Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2016

13.06.2016 | Clinical Study

Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions: 21 years experiences of a single center

verfasst von: Johanna Quick-Weller, Stephanie Lescher, Markus Bruder, Nazife Dinc, Bedjan Behmanesh, Volker Seifert, Lutz Weise, Gerhard Marquardt

Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Stereotactic biopsies are procedures performed to obtain tumor tissue for diagnostic examinations. Cerebral lesions of unknown entities can safely be accessed and tissue can be examined, resulting in correct diagnosis and according treatment. Stereotactic procedures of lesions in highly eloquent regions such as the brainstem have been performed for more than two decades in our department. In this retrospective study we focus on results, approaches, modalities of anesthesia, and complications. We performed a retrospective analysis of our prospective database, including 26 patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy of the brainstem between April 1994 and June 2015. All of the patients underwent preoperative MRI. Riechert–Mundinger-frame was used before 2000, thereafter the Leksell stereotactic frame was used. After 2000 entry and target points were calculated by using BrainLab stereotactic system. We evaluated histopathological results as well as further treatment; additionally we compared complications of local versus general anesthesia and complications of a frontal versus a trans-cerebellar approach. Median age of all patients was 33 years, and median number of tissue samples taken was 12. In all patients a final histopathological diagnosis could be established. 5 patients underwent the procedure under local anesthesia, 21 patients in general anesthesia. In 19 patients a frontal approach was performed, while in 7 patients a trans-cerebellar approach was used. Complications occurred in five patients. Thereby no significant difference was found with regard to approach (frontal versus trans-cerebellar) or anesthesia (local versus general). Stereotactic biopsies even of lesions in the brainstem are a save way to obtain tumor tissue for final diagnosis, resulting in adequate treatment. Approach can be trans-cerebellar or frontal and procedure can be performed either under local or general anesthesia without significant differences concerning complication rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdelaziz O, Eshra M, Belal A, Elshafei M (2016) Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy compared with stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 77(4):283–290 (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed Abdelaziz O, Eshra M, Belal A, Elshafei M (2016) Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy compared with stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 77(4):283–290 (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Albright AL, Packer RJ, Zimmerman R et al (1993) Magnetic resonance scans should replace biopsies for the diagnosis of diffuse brain stem gliomas: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. Neurosurgery 33:1026–1029CrossRefPubMed Albright AL, Packer RJ, Zimmerman R et al (1993) Magnetic resonance scans should replace biopsies for the diagnosis of diffuse brain stem gliomas: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. Neurosurgery 33:1026–1029CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Blasel S, Jurcoane A, Franz K, Morawe G, Pellikan S, Hattingen E (2010) Elevated peritumoural rCBV values as a mean to differentiate metastases from high-grade gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(11):1893–1899CrossRef Blasel S, Jurcoane A, Franz K, Morawe G, Pellikan S, Hattingen E (2010) Elevated peritumoural rCBV values as a mean to differentiate metastases from high-grade gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(11):1893–1899CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cartmill M, Punt J (1999) Diffuse brain stem glioma. A review of stereotactic biopsies. Childs Nerv Syst 15:235–237 (discussion 238)CrossRefPubMed Cartmill M, Punt J (1999) Diffuse brain stem glioma. A review of stereotactic biopsies. Childs Nerv Syst 15:235–237 (discussion 238)CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dellaretti M, Reyns N, Touzet G, Dubois F, Gusmao S, Pereira JL, Blond S (2012) Stereotactic biopsy for brainstem tumors: comparison of transcerebellar with transfrontal approach. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 90:79–83CrossRefPubMed Dellaretti M, Reyns N, Touzet G, Dubois F, Gusmao S, Pereira JL, Blond S (2012) Stereotactic biopsy for brainstem tumors: comparison of transcerebellar with transfrontal approach. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 90:79–83CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank F, Fabrizi AP, Frank-Ricci R, Gaist G, Sedan R, Peragut JC (1988) Stereotactic biopsy and treatment of brain stem lesions: combined study of 33 cases (Bologna-Marseille). Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 42:177–181 Frank F, Fabrizi AP, Frank-Ricci R, Gaist G, Sedan R, Peragut JC (1988) Stereotactic biopsy and treatment of brain stem lesions: combined study of 33 cases (Bologna-Marseille). Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 42:177–181
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Giunta F, Grasso G, Marini G, Zorzi F (1989) Brain stem expanding lesions: stereotactic diagnosis and therapeutical approach. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 46:86–89CrossRef Giunta F, Grasso G, Marini G, Zorzi F (1989) Brain stem expanding lesions: stereotactic diagnosis and therapeutical approach. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 46:86–89CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goncalves-Ferreira AJ, Herculano-Carvalho M, Pimentel J (2003) Stereotactic biopsies of focal brainstem lesions. Surg Neurol 60:311–320 (discussion 320)CrossRefPubMed Goncalves-Ferreira AJ, Herculano-Carvalho M, Pimentel J (2003) Stereotactic biopsies of focal brainstem lesions. Surg Neurol 60:311–320 (discussion 320)CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hattingen E, Jurcoane A, Nelles M, Müller A, Nöth U, Mädler B, Mürtz P, Deichmann R, Schild HH (2015) Quantitative MR imaging of brain tissue and brain pathologies. Clin Neuroradiol 25 (Suppl 2):219–24CrossRefPubMed Hattingen E, Jurcoane A, Nelles M, Müller A, Nöth U, Mädler B, Mürtz P, Deichmann R, Schild HH (2015) Quantitative MR imaging of brain tissue and brain pathologies. Clin Neuroradiol 25 (Suppl 2):219–24CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kickingereder P, Willeit P, Simon T, Ruge MI (2013) Diagnostic value and safety of stereotactic biopsy for brainstem tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1480 cases. Neurosurgery 72:873–881 (discussion 882; quiz 882)CrossRefPubMed Kickingereder P, Willeit P, Simon T, Ruge MI (2013) Diagnostic value and safety of stereotactic biopsy for brainstem tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1480 cases. Neurosurgery 72:873–881 (discussion 882; quiz 882)CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Landolfi JC, Thaler HT, DeAngelis LM (1998) Adult brainstem gliomas. Neurology 51(4):1136–1139CrossRefPubMed Landolfi JC, Thaler HT, DeAngelis LM (1998) Adult brainstem gliomas. Neurology 51(4):1136–1139CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lescher S, Whora K, Schwabe D, Kieslich M, Porto L (2016) Analysis of T2 signal intensity helps in the differentiation between high and low-grade brain tumours in paediatric patients. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 20(1):108–113CrossRefPubMed Lescher S, Whora K, Schwabe D, Kieslich M, Porto L (2016) Analysis of T2 signal intensity helps in the differentiation between high and low-grade brain tumours in paediatric patients. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 20(1):108–113CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunsford LD, Niranjan A, Khan AA, Kondziolka D (2008) Establishing a benchmark for complications using frame-based stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:278–287CrossRefPubMed Lunsford LD, Niranjan A, Khan AA, Kondziolka D (2008) Establishing a benchmark for complications using frame-based stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:278–287CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu Y, Yeung C, Radmanesh A, Wiemann R, Black PM, Golby AJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques. World Neurosurg 83(3):261–268. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.043 (Epub 2014 Aug 1)CrossRefPubMed Lu Y, Yeung C, Radmanesh A, Wiemann R, Black PM, Golby AJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques. World Neurosurg 83(3):261–268. doi:10.​1016/​j.​wneu.​2014.​07.​043 (Epub 2014 Aug 1)CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Massager N (2002) Usefulness of PET scan guidance in stereotaxic radioneurosurgery using a gamma knife. Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg 157:355–362 (discussion 363–359)PubMed Massager N (2002) Usefulness of PET scan guidance in stereotaxic radioneurosurgery using a gamma knife. Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg 157:355–362 (discussion 363–359)PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathisen JR, Giunta F, Marini G, Backlund EO (1987) Transcerebellar biopsy in the posterior fossa: 12 years experience. Surg Neurol 28:100–104CrossRefPubMed Mathisen JR, Giunta F, Marini G, Backlund EO (1987) Transcerebellar biopsy in the posterior fossa: 12 years experience. Surg Neurol 28:100–104CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nöth U, Hattingen E, Bähr O, Tichy J, Deichmann R (2015) Improved visibility of brain tumors in synthetic MP-RAGE anatomies with pure T1 weighting. NMR Biomed 28(7):818–830CrossRefPubMed Nöth U, Hattingen E, Bähr O, Tichy J, Deichmann R (2015) Improved visibility of brain tumors in synthetic MP-RAGE anatomies with pure T1 weighting. NMR Biomed 28(7):818–830CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pell MF, Thomas DG, Krateminos GP (1993) Stereotactic management of intrinsic brain stem lesions. Ann Acad Med Singapore 22:447–451PubMed Pell MF, Thomas DG, Krateminos GP (1993) Stereotactic management of intrinsic brain stem lesions. Ann Acad Med Singapore 22:447–451PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Preuss M, Werner P, Barthel H, Nestler U, Christiansen H, Hirsch FW, Fritzsch D, Hoffmann KT, Bernhard MK, Sabri O (2014) Integrated PET/MRI for planning navigated biopsies in pediatric brain tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 30(8):1399–403. doi:10.1007/s00381-014-2412-9 (Epub 2014 Apr 8)CrossRefPubMed Preuss M, Werner P, Barthel H, Nestler U, Christiansen H, Hirsch FW, Fritzsch D, Hoffmann KT, Bernhard MK, Sabri O (2014) Integrated PET/MRI for planning navigated biopsies in pediatric brain tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 30(8):1399–403. doi:10.​1007/​s00381-014-2412-9 (Epub 2014 Apr 8)CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Quick-Weller J, Duetzmann S, Behmanesh B, Seifert V, Weise LM, Marquardt G. (2015) Oblique positioning of the stereotactic frame for biopsies of cerebellar and brainstem lesions. World Neurosurg 86:466-469PubMed Quick-Weller J, Duetzmann S, Behmanesh B, Seifert V, Weise LM, Marquardt G. (2015) Oblique positioning of the stereotactic frame for biopsies of cerebellar and brainstem lesions. World Neurosurg 86:466-469PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Raabe A, Krishnan R, Zimmermann M, Seifert V (2003) Frame-less and frame-based stereotaxy? How to choose the appropriate procedure. Zentralbl Neurochir 64(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed Raabe A, Krishnan R, Zimmermann M, Seifert V (2003) Frame-less and frame-based stereotaxy? How to choose the appropriate procedure. Zentralbl Neurochir 64(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajshekhar V, Moorthy RK (2010) Status of stereotactic biopsy in children with brain stem masses: insights from a series of 106 patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 88(6):360–366CrossRefPubMed Rajshekhar V, Moorthy RK (2010) Status of stereotactic biopsy in children with brain stem masses: insights from a series of 106 patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 88(6):360–366CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Samadani U, Stein S, Moonis G, Sonnad SS, Bonura P, Judy KD (2006) Stereotactic biopsy of brain stem masses: Decision analysis and literature review. Surg Neurol 66:484–490 (discussion 491)CrossRefPubMed Samadani U, Stein S, Moonis G, Sonnad SS, Bonura P, Judy KD (2006) Stereotactic biopsy of brain stem masses: Decision analysis and literature review. Surg Neurol 66:484–490 (discussion 491)CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmalfuss IM, Camp M (2008) Skull base: pseudolesion or true lesion? Eur Radiol 18(6):1232–1243CrossRefPubMed Schmalfuss IM, Camp M (2008) Skull base: pseudolesion or true lesion? Eur Radiol 18(6):1232–1243CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Spiegelmann R, Friedman WA (1991) Rapid determination of thalamic CT-stereotactic coordinates: a method. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 110:77–81CrossRef Spiegelmann R, Friedman WA (1991) Rapid determination of thalamic CT-stereotactic coordinates: a method. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 110:77–81CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka N, Abe T, Kojima K, Nishimura H, Hayabuchi N (2000) Applicability and advantages of flow artifact-insensitive fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR sequences for imaging the posterior fossa. Am J Neuroradiol 21(6):1095–1098PubMed Tanaka N, Abe T, Kojima K, Nishimura H, Hayabuchi N (2000) Applicability and advantages of flow artifact-insensitive fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR sequences for imaging the posterior fossa. Am J Neuroradiol 21(6):1095–1098PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Weise LM, Bruder M, Eibach S, Seifert V, Byhahn C, Marquardt G, Setzer M (2013) Efficacy and safety of local versus general anesthesia in stereotactic biopsies: a matched-pairs cohort study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 25:148–153CrossRefPubMed Weise LM, Bruder M, Eibach S, Seifert V, Byhahn C, Marquardt G, Setzer M (2013) Efficacy and safety of local versus general anesthesia in stereotactic biopsies: a matched-pairs cohort study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 25:148–153CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Weise LM, Harter PN, Eibach S, Braczynski AK, Dunst M, Rieger J, Bahr O, Hattingen E, Steinbach JP, Plate KH, Seifert V, Mittelbronn M (2014) Confounding factors in diagnostics of MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastomas in stereotactic biopsies. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 92:129–139PubMed Weise LM, Harter PN, Eibach S, Braczynski AK, Dunst M, Rieger J, Bahr O, Hattingen E, Steinbach JP, Plate KH, Seifert V, Mittelbronn M (2014) Confounding factors in diagnostics of MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastomas in stereotactic biopsies. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 92:129–139PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner M, Nafe R, Jurcoane A, Pilatus U, Franz K, Rieger J, Steinbach JP, Hattingen E (2011) Heterogeneity in malignant gliomas: a magnetic resonance analysis of spatial distribution of metabolite changes and regional blood volume. J Neurooncol 103(3):663–672CrossRefPubMed Wagner M, Nafe R, Jurcoane A, Pilatus U, Franz K, Rieger J, Steinbach JP, Hattingen E (2011) Heterogeneity in malignant gliomas: a magnetic resonance analysis of spatial distribution of metabolite changes and regional blood volume. J Neurooncol 103(3):663–672CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions: 21 years experiences of a single center
verfasst von
Johanna Quick-Weller
Stephanie Lescher
Markus Bruder
Nazife Dinc
Bedjan Behmanesh
Volker Seifert
Lutz Weise
Gerhard Marquardt
Publikationsdatum
13.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2166-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.