Zum Inhalt

STAT6: Multidimensional analysis from hematopoietic immune regulation to pathogenesis mechanisms and therapeutic targets in hematologic malignancies

  • Open Access
  • 01.04.2026
  • Review
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Signal Transduction and Activation of Transcription 6 (STAT6) is a key molecule in the Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway. Primarily induced by Interleukin-4(IL-4) and Interleukin-13(IL-13), STAT6 undergoes phosphorylation and translocates to the nucleus, where it regulates gene transcription. While the abnormal activation and oncogenic functions of STAT6 in various solid tumors are well documented, its precise biological role in the hematopoietic system has not yet been systematically investigated. Compared with solid tumors, STAT6 activation in hematological malignancies occurs with the Type 2 T helper cell (Th2-type) immune microenvironment that it mediates, which is probably a unique pathogenic mechanism. This review, therefore, delves into the multifunctionality of STAT6 within the hematopoietic system (including viral infection and immune regulation) and hematologic malignancies, as well as its impact on chemotherapy resistance. The aim is to provide a theoretical basis for understanding the biological functions of STAT6 and developing new therapeutic approaches.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Signal Transduction and Activation of Transcription 6 (STAT6) is a 233-amino-acid member of the STAT protein family. When the cytokines such as Interleukin-4 (IL-4) and Interleukin-13 (IL-13) bind to their corresponding receptors, STAT6 becomes activated and phosphorylated. Two STAT6 molecules then form a dimer and translocate into the nucleus. By binding to a specific sequence in the promoter region of target genes, STAT6 regulates the transcription of downstream genes. This mechanism gives STAT6 a central role in various pathological processes, including cancer, inflammation, allergic diseases, and autoimmune disorders1. While altered STAT4 expression is prevalent in many tumors and autoimmune diseases, dysregulation of the STAT6 signaling pathway is particularly prominent in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)2. Research suggests that intranuclear mutations in STAT6 exhibit a familial inheritance pattern. These mutations enhance STAT6’s nuclear localization capacity, DNA-binding affinity, and spontaneous transcriptional activity2,3. Subsequently, they cause autonomous functional alterations in cells, amplifying signal transduction intensity and producing abnormal immune cell phenotypes, which promote the initiation and progression of lymphoma.
The STAT6 protein functions through the synergistic action of its six core domains (ND, Coiled-Coil domain (CCD), DNA-Binding domain (DBD), Linker domain (LK), Src Homology 2 domain (SH2), Transactivation domain (TAD)) and a key tyrosine residue (Y641). Activation begins at the Y641 site, where JAK kinases are recruited to phosphorylate STAT6. The phosphorylated Y641 site on this STAT6 monomer then recognizes and binds to the SH2 domain of another STAT6 monomer, forming a stable head-to-tail dimer. Finally, this dimer translocates into the nucleus, driven by its TAD domain. Once in the nucleus, the DBD domain of the STAT6 protein recognizes and binds to the specific palindromic sequence [TTC (N)2–4GAA], thereby anchoring the complex to the regulatory region of the target gene. During this process, the CCD domain provides an adhesive scaffold for other transcription factors, enhancing the transcriptional activity and stability of the complex. The LK domain maintains the coordination conformation between the DBD and SH2 domains to ensure their functional connection, while the ND domain mediates the formation of a tetramer from two dimers to enhance the stability and specificity of DNA-binding4.
Fig. 1
Structural diagram of STAT6, showing amino acid residue numbers and functional components. The STAT6 molecule comprises an N-terminal coiled-coil domain (CCD), a DNA-binding domain (DBD), an SH2 domain, and a C-terminal transactivation domain (TAD). Through the coordinated action of these domains, STAT6 is able to carry out the entire process, from receiving signals and dimerizing to nuclear translocation and finally regulating gene expression.
Bild vergrößern
Figure Legends: Figure 1 was created with Microsoft PowerPoint (version 2021). Previous studies indicate that STAT6 is a key mediator in various classic allergic diseases, such as Atopic dermatitis5, Asthma, Allergic rhinitis3, Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs)6 and Lymphoproliferation disorders 7, among others. In addition, the progression of non-allergic complications accompanying the STAT6-related diseases includes skin and respiratory tract infections, osteoporosis, renal fibrosis, pathological fractures, short stature, joint hyperextensibility, and hypotrichosis8. While most reports have indicated that D419H is the hotspot mutation of STAT6 9, its two activation mechanisms are different: one depends on the IL-4/IL-13/JAK signaling pathway, while the other does not. Notably, both pathways share a common dependency on phosphorylation at the Y641 site10. In summary, STAT6 plays a clearly significant role in allergic diseases and immunodeficiency-related disorders. However, its pathological function and mechanisms in hematological malignancies remain formally undefined.
In multiple hematologic tumor studies, STAT6 has been demonstrated to be closely associated with the risk of developing various lymphomas and their prognosis. However, its specific mechanism of action and clinical significance vary depending on the tumor type. In lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (LPHL), approximately 48.8% (n = 43) of cases exhibited positive expression of phosphorylated STAT6 (p-STAT6)11. In follicular lymphoma (FL), the frequency of STAT6 mutations is higher, at 57%, and there is a significant positive correlation with CD23 expression (P < 0.001)12; additionally, patients with STAT6 gain-of-function (GOF) mutations are at a markedly elevated risk of developing follicular lymphoma9. Further studies have revealed that, in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL), STAT6 is transported as cargo by the export protein Exportin 1(XPO1). The two proteins colocalize and interact in the nucleus, synergistically enhancing the phosphorylation of STAT6 13 and revealing that the STAT6 protein is uniquely activated in certain types of lymphoma. Notably, STAT6 exhibits different functions in the specific hematologic malignancies. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), STAT6 deficiency can lead to a reduction in the number of viable cells due to disturbances in the cell cycle14, suggesting that STAT6 may be involved in regulating proliferation in this disease. However, conclusions regarding its clinical significance in primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) remain inconsistent. Yang et al. 15 reported STAT6 expression in 61.5% of PCNSL patients treated with methotrexate monotherapy, which was associated with shorter survival. In contrast, Karpathiou et al. 16 found no significant association between STAT6 expression and overall survival or multiple tumor molecular markers (B-cell lymphoma 6(BCL6), B-cell lymphoma 2(BCL2), Myelocytomatosis oncogene(MYC), Programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) and Cluster of Differentiation 8(CD8)), showing only a positive correlation with MYC expression (p = 0.02). These conflicting results suggest that the prognostic value of STAT6 in PCNSL requires further validation, and its potential significance as an independent prognostic indicator remains unclear.

The effects of IL-4/IL-13 signalling on STAT6

The activation of the STAT6 signaling pathway is primarily regulated by the cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 17. When expressed, these cytokines lead to the intracellular domain of their receptor undergoing autophosphorylation, creating a unique docking site for the SH2 domain of the STAT6 protein, as well as for JAK family kinases. These JAK family members are then recruited and activated to phosphorylate STAT6, leading to STAT6 dimerization and nuclear translocation. There, STAT6 functions as a transcription factor to regulate the expression of downstream target genes, thereby exerting its immunoregulatory role18. Notably, researchers observed no significant effect of IL-4 stimulation on total STAT6 protein levels in either wild-type or mutant STAT6 samples9. Although the absolute levels of phosphorylated STAT6 (p-STAT6) increased, the ratio of p-STAT6 to total STAT6 remained stable. This indicates that the increase in p-STAT6 levels was not caused by changes in total protein content induced by IL-4 stimulation. Instead, there may be a strict and well-defined intracellular homeostasis buffering mechanism that maintains constant total protein levels during STAT6 activation. (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Schematic representation of JAK1/2/3-STAT6 activation. Figure Legends: Figure 2 was created with BioRender.com.
Bild vergrößern

The role of STAT6 in viral infection

Both Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have been associated with the development of various hematological disorders. STAT6 is an important innate immune signaling protein that is induced by viral infection. It has different activation modes compared with classic cytokine signaling pathways. Studies using human monocytic leukemia cells (THP-1) reveal that, under unstimulated conditions, STAT6 is diffusely distributed throughout the cytoplasm. However, upon infection with RNA or DNA viruses, its DBD domain interacts with the C-terminal region of the endoplasmic reticulum IFN stimulator (STING) (also known as MITA/ERIS), leading to the co-localization of STAT6 and STING, and their redistribution to the perinuclear region. This ultimately induces the translocation of the STAT6 protein into the nucleus. Furthermore, STAT6 activation during viral infection does not depend on JAK1 or IL-4, but rather requires the involvement of the adaptor proteins STING, TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), and the RNA viral mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS)10.
Further studies revealed that the chemokine C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2 (CCL2) initiates the regulation of STAT6 phosphorylation in infected cells, which occurs before the phosphorylation of other STAT family members. This suggests that STAT6 may serve as a precursor transcription activator precursor in this process. While this response is independent of the classical JAK/STAT pathway, virus-induced phosphorylation at the STAT6 Y641 site is essential for its activation. Furthermore, the study revealed that STING and MAVS do not function in the canonical STAT6 pathway. Taken together, these findings reveal a virus-specific STAT6 activation pathway that is independent of cytokines and is initiated via the STING-MAVS signaling axis. This pathway selectively regulates a specific set of genes involved in immune cell homing. This modulates chemokine expression and immune cell infiltration patterns, ultimately reshaping the antiviral immune microenvironment.

The role of STAT6 in immune cells

Gain-of-function mutations in STAT6 induce multiple immunological effects, including significant increases in B cells, eosinophils, and mast cells. Concurrently, sustained STAT6 activation promotes Th2 differentiation in helper T cells and positively regulates immunoglobulin class switching to immunoglobulin E (IgE). These phenomena demonstrate the critical role of STAT6 in maintaining normal immune function. Furthermore, studies confirm that STAT6 can enhance the gene expression of chemokines CCL2, CCL20, and CCL26 independently of JAK1 gene upregulation, thereby mediating the targeted recruitment of immune cells to infection sites10. This finding enhances our understanding of the mechanisms underlying STAT6’s non-canonical signaling pathways in immune regulation.

Effects of STAT6 on B cells

The IL-4/STAT6 signaling pathway plays a central regulatory role in B cell proliferation, differentiation, and humoral immune responses. Research indicates that this pathway drives B cell expansion and maturation, and determines their fate as either activated B cells or plasma blasts (PB) by regulating the differential response of precursor B cells to IL-4. Following early IL-4 stimulation, STAT6 signaling typically downregulates or even disappears, prompting B cells to initiate the plasma blastic differentiation programme. However, when the levels of IL-4 remain persistently high, sustained STAT6 activation paradoxically inhibits differentiation and leads to B cells remaining in an activated state19, indicating that IL-4 has a counter-regulatory effect on B cell differentiation. Concurrently, gain-of-function mutations in STAT6 further amplify IL-4-driven lymphocyte proliferation, leading to a significant increase in B cell numbers and promoting IgE class switching. This ultimately results in elevated systemic IgE levels20,21.
At the molecular level, BCL6 induces somatic hypermutation and B-cell receptor (BCR)-mediated degradation of BCL6. However, the IL-4/STAT6 signaling pathway can directly induce the BCL6 transcription, hindering its degradation and enhancing its stability. This further increases the magnitude and duration of the GC response22 by enhancing the function of the B cell immune response in vivo. Therefore, this study demonstrates that STAT6 plays a crucial role in integrating B-cell fate determination and functional regulation.

The effects of STAT6 on T cells

STAT6 plays a critical regulatory role in CD4 + T helper cell differentiation, particularly in determining the fate of Th2 cells. CD4 + T cells can differentiate into distinct subsets, including Th1, Th2, Th17, and Th22 cells. Studies indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection activates STAT6 signaling pathways in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of lung cells, thereby promoting Th2 cell polarization and contributing to cytokine storm formation. This ultimately leads to an imbalance in Th1/Th2 immune responses3. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in the Th17 and Th22 cell subsets of patients with STAT6 gene mutations compared to healthy individuals, which further highlights the specific role of STAT6 in Th2 differentiation.
In terms of the regulatory mechanisms of STAT6 activation, TNF receptor-associated factor 3(TRAF3) enhances IL-4-mediated STAT6 activation in CD4-T cells23. Conversely, the protein tyrosine phosphatase Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 1 (PTP1B) acts as a negative regulator by directly binding to the IL-4 receptor complex and interfering with JAK1-mediated STAT6 phosphorylation. This suppresses the upregulation of the GATA binding protein 3(GATA3) transcription factor and Th2 cell polarization23. Taken together, these findings establish STAT6 as a key mediator of Th2 cell differentiation.
The STAT6 signaling pathway also plays a significant role in T cell responses during the clinical treatment of hematologic malignancies. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the most commonly used treatment for hematological malignancies and can induce a graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect mediated by the donor T cells in the transplant. However, BMT can also induce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Our previous reports have demonstrated that IL-4 can induce the secretion of Th2 cytokines (including IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-β) via activation of the STAT6 signaling pathway, forming a positive feedback regulatory loop. The established Th2-polarized state can enhance the GVT effect, and simultaneously diminish the GVHD response by suppressing the production of pro-inflammatory factors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 24. This provides new approaches to preventing tumor recurrence post-transplantation and reducing GVHD-related damage.

The role of STAT6 in macrophages

Macrophages are a crucial component of the innate immune system and exhibit high functional heterogeneity and plasticity25. In the tumor microenvironment, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells can differentiate into macrophages and polarize into either the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype or the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Studies indicate that STAT6 plays a central regulatory role in M2 polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)26. Protein blot analysis reveals that STAT6 phosphorylation significantly increases the expression of M2 macrophage gene markers27. The process is primarily driven by the IL-4/STAT6 signaling pathway, which encourages macrophages to differentiate into the M2 phenotype, characterized by anti-inflammatory and tissue-repairing properties.
In recent years, significant progress has been made in developing inhibitors that target the regulation of STAT6 and macrophage polarization. The phosphopeptide mimic 37 (PM37) targets explicitly the SH2 domain of STAT6, effectively blocking and reversing the expression of M2 polarization markers28. In tumor cell-M2 macrophage co-culture systems, PM37 sensitizes tumor cells to radiation therapy, providing a new strategy to overcome tumor radioresistance. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) is a kind of nuclear hormone receptor found in cells that can activate oxidized fatty acids. The IL-4/STAT6 signaling pathway enhances the DNA-binding activity of PPARγ and regulates the lipid metabolism and inflammatory response of PPARγ target cells (macrophages and dendritic cells(DCs)) by expanding the range and intensity of regulated genes29.
Further preclinical studies reveal that the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor Zanubrutinib can reprogram macrophages from the M1 phenotype to the M2 phenotype by modulating the STAT6 signaling pathway, thereby maintaining immune homeostasis30. Concurrently, exosome-based targeted therapeutic strategies demonstrate promising applications. As they are released by cells, exosomes serve as ideal drug delivery vehicles. Research utilizing engineered exosomes to deliver STAT6 antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) has successfully induced TAMs to reprogram from the M2 phenotype to the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, thereby reshaping the tumor microenvironment31. These studies provide novel insights and approaches for developing STAT6-targeted tumor immunotherapy.

The role of STAT6 in hematologic malignancies

Hematologic malignancies are malignant proliferative diseases that originate from the hematopoietic system. They primarily encompass leukemia and lymphoma. Lymphoma can be further classified as Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). NHL exhibits significant biological and clinical heterogeneity, primarily arising from the malignant transformation of mature B lymphocytes or T lymphocytes. The major subtypes of B-cell lymphomas, based on cellular origin, include diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL), which have unique clinicopathological features. T-cell-derived subtypes primarily include peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and the distinct subtype of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Mechanism of STAT6 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a highly aggressive malignancy that originates in lymphoid progenitor cells and predominantly affects children and the elderly32. In the specific genetic subtype of Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (Ph + ALL), the characteristic Breakpoint cluster region-Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog fusion gene/protein (BCR-ABL) fusion protein exhibits two major subtypes: P210 and P190. Research indicates that abnormal STAT6 activation is particularly pronounced in the P190 subtype. This involves Jak2-phosphorylated STAT6 binding to the c-MYC gene promoter as a transcription factor, thereby driving disease progression in Ph+ ALL 33. Comparative cytokine levels in patient cells revealed no significant differences between P190 and P210 cells. This suggests that classical cytokine pathways do not mediate elevated Phosphorylated STAT6 (p-STAT6) in P190 cells, but rather depend on Jak2 pathway activation34.
Furthermore, studies confirm that the BCR-ABL kinase regulates STAT6 activation. When p-STAT6 is inhibited, ALL cells undergo cycle rearrangement, which manifests as G2/M phase arrest and a significant decrease in the proportion of S phase cells, accompanied by an increase in apoptosis rates. Analysis of clinical samples also revealed that patients with significantly reduced STAT6 levels at diagnosis exhibited higher rates of leukemic cell apoptosis upon relapse35. Collectively, these findings suggest that STAT6 is a key molecule in the mediation of malignant proliferation and poor prognosis in Ph + ALL. Furthermore, they indicate that targeted inhibition of p-STAT6 could be an effective strategy for suppressing P190 cell proliferation.
In B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), the expression of the IL-13/STAT6 signaling pathway greatly upregulates cytidine deaminase Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID, encoded by the AICDA gene) in germinal center B cells and helper T cells36, which are associated with higher clonal mutation burdens and poorer clinical outcomes, This suggests an extensive pathogenic role for STAT6 in ALL subtypes.

Mechanism of STAT6 in hodgkin lymphoma

HL is a lymphoid malignancy with unique pathological features, accounting for 15–25% of all lymphomas37. The expression status of STAT6 is used as a reference in the empirical classification of cHL. STAT6 positivity typically indicates the mixed cellularity subtype or lymphocyte-rich subtype, whereas STAT6 negativity is more commonly observed in nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL 38. In cHL, Hodgkin/Reed–Sternberg (HRS) cells express high levels of JAK211, components of the IL-13 signaling pathway, phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 (PRL-3) 39, and lymphotoxin α (LTA)40, among other factors. Approximately 85% of HRS cells can harbor this cytokine network, which can phosphorylate STAT6 and then promote tumor cell survival and migration41. Consequently, p-STAT6 detection is valuable for distinguishing cHL from certain non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
Notably, HRS cells in cHL secrete thymic and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), also known as C-C motif chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17). This factor attracts Th2 cells to the tumor microenvironment. These cells then secrete cytokines such as IL-4, which activate the STAT6 signaling pathway and promote further TARC secretion. This positive feedback loop continuously attracts eosinophils and establishes an immunosuppressive microenvironment, ultimately facilitating immune evasion in HL 42. In exploring therapy options, it was found that the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor Vorinostat not only downregulates STAT6 mRNA expression and inhibits tumor proliferation, but also directly induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HL cells43.

The mechanism of STAT6 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

DLBCL is the most common subtype of NHL, exhibiting high genetic heterogeneity and mutational diversity. The recurrence rate is as high as 40%, with an inferior prognosis and high mortality following relapse2. Among the gene features associated with DLBCL recurrence, the STAT6 D419N mutation is a critical gain-of-function site. This mutation induces the high expression of multiple genes related to cell proliferation and chemotaxis18. This reveals a potential mechanism for sustained signaling pathway activation during DLBCL recurrence: STAT6 activation is driven not by exogenous cytokines such as IL-4, but by the mutation itself within the STAT6 gene in the cell nucleus44.
Further studies revealed that the tumor microenvironment of STAT6-positive patients contained significantly higher proportions of CD4 + T cells than that of STAT6-negative patients. This suggests that STAT6 may recruit helper T cells to the tumor site via chemotaxis in order to modulate antitumor immune responses. As STAT6 mutations are frequently observed in germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtypes41, researchers constructed a GCB subtype lymphoma cell line harboring the STAT6 D419N mutation via plasmid construction. Under IL-4 co-culture conditions that simulate STAT6 overexpression, it was found that the STAT6 D419N mutation itself lacks constitutive activity18 and its growth-promoting effects depend on IL-4 stimulation45. Notably, although exogenous IL-4 does not significantly affect the phosphorylation level of STAT6 D419N, the full transactivation function of this mutant protein still requires IL-4 participation46. These seemingly contradictory experimental results collectively indicate that, in DLBCL, the STAT6 D419N mutation is the core intrinsic factor affecting its function, while external cytokine stimulation plays a synergistic regulatory role. In terms of therapy, the epigenetic modulator azacitidine could suppress JAK2-STAT6 signaling activity by inhibiting the hypermethylation of miR-518a-5p. This inhibitor suppressed DLBCL cell proliferation and invasion, promoted apoptosis, and induced cell cycle arrest47, making it an ideal targeted therapeutic agent.

