Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2017

29.06.2017 | Short Communication

Success of referral to genetic counseling after positive lynch syndrome screening test

verfasst von: Robin F. Irons, Krysta M. Contino, Janice J. Horte, Brooke Levin, Kristin D. Mattie, Margaret Wight, Michael E. Kwiatt, Kathryn C. Behling, Tina B. Edmonston, Steven J. McClane

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary condition that increases one’s risk of developing colorectal, endometrial, and other extracolonic cancers. MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper implemented a reflex screening protocol for DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) deficiency. Those with findings suspicious for LS were referred for genetic counseling (GC). Our goal was to assess compliance with GC and factors associated with successful follow-up.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the MMR proteins MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2 was performed on all colorectal tumor resections from patients ≤70 years old and all stage II cancers. Tumors with loss of MLH1/PMS2 were subsequently tested for BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter methylation to identify tumors with likely epigenetic inactivation of MLH1. Patients with loss of MLH1/PMS2 without BRAF mutations or with absence of MLH1 promoter methylation and those with loss of MSH2/MSH6 were referred to GC. Compliance with GC was assessed.

Results

Between March 2014 and August 2016, 203 tumors were tested by IHC. Fifteen (7.4%) patients had abnormal MMR protein expression patterns in the absence of BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter methylation suggestive of possible LS. GC compliance was 35.7% overall and 85.7% in those with family history of LS-associated cancers.

Conclusions

Overall, GC compliance was relatively low in our study. Interestingly, patients with a strong family history of LS-associated neoplasms were more likely to pursue GC. In the future, assessing and addressing barriers to seeking GC will provide opportunities to improve patient care through increased identification of patients with cancer predisposition syndromes.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegde M et al (2013) ACMG technical standards and guidelines for genetic testing for inherited colorectal cancer (lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and MYH-associated polyposis). Genetics in Medicine 16(1):101–116CrossRefPubMed Hegde M et al (2013) ACMG technical standards and guidelines for genetic testing for inherited colorectal cancer (lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and MYH-associated polyposis). Genetics in Medicine 16(1):101–116CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Funkhouser WK et al (2012) Relevance, pathogenesis, and testing algorithm for mismatch repair–defective colorectal carcinomas: a report of the association for molecular pathology. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 14(2):91–103CrossRefPubMed Funkhouser WK et al (2012) Relevance, pathogenesis, and testing algorithm for mismatch repair–defective colorectal carcinomas: a report of the association for molecular pathology. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 14(2):91–103CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kane MF et al (1997) Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic colon tumors and mismatch repair-defective human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 57(5):808–811PubMed Kane MF et al (1997) Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic colon tumors and mismatch repair-defective human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 57(5):808–811PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, version 2.2016. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 201X. All rights reserved. Accessed [May 22, 2017]. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, version 2.2016. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 201X. All rights reserved. Accessed [May 22, 2017]. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.​org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Copija, Angelika, et al. Clinical significance and prognostic relevance of microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer patients. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18.1 (2017): 107 Copija, Angelika, et al. Clinical significance and prognostic relevance of microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer patients. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18.1 (2017): 107
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald B et al (2013) Implementation of universal microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry screening for diagnosing lynch syndrome in a large academic medical center. J Clin Oncol 31(10):1336–1340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heald B et al (2013) Implementation of universal microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry screening for diagnosing lynch syndrome in a large academic medical center. J Clin Oncol 31(10):1336–1340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Geer KP et al (2001) Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services. J Genet Couns 10(1):25–40CrossRefPubMed Geer KP et al (2001) Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services. J Genet Couns 10(1):25–40CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hampel H et al (2005) Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). N Engl J Med 352(18):1851–1860CrossRefPubMed Hampel H et al (2005) Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). N Engl J Med 352(18):1851–1860CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Success of referral to genetic counseling after positive lynch syndrome screening test
verfasst von
Robin F. Irons
Krysta M. Contino
Janice J. Horte
Brooke Levin
Kristin D. Mattie
Margaret Wight
Michael E. Kwiatt
Kathryn C. Behling
Tina B. Edmonston
Steven J. McClane
Publikationsdatum
29.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2849-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.