nach oben

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

Erschienen in:

06.05.2019 | Original Article

Standardization of laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy: anatomic considerations to protect the ureter

verfasst von: Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Caroline Paquet, Vincent Lavoué, Cyril Touboul, Arnaud Fauconnier

Erschienen in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the procedure of laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy to avoid ureter injury.

Methods

Data were obtained from: (1) anatomic study of ten fresh female cadavers to measure the distance between the point where the ureter and uterine artery cross and the level of section of the ascending branch of the uterine artery during extrafascial dissection of the uterine pedicle and uterosacral ligament (Paris School of Surgery). The Wilcoxon test was used to compare measurements within each subject. P < 0.05 was considered to denote significance; (2) prospectively collected clinical data from women undergoing laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy from July 2006 to March 2014 at Poissy University Hospital, to describe the laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy technique with analysis of surgical complications using the Clavien–Dindo classification.

Results

Anatomic study: The mean (SD) distance between the point where the ureter and uterine artery cross and the level of the section of the ascending branch of the uterine artery were: 11.6 mm (5.2) in neutral position and 25 mm (7.5) after pulling the uterus laterally; and 25mm (8.9) after sectioning the ascending portion of the uterine pedicle and 38.6 mm (4.5) after complete uterine artery pedicle dissection through the uterosacral ligaments. After release of the ureter, the curve in front of the uterine artery disappeared.

Clinical laparoscopic study: Sixty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy. No ureteral complications occurred.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy is a safe and feasible procedure. Combined lateralization and elevation of the uterus, section of the ascending branch of the uterine artery, and its extrafascial dissection along the uterosacral ligament contribute to protecting the ureter during the procedure.

Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Adelman MR, Bardsley TR, Sharp HT (2014) Urinary tract injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review. J Minimal Invasive Gynecol 21:558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.006 CrossRef

Baiocchi G, de Brot L, Faloppa CC, Mantoan H, Duque MR, Badiglian-Filho L, da Costa A, Kumagai LY (2017) Is parametrectomy always necessary in early-stage cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 146:16–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.514 CrossRefPubMed

Blackwell RH, Kirshenbaum EJ, Shah AS, Kuo PC, Gupta GN, Turk TMT (2018) Complications of recognized and unrecognized iatrogenic ureteral injury at time of hysterectomy: a population based analysis. J Urol 199:1540–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.067 CrossRefPubMed

Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ (2013) Complications of hysterectomy. Obstetr Gynecol 121:654–673. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182841594 CrossRef

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Emam TA, Cuschieri A (2003) How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection? Ann Surg 237:186–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Sla.0000048454.11276.62 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ercoli A, Delmas V, Fanfani F, Gadonneix P, Ceccaroni M, Fagotti A, Mancuso S, Scambia G (2005) Terminologia Anatomica versus unofficial descriptions and nomenclature of the fasciae and ligaments of the female pelvis: a dissection-based comparative study. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 193:1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.007 CrossRef

Fermaut M, Nyangoh Timoh K, Lebacle C, Moszkowicz D, Benoit G, Bessede T (2016) Deep infiltrating endometriosis surgical management and pelvic nerves injury. Gynecol Obstetr Fertil 44:302–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.03.007 CrossRef

10.

Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, Higuchi T, Yura S, Mandai M, Baba T (2007) Precise anatomy of the vesico-uterine ligament for radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 104:186–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.07.041 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Gray LA (1958) Techniques of abdominal total hysterectomy, with report of three methods used in 1,000 cases. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 75:334–347CrossRef

12.

Hasson HM, Parker WH (1998) Prevention and management of urinary tract injury in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 5:99–114PubMed

13.

Janssen PF, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA (2013) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic ureter injuries: an analysis of 31 cases during laparoscopic hysterectomy in the Netherlands. Surg Endosc 27:946–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2539-2 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Phipps JH (1994) (1994) Thermometry studies with bipolar diathermy during hysterectomy. Gynaecol Endosc 3:5–7

17.

Querleu D, Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR (2017) 2017 Update on the Querleu–Morrow classification of radical hysterectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3406–3412. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6031-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Te Linde RWRJ, Thompson JD (1997) Te Linde’s operative gynecology, 8th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

19.

Yabuki Y, Sasaki H, Hatakeyama N, Murakami G (2005) Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure: harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver dissection. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 193:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.108 CrossRef

Titel: Standardization of laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy: anatomic considerations to protect the ureter
verfasst von: Krystel Nyangoh Timoh
Caroline Paquet
Vincent Lavoué
Cyril Touboul
Arnaud Fauconnier
Publikationsdatum: 06.05.2019
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Elektronische ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02242-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Standardization of laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy: anatomic considerations to protect the ureter

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Quantitative anatomy of the primary ossification center of the radial shaft in human fetuses

Magnetic resonance and retrograde endoscopic cholangiopancreatography-based identification of biliary tree variants: are there type-related variabilities among the Saudi population?

Third primary branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve at the thoracolumbar region: a cadaveric study

Comments about the article “First report of lateral nasal wall pneumatization”

Cone-beam CT assessment of implant-related anatomy landmarks of the anterior mandible in a Chinese population

Accessory right spermatic ganglion: possible embryological basis and clinical significance

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie