In 2007, the European Association of Palliative Care (EAPC) provided a comprehensive set of recommendations and standards for the provision of adequate pediatric palliative care. A number of studies have shown deficits in pediatric palliative care compared to EAPC standards. In Germany, pediatric palliative care patients can be referred to specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) services, which are known to enhance quality of life, e.g. by avoiding hospitalization. However, current regulations for the provision of SOPC in Germany do not account for the different circumstances and needs of children and their families compared to adult palliative care patients. The “Evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) in the German state of Hesse (ELSAH)” study aims to perform a needs assessment for pediatric patients (children, adolescents and young adults) receiving SOPC. This paper presents the study protocol for this assessment (work package II).
The study uses a sequential mixed-methods study design with a focus on qualitative research. Data collection from professional and family caregivers and, as far as possible, pediatric patients, will involve both a written questionnaire based on European recommendations for pediatric palliative care, and semi-structured interviews. Additionally, professional caregivers will take part in focus group discussions and participatory observations. Interviews and focus groups will be tape- or video-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed in accordance with the principles of grounded theory (interviews) and content analysis (focus groups). A structured field note template will be used to record notes taken during the participatory observations. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 22 or higher) will be used for descriptive statistical analyses. The qualitative data analyses will be software-assisted by MAXQDA (version 12 or higher).
This study will provide important information on what matters most to family caregivers and pediatric patients receiving SOPC. The results will add valuable knowledge to the criteria that distinguish SOPC for pediatric from SOPC for adult patients, and will provide an indication of how the German SOPC rule of procedure can be optimized to satisfy the special needs of pediatric patients.
Internet Portal of the German Clinical Trials Register (www.germanctr.de, DRKS-ID: DRKS00012431).
Hahn J, Klasen J, Classen C. Assessment of ambulatory pediatric palliative Care in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania – status before establishment of specialized ambulatory pediatric. Palliat Care. 2013;14:173–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1343152.
Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses zur Verordnung von spezialisierter ambulanter Palliativversorgung: SAPV-RL; 25.06.2010.
Steering Committee of the EAPC task force on palliative care. IMPaCCT: standards for paediatric palliative care in Europe. Eur J Palliat Care. 2007;14:109–14.
Rosenberg AR, Postier A, Osenga K, Kreicbergs U, Neville B, Dussel V, Wolfe J. Long-term psychosocial outcomes among bereaved siblings of children with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2015;49:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.006. CrossRef
Kremeike K, Mohr A, Nachtmann J, Reinhardt D, Geraedts M, Sander A. Evaluation of specialised Paediatric palliative home Care in Lower Saxony, Germany - a qualitative study on Parents’ perspectives. Gesundheitswesen. 2016;78:306–12. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390451.
Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358:483–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6. CrossRefPubMed
Hauch H, Klinkel N, Chao C-M, Behrje J, Kreuzaler P, Bagheri A, et al. Constitution of a new specialised pediatric home care team – first year experience. Klin Padiatr. 2016;228:145–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-103327.
Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. AJTAS. 2016;5(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
Higginbottom GMA. Sampling issues in qualitative research. Nurs Res. 2004;12:7–19. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2004.07.12.1.7.c5927. CrossRef
Patton MQ, editor. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park and Calif: Sage Publications; 1990.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. 7th ed. New Brunswick [u.a.]: AldineTransaction; 2012.
Ortlipp M. Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. Qual Rep. 2008;13:695–705.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Vorschläge zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Denkschrift; Memorandum; Empfehlungen der Kommission “Selbstkontrolle in der Wissenschaft” = Proposals for safeguarding good scientific practice. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2013. CrossRef
Steele R, Bosma H, Johnston MF, Cadell S, Davies B, Siden H, Straatman L. Research priorities in pediatric palliative care: a Delphi study. J Palliat Care. 2008;24:229–39. PubMed
Elemraid M, Pollard K, Thomas M, Simmister C, Spencer D, Rushton S, et al. Parental decisions on children participating in research. Nurs Child Young People. 2013;25:16–21. https://doi.org/10.7748/ncyp2013.10.25.8.16.e304. CrossRefPubMed
Kirk S. Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44:1250–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015.
- Study protocol: evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) in the German state of Hesse (ELSAH study) – work package II: palliative care for pediatric patients
Ferdinand M. Gerlach
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
Mail Icon II