Cancer survivors may be at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, but little is known about whether prescribing guidelines for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease are adequately implemented in these patients. We compared levels of statin initiation and cessation among cancer survivors compared to the general population to determine differences in uptake of pharmaceutical cardiovascular risk prevention measures in these groups.
Methods
The study population included individuals aged ≥40 during 2005–13 within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink primary care database. Within this population we identified cancer survivors who were alive and under follow-up at least 1 year after diagnosis, and controls with no cancer history. Follow-up time prior to cancer diagnosis was included in the control cohort. Using logistic regression, we compared these groups with respect to uptake of statins within 1 month of a first high recorded cardiovascular risk score. Then, we used Cox modelling to compare persistence on statin therapy (time to statin cessation) between cancer survivors and controls from the main study population who had initiated on a statin.
Results
Among 4202 cancer survivors and 113,035 controls with a record indicating a high cardiovascular risk score, 23.0% and 23.5% respectively initiated a statin within 1 month (adjusted odds ratio 0.98 [91.8–1.05], p = 0.626). Cancer survivors appeared more likely to discontinue statin treatment than controls (adjusted hazard ratio 1.07 [1.01–1.12], p = 0.02). This greater risk of discontinuing was only evident after the first year of therapy (p-interaction < 0.001).
Interpretation
Although cardiovascular risk is thought to be higher in cancer survivors compared to the general population, cancer survivors were no more likely to receive statins, and marginally more likely to cease long-term therapy, than general population controls. There may be an opportunity to mitigate the suspected higher cardiovascular risk in the growing population of cancer survivors by improving uptake of lipid-lowering treatment and persistence on therapy.
Advances in cancer detection and treatment over the past 20 years have led to considerable improvements in cancer survival [1, 2]. Consequently, the number of people living with a history of cancer – “cancer survivors” - is steadily increasing [1]. Some cancers are increasingly thought of as chronic diseases that require evidence based multidisciplinary care for the prevention and management of comorbidities and sequelae [3‐6].
Recent evidence has demonstrated that cancer survivors are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population [7] and that in certain populations (e.g. breast cancer survivors) CVD competes with cancer as the leading cause of death [8, 9]. This is likely to be due to shared risk factors (e.g. obesity and tobacco use) and potential cardiotoxic effects of systemic therapies and radiotherapy [10, 11]. It has been suggested that sub-optimal primary prevention may also be responsible [12, 13]. In the absence of specific cardiovascular risk prevention guidelines targeted at cancer survivors, such individuals would be expected to follow strategies recommended for the general population, i.e. reducing lifestyle-related risk factors, and pharmacological management of lipid and blood pressure [14]. Since 2005, UK guidelines on primary CVD prevention (Additional file 1: Table S1) have recommended all people with high cardiovascular risk (i.e. 10 year predicted risk ≥20%) be offered statin therapy [15]. Current risk assessment tools do not take possible additional risks associated with previous cancer into account, and may under-estimate vascular risk among cancer survivors. Statin uptake rates in the general population appear to be low, with a number of studies finding that only around one fifth to one third of patients at high cardiovascular risk were actually prescribed a statin [16‐19]. To our knowledge, equivalent statin uptake rates in cancer survivors have not previously been quantified.
Anzeige
In order to best target initiatives to improve gaps in survivorship care, we need to confirm whether cardiovascular risk prevention strategies are being followed in this vulnerable population, and whether cancer survivors persist with long-term medications intended to reduce their cardiovascular risk. We therefore aimed to compare use of lipid-lowering drugs between cancer survivors and control patients with no previous cancer, specifically focusing on prescribing of statins to those scored as high CV risk; and the time to statin discontinuation, among those starting a statin.
Methods
Data source and main study population
We conducted a longitudinal population-based open cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD data. CPRD GOLD is a primary care database containing the anonymised medical records for over 15 million patients from 674 general practices in the United Kingdom (UK) [20]. CPRD GOLD data, which are collated daily from participating practices that use Vision software, include information on demographics, symptoms, tests, diagnoses, and prescriptions, and are subject to data quality checks. Diagnoses in CPRD are typically recorded using National Health Service (NHS) Read codes. Approximately 7% of the UK population are included, with patients broadly representative of the UK general population in terms of age, sex and ethnicity [20]. In the UK, the General Practitioner (GP) is the first point of contact and “gatekeeper” for most non-emergency NHS care; the vast majority of the population is registered with a GP [21].
The study period was 1st January 2005 to 31st December 2013 because during this period national guidelines (Additional file 1: Table S1) remained constant in recommending statin therapy for people with predicted cardiovascular risk ≥20% over 10 years, for primary prevention. Patients who were 40 years or older during the study period and had at least 12 months of research quality CPRD follow-up prior to entering the cohort were included; follow-up began on the latest of 1/1/2005, the patient’s 40th birthday, or the date on which 12 months of follow-up had been accumulated in CPRD; follow-up ended on the earliest of 31/12/2013, the last data collection date, or the end of follow-up in CPRD. Patients with a CVD event (Additional file 2: Table S2) prior to entering the study were excluded (as our focus was on primary CVD prevention).
