX-F2 lithotripter. Eur Urol 59:637–644PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Musa AA (2008) Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 40:19–22PubMedCrossRef Musa AA (2008) Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 40:19–22PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ et al (2001) Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 166:2065–2071PubMedCrossRef Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ et al (2001) Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 166:2065–2071PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM et al (2005) Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 65:1070–1074PubMedCrossRef Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM et al (2005) Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 65:1070–1074PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wendt-Nordahl G, Trojan L, Alken P et al (2007) Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application. J Endourol 21:1439–1444PubMedCrossRef Wendt-Nordahl G, Trojan L, Alken P et al (2007) Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application. J Endourol 21:1439–1444PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Watterson JD, Girvan AR, Cook AJ et al (2002) Safety and efficacy of holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol 168:442–445PubMedCrossRef Watterson JD, Girvan AR, Cook AJ et al (2002) Safety and efficacy of holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol 168:442–445PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T et al (2012) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology 80:1214–1249PubMedCrossRef Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T et al (2012) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology 80:1214–1249PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickstein RJ, Kreshover JE, Babayan RK et al (2010) Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol 24:1589–1592PubMedCrossRef Dickstein RJ, Kreshover JE, Babayan RK et al (2010) Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol 24:1589–1592PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD et al (2004) Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol 18:33–36PubMedCrossRef Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD et al (2004) Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol 18:33–36PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat L’Esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr et al (2005) Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology 66:252–255CrossRef L’Esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr et al (2005) Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology 66:252–255CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ et al (2002) Ureteroscopic treatment of lower pole calculi: comparison of lithotripsy in situ and after displacement. J Urol 168:43–45PubMedCrossRef Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ et al (2002) Ureteroscopic treatment of lower pole calculi: comparison of lithotripsy in situ and after displacement. J Urol 168:43–45PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Schatloff O, Lindner U, Ramon J et al (2010) Randomized trial of stone fragment active retrieval versus spontaneous passage during holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones. J Urol 183:1031–1035PubMedCrossRef Schatloff O, Lindner U, Ramon J et al (2010) Randomized trial of stone fragment active retrieval versus spontaneous passage during holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones. J Urol 183:1031–1035PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G et al (2006) Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20:179–185PubMedCrossRef Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G et al (2006) Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20:179–185PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandal S, Goel A, Singh MK et al (2012) Clavien classification of semirigid ureteroscopy complications: a prospective study. Urology 80:995–1001PubMedCrossRef Mandal S, Goel A, Singh MK et al (2012) Clavien classification of semirigid ureteroscopy complications: a prospective study. Urology 80:995–1001PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Lingeman JE (2005) Improving outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: access. EAU Update Ser 3:37–43CrossRef Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Lingeman JE (2005) Improving outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: access. EAU Update Ser 3:37–43CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51:899–906PubMedCrossRef Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51:899–906PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S et al (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 18:715–722PubMed Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S et al (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 18:715–722PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Opondo D, Tefekli A, Esen T et al; CROES PCNL study group (2012) Impact of case volumes on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62:1181–1187PubMedCrossRef Opondo D, Tefekli A, Esen T et al; CROES PCNL study group (2012) Impact of case volumes on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62:1181–1187PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190PubMedCrossRef Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K et al (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878PubMedCrossRef Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K et al (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Basiri A, Ziaee AM, Kianian HR et al (2008) Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 22:281–284PubMedCrossRef Basiri A, Ziaee AM, Kianian HR et al (2008) Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 22:281–284PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritter M, Rassweiler MC, Rassweiler JJ et al (2012) New puncture techniques in urology using 3-D assisted imaging. Urologe A 51:1703–1707PubMedCrossRef Ritter M, Rassweiler MC, Rassweiler JJ et al (2012) New puncture techniques in urology using 3-D assisted imaging. Urologe A 51:1703–1707PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Falahatkar S, Neiroomand H, Akbarpour M et al (2009) One-shot versus metal telescopic dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of safety and efficacy. J Endourol 23:615–618PubMedCrossRef Falahatkar S, Neiroomand H, Akbarpour M et al (2009) One-shot versus metal telescopic dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of safety and efficacy. J Endourol 23:615–618PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kara C, Resorlu B, Bayindir M et al (2010) A randomized comparison of totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients. Urology 76:289–293PubMedCrossRef Kara C, Resorlu B, Bayindir M et al (2010) A randomized comparison of totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients. Urology 76:289–293PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S et al (2011) Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol 186:140–145PubMedCrossRef Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S et al (2011) Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol 186:140–145PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Krombach P et al (2009) Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol 23:1209–1212PubMedCrossRef Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Krombach P et al (2009) Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol 23:1209–1212PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K et al (2001) The efficiacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi. J Urol 166:2081–2084PubMedCrossRef Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K et al (2001) The efficiacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi. J Urol 166:2081–2084PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis – initial results. J Urol 166:2072–2080PubMedCrossRef Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis – initial results. J Urol 166:2072–2080PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT et al (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater – is this the new frontier? J Urol 179:981–984PubMedCrossRef Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT et al (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater – is this the new frontier? J Urol 179:981–984PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S (2009) Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol 23:1395–1398PubMedCrossRef Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S (2009) Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol 23:1395–1398PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S et al (2010) Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi  > 2 cm. Urol Res 38:397–402PubMedCrossRef Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S et al (2010) Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi  > 2 cm. Urol Res 38:397–402PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Gonzalez G, Netsch C, Oberhagemann K et al (2011) Effectiveness of single flexible ureteroscopy for multiple renal calculi. J Endourol 25:431–435PubMedCrossRef Herrera-Gonzalez G, Netsch C, Oberhagemann K et al (2011) Effectiveness of single flexible ureteroscopy for multiple renal calculi. J Endourol 25:431–435PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT et al (2009) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol 55:1190–1197PubMedCrossRef Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT et al (2009) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol 55:1190–1197PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R et al (2005) Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 173:2005–2009PubMedCrossRef Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R et al (2005) Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 173:2005–2009PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Nierenkelchsteine
verfasst von
Dr. C. Netsch
A.J. Gross
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Die Urologie / Ausgabe 8/2013
Print ISSN: 2731-7064
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7072
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3239-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2013

Der Urologe 8/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Berufspolitik BDU

Berufspolitik BDU

Mitteilungen der DGU

Mitteilungen der DGU

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.