Skip to main content
Erschienen in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 12/2018

16.08.2018 | Original Article

Stonehenge technique is associated with faster aortic clamp time in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy

verfasst von: Masataka Yamazaki, Akihiro Yoshitake, Tatsuo Takahashi, Tsutomu Ito, Naritaka Kimura, Akinori Hirano, Yasunori Iida, Shuichiro Takanashi, Hideyuki Shimizu

Erschienen in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Trans-right axillary aortic valve replacement (TAX-AVR) remains uncommon. We developed a special method to pull the heart closer to the right chest wall to make the surgery as easy and safe as aortic valve replacement via median sternotomy. Because the retraction sutures lifting the ascending aorta and aortic root are arranged circularly around the wound, we named this technique “Stonehenge technique”.

Methods

We examined 47 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement through a small right infra-axillary thoracotomy as the initial surgical therapy. These patients were divided into two groups: the conventional TAX-AVR group that underwent AVR via the conventional small right axillary incision approach (n = 20) and the TAX-AVR with SH group that underwent AVR with the Stonehenge technique (n = 27).

Results

The aortic cross-clamp and the extracorporeal circulation time were significantly shorter in the TAX-AVR with SH group than in the conventional TAX-AVR group (conventional TAX-AVR group: 125.5 ± 47.9; TAX-AVR with SH group: 96.0 ± 14.0, p = 0.004, and conventional TAX-AVR group: 163.8 ± 55.9; TAX-AVR with SH group: 140.0 ± 16.8, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

The outcomes of this technique depend on the site of the retraction sutures in the opened pericardium, direction of pull, amount of force applied, and precautions taken. If performed correctly, the ascending aorta and the root can be pulled from the wound to within the surgeon’s fingers’ reach, thereby reducing aortic cross-clamp and extracorporeal circulation times in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahesh B, Navaratnarajah M, Mensah K, Ilsley C, Amrani M. Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement: is it safe and effective? Comparison with standard techniques. J Heart Valve Dis. 2011;20:650–6.PubMed Mahesh B, Navaratnarajah M, Mensah K, Ilsley C, Amrani M. Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement: is it safe and effective? Comparison with standard techniques. J Heart Valve Dis. 2011;20:650–6.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Bevilacqua S, Gilmanov D, Farneti P, Glauber M. Traversing the lealning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon’s experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:1242–6.CrossRef Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Bevilacqua S, Gilmanov D, Farneti P, Glauber M. Traversing the lealning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon’s experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:1242–6.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Miceli A, Murzi M, Gilmanov D, Fugà R, Ferrarini M, Solinas M, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using rightminithoracotomy is associated with better outcomes than ministernotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:133–7.CrossRef Miceli A, Murzi M, Gilmanov D, Fugà R, Ferrarini M, Solinas M, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using rightminithoracotomy is associated with better outcomes than ministernotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:133–7.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilmanov D, Solinas M, Farneti PA, Cerillo AG, Kallushi E, Santarelli F, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4:160–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Gilmanov D, Solinas M, Farneti PA, Cerillo AG, Kallushi E, Santarelli F, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4:160–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Totsugawa T, Suzuki K, Hiraoka A, Tamura K, Yoshitaka H, Sakaguchi T. Concomitant septal myectomy during minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right mini-thoracotomy for the treatment of aortic stenosis with systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65:657–60.CrossRef Totsugawa T, Suzuki K, Hiraoka A, Tamura K, Yoshitaka H, Sakaguchi T. Concomitant septal myectomy during minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right mini-thoracotomy for the treatment of aortic stenosis with systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65:657–60.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Magruder JT, Grimm JC, Kilic A, Crawford T, Conte JV, Cameron DE, et al. Mini-aortic valve replacements are not associated with an increased incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch: a propensity-scored analysis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:144–8.CrossRef Magruder JT, Grimm JC, Kilic A, Crawford T, Conte JV, Cameron DE, et al. Mini-aortic valve replacements are not associated with an increased incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch: a propensity-scored analysis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:144–8.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beckmann A, Funkat AK, Lewandowski J, Frie M, Ernst M, Hekmat K, et al. German Heart Surgery Report 2015: the Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:462–74.CrossRef Beckmann A, Funkat AK, Lewandowski J, Frie M, Ernst M, Hekmat K, et al. German Heart Surgery Report 2015: the Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:462–74.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishi H, Miyata H, Motomura N, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Sawa Y, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database. Surg Today. 2015;45:1144–52.CrossRef Nishi H, Miyata H, Motomura N, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Sawa Y, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database. Surg Today. 2015;45:1144–52.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito T. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right mini-thoracotomy: recommendations for good exposure, stable cardiopulmonary bypass, and secure myocardial protection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:371–8.CrossRef Ito T. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right mini-thoracotomy: recommendations for good exposure, stable cardiopulmonary bypass, and secure myocardial protection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:371–8.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakaguchi T. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:699–706.CrossRef Sakaguchi T. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:699–706.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito T, Maekawa A, Hoshino S, Hayashi Y. Right infraaxillary thoracotomy for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:715–7.CrossRef Ito T, Maekawa A, Hoshino S, Hayashi Y. Right infraaxillary thoracotomy for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:715–7.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamazaki M, Kin H, Kitamoto S, Yamanaka S, Nishida H, Nishigawa K, et al. Efficacy of the stonehenge technique for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infraaxillary thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23:45–8.CrossRef Yamazaki M, Kin H, Kitamoto S, Yamanaka S, Nishida H, Nishigawa K, et al. Efficacy of the stonehenge technique for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infraaxillary thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23:45–8.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Saadat S, Schultheis M, Azzolini A, Romero J, Dombrovskiy V, Odroniec K, et al. Femoral cannulation: a safe vascular access option for cardiopulmonary bypass in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 2016;31:131–4.CrossRef Saadat S, Schultheis M, Azzolini A, Romero J, Dombrovskiy V, Odroniec K, et al. Femoral cannulation: a safe vascular access option for cardiopulmonary bypass in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 2016;31:131–4.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Young C, Laufer G, Kocher A, Solinas M, Alamanni F, Polvani G, et al. One-year outcomes after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:575–85.CrossRef Young C, Laufer G, Kocher A, Solinas M, Alamanni F, Polvani G, et al. One-year outcomes after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:575–85.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Accola KD, Chitwood WR Jr, Mumtaz MA, Barnhart GR. Step-by-step aortic valve replacement with a new rapid deployment valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:966–71.CrossRef Accola KD, Chitwood WR Jr, Mumtaz MA, Barnhart GR. Step-by-step aortic valve replacement with a new rapid deployment valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:966–71.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen A, Stevens LM, Bouchard D, Demers P, Perrault LP, Carrier M. Early outcomes with rapid-deployment vs stented biological valves: a propensity-match analysis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;30:16–23.CrossRef Nguyen A, Stevens LM, Bouchard D, Demers P, Perrault LP, Carrier M. Early outcomes with rapid-deployment vs stented biological valves: a propensity-match analysis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;30:16–23.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Glauber M, Moten SC, Quaini E, Solinas M, Folliguet TA, Meuris B, et al. International expert consensus on sutureless and rapid deployment valves in aortic valve replacement using minimally invasive approaches. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11:165–73.CrossRef Glauber M, Moten SC, Quaini E, Solinas M, Folliguet TA, Meuris B, et al. International expert consensus on sutureless and rapid deployment valves in aortic valve replacement using minimally invasive approaches. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11:165–73.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Stonehenge technique is associated with faster aortic clamp time in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy
verfasst von
Masataka Yamazaki
Akihiro Yoshitake
Tatsuo Takahashi
Tsutomu Ito
Naritaka Kimura
Akinori Hirano
Yasunori Iida
Shuichiro Takanashi
Hideyuki Shimizu
Publikationsdatum
16.08.2018
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-6705
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-6713
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0987-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2018

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 12/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.