Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology 1/2017

17.11.2016 | REVIEW

Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975–2014: a systematic review

verfasst von: Andreas Stang, Markus Deckert, Charles Poole, Kenneth J. Rothman

Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Since its introduction in the twentieth century, null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), a hybrid of significance testing (ST) advocated by Fisher and null hypothesis testing (NHT) developed by Neyman and Pearson, has become widely adopted but has also been a source of debate. The principal alternative to such testing is estimation with point estimates and confidence intervals (CI). Our aim was to estimate time trends in NHST, ST, NHT and CI reporting in abstracts of major medical and epidemiological journals. We reviewed 89,533 abstracts in five major medical journals and seven major epidemiological journals, 1975–2014, and estimated time trends in the proportions of abstracts containing statistical inference. In those abstracts, we estimated time trends in the proportions relying on NHST and its major variants, ST and NHT, and in the proportions reporting CIs without explicit use of NHST (CI-only approach). The CI-only approach rose monotonically during the study period in the abstracts of all journals. In Epidemiology abstracts, as a result of the journal’s editorial policy, the CI-only approach has always been the most common approach. In the other 11 journals, the NHST approach started out more common, but by 2014, this disparity had narrowed, disappeared or reversed in 9 of them. The exceptions were JAMA, New England Journal of Medicine, and Lancet abstracts, where the predominance of the NHST approach prevailed over time. In 2014, the CI-only approach is as popular as the NHST approach in the abstracts of 4 of the epidemiology journals: the American Journal of Epidemiology (48%), the Annals of Epidemiology (55%), Epidemiology (79%) and the International Journal of Epidemiology (52%). The reporting of CIs without explicitly interpreting them as statistical tests is becoming more common in abstracts, particularly in epidemiology journals. Although NHST is becoming less popular in abstracts of most epidemiology journals studied and some widely read medical journals, it is still very common in the abstracts of other widely read medical journals, especially in the hybrid form of ST and NHT in which p values are reported numerically along with declarations of the presence or absence of statistical significance.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gigerenzer G, Swijtink Z, Porter T, Daston L, Beatty J, Krüger L. The empire of chance. How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.CrossRef Gigerenzer G, Swijtink Z, Porter T, Daston L, Beatty J, Krüger L. The empire of chance. How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Thompson WL. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. J Wildl Manag. 2000;64(4):912–23.CrossRef Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Thompson WL. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. J Wildl Manag. 2000;64(4):912–23.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296(6619):401–5.CrossRef International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296(6619):401–5.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6522):746–50.CrossRef Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6522):746–50.CrossRef
7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(4):337–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(4):337–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016;70(2):129–33.CrossRef Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016;70(2):129–33.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter SD. Methods of reporting statistical results from medical research studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141(10):896–906.CrossRefPubMed Walter SD. Methods of reporting statistical results from medical research studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141(10):896–906.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gastwirth JL. Statistical considerations support the supreme court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano. Jurimetrics. 2012;52:155–75. Gastwirth JL. Statistical considerations support the supreme court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano. Jurimetrics. 2012;52:155–75.
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous. Psychology journal bans P values. Nature 2015; 519:9. Anonymous. Psychology journal bans P values. Nature 2015; 519:9.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Savitz DA, Tolo KA, Poole C. Statistical significance testing in the American Journal of Epidemiology, 1970–1990. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139(10):1047–52.CrossRefPubMed Savitz DA, Tolo KA, Poole C. Statistical significance testing in the American Journal of Epidemiology, 1970–1990. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139(10):1047–52.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fidler F, Thomason N, Cumming G, Finch S, Leeman J. Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can’t make them think: statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychol Sci. 2004;15(2):119–26.CrossRefPubMed Fidler F, Thomason N, Cumming G, Finch S, Leeman J. Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can’t make them think: statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychol Sci. 2004;15(2):119–26.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat MacArthur RD, Jackson GG. An evaluation of the use of statistical methodology in the. J Infect Dis. 1984;149(3):349–54.CrossRefPubMed MacArthur RD, Jackson GG. An evaluation of the use of statistical methodology in the. J Infect Dis. 1984;149(3):349–54.