Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2021

04.02.2021 | Original Scientific Report

Staging Paradox and Discrepancy in Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with T4N0, T1-2N1, and T3N1 Colon Cancer

verfasst von: Hiroki Shimizu, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Tomohiro Arita, Jun Kiuchi, Yusuke Yamamoto, Hirotaka Konishi, Ryo Morimura, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hisashi Ikoma, Takeshi Kubota, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Kazuma Okamoto, Eigo Otsuji

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A survival paradox between T4N0 (stage IIB/C) and T3N1 (stage IIIB) colon cancer has been rarely reported. The indication and regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy are separately described in the guidelines. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors and investigate proper adjuvant treatment in colon cancer patients at these stages.

Methods

Patients who underwent R0 resection for pathological T4N0 (n = 49), T1-2N1 (n = 31), or T3N1 (n = 82) colon cancer between 2008 and 2016 at a single institute were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics, status of adjuvant chemotherapy, and oncologic outcomes of patients with T4N0 tumors were compared with those of patients with T1-2N1 and T3N1 tumors.

Results

The biological characteristics of T4N0 tumors were more aggressive compared with the characteristics of T1-2N1 tumors and were similar to those of T3N1 tumors. The usage rate of oxaliplatin as an adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly lower in T4N0 patients than in T1-2N1 and T3N1 patients. The rate of local recurrence was the highest in patients with T4N0 tumors, and the survival outcomes for patients with T4N0 tumors were significantly worse compared with those of T1-2N1 patients and were similar to those of T3N1 patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that lack of adequate use of oxaliplatin for adjuvant chemotherapy was the only prognostic factor.

Conclusions

T4N0 colon cancer had similar oncological characteristics and survival outcomes to T3N1 colon cancer. Systematic adjuvant chemotherapy, including oxaliplatin, should be incorporated into the therapy for T4N0 patients as well as T3N1 patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours UICC. Wiley Blackwell, New Jersey Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours UICC. Wiley Blackwell, New Jersey
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MJ, Jeong SY, Choi SJ et al (2015) Survival paradox between stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1–2N1) colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:505–512CrossRef Kim MJ, Jeong SY, Choi SJ et al (2015) Survival paradox between stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1–2N1) colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:505–512CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu QD, Zhou M, Medeiros KL et al (2016) Poor survival in stage IIB/C (T4N0) compared to stage IIIA (T1–2 N1, T1N2a) colon cancer persists even after adjusting for adequate lymph nodes retrieved and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. BMC cancer 16:460CrossRef Chu QD, Zhou M, Medeiros KL et al (2016) Poor survival in stage IIB/C (T4N0) compared to stage IIIA (T1–2 N1, T1N2a) colon cancer persists even after adjusting for adequate lymph nodes retrieved and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. BMC cancer 16:460CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HS, Kim KM, Lee SB et al (2019) Clinicopathological and biomolecular characteristics of stage IIB/IIC and stage IIIA colon cancer: insight into the survival paradox. J Surg Oncol 120:423–430CrossRef Kim HS, Kim KM, Lee SB et al (2019) Clinicopathological and biomolecular characteristics of stage IIB/IIC and stage IIIA colon cancer: insight into the survival paradox. J Surg Oncol 120:423–430CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rottoli M, Stocchi L, Dietz DW (2012) T4N0 colon cancer has oncologic outcomes comparable to stage III in a specialized center. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2500–2505CrossRef Rottoli M, Stocchi L, Dietz DW (2012) T4N0 colon cancer has oncologic outcomes comparable to stage III in a specialized center. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2500–2505CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM et al (2018) NCCN guidelines insights: colon cancer, version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw: JNCCN 16:359–369CrossRef Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM et al (2018) NCCN guidelines insights: colon cancer, version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw: JNCCN 16:359–369CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y et al (2020) Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 25:1–42CrossRef Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y et al (2020) Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 25:1–42CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada Y, Hamaguchi T, Mizusawa J et al (2014) Randomised phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin versus intravenous fluorouracil and levofolinate in patients with stage III colorectal cancer who have undergone Japanese D2/D3 lymph node dissection: final results of JCOG0205. Eur J Cancer 50:2231–2240CrossRef Shimada Y, Hamaguchi T, Mizusawa J et al (2014) Randomised phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin versus intravenous fluorouracil and levofolinate in patients with stage III colorectal cancer who have undergone Japanese D2/D3 lymph node dissection: final results of JCOG0205. Eur J Cancer 50:2231–2240CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda C, Ishiguro M, Teramukai S et al (2018) A randomised-controlled trial of 1-year adjuvant chemotherapy with oral tegafur-uracil versus surgery alone in stage II colon cancer: SACURA trial. Eur J Cancer 96:54–63CrossRef Matsuda C, Ishiguro M, Teramukai S et al (2018) A randomised-controlled trial of 1-year adjuvant chemotherapy with oral tegafur-uracil versus surgery alone in stage II colon cancer: SACURA trial. Eur J Cancer 96:54–63CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor ES, Greenblatt DY, LoConte NK et al (2011) Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer with poor prognostic features. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29:3381–3388CrossRef O’Connor ES, Greenblatt DY, LoConte NK et al (2011) Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer with poor prognostic features. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29:3381–3388CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiao X, Hay JW, Sadeghi S et al (2020) Outcomes and utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer in the oxaliplatin period: a SEER-medicare analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 43:428–434CrossRef Jiao X, Hay JW, Sadeghi S et al (2020) Outcomes and utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer in the oxaliplatin period: a SEER-medicare analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 43:428–434CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L et al (2004) Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. New Eng J Med 350:2343–2351CrossRef André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L et al (2004) Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. New Eng J Med 350:2343–2351CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuebler JP, Wieand HS, O’Connell MJ et al (2007) Oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: results from NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 25:2198–2204CrossRef Kuebler JP, Wieand HS, O’Connell MJ et al (2007) Oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: results from NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 25:2198–2204CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat André T, Boni C, Navarro M et al (2009) Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 27:3109–3116CrossRef André T, Boni C, Navarro M et al (2009) Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 27:3109–3116CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoll HJ, Tabernero J, Maroun J et al (2015) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: final results of the NO16968 randomized controlled phase III trial. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 33:3733–3740CrossRef Schmoll HJ, Tabernero J, Maroun J et al (2015) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: final results of the NO16968 randomized controlled phase III trial. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 33:3733–3740CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Haller DG, Tabernero J, Maroun J et al (2011) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 29:1465–1471CrossRef Haller DG, Tabernero J, Maroun J et al (2011) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 29:1465–1471CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Benson AB 3rd, Schrag D, Somerfield MR et al (2004) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22:3408–3419CrossRef Benson AB 3rd, Schrag D, Somerfield MR et al (2004) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22:3408–3419CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A et al (2012) ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol: Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 23:2479–2516CrossRef Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A et al (2012) ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol: Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 23:2479–2516CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar A, Kennecke HF, Renouf DJ et al (2015) Adjuvant chemotherapy use and outcomes of patients with high-risk versus low-risk stage II colon cancer. Cancer 121:527–534CrossRef Kumar A, Kennecke HF, Renouf DJ et al (2015) Adjuvant chemotherapy use and outcomes of patients with high-risk versus low-risk stage II colon cancer. Cancer 121:527–534CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY, (2004) Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96(19): 1420-1425 Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY, (2004) Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96(19): 1420-1425
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Kotake K, et al (2012) Evaluation of the seventh edition of the tumour, node, metastasis TNM classification for colon cancer in two nationwide registries of the United States and Japan. Colorectal disease the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 14:1065-1074 Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Kotake K, et al (2012) Evaluation of the seventh edition of the tumour, node, metastasis TNM classification for colon cancer in two nationwide registries of the United States and Japan. Colorectal disease the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 14:1065-1074
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ et al (2010) Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 28:264–271CrossRef Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ et al (2010) Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 28:264–271CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Staging Paradox and Discrepancy in Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with T4N0, T1-2N1, and T3N1 Colon Cancer
verfasst von
Hiroki Shimizu
Yoshiaki Kuriu
Tomohiro Arita
Jun Kiuchi
Yusuke Yamamoto
Hirotaka Konishi
Ryo Morimura
Atsushi Shiozaki
Hisashi Ikoma
Takeshi Kubota
Hitoshi Fujiwara
Kazuma Okamoto
Eigo Otsuji
Publikationsdatum
04.02.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05973-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

World Journal of Surgery 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.