Read code lists to identify cancer diagnoses were developed using the methodology described in a previous study [22]. All person-time was categorised into “never-cancer”, “first year post-cancer diagnosis” and “≥ 1 year post-cancer diagnosis”. Person-time in the ≥1 year post-cancer diagnosis category made up the cancer survivor group, while “never-cancer” person-time made up the control group. Person-time in the first year post-cancer diagnosis was not analysed further. People could contribute to more than one of the comparison groups, if they developed cancer during follow-up, but could only contribute to one exposure group at any given moment of follow-up. From this overall study population, sub-cohorts were defined to address each of our objectives, as described in the sections below.
Anzeige
Descriptive analysis
Baseline characteristics were described for the overall study population and sub-populations (defined below). We also described the proportion of patients with at least one measurement recorded in the past 5 years for each of: blood pressure (diastolic and systolic recorded on the same day), lipids (total cholesterol and/or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) and/or cholesterol/HDL ratio), and 10 year predicted cardiovascular risk score (Framingham, QRisk, ASSIGN, Joint British Society (JBS), or unspecified; Read terms used to identify cardiovascular risk scores are included in Additional file 3: Table S3). This description of blood pressure/lipids/risk score recording was stratified by cancer survivor / control status, gender and specific points of age (namely at age 45, and in steps of 5 years up to 75); and within strata, was restricted to individuals under follow-up at the given age and with at least 5 years of prior follow-up in CPRD.
Uptake of statins among those recorded as high CVD risk
To assess uptake of statin therapy among patients with high recorded CVD risk, all patients from the overall study population with a first ever Read code or quantitative record indicating predicted 10 year cardiovascular risk of ≥20% in CPRD and no previous statin use were included in the ‘high cardiovascular risk cohort’. To exclude patients with previous high risk scores, patients were required to have at least 12 months of research quality follow-up in CPRD prior to the first high risk score record. Patients were excluded if their follow-up ended during the 31 day period after the high cardiovascular risk score, leaving inadequate eligible time to assess prescription of a statin within 1 month. For this analysis, patients were grouped as cancer survivors or controls based on their status on the date of their first high CVD risk record. The outcome was statin uptake, defined as having a first prescription for statin therapy (defined using the codes in Additional file 4: Table S4) within 31 days of the first high cardiovascular risk score. The association between cancer survivorship and statin uptake was assessed using logistic regression. First, the unadjusted association was estimated, then we adjusted for age at baseline (i.e. at first high cardiovascular risk score, in 10 year categories) and gender as a-priori confounders. The following potential confounders were considered one at a time: practice Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile (a proxy for socio-economic status) [23]; body mass index (BMI, categorised as underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), healthy weight (18.5-25 kg/m2) and overweight/obese (> 25 kg/m2)); total cholesterol (categorised as normal (< 5 mmol), moderate-high (5-8 mmol) and high (> 8 mmol)); smoking status (never, current, ex-smoker); alcohol consumption (non-drinker, ex-drinker, high/medium/low/unknown-level current drinker); chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and chronic liver disease at baseline (both defined using Read codes); and calendar time (split into 2005–07, 2008–10, 2011–13 to account for the marked increase in statin prescribing demonstrated in previous CPRD research over the study time period [24]). These covariates were only included in the final model if the absolute change to the odds ratio (OR) was greater than 10% when the single variable was added to the unadjusted model. Only participants with complete data for the relevant confounder were included in the stepwise testing analyses (adjusted and comparative a-priori models).
We investigated whether calendar period modified the association between cancer and initiation of a statin by adding calendar period to the model as an interaction term - the stratified ORs were assessed and a likelihood ratio test was used to compare the models with and without the interaction term. There was not considered to be any a priori reason to test for any other interactions.
Time to statin discontinuation among those starting a statin
To assess statin persistence, patients from the overall study population who started a statin for primary prevention (i.e. with no previous CVD record) during the study time period were included in the ‘statin initiator cohort’. To exclude prevalent statin users, patients were required to have at least 12 months of research quality follow-up prior to first prescription. For this analysis, patients were grouped as cancer survivors or controls based on their status on the date of their first statin prescription. The outcome was the time from statin initiation to first cessation of therapy, calculated from prescription records. The end date of each prescription was calculated by dividing the quantity prescribed by the daily dose where this information was available. Where duration could not be calculated, the modal prescription duration (28 days) was assumed. If there was no repeat prescription within 90 days after the estimated end date of a prescription, a patient was defined as having ceased therapy at the estimated end date. A multivariate Cox model was built, with time since statin initiation as the underlying time scale and with age (time-updated), gender, BMI, smoking status and diabetes (time updated) included as a priori confounders. All regression analyses were restricted to individuals with complete data for these confounders. Other candidate confounders were assessed and added to the model using the same model-building strategy as described for the analysis of statin uptake (above).
We investigated an interaction between cancer survivorship and calendar period as uptake of statins varies over time and drivers of this may differ in cancer survivors versus the general population. We also considered heterogeneity by time since cancer diagnosis. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed by testing for an interaction between cancer survivor status and time since statin initiation (categorised as < 0.5, 0.5–1, > 1–2, > 2 years). In a sensitivity analysis, the Cox model time scale was switched to age (to control more closely for age), and time since initiation was adjusted for as a time-varying covariate. Robust standard errors were used in all analyses to account for clustering at GP practice level.
Results
Overall, 3,369,849 individuals aged 40 years or over during the study period 2005 to 2013 were included in the main study cohort (Fig. 1). Of the main study cohort 131,676 contributed person-time to the cancer survivors (exposed) and 3,324,152 to the general population controls (unexposed). Demographics and baseline characteristics of the study populations are described in Table 1.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics for the main study cohort and sub-populations by cancer survivor (> = 1 year) status
Main Study Cohorta
High Cardiovascular Risk Cohortb
Statin Initiator Cohortc
Cancer Survivor
Control
Cancer Survivor
Control
Cancer Survivor
Control
n = 131,676
n = 3,324,152
n = 4202
n = 113,035
n = 12,142
n = 366,280
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
Sex
Male
58,587 (44.7)
1,618,820 (48.70)
2659 (63.3)
80,264 (71.0)
5959 (49.1)
194,430 (53.1)
Female
72,823 (55.3)
1,705,299 (51.30)
1543 (36.7)
32,771 (29.0)
6183 (50.9)
171,848 (46.9)
Age (years)
Median (IQR)
66.5 (57.5–75.5)
50.5 (42.1–62.3)
69.1 (64.2–72.9)
64.2 (58.4–69.8)
68.9 (62.4–75.1)
62.6 (54.9–70.2)
40–49
14,117 (10.7)
1,529,272 (46.0)
27 (0.6)
5410 (4.8)
351 (2.9)
45,132 (12.3)
50–59
24,564 (18.6)
775,972 (23.3)
368 (8.8)
27,121 (24.0)
1630 (13.4)
96,664 (26.7)
60–69
38,078 (28.9)
521,777 (15.7)
1815 (43.2)
50,847 (45.0)
4393 (36.2)
125,540 (34.3)
70–79
33,983 (25.8)
303,231 (9.1)
1765 (42.0)
26,713 (23.6)
4086 (33.7)
73,598 (20.1)
80+
20,934 (15.9)
193,900 (5.8)
227 (5.4)
2944 (2.6)
1682 (13.7)
25,346 (6.9)
BMI (kg/m2)
Mean (SD)
26.9 (5.3)
26.9 (5.3)
28.3 (4.8)
27.8 (5.1)
28.2 (5.4)
28.7 (5.6)
< 18.5
2748 (2.1)
48,109 (1.4)
50 (1.2)
897 (0.8)
131 (1.1)
2906 (0.8)
18.5–25
46,037 (35.0)
1,130,838 (34.0)
1127 (26.8)
27,294 (24.2)
3175 (26.9)
86,962 (24.5)
≥ 25
74,375 (56.5)
1,736,648 (52.2)
2925 (69.6)
81,734 (72.3)
8504 (72.0)
265,128 (74.7)
Missing
8516 (6.5)
408,557 (12.3)
100 (2.4)
3113 (2.8)
332 (2.7)
11,285 (3.1)
Cholesterol (mmol/L)
Mean (SD)
5.3 (1.2)
5.4 (1.1)
5.7 (1.0)
5.8 (1.1)
6.0 (1.3)
6.1 (1.3)
Normal (< 5)
42,503 (32.3)
796,230 (23.9)
898 (21.4)
21,543 (19.1)
2242 (18.7)
58,780 (16.2)
Mod (5–8)
62,529 (47.5)
1,405,997 (42.3)
3137 (74.6)
85,221 (75.4)
8965 (74.8)
278,848 (76.9)
High (> 8)
1704 (1.5)
38,297 (1.2)
92 (2.2)
3316 (2.9)
775 (6.47)
25,032 (6.9)
Missing
24,940 (18.9)
1,083,578 (32.6)
75 (1.8)
2955 (2.6)
157 (1.29)
3640 (1.0)
Smoking status
Never
46,606 (35.4)
1,358,706 (40.9)
1194 (28.4)
29,306 (25.9)
3729 (30.7)
118,728 (32.4)
Ex
61,969 (47.1)
965,510 (29.1)
2133 (50.8)
46,494 (41.2)
6572 (54.1)
166,482 (45.5)
Current
22,627 (17.2)
885,915 (26.6)
875 (20.8)
37,190 (32.9)
1840 (15.2)
80,841 (22.1)
Missing
474 (0.4)
114,021 (3.4)
< 5
45 (0.0)
< 5
299 (0.1)
Alcohol status (non- ex- current drinker)
Non
25,030 (19.0)
577,211 (17.4)
742 (17.7)
18,139 (16.1)
2500 (27.3)
75,516 (27.5)
Ex
3778 (2.84)
74,249 (2.2)
162 (3.9)
4079 (3.6)
447 (4.9)
13,002 (4.7)
Current
light
48,354 (36.7)
1,042,681 (31.3)
1629 (38.8)
40,996 (36.3)
4868 (53.1)
140,039 (51.0)
moderate
4776 (3.6)
106,934 (3.2)
224 (5.3)
5904 (5.2)
503 (5.5)
15,837 (5.8)
heavy
5025 (3.8)
150,372 (4.5)
254 (6.0)
9229 (8.2)
562 (6.1)
19,668 (7.2)
unknown
2819 (2.1)
74,769 (2.3)
117 (2.8)
4193 (3.7)
280 (3.1)
10,747 (3.9)
Missing
41,894 (31.8)
1,297,936 (39.0)
1074 (25.6)
30,495 (27.0)
2982 (24.6)
91,474 (25.0)
Medical history
Diabetes
12,045 (9.2)
153,405 (4.6)
187 (4.5)
5308 (4.7)
2239 (18.4)
69,156 (18.9)
CKD
9577 (7.3)
28,419 (0.9)
368 (8.8)
5465 (4.8)
1450 (12.0)
24,464 (6.7)
Chronic liver disease
2223 (1.7)
39,429 (1.2)
75 (1.8)
7975 (1.8)
221 (1.8)
6378 (1.7)
Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile
1 (least)
16,993 (12.9)
298,566 (9.0)
641 (15.2)
12,842 (11.4)
1697 (11.1)
40,458 (11.1)
2
12,043 (12.9)
340,205 (10.2)
588 (14.0)
13,616 (12.6)
1607 (13.2)
43,074 (11.8)
3
18,708 (14.2)
384,484 (11.6)
545 (13.0)
14,211 (12.6)
1655 (13.6)
48,491 (13.2)
4
64,007 (48.6)
1,978,653 (59.5)
1894 (45.1)
57,464 (50.8)
5615 (46.2)
188,142 (51.4)
5 (most)
14,985 (11.4)
322,244 (9.7)
434,534 (12.7)
14,902 (13.2)
1586 (13.1)
46,115 (12.6)
Calendar year
2005–07
62,916 (47.8)
2,423,116 (72.9)
623 (14.8)
23,020 (20.4)
4105 (33.8)
156,589 (42.8)
2008–10
34,416 (26.1)
471,289 (14.2)
1681 (40.0)
48,349 (42.8)
4310 (35.5)
124,339 (33.9)
2011–13
34,344 (26.1)
429,747 (12.9)
1898 (45.2)
41,666 (36.9)
3727 (30.7)
85,352 (23.3)
aCovariates were measured at baseline (or closest recording) defined in the ‘main study cohort’ as the date of the start of unexposed (non-cancer) and exposed (≥ 1 year post cancer diagnosis) follow-up time. Patients in the Main Study Cohort could contribute person-time to exposed and unexposed cohorts
bBaseline was defined in the ‘high cardiovascular risk cohort’ as the date of the first high cardiovascular risk score. Patients could only be included in one of the comparison cohorts
cBaseline was defined in the ‘statin initiator cohort’ as the date of the first statin prescription. Patients could only be included one of the comparison cohorts. If a non-cancer patient developed cancer while on statin therapy they were censored
×
Cancer survivors were older on average than controls (median: 67 years vs. 51 years), and a higher proportion were females (55.3% vs. 51.3%). As patients enter the cancer survivor group later than the general population control group, the proportion of patients followed up from later calendar years was greater in the cancer survivor group (26.1% vs. 12.9% for 2011–2013). The baseline prevalence of diabetes and CKD were substantially higher among cancer survivors compared with controls (9.2% vs 4.6% respectively for diabetes, and 7.3% vs 0.9% for CKD). Figure 2 describes the proportion of individuals from the full study population with a BP, cholesterol measurement, or a cardiovascular risk score recorded at least once in the past 5 years, by age, gender and exposure status; a table of the same results presented numerically is provided in Additional file 5: Table S5. Overall, the highest level of monitoring was observed for BP (range: 60.0% to 97.2%), followed by cholesterol (range: 32.6% to 80.1%). BP and cholesterol monitoring were consistently higher in cancer survivors than controls, across all ages and gender with the exception of cholesterol monitoring in women which appeared to be similar between cancer survivors and controls. There was suboptimal recording of cardiovascular risk scores for both sexes and in all age groups, regardless of cancer status (range: 5.6% to 21.3%). Cancer survivors tended to have either similar or marginally better recording of cardiovascular risk compared to controls of the same age and gender. We repeated these analyses post-hoc restricting to patients without CKD or diabetes, in case baseline differences in these diseases affected the comparison between cancer survivors and controls. Similar patterns were seen.
×
Uptake of statins among those recorded as high CVD risk
The ‘high cardiovascular risk cohort’ included 118,012 individuals (Fig. 1). Of these, 4202 individuals were cancer survivors at the time of their first high risk score and 113,035 were controls; cancer survivors were more likely than controls to be older (median age 69.1 vs 64.2 years), female (36.7% vs. 29.0%), current non-smokers (79.2% vs. 67.1%), less deprived (29.2% vs 24.0% in the lower two deprivation quintiles) and to have CKD (8.8% vs. 4.8%; Table 1, middle columns). There were also small but statistically significant differences in cholesterol and alcohol status between the groups.
Anzeige
Nine hundred sixty-eight of 4202 cancer survivors (23.0%) and 26,606 of 113,035 controls (23.5%) initiated a statin within a month of their first high cardiovascular risk score. There was no evidence of association between cancer survivorship and statin initiation in the initial unadjusted analysis: OR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90–1.05, p = 0.443, Table 2). There was evidence that statin initiation was more likely among females, those with BMI ≥25 kg/m2, total cholesterol > 5 mmol/L, ex-smokers, and those with diabetes or CKD, and less common in people aged over 80 years, heavy drinkers, underweight individuals, and those in later calendar periods. None of the tested covariates individually changed the association between cancer survivorship and statin initiation by more than 10%; the maximum change being 1.5%. Therefore only age and gender were included in the final logistic regression model as a priori confounders associated with both cancer status and statin initiation. The final adjusted odds ratio was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92–1.05, P = 0.626) (Table 2). There was no evidence that the association between cancer survivorship and statin initiation differed by calendar period (p-interaction = 0.709).
Table 2
Associations between cancer survivorship and covariates, and statin initiation among the high cardiovascular risk cohort
Total n
Initiates statin n (%)
Crude OR (95% CI)
p-value
Adjusteda OR (95% CI)
p-value
Cancer status (binary)
Non-cancer
113,035
26,606 (23.54)
1
0.443
1
Cancer survivor
4202
968 (23.04)
0.97 (0.90–1.05)
0.98 (0.92–1.05)
0.626
Sex
Males
82,923
18,902 (22.79)
1
< 0.001
1
< 0.001
Females
34,314
8672 (25.27)
1.15 (1.11–1.18)
1.19 (1.15–1.23)
Age (years)
40–49
5437
1301 (23.93)
1
< 0.001
1
< 0.001
50–59
27,489
6402 (23.29)
0.97 (0.90–1.04)
0.96 (0.89–1.03)
60–69
52,662
12,760 (24.23)
1.02 (0.92–1.12)
1.00 (0.90–1.10)
70–79
28,478
6624 (23.26)
0.96 (0.87–1.06)
0.92 (0.83–1.01)
80+
3171
487 (15.36)
0.58 (0.47–0.71)
0.53 (0.43–0.65)
BMI (kg/m2)
< 18.5
948
136 (14.35)
0.62 (0.53–0.73)
< 0.001
18.5–25
28,421
6050 (21.29)
1
≥ 25
84,659
20,779 (24.54)
1.2 (1.17–1.24)
Missing n (%)
3213 (2.74)
Cholesterol (mmol/L)
Normal (< 5)
22,469
2910 (12.95)
1
< 0.001
Moderate - High (5–8)
88,274
22,838 (25.87)
2.36 (2.25–2.49)
High (> 8)
3435
1750 (50.95)
7.1 (6.48–7.78)
Missing n (%)
3059 (2.61)
Smoking status
Never smoker
30,500
6863 (22.5)
1
< 0.001
Ex-smoker
48,627
11,971 (24.62)
1.12 (1.08–1.17)
Current smoker
38,065
8738 (22.96)
1.03 (0.97–1.09)
Missing n (%)
45 (0.04)
Alcohol status
Non-drinker
18,881
4598 (24.35)
1
< 0.001
Ex-drinker
4241
1064 (25.09)
1.04 (0.94–1.15)
Current drinker
light
42,625
10,455 (24.53)
1.01 (0.96–1.06)
moderate
6128
1475 (24.07)
0.98 (0.91–1.06)
heavy
9483
2039 (21.50)
0.85 (0.77–0.94)
amount unknown
4310
1009 (23.41)
0.95 (0.85–1.06)
Missing n (%)
31,569 (26.93)
Medical history
Diabetes
5495
1853 (33.72)
1.7 (1.57–1.85)
< 0.001
Chronic kidney disease
5833
1568 (26.88)
1.21 (1.11–1.31)
< 0.001
Chronic liver disease
2050
453 (22.10)
0.92 (0.83–1.02)
0.120
Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile
1 (least deprived)
13,483
3133 (23.24)
1
< 0.001
2
14,204
3143 (22.13)
0.94 (0.75–1.17)
3
14,756
3510 (23.79)
1.03 (0.82–1.29)
4
59,358
13,626 (22.96)
0.98 (0.84–1.16)
5 (most deprived)
15,436
4162 (26.96)
1.22 (0.95–1.56)
Calendar year
2005–07
23,643
6257 (26.46)
1
< 0.001
2008–10
50,030
11,461 (22.91)
0.83 (0.80–0.86)
2011–13
43,564
9856 (22.62)
0.81 (0.78–0.84)
aAdjusted for a priori confounders (age and gender). No other covariates changed the association between cancer survivorship and statin initiation by more than 10%
Persistence on statin therapy for primary prevention of CVD
Three hundred eighty thousand eight hundred fifty-five individuals were newly prescribed a statin for primary prevention (Fig. 1). Twelve thousand one hundred forty-two were cancer survivors at the time of statin initiation, 366,280 were controls and 2433 were excluded from the analysis as statins were initiated within 1 year of cancer diagnosis. Characteristics of the two groups are described in Table 1 (right hand columns); differences between the groups were similar to those observed in the high cardiovascular risk cohort. In the statin survivor and control group, 6141 (50.6%) and 190,044 (51.9%) individuals discontinued statin therapy over a median follow-up time of 1.56 and 1.65 years respectively. Following exclusion of subjects with missing a-priori confounder values, 366,771 subjects (96.9%) were included in the Cox regression models. The overall discontinuation rates were 20.7 and 19.8 per 100 person years for the cancer survivor and general population groups. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for association between cancer survivorship and statin discontinuation was 1.02 (95%CI: 0.96–1.09, p = 0.50; Table 3). Associations between covariates and statin discontinuation are also shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Associations between cancer survivorship covariates, and time to statin cessation among statin initiators
Statin initiators
Number of eventsa
Person-Years of Follow-Up (hundreds)
Crude Rate (per 100 Person-Years)
Unadjusted HRb
p-value
Adjusted HRc
p-value
n
%
Cancer status (binary)
Non-cancer
354,961
96.8
183,844
92.5
19.8
1
0.502
1
0.02
Cancer survivor
11,810
3.2
5962
2.8
20.7
1.02 (0.96–1.09)
1.07 (1.01–1.12)
Sex
Males
193,646
52.8
98,246
50.6
19.4
1
< 0.001
1
< 0.001
Females
173,125
47.2
91,560
44.7
20.5
1.05 (1.04–1.06)
1.05 (1.04–1.06)
Age (yrs)
40–49
44,088
12.0
26,453
9.8
27.1
1
< 0.001
1
< 0.001
50–59
95,539
26.1
51,099
24.5
20.8
0.81 (0.80–0.82)
0.80 (0.79–0.82)
60–69
126,570
34.5
60,763
34.9
17.4
0.69 (0.68–0.70)
0.66 (0.65–0.67)
70–79
75,425
20.6
37,647
20.5
18.4
0.73 (0.71–0.75)
0.68 (0.67–0.70)
80+
25,149
6.9
13,844
5.7
24.2
0.89 (0.85–0.93)
1.14 (1.05–1.24)
BMI (kg/m2)
< 18.5
3035
0.8
1773
0.6
28.9
1.25 (1.20–1.30)
< 0.001
1.18 (1.14–1.23)
< 0.001
18.5–25
90,123
24.6
48,251
22.6
21.3
1
1
≥ 25
273,613
74.6
139,782
72.1
19.4
0.92 (0.91–0.93)
0.94 (0.93–0.95)
Cholesterol (mmol/L)
Normal (< 5)
59,402
16.2
29,003
15.8
18.4
1
< 0.001
Mod-High (5–8)
279,538
76.2
146,489
72.4
20.2
1.10 (1.09–1.11)
High (> 8)
24,778
6.8
12,533
6.8
18.5
1.01 (0.99–1.03)
Missing
3053
0.8
Smoking status
Never smoker
117,658
32.1
61,055
31.1
19.6
1
< 0.001
1
< 0.001
Ex-smoker
169,393
46.2
84,172
45.3
18.6
0.94 (0.93–0.96)
0.98 (0.96–0.99)
Current smoker
79,720
21.7
44,579
19.0
23.5
1.16 (1.14–1.17)
1.13 (1.12–1.15)
Alcohol status
Non-drinker
76,637
20.9
40,349
20.0
20.2
1
< 0.001
Ex-drinker
13,239
3.6
6783
3.6
18.9
0.95 (0.92–0.97)
Current drinker
light
143,351
39.1
72,291
39.2
18.4
0.93 (0.90–0.95)
moderate
16,097
4.4
8198
4.3
18.9
0.95 (0.91–0.99)
heavy
19,720
5.4
10,777
4.7
22.8
1.09 (1.07–1.12)
amount unknown
10,869
3.0
5772
2.8
20.3
1.01 (0.96–1.05)
Missing
86,858
23.7
Medical history
Diabetes
70,990
19.4
34,520
19.9
17.3
0.87 (0.85–0.88)
< 0.001
0.83 (0.82–0.84)
< 0.001
Chronic kidney disease
25,278
6.9
12,243
5.7
21.4
1.01 (0.98–1.05)
< 0.001
Chronic liver disease
6440
1.8
3395
1.4
23.5
1.12 (1.08–1.16)
< 0.001
IMD quintile
1 (least deprived)
40,769
11.1
21,052
11.7
18.0
1
< 0.001
2
43,256
11.8
22,097
11.9
18.6
1.01 (0.97–1.06)
3
48,504
13.2
24,908
13.1
19.1
1.03 (0.98–1.09)
4
187,806
51.2
98,030
46.1
21.3
1.11 (1.06–1.17)
5 (most deprived)
46,436
12.7
23,719
12.6
18.8
1.03 (0.97–1.09)
Calendar year
2005–07
155,758
42.5
86,412
56.6
15.3
1
< 0.001
2008–10
124,788
34.0
67,538
30.1
22.5
1.27 (1.26–1.29)
2011–13
86,225
23.5
35,856
8.7
41.3
1.52 (1.50–1.55)
aEvents = first cessation of statin therapy defined as a no further prescriptions 90 days after the expected end date of the last prescription
bCox model with time since study entry (i.e. statin initiation) as the timescale
cAdjusted for a priori confounders [age (time-updated), gender, body mass index, smoking status and diabetes (time-updated)]. No other covariates changed the association between cancer survivorship and statin cessation by more than 10%.
All regression models are restricted to patients with complete data for a-priori confounders
Only the a priori confounders (age, sex, BMI, smoking, diabetes status) were included in the final model as none of the other covariates changed the HR for cancer survivorship by more than 10%. The maximum change was 3.6% with the inclusion of calendar year (HR = 1.02, 0.98–1.06). The final adjusted Cox regression model provided evidence that the risk of statin discontinuation was higher in cancer survivors than controls (HR 1.07 95% CI: 1.01–1.12; p = 0.02). The same model built with age as the underlying timescale and adjusted for time since statin initiation gave similar results (HR = 1.07, 1.01–1.13, p = 0.02). There was no evidence of interaction between cancer survivorship and calendar period (p-interaction = 0.44) or of differences in the association according to time since cancer diagnosis (p = 0.70). However, the association between cancer survivorship status and statin discontinuation appeared to change with time since statin initiation (i.e. evidence of non-proportional hazards, p < 0.001): there was no evidence of an effect of cancer survivorship on statin discontinuation in the first 6 months (HR = 1.00 (0.96–1.04)) or at 6 months to 1 year of therapy (HR = 1.01 (0.94–1.08)); from the second year of therapy onwards, there was good evidence that the risk of statin discontinuation rate was higher among cancer survivors (HR = 1.09 95% CI = 1.02–1.17; p = 0.008 for the 2nd year of therapy, and HR = 1.22 95% CI =1.16–1.28; p < 0.001 for > 2 years after initiation, Fig. 3).
×
Discussion
There was a low uptake of statins among cancer survivors with a high recorded cardiovascular risk, with only 23% starting a statin within 31 days of their high risk score record; however, there was no evidence of any difference in uptake between cancer survivors and non-cancer controls, after adjusting for age and sex, either overall or within specific calendar periods. Cancer survivors did appear to be more likely to discontinue statins than controls, in particular after the first year since statin initiation, with the risk of discontinuation 9% (95% CI 2–17%) higher during the second year since statin initiation (p = 0.013) and 22% (95% CI 16–28%) higher after 2 years or more on therapy (p < 0.001).
Anzeige
This is the first large observational database study to report on initiation of statin therapy in cancer survivors. Neither are there any directly comparable studies on statin cessation rates in cancer survivors versus non-cancer or general population controls. However, our finding of a greater tendency for cancer survivors to stop statin therapy is in line with a self controlled retrospective cohort study in 36,149 breast cancer patients that used a large health care claims database to compare adherence to oral medications in the 1 year prior to diagnosis with 0.5–1.5 years after diagnosis [25]. The study found adherence to hyperlipidemia medications (based on medication possession ratio) declined from 83.2 to 57.1% (P < 0.001). Adherence to long term medications including statins tends to wane with time [26, 27], which might explain the findings from Yang et al.’s after vs before comparison. Statin cessation rates for controls in this study were higher than an earlier study in CPRD (20.1 vs. 13 per 100 person years, respectively), possibly explained by the earlier study excluding people with < 2 statin prescriptions and those with < 1 year of follow-up after their first statin script [28]. One other retrospective cohort study compared statin discontinuation by indication (primary versus secondary prevention) in 539 poor prognosis cancer patients [29]. Over 60% of patients continued filling statin scripts during the 2 years after diagnosis and use was similar regardless of indication. The study can only be generalised to poor prognosis patients and those who start statin therapy before a cancer diagnosis, was underpowered to compare number of refills after diagnosis, and lacked a control group.
Our cohort study was large in size, with sufficient power to produce precise estimates and detect small associations. CPRD is broadly representative of the UK population in terms of age, sex and ethnicity [20]. Cancer diagnoses in CPRD have been previously validated by comparing with national cancer registration and hospitalization and death certificate data: > 90% of cancers in CPRD were confirmed in other data sources, and > 90% of nationally registered cancers were captured in CPRD [30, 31]. Statin prescribing is likely to be extremely well captured in CPRD because the vast majority of statin prescribing takes place in primary care, and GP prescription data are captured automatically at the point of issue.
Our study also has some limitations. There were some missing data in BMI and smoking, leading to omission of patients from the statin cessation regression analysis (in which only complete cases were included); this could lead to selection bias if the association between the exposure, outcome and covariates was different in patients with and without missing data. However, the amount of missing data for BMI and smoking was low (≤ 3.1%) and this is unlikely to have significantly impacted our results.
Despite the excellent prescribing data in CPRD, statin initiation might have been underestimated because over the counter therapy (OTC) is not captured in CPRD. However based on OTC sales and consumer interviews, this is not expected to be large issue [32]. Equally, in the statin initiation analysis, it was impossible to decipher from the data available whether a statin was offered and refused by the patient versus not offered. Misclassification of statin cessation may also have occurred for individuals who did not fill the statin prescription and individuals who received the drug but not take it. This may lead to an underestimation of statin cessation in cancer survivors and controls. To our knowledge, there is no evidence that this would differ between groups, so this non-differential misclassification may have led to an underestimation of the difference in cessation between the groups. While the analyses of statin initiation and cessation attempted to control for confounding, some potential confounding factors were not consistently available for individual patients, including ethnicity, and family history of CVD, so there is some potential for residual confounding. Ethnic minorities tend to have lower cancer rates [33] and are more likely to discontinue statins [34] which could also produce negative confounding, not controlled for in this study.
Anzeige
During cancer treatment and survivorship, patients are likely to visit their GP more regularly and measurement of individual cardiovascular risk factors is increased. This represents an opportunity to re-inforce the importance of preventative measures in a patient group that is thought to be at increased risk of CVD. Our findings suggest that this opportunity has been missed over the study period (2005–2013). Initiatives such as cancer treatment summaries and survivorship care plans aim to increase GP and patient awareness of potential adverse events associated with cancer treatment [35, 36]. Better implementation of these initiatives may improve uptake of measures designed to prevent CVD.
Our study highlights opportunities for further research. We considered cancer survivors in a single group, but future research might look at whether our results are dependent upon type of cancer history. Our descriptive analyses demonstrated suboptimal levels of cardiovascular risk score recording in both cancer survivors and never cancer controls. Future studies are warranted estimating the number of cancer survivors who are not prescribed statins although they are at high risk of CVD, whether or not they have a risk score recorded. Qualitative studies might be carried out to further investigate the reasons for similarly low levels of statin initiation and slightly higher statin cessation rates among cancer survivors after 1 year compared to the general population. Other aspects of cardiovascular risk prevention should also be assessed, including initiation of antihypertensive therapies in at risk patients.
Conclusions
We observed low uptake of statins in both cancer survivors and controls with no history of cancer, with no evidence of difference between the two groups. Cessation of statin use is substantial and may be somewhat higher after 1 year of treatment in cancer survivors than in the general population. Further research might explore the reasons for this and investigate a wider range of preventative measures. There may be an opportunity to mitigate the suspected higher cardiovascular risk in the growing population of cancer survivors by improving uptake of lipid-lowering treatment and persistence on therapy.
Funding
This study was supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship awarded to KB, jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and Royal Society (grant number 107731/Z/15/Z).
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available from CPRD but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The protocol for this study was approved by the MHRA Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (ISAC) (protocol number 16_163; protocol included as Additional file 6: Protocol), and the study was approved by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine MSc Ethics Committee (approval number 10700). Participant consent is not required for ISAC approved CPRD studies using purely observational data.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.