Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 4/2016

27.04.2016 | Clinical Investigation

Success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

verfasst von: Masahiro Fujimoto, Ken Ogino, Hiroko Matsuyama, Chika Miyazaki

Erschienen in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Our aim was to review the success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 498 patients (521 eyes) diagnosed with CNLDO between January 2011 and November 2013. Of these, 54 eyes met the eligibility criteria and underwent probing with a dacryoendoscope.

Results

Of the 54 eyes, 21 were classified as failed cases at other hospitals, 13 as cases requiring conversion from blind to dacryoendoscopy-guided probing during surgery at our hospital, and 20 as cases requiring intervention under general anesthesia because of difficulty with topical anesthesia. The overall success rate with dacryoendoscopy was 98.1 % (53/54 eyes) at postoperative week 2 and 97.1 % (33/34 eyes) a year after surgery. Among the cases that failed at other hospitals, one showed the formation of five false passages in the middle area of the nasolacrimal duct. In 11 eyes, slit-like adhesion was confirmed as a blurred linear line at the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. Patency could be smoothly achieved by releasing the adhesion.

Conclusions

Our study showed a high success rate for dacryoendoscopy-guided probing in CNLDO patients. The use of a dacryoendoscope allows direct visualization of the lacrimal passage and is likely to become necessary for managing CNLDO.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Robb RM. Success rates of nasolacrimal duct probing at time intervals after 1 year of age. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1307–9.CrossRefPubMed Robb RM. Success rates of nasolacrimal duct probing at time intervals after 1 year of age. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1307–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapadia MK, Freitag SK, Woog JJ. Evaluation and management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39:959–77.CrossRef Kapadia MK, Freitag SK, Woog JJ. Evaluation and management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39:959–77.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakizaki H, Takahashi Y, Kinoshita S, Shiraki K, Iwaki M. The rate of symptomatic improvement of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Japanese infants treated with conservative management during the 1st year of age. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2:291–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kakizaki H, Takahashi Y, Kinoshita S, Shiraki K, Iwaki M. The rate of symptomatic improvement of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Japanese infants treated with conservative management during the 1st year of age. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2:291–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nucci P, Capoferri C, Alfarano R, Brancato R. Conservative management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1989;26:39–43.PubMed Nucci P, Capoferri C, Alfarano R, Brancato R. Conservative management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1989;26:39–43.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen RA, Robb RM. The natural course of congenital obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1978;15:246–50.PubMed Petersen RA, Robb RM. The natural course of congenital obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1978;15:246–50.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller AM, Chandler DL, Repka MX, Hoover DL, Lee KA, Melia M, et al. Office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants. J AAPOS. 2014;18:26–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller AM, Chandler DL, Repka MX, Hoover DL, Lee KA, Melia M, et al. Office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants. J AAPOS. 2014;18:26–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zwaan J. Treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction before and after the age of 1 year. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1997;28:932–6.PubMed Zwaan J. Treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction before and after the age of 1 year. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1997;28:932–6.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Repka MX, Chandler DL, Beck RW, Crouch ER 3rd, Donahue S, Holmes JM, et al. Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with probing in children younger than 4 years. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:577–84.CrossRefPubMed Repka MX, Chandler DL, Beck RW, Crouch ER 3rd, Donahue S, Holmes JM, et al. Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with probing in children younger than 4 years. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:577–84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Honavar SG, Prakash VE, Rao GN. Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:42–8.CrossRefPubMed Honavar SG, Prakash VE, Rao GN. Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:42–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cha DS, Lee H, Park MS, Lee JM, Baek SH. Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24:261–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cha DS, Lee H, Park MS, Lee JM, Baek SH. Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24:261–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Katowitz JA, Welsh MG. Timing of initial probing and irrigation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:698–705.CrossRefPubMed Katowitz JA, Welsh MG. Timing of initial probing and irrigation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:698–705.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannor GE, Rose GE, Frimpong-Ansah K, Ezra E. Factors affecting the success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:616–7.CrossRefPubMed Mannor GE, Rose GE, Frimpong-Ansah K, Ezra E. Factors affecting the success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:616–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashkouli MB, Beigi B, Parvaresh MM, Kassaee A, Tabatabaee Z. Late and very late initial probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: what is the cause of failure? Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1151–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kashkouli MB, Beigi B, Parvaresh MM, Kassaee A, Tabatabaee Z. Late and very late initial probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: what is the cause of failure? Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1151–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Perveen S, Sufi AR, Rashid S, Khan A. Success rate of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction at various ages. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014;9:60–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Perveen S, Sufi AR, Rashid S, Khan A. Success rate of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction at various ages. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014;9:60–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kushner BJ. The management of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children between 18 months and 4 years old. J AAPOS. 1998;2:57–60.CrossRefPubMed Kushner BJ. The management of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children between 18 months and 4 years old. J AAPOS. 1998;2:57–60.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Medghalchi A, Mohammadi MJ, SoltaniMoghadam R, Dalili H. Results of nasolacrimal duct probing in children between 9–48 months. Acta Med Iran. 2014;52:545–51.PubMed Medghalchi A, Mohammadi MJ, SoltaniMoghadam R, Dalili H. Results of nasolacrimal duct probing in children between 9–48 months. Acta Med Iran. 2014;52:545–51.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Faky YH, Mousa A, Kalantan H, Al-Otaibi A, Alodan H, Alsuhaibani AH. A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:246–50.CrossRefPubMed Al-Faky YH, Mousa A, Kalantan H, Al-Otaibi A, Alodan H, Alsuhaibani AH. A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:246–50.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Andalib D, Nabei R. Intraoperative prognostic factors for probing outcome in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23:329–32.CrossRefPubMed Andalib D, Nabei R. Intraoperative prognostic factors for probing outcome in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23:329–32.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Maheshwari R. Success rate and cause of failure for late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2008;45:168–71.CrossRefPubMed Maheshwari R. Success rate and cause of failure for late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2008;45:168–71.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi Y, Iwaki M, Nakamura Y, Kakizaki H. Dacryoendoscopic findings of intracanalicular punctal plug migration with or without canaliculitis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:128–30.CrossRef Takahashi Y, Iwaki M, Nakamura Y, Kakizaki H. Dacryoendoscopic findings of intracanalicular punctal plug migration with or without canaliculitis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:128–30.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki T, Sounou T, Sugiyama K. Dacryoendoscopic surgery and tube insertion in patients with common canalicular obstruction and ductal stenosis as a frequent complication. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009;53:145–50.CrossRefPubMed Sasaki T, Sounou T, Sugiyama K. Dacryoendoscopic surgery and tube insertion in patients with common canalicular obstruction and ductal stenosis as a frequent complication. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009;53:145–50.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki T, Nagata Y, Sugiyama K. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction classified by dacryoendoscopy and treated with inferior meatal dacryorhinotomy: part II. Inferior meatal dacryorhinotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:1070–4.CrossRefPubMed Sasaki T, Nagata Y, Sugiyama K. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction classified by dacryoendoscopy and treated with inferior meatal dacryorhinotomy: part II. Inferior meatal dacryorhinotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:1070–4.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Theodoropoulou S, Sutherland MS, Haddow K, Blaikie A. Success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127:794–8.CrossRefPubMed Theodoropoulou S, Sutherland MS, Haddow K, Blaikie A. Success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127:794–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato K, Matsunaga K, Takashima Y, Kondo M. Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:977–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kato K, Matsunaga K, Takashima Y, Kondo M. Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:977–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat MacEwen CJ, Young JD. The fluorescein disappearance test (FDT): an evaluation of its use in infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991;28:302–5.PubMed MacEwen CJ, Young JD. The fluorescein disappearance test (FDT): an evaluation of its use in infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991;28:302–5.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss AH, Baran F, Kelly J. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: delineation of anatomic abnormalities with 3-dimensional reconstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:842–8.CrossRefPubMed Weiss AH, Baran F, Kelly J. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: delineation of anatomic abnormalities with 3-dimensional reconstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:842–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee H, Ha S, Lee Y, Park M, Baek S. Anatomical and morphometric study of the bony nasolacrimal canal using computed tomography. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227:153–9.CrossRefPubMed Lee H, Ha S, Lee Y, Park M, Baek S. Anatomical and morphometric study of the bony nasolacrimal canal using computed tomography. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227:153–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Abrishami M, Bagheri A, Salour SH, Mirdehghan SA. Late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2009;4:102–4.PubMedPubMedCentral Abrishami M, Bagheri A, Salour SH, Mirdehghan SA. Late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2009;4:102–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Alanon-Fernandez MA, Alanon-Fernandez FJ, Martinez-Fernandez A, del Mar Gorgora M, Calero B, Lopez-Marin I, et al. Comparative study of primary intention lacrimal probing with and without nasal endoscopy. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2014;65:297–301.CrossRefPubMed Alanon-Fernandez MA, Alanon-Fernandez FJ, Martinez-Fernandez A, del Mar Gorgora M, Calero B, Lopez-Marin I, et al. Comparative study of primary intention lacrimal probing with and without nasal endoscopy. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2014;65:297–301.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
verfasst von
Masahiro Fujimoto
Ken Ogino
Hiroko Matsuyama
Chika Miyazaki
Publikationsdatum
27.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0021-5155
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-2246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0445-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.