The mechanism of STAT6 in follicular lymphoma

FL, the second most common NHL, is closely associated with the IL-4/IL-4R-activated JAK–STAT6 signaling pathway in its development48. This pathway mediates tumorigenesis in stage I FL patients by modulating BCL2 protein expression through BCL2 translocation49, which ultimately promotes CD23 overexpression. Consequently, CD23 expression serves as an alternative biomarker for STAT6 pathway activation50. In this process, Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 14(PARP14) acts as a co-activator that binds to STAT6, thereby enhancing the transcriptional activity of this pathway and promoting the regulation of STAT6 by downstream target genes46.
Patients with STAT6 mutations exhibit distinct molecular characteristics compared to those with wild-type STAT6: their STAT6 activation does not depend on tyrosine phosphorylation at the Y641 site9, yet they still show high expression of IL-4-responsive genes51, accompanied by shorter progression-free survival52, reflecting the functional heterogeneity of STAT6 mutations in FL pathogenesis. Further studies have revealed that both IL-4 and BCR signaling activate the mTOR pathway. This process is inhibited by CREB-binding protein (CREBBP) but enhanced by STAT6 53, indicating that STAT6 promotes tumor cell growth via mTOR signaling.
In addition to acting directly on tumor cells, STAT6 plays an active role in remodeling the FL tumor microenvironment (TME). For instance, it recruits CD4 + T cells to infiltrate tumor regions by upregulating the CCL17 chemokine, modulates redox homeostasis and protein disulfide bond formation via Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (QSOX1), and influences apoptosis through Nuclear factor, interleukin 3 regulated (NFIL3). In summary, STAT6 mutations play a central role in FL pathogenesis and promote the disease process by multidimensionally regulating the tumor microenvironment.

Mechanism of STAT6 in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma

PMBL is a distinct subtype of DLBCL characterized by unique clinical and pathological features. Its molecular hallmarks primarily involve the abnormal expression of STAT6 and BCL6 54. In PMBL patients, the incidence of STAT6 mutations is relatively low, ranging from approximately 33% to 36%44. The disease is characterized by an earlier age of onset and a male predominance.
At the molecular level, PMBL patients commonly exhibit high JAK2 expression 11, with 91% of cases accompanied by Suppressor of cytokine signaling 1(SOCS1) gene mutations44. These SOCS1 mutations primarily disrupt normal negative feedback regulation through somatic hypermutation, leading to sustained phosphorylation and activation of STAT6. Interestingly, unlike in FL, CD23 expression in PMBL patients shows no significant correlation with STAT6 mutation status (p = 0.13) 55.
STAT6 gene mutations primarily occur in the exons encoding the DNA-binding domain. Approximately 35% of PMBL patients exhibit substitution mutations, predominantly at the D419 site56,57. These mutations predominantly occur at T: A base pairs within the DBD and SH2 domains58, primarily affecting aspartic acid (Asp) residues, followed by glutamic acid (Glu) residues8. Analysis of the large-scale population genome database (gnomAD) revealed that the mutation rate of STAT6 in the general population is close to zero and that all identified STAT6 mutations have high Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores (> 20 points). Collectively, this evidence supports the idea that both germline and somatic gain-of-function variants in STAT6 independently contribute to the pathogenesis of PMBL.
However, recent studies have demonstrated that STAT6 activation can also be induced by mutations. This finding highlights the distinct nature of PMBL in the regulation of STAT6 signaling compared to other lymphoma subtypes. More importantly, recent studies have reported that the region encoding the STAT6 DNA-binding domain is a major hotspot for recurrent mutations in PMBL59, with this molecule playing a central role in PMBL pathogenesis.

The mechanism of STAT6 in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LBL)

PTCL constitutes a group of T-lymphocyte malignancies characterized by significant heterogeneity60. The presence of Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS)-like cells in the tumor microenvironment often complicates differential diagnosis with other cells that are morphologically similar to HRS cells in cHL. To solve this problem, the study analyzed the molecular characteristics of HRS cells in PTCL and cHL. The study found that HRS-like cells in PTCL exhibited significantly lower expression levels of STAT6 (P < 0.001) and p-STAT6 (P < 0.001), a difference which was statistically significant61. This indicates that the expression status of STAT6 holds important clinical value in differentiating between the two conditions.
.
Furthermore, studies demonstrate that high activation of the JAK1/2-STAT6 signaling pathway correlates positively with favorable progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL), the second most common childhood NHL. Therefore, the activity level of the JAK1/2-STAT6 pathway can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with T-LBL, providing a basis for the precise treatment of this disease.

The mechanism of STAT6 in cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas (CTCL)

The most common clinical subtypes of CTCL, Sezary syndrome (SS) and mycosis fungoides (MF), exhibit a close association between their pathogenesis and abnormal activation of the STAT6 signaling pathway. Research indicates that SS/MF tumor cells can produce high levels of cytokines, such as IL-13 and IL-19, via autocrine mechanisms, thereby inducing sustained activation of STAT6. Pharmacological inhibition of STAT6 expression greatly downregulates related signaling pathways, including those involved in cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and Th2 cytokine production. This results in tumor cell cycle arrest at the G1/G2 phase and effectively suppresses the proliferative activity of malignant lymphocytes62.
Additionally, STAT6 stimulates Th2 cells to generate IL-4 and IL-13, These cytokines then direct the polarization of TAMs towards the M2 phenotype. This alters their unique gene expression patterns, fosters the development of an immunosuppressive microenvironment, and increases tumor invasiveness. Notably, STAT6 also recruits additional immunosuppressive cells to the tumor microenvironment by regulating the expression of chemokines such as CCL17, CCL13, and CCL8 63. At the same time, STAT6 induces the expression of systemic and local immunosuppressive factors, such as TGF-β, thereby enhancing the immunosuppressive functions of TAMs64. These mechanisms collectively induce an immunosuppressive state in CTCL and provide an experimental basis for inhibiting the STAT signaling pathway in advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Mechanism of STAT6 in breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma

Breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a CD30-positive, ALK-negative peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Immunohistochemical studies reveal that approximately 90% of BIA-ALCL cases express IL-13 65. This cytokine can mediate the downstream STAT6 signaling pathway and promote the survival and proliferation of tumor cells. Subsequent experiments also found that CD30-targeted therapy can significantly reduce the expression of IL-13 in BIA-ALCL and inhibit the growth of tumor cells. Additionally, experimental studies suggest that the STAT6-specific inhibitor AS1517499 can reduce the survival rate of BIA-ALCL cell lines by up to 80% 66. These results indicate that the STAT6 signaling pathway plays a significant role in the pathogenesis process of BIA-ALCL and provides a basis for the use of STAT6 inhibitors in the treatment of this disease. (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Mechanisms of STAT6 in Different Cell Types, Viral Infections, and Related Diseases.
Bild vergrößern
Figure Legends: Figure 3 was created with BioRender.com. Schematic illustration of signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) signaling pathways across multiple cell types and pathological conditions. Center: Domain structure of STAT6 protein featuring phosphorylation sites (P). B cell compartment (upper left): Canonical IL-4/STAT6 signaling through JAK1 sustains baseline immunosurveillance, regulating B cell differentiation, immunoglobulin class switching, and normal lymphopoiesis. Sustained IL-4/STAT6 activation leads to B cell activation, BCL6 upregulation, and IgE hyperreactivity, resulting in differentiation arrest and humoral imbalance. Viral infection (left) : Viral infection activates STAT6 via the non-canonical STING-TBK1-MAVS axis, independent of JAK1, modulating chemokine expression (CCL2/CCL20/CCL26) to direct immune cell trafficking. T cell compartment (upper right): IL-4/STAT6 signaling promotes CD4 + T cell differentiation toward Th2 predominance, facilitated by TRAF3 and GATA3. This Th2 bias favors graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects while mitigating graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in bone marrow transplantation settings. M2 macrophage compartment (right): IL-4/STAT6 signaling drives M2 polarization through PPARγ DNA binding enhancement, resulting in altered lipid metabolism and inflammatory gene regulation compared to homeostatic M1-M2 balanced phenotypes. Follicular lymphoma (FL) (lower right): Wild-type STAT6 maintains baseline BCL2 and CD23 expression. PARP14 serves as a STAT6 coactivator, promoting BCL2 and CD23 overexpression, which initiates stage I tumor formation and serves as a STAT6 activation surrogate marker. CREBBP negatively regulates this pathway. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (bottom): Wild-type STAT6 shows baseline expression with unaltered T cell distribution, whereas D419N-mutated STAT6 exhibits IL-4-dependent potentiation, enriched CD4 + T cell infiltration via chemotaxis, and enhanced expression of pro-proliferative and pro-migratory genes. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) (lower left): In physiological lymphoid tissue, STAT6 undergoes transient activation with normal immune function. In Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells, constitutive JAK2 activation drives persistent STAT6 phosphorylation, establishing a positive feedback loop involving TARC secretion and CCR4 + Th2 cell recruitment. This results in sustained eosinophil recruitment, immunosuppressive microenvironment formation, immune evasion, and tumor survival. Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) (left): Normal BCP-ALL shows transient, regulatable STAT6 phosphorylation. The P190 BCR-ABL subtype exhibits JAK2-mediated persistent STAT6 hyperphosphorylation, promoting c-MYC transcription, cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase, S-phase reduction, suppressed apoptosis, and hyperproliferation.

Role of STAT6 in chemotherapy resistance in hematologic malignancies

Targeting STAT6 to reverse treatment resistance is an important direction for precision therapy in hematologic malignancies, yet its potential value and intervention strategies show significant heterogeneity or even contradictory effects depending on the disease type.
In DLBCL, lymphoma cells carrying the STAT6 D419N mutation do not exhibit altered responsiveness to any single agent in the standard R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) 18, suggesting that the role of STAT6 in regulating chemotherapy resistance in DLBCL may be limited. In contrast, activation of STAT6 clearly promotes the resistant phenotype in other diseases. For example, in AML, overexpression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) can induce chemotherapy resistance in leukemic cells harboring Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations via the IL-4/STAT6 pathway, and this effect can be reversed by the novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor Gilteritinib67. In the tumor microenvironment of CLL, a large amount of IL-4 derived from T cells activates the JAK1/3–STAT6 axis and the downstream atypical Nuclear Factor kappa-B (NF-κB) pathway, upregulating anti-apoptotic proteins and thereby enhancing tumor cell survival and resistance68.
Conversely, in some leukemia models, inhibiting STAT6 signaling can effectively enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy. Ruxolitinib can inhibit the JAK1/2–STAT6 pathway and, when combined with dexamethasone, synergistically reverses the resistance of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cell lines to glucocorticoids69. In B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), STAT6 plays a dual role in promoting oncogenesis and regulating chemotherapy sensitivity. Combined inhibition of Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor (IGF1R) and MAPK/ERK Kinase (MEK) downregulates STAT6 expression, disrupting the STAT6–ERK–NF-κB survival network to enhance sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs70,71. Downregulation or knockdown of STAT6 can respectively increase the sensitivity of relapsed ALL to cytarabine and the efficacy of chemotherapy in resistant pediatric ALL35,72. This suggests that targeting STAT6 may become a new strategy to overcome chemotherapy resistance in ALL.
Targeting STAT6 also shows potential in lymphomas. In FL, targeting JAK kinase with Fedratinib73, downregulating STAT6 mRNA expression with Vorinostat74, or targeting PARP14 to disrupt the STAT6 transcription complex75, all successfully induce tumor cell apoptosis. Among these, Vorinostat not only reduces the expression of downstream target genes of STAT6, such as B-cell lymphoma - x Large isoform (Bcl-xL), but also synergizes with chemotherapy agents like doxorubicin and gemcitabine to produce antitumor effects.
It is particularly noteworthy that PMBL and cHL have high biological homogeneity, with the JAK/STAT pathway (especially STAT6) being continuously activated due to recurrent mutations. Recent studies have shown that heat shock protein Heat Shock Protein 110 (HSP110) acts as a molecular chaperone for STAT6, promoting its phosphorylation and stabilization, while Exportin 1 (XPO1) regulates the nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of STAT676. Inhibitors targeting both (selinexor or novel HSP110 inhibitors) can suppress STAT6 signaling and exert antitumor effects, and their combined use may produce synergistic effects, offering new therapeutic strategies for these types of lymphomas. (Table 1).

Limitations and future perspectives

Although the role of STAT6 in drug resistance mechanisms of various leukemias is becoming increasingly clear, its clinical application as a therapeutic target and prognostic marker still faces significant challenges. A phase II clinical trial evaluating the monotherapy of JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in CLL was prematurely terminated due to severe infections and frequent anemia in patients77, highlighting the potential clinical risks of broadly inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway. Moreover, in highly prevalent tumors such as DLBCL, the prognostic value of STAT6 mutations or expression remains limited, failing to provide stable stratification information. More importantly, the prognostic significance of STAT6 in certain hematologic malignancies, such as PCNSL and ALL, remains controversial, and its clear clinical value needs to be further validated by larger prospective studies.
Table 1
Mechanisms of STAT6-mediated drug resistance and therapeutic targeting in hematologic malignancies
Disease Type
STAT6 Role
Mechanism of Action / Key Finding
Targeted Drug/Therapeutic Strategy
Ref
DLBCL
Limited Role
The STAT6 D419N mutation did not alter responsiveness to any single agent in the R-CHOP regimen.
Suggests direct targeting of STAT6 may have limited significance in reversing DLBCL chemotherapy resistance.
[18]
AML
Promotes Resistance
HO-1 overexpression mediates resistance in FLT3-ITD cells via the IL-4/STAT6 pathway.
Gilteritinib (FLT3 inhibitor) can reverse this resistance.
[69]
CLL
Promotes Resistance
T cell-derived IL-4 in the tumor microenvironment activates the JAK1/3–STAT6 axis and the atypical NF-κB pathway, upregulating anti-apoptotic proteins.
Ruxolitinib (JAK inhibitor) – a Phase II trial was terminated early due to toxicity.
[70]
T-ALL
Promotes Resistance
STAT6 activation leads to glucocorticoid resistance.
Ruxolitinib + Dexamethasone combination synergistically reverses resistance.
[71]
B-ALL
Dual Role
1. Promotes Survival: Core of a predictive STAT6–ERK–NF-κB survival network.
2. Regulates Sensitivity: Its expression level directly affects sensitivity to drugs like Ara-C.
1. IGF1/R + MEK inhibitor combination sensitizes by co-downregulating STAT6.
2. Direct reduction of STAT6 expression sensitizes to chemotherapy.
[72, 73]
FL
Potential Target
STAT6 pathway activation drives tumorigenesis.
1. Fedratinib (targets JAK)
2. Vorinostat (downregulates STAT6 mRNA, synergistic with chemo)
3. Targeting PARP14 (disrupts STAT6-associated complexes)
[7577]
PMBL / cHL
Core Driver Target
The JAK/STAT6 pathway is constitutively activated via recurrent mutations and is finely regulated by HSP110 and XPO1.
1. Selinexor (XPO1 inhibitor)
2. HSP110 inhibitor
3. Combination of both shows synergistic effects.
[78]

Conclusion

STAT6, as a key regulatory factor in the immune system, governs the differentiation fate of B cells, T cells, and macrophages. It exerts a vital influence on the genesis and evolution of hematologic malignancies, like leukemia and lymphoma, by modulating cell cycle events, fueling cell proliferation, and remodeling the tumor microenvironment. Current evidence indicates that STAT6 primarily exhibits gain-of-function characteristics in hematologic malignancies. STAT6 plays a key role in immune regulation, tumor formation, and chemotherapy resistance. Targeting it is a promising treatment option for blood diseases and may lead to the development of new targeted drugs.

Declarations

Ethical approval

Review does not require ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Lanzhou University Second Hospital.

Disclosure

statement: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
STAT6: Multidimensional analysis from hematopoietic immune regulation to pathogenesis mechanisms and therapeutic targets in hematologic malignancies
Verfasst von
Shuni Zhang
Shuzhen Xiong
Xinyang Liu
Jiajia Cao
Ningning Yue
Chongyang Wu
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2026
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Annals of Hematology / Ausgabe 4/2026
Print ISSN: 0939-5555
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-026-06932-2
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolomeo M, Cascio A (2024) STAT4 and STAT6, their role in cellular and humoral immunity and in diverse human diseases. Int Rev Immunol 43(6):394–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/08830185.2024.2395274CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Benoit A, Abraham MJ, Li S et al (2024) STAT6 mutations enriched at diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapse reshape the tumor microenvironment. Int J Hematol 119(3):275–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-023-03692-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Suratannon N, Ittiwut C, Dik WA et al (2023) A germline STAT6 gain-of-function variant is associated with early-onset allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 151(2):565–571e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2022.09.028CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Philips RL, Wang Y, Cheon H et al (2022) The JAK-STAT pathway at 30: Much learned, much more to do. Cell 185(21):3857–3876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.023CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma M, Leung D, Momenilandi M et al (2023) Human germline heterozygous gain-of-function STAT6 variants cause severe allergic disease. J Exp Med 220(5):e20221755. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20221755CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous Heritable Polygenic Editing: The next Frontier in Genomic Medicine? | Nature. n.d. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08300-4 [Last accessed: 1/5/2026]
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baris S, Benamar M, Chen Q et al (2023) Severe allergic dysregulation due to a gain of function mutation in the transcription factor STAT6. J Allergy Clin Immunol 152(1):182–194e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2023.01.023CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma M, Suratannon N, Leung D et al (2024) Human germline gain-of-function in STAT6: From severe allergic disease to lymphoma and beyond. Trends Immunol 45(2):138–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2023.12.003CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Minskaia E, Maimaris J, Jenkins P et al (2023) Autosomal dominant STAT6 gain of function causes severe atopy associated with lymphoma. J Clin Immunol 43(7):1611–1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-023-01530-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous (2011) Activation of STAT6 by STING is critical for antiviral innate immunity. Cell 147(2):436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.022CrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nann D, Ramis-Zaldivar JE, Müller I et al (2020) Follicular lymphoma t(14;18)-negative is genetically a heterogeneous disease. Blood Adv 4(22):5652–5665. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002944CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Miloudi H, Leroy K, Jardin F et al (2018) STAT6 is a cargo of exportin 1: Biological relevance in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Cell Signal 46:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.02.016CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Weston VJ, Wei W, Stankovic T et al (2018) Synergistic action of dual IGF1/R and MEK inhibition sensitizes childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells to cytotoxic agents and involves downregulation of STAT6 and PDAP1. Exp Hematol 63:52–63e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2018.04.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang S-H, Lee KS, Kim IS et al (2009) Long-term survival in primary CNS lymphoma treated by high-dose methotrexate monochemotherapy: Role of STAT6 activation as prognostic determinant. J Neurooncol 92(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9736-9CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mondello P, Cuzzocrea S, Arrigo C et al (2020) STAT6 activation correlates with cerebrospinal fluid IL-4 and IL-10 and poor prognosis in primary central nervous system lymphoma. Hematol Oncol 38(1):106–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2679CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi J-H, Liu L-N, Song D-D et al (2023) TRAF3/STAT6 axis regulates macrophage polarization and tumor progression. Cell Death Differ 30(8):2005–2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-023-01194-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Benoit A, Abraham MJ, Li S et al (2024) STAT6 mutations enriched at diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapse reshape the tumor microenvironment. Int J Hematol 119(3):275–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-023-03692-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pignarre A, Chatonnet F, Caron G et al (2021) ****Plasmablasts derive from CD23– activated B cells after the extinction of IL-4/STAT6 signaling and IRF4 induction. Blood 137(9):1166–1180. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020005083CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stokes K, LaMarche NM, Islam N et al (2015) Cutting edge: STAT6 signaling in eosinophils is necessary for development of allergic airway inflammation. J Immunol 194(6):2477–2481. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1402096CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Stokes K, LaMarche NM, Islam N et al (2015) Cutting edge: STAT6 signaling in eosinophils is necessary for development of allergic airway inflammation. J Immunol 194(6):2477–2481. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1402096CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chevrier S, Kratina T, Emslie D et al (2017) IL4 and IL21 cooperate to induce the high Bcl6 protein level required for germinal center formation. Immunol Cell Biology 95(10):925–932. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.2017.71CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Arkee T, Hornick EL, Bishop GA (2024) TRAF3 regulates STAT6 activation and T-helper cell differentiation by modulating the phosphatase PTP1B. J Biol Chem 300(10):107737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107737CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Guan X, Fury H, Issuree PD et al (2024) The impact of cell-intrinsic STAT6 protein on donor T cell-mediated graft-versus-tumor effect. Int J Mol Sci 26(1):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010280CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassetta L, Pollard JW (2023) A timeline of tumour-associated macrophage biology. Nat Rev Cancer 23(4):238–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-022-00547-1CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamerkar S, Leng C, Burenkova O et al (2022) Exosome-mediated genetic reprogramming of tumor-associated macrophages by exoASO-STAT6 leads to potent monotherapy antitumor activity. Sci Adv 8(7):eabj7002. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj7002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahal OM, Wolfe AR, Mandal PK et al (2018) Blocking interleukin (IL)4- and IL13-mediated phosphorylation of STAT6 (Tyr641) decreases M2 polarization of macrophages and protects against macrophage-mediated radioresistance of inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 100(4):1034–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.043CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandal PK, Morlacchi P, Knight JM et al (2015) Targeting the src homology 2 (SH2) domain of signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) with cell-permeable, phosphatase-stable phosphopeptide mimics potently inhibits Tyr641 phosphorylation and transcriptional activity. J Med Chem 58(22):8970–8984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Szanto A, Balint BL, Nagy ZS et al (2010) STAT6 transcription factor is a facilitator of the nuclear receptor PPARγ-regulated gene expression in macrophages and dendritic cells. Immunity 33(5):699–712CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous (2022) Zanubrutinib ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury via regulating macrophage polarization. Int Immunopharmacol 111:109138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109138CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamerkar S, Leng C, Burenkova O et al Exosome-mediated genetic reprogramming of tumor-associated macrophages by exoASO-STAT6 leads to potent monotherapy antitumor activity. Sci Adv n d ;8(7):eabj7002; https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj7002
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia - PubMed. n.d. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36122035/ [Last accessed: 9/29/2025]
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin R, Wang T, He W et al (2023) Jak2/STAT6/c-myc pathway is vital to the pathogenicity of philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia caused by P190BCR-ABL. Cell Commun Signal 21:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01039-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Shea JJ, Plenge R (2012) JAK and STAT signaling molecules in immunoregulation and immune-mediated disease. Immunity 36(4):542–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun S, Cheng Y, Huang X et al (2025) Targeted deprivation of STAT6 sensitizes acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells to cytarabine in vivo and in vitro: Clinical implications. Cell Death Dis 16(1):669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-025-07981-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Traxel S, Lehmann J, Richard S et al (2021) Support of BCP-ALL-cells by autologous bone marrow th-cells involves induction of AID expression but not widespread AID off-target mutagenesis. Cancer Immunol Immunother 70(8):2275–2289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02835-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottok A, Steidl C (2018) Biology of classical hodgkin lymphoma: Implications for prognosis and novel therapies. Blood 131(15):1654–1665. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-09-772632CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bayçelebi D, Yildiz Ş, Yildiz L et al (2025) STAT6 can be used in the diagnosis of hodgkin lymphoma: There are differences in expression among subtypes. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphology 33(5):277. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001277CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Hjort MA, Hov H, Abdollahi P et al (2018) Phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 (PRL-3) is overexpressed in classical hodgkin lymphoma and promotes survival and migration. Exp Hematol Oncol 7:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-018-0100-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat von Hoff L, Kärgel E, Franke V et al (2019) Autocrine LTA signaling drives NF-κB and JAK-STAT activity and myeloid gene expression in hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 133(13):1489–1494. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-08-871293CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Slambrouck C, Huh J, Suh C et al (2020) Diagnostic utility of STAT6YE361 expression in classical hodgkin lymphoma and related entities. Mod Pathol 33(5):834–845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0428-0CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Zijtregtop EAM, van der Strate I, Beishuizen A et al (2021) Biology and clinical applicability of plasma thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) in classical hodgkin lymphoma. Cancers (Basel) 13(4):884. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Buglio D, Georgakis GV, Hanabuchi S et al (2008) Vorinostat inhibits STAT6-mediated TH2 cytokine and TARC production and induces cell death in hodgkin lymphoma cell lines. Blood 112(4):1424–1433. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-01-133769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Donzel M, Pesce F, Trecourt A et al (2023) Molecular characterization of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphomas. Cancers (Basel) 15(19):4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194866CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Benoit A, Abraham MJ, Li S et al (2024) STAT6 mutations enriched at diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapse reshape the tumor microenvironment. Int J Hematol 119(3):275–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-023-03692-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Mentz M, Keay W, Strobl CD et al (2022) PARP14 is a novel target in STAT6 mutant follicular lymphoma. Leukemia 36(9):2281–2292. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01641-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Q, Zhang F, Fu H et al Epigenetic regulation of miR-518a-5p-CCR6 feedback loop promotes both proliferation and invasion in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Epigenetics n d ;16(1):28–44; https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2020.1786317CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Hebenstreit D, Wirnsberger G, Horejs-Hoeck J et al (2006) Signaling mechanisms, interaction partners, and target genes of STAT6. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 17(3):173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2006.01.004CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Los-de Vries GT, Stevens WBC, van Dijk E et al (2022) Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV. Blood Adv 6(18):5482–5493. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008355CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Crouch S, Painter D, Barrans SL et al (2022) Molecular subclusters of follicular lymphoma: A report from the united kingdom’s haematological malignancy research network. Blood Adv 6(21):5716–5731. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Yildiz M, Li H, Bernard D et al (2015) Activating STAT6 mutations in follicular lymphoma. Blood 125(4):668–679. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-06-582650CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Russler-Germain DA, Krysiak K, Ramirez C et al (2023) Mutations associated with progression in follicular lymphoma predict inferior outcomes at diagnosis: Alliance A151303. Blood Adv 7(18):5524–5539. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010779CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Shao Q, Bedi K, Malek IA et al (2025) STAT6 mutations compensate for CREBBP mutations and hyperactivate IL4/STAT6/RRAGD/mTOR signaling in follicular lymphoma. Leukemia 39(4):899–908. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02525-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritz O, Guiter C, Castellano F et al (2009) Recurrent mutations of the STAT6 DNA binding domain in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Blood 114(6):1236–1242. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-03-209759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Donzel M, Pesce F, Trecourt A et al (2023) Molecular characterization of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphomas. Cancers (Basel) 15(19):4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194866CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritz O, Guiter C, Dorsch K et al (2008) STAT6 activity is regulated by SOCS-1 and modulates BCL-XL expression in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia 22(11):2106–2110. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2008.85CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritz O, Guiter C, Castellano F et al (2009) Recurrent mutations of the STAT6 DNA binding domain in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Blood 114(6):1236–1242. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-03-209759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation | Nature Reviews Immunology. n.d. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nri1896 [Last accessed: 9/12/2025]
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritz O, Guiter C, Castellano F et al (2009) Recurrent mutations of the STAT6 DNA binding domain in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Blood 114(6):1236–1242. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-03-209759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik JH, Koh J, Han B et al (2023) Distinct and overlapping features of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas exhibiting a follicular helper T-cell phenotype: A multicenter study emphasizing the clinicopathological significance of follicular helper T-cell marker expression. Hum Pathol 131:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2022.12.003CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Satou A, Takahara T, Yamashita D et al (2023) Diagnostic utility of STAT6 and pSTAT6 immunohistochemistry for distinguishing classic hodgkin lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma with hodgkin and reed-sternberg–like cells. Am J Surg Pathol 47(8):897. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002062CrossRefPubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaydosik AM, Queen DS, Trager MH et al (2020) Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of the STAT6-regulated genes in advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 136(15):1748–1759. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019004725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu X, Schulte BC, Zhou Y et al (2014) Depletion of M2-like tumor-associated macrophages delays cutaneous T-cell lymphoma development in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 134(11):2814–2822. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.206CrossRefPubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleinhans M, Tun-Kyi A, Gilliet M et al (2003) Functional expression of the eotaxin receptor CCR3 in CD30 + cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 101(4):1487–1493. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-02-0475CrossRefPubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner SD, Inghirami G, Miranda RN et al (2020) Cell of origin and immunologic events in the pathogenesis of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Am J Pathol 190(1):2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.09.005CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadin ME, Morgan J, Wei W et al (2023) CD30 regulation of IL-13–STAT6 pathway in breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Aesthet Surg J 43(2):137–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjac234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang T, Wei D, Zhan Y et al (2025) Heme oxygenase 1 confers gilteritinib resistance in FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia in a STAT6-dependent manner. Cancer Cell Int 25(1):129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-025-03757-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray PJ (2007) The JAK-STAT signaling pathway: Input and output integration. J Immunol 178(5):2623–2629. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2623CrossRefPubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Veltri G, Silvestri C, Gallingani I et al (2021) Ruxolitinib as a novel therapeutic option for poor prognosis T-LBL pediatric patients. Cancers (Basel) 13(15):3724. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun S, Cheng Y, Huang X et al (2025) Targeted deprivation of STAT6 sensitizes acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells to cytarabine in vivo and in vitro: Clinical implications. Cell Death Dis 16(1):669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-025-07981-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Weston VJ, Wei W, Stankovic T et al (2018) Synergistic action of dual IGF1/R and MEK inhibition sensitizes childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells to cytotoxic agents and involves downregulation of STAT6 and PDAP1. Exp Hematol 63:52–63e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2018.04.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Weston VJ, Wei W, Stankovic T et al (2018) Synergistic action of dual IGF1/R and MEK inhibition sensitizes childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells to cytotoxic agents and involves downregulation of STAT6 and PDAP1. Exp Hematol 63:52–63e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2018.04.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Hao Y, Chapuy B, Monti S et al (2014) Selective JAK2 inhibition specifically decreases hodgkin lymphoma and mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma growth in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 20(10):2674–2683. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Buglio D, Georgakis GV, Hanabuchi S et al (2008) Vorinostat inhibits STAT6-mediated TH2 cytokine and TARC production and induces cell death in hodgkin lymphoma cell lines. Blood 112(4):1424–1433. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-01-133769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Mentz M, Keay W, Strobl CD et al (2022) PARP14 is a novel target in STAT6 mutant follicular lymphoma. Leukemia 36(9):2281–2292. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01641-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Durand M, Cabaud Gibouin V, Duplomb L et al (2024) A first-in-class inhibitor of HSP110 to potentiate XPO1-targeted therapy in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and classical hodgkin lymphoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 43(1):148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-024-03068-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Spaner DE, Wang G, McCaw L et al (2016) Activity of the janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results of a phase II trial. Haematologica 101(5):e192–e195. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2015.135418CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Pharmakotherapie im Alter: Jede/r Vierte inadäquat behandelt

Die medikamentöse Versorgung von älteren Menschen in Deutschland ist offenbar stark verbesserungsbedürftig. In einer Kohortenstudie wurden sechs Patientengruppen identifiziert, bei denen sich eine sorgfältige Überprüfung der Medikamentenpläne lohnen könnte.

Neue Methode zur kardialen Resynchronisation zeigt Vorteile

Eine neue Schrittmacher-Methode hat sich in einer Studie bei Patienten mit Indikation zur kardialen Resynchronisationstherapie im Vergleich zur konventionellen biventrikulären Schrittmacher-Stimulation als vorteilhaft erwiesen.

Bessere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose dank Klasse-1C-Antiarrhythmika

Eine frühe Rhythmuskontrolle kann das Outcome bei Vorhofflimmern im Vergleich zur bloßen Frequenzkontrolle verbessern: Real-World-Daten zufolge ist das auch dann der Fall, wenn dazu Klasse-1C-Antiarrhythmika eingesetzt werden.

Stellenwert der Neoadjuvanz beim lokal fortgeschrittenen kolorektalen Karzinom

Mit der NeoCol-Studie ist nun die dritte randomisierte kontrollierte Studie zur neoadjuvanten Therapie des lokal fortgeschrittenen CRC ohne Vorteil für das krankheitsfreie Überleben verlaufen. Und dennoch ruhen auf dem Ansatz weiter Hoffnungen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Ältere Frau nimmt Tablette ein/© Kseniia / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell), Älterer Mann mit Tabletten in der Hand/© vorDa / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell)