Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2020

12.06.2019 | Pelvis

Staging MRI of uterine malignant mixed Müllerian tumors versus endometrial carcinomas with emphasis on dynamic enhancement characteristics

verfasst von: Alheli Garza, Sherif B. Elsherif, Silvana C. Faria, Tara Sagebiel, Jia Sun, Jingfei Ma, Priya R. Bhosale

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether staging pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can distinguish malignant mixed Müllerian tumor (MMMT) from EC.

Methods

Thirty-seven treatment-naïve patients with histologically proven uterine MMMT and 42 treatment-naïve patients with EC, treated at our institution, were included in our retrospective study. Staging pelvic MRI scans were reviewed for tumor size, prolapse through cervical os, and other features. Time-intensity curves for tumor and surrounding myometrium regions of interest were generated, and positive enhancement integral (PEI), maximum slope of increase (MSI), and signal enhancement ratio (SER) were measured. The Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare characteristics between disease groups. Multivariate and univariate logistic regression models were used to distinguish MMMT from EC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate prediction ability.

Results

MMMTs were larger than ECs with higher rate of tumor prolapse and more heterogeneous tumor enhancement compared to ECs. During the late phase of contrast enhancement, 100% of ECs, but only 84% of MMMTs, had lower signal intensity than the myometrium. Threshold PEI ratio ≥ 0.67 predict MMMT with 76% sensitivity, 84%, specificity and 0.83 AUC. Threshold SER ≤ 125 predict MMMT with 90% sensitivity, 50% specificity, and 0.72 AUC.

Conclusion

MMMTs may show more frequent tumor prolapse, more heterogeneous enhancement, delayed iso- or hyper-enhancement, higher PEI ratios, and lower tumor SERs compared with EC. MRI can be used as a biomarker to distinguish MMMT from EC based on the enhancement pattern.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pradhan D, Dabbs D, Bhargava R, Onisko A, Stram M, Jones M Clinical and immunohistochemical study of uterine carcinosarcoma in a large academic women's center. In, Cary, 2016. Oxford Univ Press Inc, p S136.CrossRef Pradhan D, Dabbs D, Bhargava R, Onisko A, Stram M, Jones M Clinical and immunohistochemical study of uterine carcinosarcoma in a large academic women's center. In, Cary, 2016. Oxford Univ Press Inc, p S136.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Costa MJ, Tidd C, Willis D (1992) Cervicovaginal cytology in carcinosarcoma [malignant mixed mullerian (mesodermal) tumor] of the uterus. Diagn Cytopathol 8 (1):33-40CrossRef Costa MJ, Tidd C, Willis D (1992) Cervicovaginal cytology in carcinosarcoma [malignant mixed mullerian (mesodermal) tumor] of the uterus. Diagn Cytopathol 8 (1):33-40CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat . Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, Chon HS, Chu C, Cohn D, Crispens MA, Damast S, Dorigo O, Eifel PJ, Fisher CM, Frederick P, Gaffney DK, George S, Han E, Higgins S, Huh WK, Lurain JR, 3rd, Mariani A, Mutch D, Nagel C, Nekhlyudov L, Fader AN, Remmenga SW, Reynolds RK, Tillmanns T, Ueda S, Wyse E, Yashar CM, McMillian NR, Scavone JL (2018) Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16 (2):170-199. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2018.0006 CrossRef . Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, Chon HS, Chu C, Cohn D, Crispens MA, Damast S, Dorigo O, Eifel PJ, Fisher CM, Frederick P, Gaffney DK, George S, Han E, Higgins S, Huh WK, Lurain JR, 3rd, Mariani A, Mutch D, Nagel C, Nekhlyudov L, Fader AN, Remmenga SW, Reynolds RK, Tillmanns T, Ueda S, Wyse E, Yashar CM, McMillian NR, Scavone JL (2018) Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16 (2):170-199. https://​doi.​org/​10.​6004/​jnccn.​2018.​0006 CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogani G, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Ghezzi F, Rossetti D, Frigerio L, Mariani A (2016) Management of endometrial cancer: issues and controversies. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 37 (1):6-12PubMed Bogani G, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Ghezzi F, Rossetti D, Frigerio L, Mariani A (2016) Management of endometrial cancer: issues and controversies. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 37 (1):6-12PubMed
43.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori N, Tsuchiya K, Sheth D, Mugikura S, Takase K, Katscher U, Abe H (2018) Diagnostic value of electric properties tomography (EPT) for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: comparison with standard dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5708-4 Mori N, Tsuchiya K, Sheth D, Mugikura S, Takase K, Katscher U, Abe H (2018) Diagnostic value of electric properties tomography (EPT) for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: comparison with standard dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00330-018-5708-4
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakata N, Ohta T, Nishioka M, Takeyama H, Toriumi Y, Kato K, Nogi H, Kamio M, Fukuda K (2015) Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography. J Ultrasound Med 34 (11):1969-1976. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.14.10042 CrossRefPubMed Nakata N, Ohta T, Nishioka M, Takeyama H, Toriumi Y, Kato K, Nogi H, Kamio M, Fukuda K (2015) Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography. J Ultrasound Med 34 (11):1969-1976. https://​doi.​org/​10.​7863/​ultra.​14.​10042 CrossRefPubMed
48.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu HL, Zong M, Wei H, Lou JJ, Wang SQ, Zou QG, Shi HB, Jiang YN (2017) Preoperative predicting malignancy in breast mass-like lesions: value of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for improving confidence level. Br J Radiol 90 (1079):20170394. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170394 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu HL, Zong M, Wei H, Lou JJ, Wang SQ, Zou QG, Shi HB, Jiang YN (2017) Preoperative predicting malignancy in breast mass-like lesions: value of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for improving confidence level. Br J Radiol 90 (1079):20170394. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1259/​bjr.​20170394 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Staging MRI of uterine malignant mixed Müllerian tumors versus endometrial carcinomas with emphasis on dynamic enhancement characteristics
verfasst von
Alheli Garza
Sherif B. Elsherif
Silvana C. Faria
Tara Sagebiel
Jia Sun
Jingfei Ma
Priya R. Bhosale
Publikationsdatum
12.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02096-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Abdominal Radiology 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.