Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 9/2009

01.09.2009 | Original Article

Staging primary head and neck cancers with 18F-FDG PET/CT: is intravenous contrast administration really necessary?

verfasst von: Keisuke Yoshida, Akiko Suzuki, Toshiyuki Nagashima, Jin Lee, Choichi Horiuchi, Mamoru Tsukuda, Tomio Inoue

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 9/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate whether intravenous contrast media in integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) significantly contributes to evaluation of primary head and neck cancers compared with unenhanced PET/CT, regional contrast-enhanced CT of head and neck (neck CE-CT) and regional magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck (neck MRI).

Methods

Subjects were 42 consecutive patients (35 men, 7 women; age range: 36–91 years) with biopsy-proven primary head and neck cancers. Lesion detection of primary and nodal sites and TNM classification were assessed on a per-patient basis. McNemar test and κ statistics were employed for statistical analyses.

Results

Forty patients (95%) were successfully followed up: 24 patients had nodal disease and 3 had distant metastasis. Contrast-enhanced and unenhanced PET/CT detected 98 and 95% of the primary tumours, respectively, and both detected 92% of patients with nodal disease, which revealed no statistically significant difference. Accuracy for T status was 75 and 73%, respectively, which proved significantly more accurate than neck CE-CT, which had an accuracy of 53% (p = 0.0133 and 0.0233, respectively). Neck MRI correctly classified the T status in 58% of patients; however, no statistically significant difference was found between PET/CT and neck MRI. Contrast-enhanced PET/CT, unenhanced PET/CT, neck CT and neck MRI correctly staged the N status in 90, 90, 79 and 90% of patients, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. Overall TNM classification was correctly classified in 68 and 65% of patients, respectively. Weighted κ values between enhanced and unenhanced PET/CT for primary tumour detection, nodal detection, T status and N status were 0.655, 1.000, 0.935 and 1.000, respectively.

Conclusion

We found almost perfect correlation between enhanced and unenhanced PET/CT for lesion detection and initial staging of primary head and neck cancers. Routine contrast administration for PET/CT imaging may not be justified.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dammann F, Horger M, Mueller-Berg M, Schlemmer H, Claussen CD, Hoffman J, et al. Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1326–31.PubMed Dammann F, Horger M, Mueller-Berg M, Schlemmer H, Claussen CD, Hoffman J, et al. Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1326–31.PubMed
3.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stokkel MP, Terhaard CH, Hordijk GJ, van Rijk PP. The detection of local recurrent head and neck cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose dual-head positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:767–73. doi:10.1007/s002590050448.PubMedCrossRef Stokkel MP, Terhaard CH, Hordijk GJ, van Rijk PP. The detection of local recurrent head and neck cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose dual-head positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:767–73. doi:10.​1007/​s002590050448.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kresnik E, Mikosch P, Gallowitsch HJ, Kogler D, Wiesser S, Heinisch M, et al. Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:816–21. doi:10.1007/s002590100554.PubMedCrossRef Kresnik E, Mikosch P, Gallowitsch HJ, Kogler D, Wiesser S, Heinisch M, et al. Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:816–21. doi:10.​1007/​s002590100554.PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming AJ Jr, Smith SP Jr, Paul CM, Hall NC, Daly BT, Agrawal A, et al. Impact of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1173–9. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e31805d017b.PubMedCrossRef Fleming AJ Jr, Smith SP Jr, Paul CM, Hall NC, Daly BT, Agrawal A, et al. Impact of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1173–9. doi:10.​1097/​MLG.​0b013e31805d017b​.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Connell CA, Corry J, Milner AD, Hogg A, Hicks RJ, Rischin D, et al. Clinical impact of, and prognostic stratification by, F-18 FDG PET/CT in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2007;29:986–95. doi:10.1002/hed.20629.PubMedCrossRef Connell CA, Corry J, Milner AD, Hogg A, Hicks RJ, Rischin D, et al. Clinical impact of, and prognostic stratification by, F-18 FDG PET/CT in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2007;29:986–95. doi:10.​1002/​hed.​20629.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med 2007;48:78S–88S.PubMed Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med 2007;48:78S–88S.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Domeki Y, Kaji Y, Fukasawa I, et al. Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:1439–48. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0776-3.PubMedCrossRef Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Domeki Y, Kaji Y, Fukasawa I, et al. Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:1439–48. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-008-0776-3.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez-Vigil B, Gómez-León N, Pinilla I, Hernández-Maraver D, Coya J, Martín-Curto L, et al. PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1643–8.PubMed Rodríguez-Vigil B, Gómez-León N, Pinilla I, Hernández-Maraver D, Coya J, Martín-Curto L, et al. PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1643–8.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Goerres GW, Schuknecht B, Schmid DT, Stoeckli SJ, Hany TF. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and restaging of head and neck cancer: comparison with positron emission tomography read together with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Clin Imaging 2008;32:431–7. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.04.012.PubMedCrossRef Goerres GW, Schuknecht B, Schmid DT, Stoeckli SJ, Hany TF. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and restaging of head and neck cancer: comparison with positron emission tomography read together with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Clin Imaging 2008;32:431–7. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clinimag.​2008.​04.​012.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng SH, Yen TC, Liao CL, Chang JT, Chan SC, Ko SF, et al. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1136–43.PubMed Ng SH, Yen TC, Liao CL, Chang JT, Chan SC, Ko SF, et al. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1136–43.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Green FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2002. Green FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2002.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong HS, Baek CH, Son YI, Chung M, Kyung Lee D, Young Choi J, et al. Use of integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT to improve the accuracy of initial cervical nodal evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2007;29:203–10. doi:10.1002/hed.20504.PubMedCrossRef Jeong HS, Baek CH, Son YI, Chung M, Kyung Lee D, Young Choi J, et al. Use of integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT to improve the accuracy of initial cervical nodal evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2007;29:203–10. doi:10.​1002/​hed.​20504.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Caldemeyer KS, Mathews VP, Righi PD, Smith RR. Imaging features and clinical significance of perineural spread or extension of head and neck tumors. Radiographics 1998;18:97–110.PubMed Caldemeyer KS, Mathews VP, Righi PD, Smith RR. Imaging features and clinical significance of perineural spread or extension of head and neck tumors. Radiographics 1998;18:97–110.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Genden EM, Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Silver CE, Fagan JJ, Suárez C, et al. Recent changes in the treatment of patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 2008;30:103–10. doi:10.1002/hed.20715.PubMedCrossRef Genden EM, Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Silver CE, Fagan JJ, Suárez C, et al. Recent changes in the treatment of patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 2008;30:103–10. doi:10.​1002/​hed.​20715.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Staging primary head and neck cancers with 18F-FDG PET/CT: is intravenous contrast administration really necessary?
verfasst von
Keisuke Yoshida
Akiko Suzuki
Toshiyuki Nagashima
Jin Lee
Choichi Horiuchi
Mamoru Tsukuda
Tomio Inoue
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 9/2009
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1127-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2009

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 9/2009 Zur Ausgabe