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Vacha-Haase T, Nilsson JE, Reetz DR, Lance TS, Thompson B. Reporting practices and APA editorial policies regarding statistical significance and effect size. Theory Psychol. 2000;10(3):413–25.CrossRef Vacha-Haase T, Nilsson JE, Reetz DR, Lance TS, Thompson B. Reporting practices and APA editorial policies regarding statistical significance and effect size. Theory Psychol. 2000;10(3):413–25.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chavalarias D, Wallach JD, Li AH, Ioannidis JP. Evolution of reporting P values in the biomedical literature, 1990–2015. JAMA. 2016;315(11):1141–8.CrossRefPubMed Chavalarias D, Wallach JD, Li AH, Ioannidis JP. Evolution of reporting P values in the biomedical literature, 1990–2015. JAMA. 2016;315(11):1141–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritz A, Scherndl T, Kühlberger A. A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals: are effect sizes really enough? Theory Psychol. 2012;23(1):98–112.CrossRef Fritz A, Scherndl T, Kühlberger A. A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals: are effect sizes really enough? Theory Psychol. 2012;23(1):98–112.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson B. Journal editorial policies regarding statistical significance tests: heat is to fire as p is to importance. Educ Psychol Rev. 1999;11(2):157–69.CrossRef Thompson B. Journal editorial policies regarding statistical significance tests: heat is to fire as p is to importance. Educ Psychol Rev. 1999;11(2):157–69.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleveland WS, Devlin S, Grosse E. Regression by local fitting. J Econom. 1988;37:87–114.CrossRef Cleveland WS, Devlin S, Grosse E. Regression by local fitting. J Econom. 1988;37:87–114.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleveland WS, Grosse E. Computational methods for local regression. Stat Comput. 1991;1:47–62.CrossRef Cleveland WS, Grosse E. Computational methods for local regression. Stat Comput. 1991;1:47–62.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):857–72.CrossRefPubMed Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):857–72.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Milne PH. Presentation graphics for engineering, science, and business. London: E & FN Spon; 2005. Milne PH. Presentation graphics for engineering, science, and business. London: E & FN Spon; 2005.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton NJ, Switzer SS. Statistical methods in the journal. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(18):1977–9.CrossRefPubMed Horton NJ, Switzer SS. Statistical methods in the journal. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(18):1977–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Felson DT, Cupples LA, Meenan RF. Misuse of statistical methods in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1982 versus 1967-68. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(9):1018–22.CrossRefPubMed Felson DT, Cupples LA, Meenan RF. Misuse of statistical methods in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1982 versus 1967-68. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(9):1018–22.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold LD, Braganza M, Salih R, Colditz GA. Statistical trends in the Journal of the American Medical Association and implications for training across the continuum of medical education. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arnold LD, Braganza M, Salih R, Colditz GA. Statistical trends in the Journal of the American Medical Association and implications for training across the continuum of medical education. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin Z, Yu D, Zhang L, et al. A retrospective survey of research design and statistical analyses in selected Chinese medical journals in 1998 and 2008. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(5):e10822.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jin Z, Yu D, Zhang L, et al. A retrospective survey of research design and statistical analyses in selected Chinese medical journals in 1998 and 2008. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(5):e10822.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 510 (updated March 2011): Cochrane Collaboration (www.handbook.cochrane.com); 2011. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 510 (updated March 2011): Cochrane Collaboration (www.​handbook.​cochrane.​com); 2011.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Koricheva J, Gurevitch J. Place of meta-analysis among other methods of research synthesis. In: Koricheva J, Gurevitch J, Mengerson K, editors. Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013. p. 1–13. Koricheva J, Gurevitch J. Place of meta-analysis among other methods of research synthesis. In: Koricheva J, Gurevitch J, Mengerson K, editors. Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013. p. 1–13.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Freemantle N, Geddes J. Understanding and interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Part 2: meta-analyses. Evid Based. Mental Health. 1998;1:102–4. Freemantle N, Geddes J. Understanding and interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Part 2: meta-analyses. Evid Based. Mental Health. 1998;1:102–4.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 2009. P. 251–5, 297–302, 325–31. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 2009. P. 251–5, 297–302, 325–31.
Metadaten
Titel
Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975–2014: a systematic review
verfasst von
Andreas Stang
Markus Deckert
Charles Poole
Kenneth J. Rothman
Publikationsdatum
17.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0211-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

European Journal of Epidemiology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe