Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019

03.12.2018 | Original Research

Subgroups of High-Cost Medicare Advantage Patients: an Observational Study

verfasst von: Brian W. Powers, MD, MBA, Jiali Yan, MS, Jingsan Zhu, MS, MBA, Kristin A. Linn, PhD, Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA, Jennifer L. Kowalski, MS, Amol S. Navathe, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is a growing focus on improving the quality and value of health care delivery for high-cost patients. Compared to fee-for-service Medicare, less is known about the clinical composition of high-cost Medicare Advantage populations.

Objective

To describe a high-cost Medicare Advantage population and identify clinically and operationally significant subgroups of patients.

Design

We used a density-based clustering algorithm to group high-cost patients (top 10% of spending) according to 161 distinct demographic, clinical, and claims-based variables. We then examined rates of utilization, spending, and mortality among subgroups.

Participants

Sixty-one thousand five hundred forty-six Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

Main Measures

Spending, utilization, and mortality.

Key Results

High-cost patients (n = 6154) accounted for 55% of total spending. High-cost patients were more likely to be younger, male, and have higher rates of comorbid illnesses. We identified ten subgroups of high-cost patients: acute exacerbations of chronic disease (mixed); end-stage renal disease (ESRD); recurrent gastrointestinal bleed (GIB); orthopedic trauma (trauma); vascular disease (vascular); surgical infections and other complications (complications); cirrhosis with hepatitis C (liver); ESRD with increased medical and behavioral comorbidity (ESRD+); cancer with high-cost imaging and radiation therapy (oncology); and neurologic disorders (neurologic). The average number of inpatient days ranged from 3.25 (oncology) to 26.09 (trauma). Preventable spending (as a percentage of total spending) ranged from 0.8% (oncology) to 9.5% (complications) and the percentage of spending attributable to prescription medications ranged from 7.9% (trauma and oncology) to 77.0% (liver). The percentage of patients who were persistently high-cost ranged from 11.8% (trauma) to 100.0% (ESRD+). One-year mortality ranged from 0.0% (liver) to 25.8% (ESRD+).

Conclusions

We identified clinically distinct subgroups of patients within a heterogeneous high-cost Medicare Advantage population using cluster analysis. These subgroups, defined by condition-specific profiles and illness trajectories, had markedly different patterns of utilization, spending, and mortality, holding important implications for clinical strategy.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Riley GF. Long-term trends in the concentration of Medicare spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(3):808–816.CrossRefPubMed Riley GF. Long-term trends in the concentration of Medicare spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(3):808–816.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat National Academy of Medicine. Effective care for high-need patients. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2017. National Academy of Medicine. Effective care for high-need patients. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2017.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong CS, Abrams MK, Ferris TG. Toward increased adoption of complex care management. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(6):491–493.CrossRefPubMed Hong CS, Abrams MK, Ferris TG. Toward increased adoption of complex care management. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(6):491–493.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Clough JD, Riley GF, Cohen M, et al. Patterns of care for clinically distinct segments of high cost Medicare beneficiaries. Healthc (Amst). 2016;4(3):160–165.CrossRefPubMed Clough JD, Riley GF, Cohen M, et al. Patterns of care for clinically distinct segments of high cost Medicare beneficiaries. Healthc (Amst). 2016;4(3):160–165.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Joynt KE, Figueroa JF, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Segmenting high-cost Medicare patients into potentially actionable cohorts. Healthc (Amst). 2017;5(1–2):62–67.CrossRefPubMed Joynt KE, Figueroa JF, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Segmenting high-cost Medicare patients into potentially actionable cohorts. Healthc (Amst). 2017;5(1–2):62–67.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Blumenthal D, Abrams MK. Tailoring complex care management for high-need, high-cost patients. JAMA. 2016;316(16):1657–1658.CrossRefPubMed Blumenthal D, Abrams MK. Tailoring complex care management for high-need, high-cost patients. JAMA. 2016;316(16):1657–1658.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynn J, Straube BM, Bell KM, Jencks SF, Kambic RT. Using population segmentation to provide better health care for all: the “Bridges to Health” model. Milbank Q. 2007;85(2):185–208; discussion 209-112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lynn J, Straube BM, Bell KM, Jencks SF, Kambic RT. Using population segmentation to provide better health care for all: the “Bridges to Health” model. Milbank Q. 2007;85(2):185–208; discussion 209-112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–1139.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–1139.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Choudhry NK, Shrank WH, Levin RL, et al. Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(7):457–464.PubMedPubMedCentral Choudhry NK, Shrank WH, Levin RL, et al. Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(7):457–464.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Joynt KE, Gawande AA, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Contribution of preventable acute care spending to total spending for high-cost Medicare patients. JAMA. 2013;309(24):2572–2578.CrossRefPubMed Joynt KE, Gawande AA, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Contribution of preventable acute care spending to total spending for high-cost Medicare patients. JAMA. 2013;309(24):2572–2578.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Figueroa JF, Joynt Maddox KE, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Jha AK. Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(10):706–713.CrossRefPubMed Figueroa JF, Joynt Maddox KE, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Jha AK. Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(10):706–713.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan J, Linn KA, Powers BW, et al. Applying Machine Learning Algorithms to Segment High-Cost Patient Populations. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. Yan J, Linn KA, Powers BW, et al. Applying Machine Learning Algorithms to Segment High-Cost Patient Populations. J Gen Intern Med. 2018.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Der Maaten L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15(1):3221–3245. Van Der Maaten L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15(1):3221–3245.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Maaten Lvd, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res. 2008;9(Nov):2579–2605. Maaten Lvd, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res. 2008;9(Nov):2579–2605.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Sander J, Xu X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters a density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 1996; Portland, Oregon. Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Sander J, Xu X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters a density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 1996; Portland, Oregon.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ankerst M, Breunig MM, Kriegel H-P, #246, Sander r. OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. SIGMOD Rec. 1999;28(2):49–60. Ankerst M, Breunig MM, Kriegel H-P, #246, Sander r. OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. SIGMOD Rec. 1999;28(2):49–60.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Congressional Budget Office. High-Cost Medicare Beneficiaries. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office;2005. Congressional Budget Office. High-Cost Medicare Beneficiaries. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office;2005.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Powers BW, Chaguturu SK, Ferris TG. Optimizing high-risk care management. JAMA. 2015;313(8):795–796.CrossRefPubMed Powers BW, Chaguturu SK, Ferris TG. Optimizing high-risk care management. JAMA. 2015;313(8):795–796.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Figueroa JF, Jha AK. Approach for achieving effective care for high-need patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. Figueroa JF, Jha AK. Approach for achieving effective care for high-need patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2018.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Newcomer SR, Steiner JF, Bayliss EA. Identifying subgroups of complex patients with cluster analysis. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):e324–332.PubMed Newcomer SR, Steiner JF, Bayliss EA. Identifying subgroups of complex patients with cluster analysis. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):e324–332.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee NS, Whitman N, Vakharia N, Ph DG, Rothberg MB. High-cost patients: hot-spotters don’t explain the half of it. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(1):28–34.CrossRefPubMed Lee NS, Whitman N, Vakharia N, Ph DG, Rothberg MB. High-cost patients: hot-spotters don’t explain the half of it. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(1):28–34.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Subgroups of High-Cost Medicare Advantage Patients: an Observational Study
verfasst von
Brian W. Powers, MD, MBA
Jiali Yan, MS
Jingsan Zhu, MS, MBA
Kristin A. Linn, PhD
Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA
Jennifer L. Kowalski, MS
Amol S. Navathe, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
03.12.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4759-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.