nach oben

06.12.2024 | Original Article

Stress distribution in restored mandibular molars with external cervical resorption: a finite element analysis

verfasst von: Tuğrul Aslan, Emir Esim, Yakup Üstün

Erschienen in: Odontology

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study evaluates the stress distribution in mandibular molar teeth with external cervical resorption restored using various restorative and biomimetic materials through finite element analysis. A mandibular first molar was scanned to create a 3D model. ‘Class 2Bp’ external cervical resorption defects were simulated on the buccal aspect and restored with different materials. Composite resin or highly viscous glass ionomer cement restored the coronal portion, while mineral-trioxide-aggregate, Biodentine, BioAggregate, or glass-ionomer cement filled the radicular portion. Models representing unrestored external cervical resorption and intact teeth were also created. Access cavities were restored with composite resin in all models except the intact tooth model. This computational simulation study used finite element analysis (ANSYS) to assess stress distribution in mandibular molars with external cervical resorption. A 300 N oblique force, directed buccally at a 45° angle, was applied to simulate masticatory forces, and von Mises stresses were evaluated in the resorption regions to compare materials' performance in terms of stress concentration and tooth integrity. Similar stress distributions were observed when restoring the coronal portion with composite resin or highly-viscous glass ionomer cement. Stress decreased with mineral-trioxide-aggregate or glass-ionomer cement in the radicular portion compared to Biodentine and BioAggregate. Restored and intact tooth models experienced lower stresses than unrestored tooth. All tested models were considered safe, except the unrestored external cervical resorption model. Restored external cervical resorption models are generally safe; however, using mineral-trioxide-aggregate or glass-ionomer cement in the radicular portion may slightly reduce stress in external cervical resorption regions.

Heithersay GS. Invasive cervical resorption: an analysis of potential predisposing factors. Quintessence Int 1999;30(2):83–95. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10356560/.

Gulsahi A, Gulsahi K, Ungor M. Invasive cervical resorption: clinical and radiological diagnosis and treatment of 3 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(3):65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.10.005.CrossRef

Irinakis E, Aleksejuniene J, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. External cervical resorption: a retrospective case-control study. J Endod. 2020;46(10):1420–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.021.CrossRefPubMed

Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent. 1991;3(1):14–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00799.x.CrossRef

Gold SI, Hasselgren G. Peripheral inflammatory root resorption. A review of the literature with case reports. J Clin Periodontol. 1992;19(8):523–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1992.tb00679.x.CrossRefPubMed

Neuvald L, Consolaro A. Cementoenamel junction: microscopic analysis and external cervical resorption. J Endod. 2000;26(9):503–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200009000-00004.CrossRefPubMed

Mavridou AM, Bergmans L, Barendregt D, Lambrechts P. Descriptive analysis of factors associated with external cervical resorption. J Endod. 2017;43(10):1602–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.026.CrossRefPubMed

Patel S, Foschi F, Condon R, Pimentel T, Bhuva B. External cervical resorption: part 2—management. Int Endod J. 2018;51(11):1224–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12946.CrossRefPubMed

Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007;40(10):818–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01299.x.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Patel S, Foschi F, Mannocci F, Patel K. External cervical resorption: a three-dimensional classification. Int Endod J. 2018;51(2):206–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12824.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Soares CJ, de Rodrigues MP, Faria-e-Silva AL, Santos-Filho PCF, Veríssimo C, Kim H-C, et al. How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures? Braz Oral Res 2018;32(supple 1):76. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0076

12.

Dotto L, Onofre RS, Bacchi A, Pereira GKR. Effect of root canal irrigants on the mechanical properties of endodontically treated teeth: a scoping review. J Endod. 2020;46(5):596-604.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.017.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kishen A. Biomechanics of fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Topics. 2015;33(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/etp.12089.CrossRef

14.

Örs SA, Eren SK. Effects of different treatment modalities on biomechanical behavior of maxillary incisors with external invasive cervical resorption at different progression levels. Dent Traumatol. 2023;39(6):605–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12868.CrossRef

15.

Main C, Mirzayan N, Shabahang S, Torabinejad M. Repair of root perforations using mineral trioxide aggregate: a long-term study. J Endod. 2004;30(2):80–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200402000-00004.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Zhang H, Pappen FG, Haapasalo M. Dentin enhances the antibacterial effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and bioaggregate. J Endod. 2009;35(2):221–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.001.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Czarnecka B, Limanowska-Shaw H, Nicholson JW. Buffering and ion-release by a glass-ionomer cement under near-neutral and acidic conditions. Biomaterials. 2002;23(13):2783–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00014-5.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Ozkanoglu S, Akin EG. Evaluation of the effect of various beverages on the color stability and microhardness of restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pr. 2020;23(3):322–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_306_19.CrossRef

19.

Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, Hume WR. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dent Mater. 2001;17(1):34–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00053-1.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Aslan T, Esim E, Ustun Y, Ozkan HD. Evaluation of stress distributions in mandibular molar teeth with different iatrogenic root perforations repaired with Biodentine or mineral trioxide aggregate: a finite element analysis study. J Endod. 2020;47(4):631–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.11.018.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Trivedi S. Finite element analysis: a boon to dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2014;4(3):200–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2014.11.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Aslan T, Ustun Y, Esim E. Stress distributions in internal resorption cavities restored with different materials at different root levels: a finite element analysis study. Aust Endod J. 2019;45(1):64–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12275.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Rajawat A, Kaushik M. Stresses in teeth with external cervical resorption defects restored with different biomimetic cements: a finite element analysis. J Endod. 2023;49(8):995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.06.010.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Öksüzer MÇ, Çıkman AŞ. Evaluation of fracture strength after repair of cervical external resorption cavities with different materials. J Endod. 2024;50(1):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.10.007.CrossRef

25.

Craig RG, Peyton FA. Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J Dent Res. 1958;37(4):710–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345580370041801.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The elastic moduli of enamel and dentine. Clin Mater. 1993;14(1):35–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(93)90045-9.CrossRef

27.

Ruse ND. Propagation of erroneous data for the modulus of elasticity of periodontal ligament and gutta percha in FEM/FEA papers: a story of broken links. Dent Mater. 2008;24(12):1717–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.006.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Ichim I, Schmidlin PR, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Mechanical evaluation of cervical glass-ionomer restorations: 3D finite element study. J Dent. 2007;35(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.003.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Cook SD. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1980;14(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820140104.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Lin S-L, Lee S-Y, Lin Y-C, Huang Y-H, Yang J-C, Huang H-M. Evaluation of mechanical and histological properties of cryopreserved human premolars under short-term preservation: a preliminary study. J Dent Sci. 2014;9(3):244–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2013.04.010.CrossRef

31.

Miura J, Maeda Y. Biomechanical model of incisor avulsion: a preliminary report. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24(4):454–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00618.x.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Haecker C-J, Garboczi EJ, Bullard JW, Bohn RB, Sun Z, Shah SP, et al. Modeling the linear elastic properties of Portland cement paste. Cement Concrete Res. 2005;35(10):1948–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.05.001.CrossRef

33.

Eram A, Zuber M, Keni LG, Kalburgi S, Naik R, Bhandary S, et al. Finite element analysis of immature teeth filled with MTA, biodentine and bioaggregate. Comput Meth Prog Bio. 2020;190: 105356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105356.CrossRef

34.

Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Rienzo AD, Lanzotti A, Ventre M, Watts DC. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis. Dent Mater. 2019;35(10):1514–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.017.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Yap AU, Ong JE, Yahya NA. Effect of resin coating on highly viscous glass ionomer cements: a dynamic analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;113: 104120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104120.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Beer FP, Johnston JRER, DeWolf JT, Mazurek DF. Mechanics of materials. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2012. p. 838.

37.

Hibbler RC. Mechanics of materials. Singapore: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd.; 2011. p. 866.

38.

Larato DC. Influence of a composite resin restoration on the gingiva. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;28(4):402–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90241-7.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Dijken JWVV, Sjöström S, Wing K. The effect of different types of composite resin fillings on marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14(4):185–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1987.tb00965.x.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Kosaka T, Ono T, Kida M, Kikui M, Yamamoto M, Yasui S, et al. A multifactorial model of masticatory performance: the Suita study. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(5):340–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12371.CrossRefPubMed

41.

van der Bilt A, Engelen L, Pereira LJ, van der Glas HW, Abbink JH. Oral physiology and mastication. Physiol Behav. 2006;89(1):22–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.025.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Liu B, Lu C, Wu Y, Zhang X, Arola D, Zhang D. The effects of adhesive type and thickness on stress distribution in molars restored with all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont. 2010;20(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2010.00650.x.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Nakamura Y, Kanbara R, Ochiai KT, Tanaka Y. A finite element evaluation of mechanical function for 3 distal extension partial dental prosthesis designs with a 3-dimensional nonlinear method for modeling soft tissue. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):972–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.011.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitaşcıoğlu G. Effect of different treatment options on biomechanics of immature teeth: a finite element stress analysis study. J Endod. 2018;44(3):475–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.037.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Ricks-Williamson LJ, Fotos PG, Goel VK, Spivey JD, Rivera EM, Khera SC. A three-dimensional finite-element stress analysis of an endodontically prepared maxillary central incisor. J Endod. 1995;21(7):362–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80971-4.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 2002;23(13):2667–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00407-0.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Eraslan Ö, Eraslan O, Eskitaşcıoğlu G, Belli S. Conservative restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolar teeth: a FEM study. Clin Oral Invest. 2011;15(3):403–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0397-7.CrossRef

48.

Jiang W, Bo H, YongChun G, LongXing N. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(09)60206-7.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Meerbeek BV, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res. 1994;73(11):1690–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730110401.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Srirekha A, Bashetty K. A comparative analysis of restorative materials used in abfraction lesions in tooth with and without occlusal restoration: three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(2):157–61. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.108200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Wan B, Chung BH, Zhang MR, Kim SA, Swain M, Peters OA, et al. The effect of varying occlusal loading conditions on stress distribution in roots of sound and instrumented molar teeth: a finite element analysis. J Endod. 2022;48(7):893–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.03.009.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent. 2010;04(02):223–32. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697833.CrossRef

53.

Gere JM. Mechanics of materials. 6th ed. Belmont: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning; 2004. p. 39.

Titel: Stress distribution in restored mandibular molars with external cervical resorption: a finite element analysis
verfasst von: Tuğrul Aslan
Emir Esim
Yakup Üstün
Publikationsdatum: 06.12.2024
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Odontology
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-01029-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Wie gefährlich sind suspekte Veränderungen in der Mundhöhle?

17.12.2024
Mundhöhlenkarzinom
Nachrichten

Wie hoch ist das Risiko, dass sich aus einer bereits verdächtigen Veränderung der Mundschleimhaut ein Karzinom entwickelt? Ein US-Team hat dazu das Patientenregister der Universität San Francisco ausgewertet.

Das deutsche Gesundheitssystem kränkelt und hat Fieber

22.11.2024
Gesundheitspolitik
Nachrichten

OECD und Europäische Kommission haben zusammen einen Bericht zum Zustand der europäischen Gesundheitssysteme herausgegeben. Diagnose für Deutschland: Wäre das Land ein menschliches Wesen, würde man es wohl krankschreiben.

Elektronische Patientenakte: Wie gut sind Praxen und PVS gerüstet?

08.11.2024
Elektronische Patientenakte
Nachrichten

Lauterbachs Zeitplan steht: Ab dem 15. Januar wird die E-Patientenakte zunächst in Modellregionen starten. Vier Wochen später soll der bundesweite Rollout erfolgen. Doch sind Praxisverwaltungssysteme (PVS) und Praxisteams tatsächlich vorbereitet? Erich Gehlen, Vorstandsvorsitzender beim genossenschaftlichen Softwarehaus DURIA, gibt Einblick.

Urteil: Chefarztbehandlung auch mit Vertretung möglich

25.10.2024
Klinik aktuell
Nachrichten

„Chefarztbehandlung“ ist kein Terminus, der in Stein gemeißelt wäre. Auch hier gilt: Alles eine Sache transparenter Vereinbarung.

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen